Superphysics
The Aethereal Layer
2 minutes • 401 words
Table of contents
The aethereal layer is the first and highest layer in our 5 layers model and will be known as the Fifth Force in Modern Physics.
| Attribute | Quality |
|---|---|
| Name | Aether |
| Physics Name | Pseudoscience |
| Traditional Name | Aether, Akasha, 水 |
| Descartes’ Name | Pure Aether or Substance |
| Domain | Quasi-Physical |
| Force | Dynamism Feeling Particles (moa2) |
| Medium | Idea (moa3) |
| Substance | Free Aether (soa3) |
| Quanta | Monads (qoa) |
| Aether Content | 5 |
| Movement | Purely Kinetic |
| Quality | Most Subtle, Highest Control |
Definition of the Aethereal Layer
The aethereal layer of the 5 Layers Model of Material Superphysics is the substance of the physical and quasi-physical universe.
It is a bit different from the aether of the 5 Strata Model of Bio Superphysics which is the substance of ideas, feelings, and abstract minds or souls.
The 5 Layers aether is made up of monads which are its “quantum” particle.
The ancient Greeks, Kepler, Descartes, and the Asian sciences (Buddhism, Hinduism, Taoism) all attributed all the motions in the universe to God through it. In Hinduism, the aether is the akasha.
The aether is the highest and most important layer in the universe. It is the start of existence in the quasi-physical domain (since the previous layer is Probability which is only theoretical).
This layer dominates and rules the other four layers, just like spacetime dominates light as to give it a speed limit, and electromagnetism dominates matter as to prevent two rocks from merging or passing through each other.
In terms of creation, this layer is the first layer that precedes physical manifestation. Since it is above spacetime, it is beyond Einstein’s rule that nothing can travel faster than light. Thus, time travel and teleportation to other multiverses is facilitated by this layer.
We write aether with an “a” to differentiate it from the ether of science. This is similar to writing dialectics as “Socratic Dialectics” to set it apart from the corrupted dialetics of Marx.
