/ Material Superphysics / Fallacies / General Relativity Sophistry /

The Sophistry of Albert Einstein

How to Fix Einstein's General Relativity

by Juan

June 14, 2021 7 minutes • 1302 words

Table of contents

Let’s Fix Relativity!
- The Ego Hates the Aether
- Not so fast, Einstein!
Probably a German Quirk

While collating the works of Socrates in order to unify them with those of David Hume to harmonize Superphysics, I came upon his maxims on astrophysics:

Socrates

The spangled heavens should be used as a pattern and with a view to that higher knowledge. Any geometrician who saw them would never think that there is a true equal, true double, or true proportion in the spangled heavens. Likewise, a true astronomer..will never imagine that the proportions of night and day, the stars to one another are eternal and subject to no deviation.

Simple Republic by Plato, Chapter 7

Socrates is clearly against having any fixed or constant value to define the universe and any movements within it. According to this, any established constant would eventually be rejected the more humans learn about the universe. This is what happened to the constant Gravity G advocated by Newton which was overturned by Einstein’s Theory of Relativity.

However, Einstein also established his own constant as the speed of light as c. This must also be overturned if we are to unify Physics with Metaphysics and even Quantum Physics.

The need to overturn the speed of light as a constant is emphasized by Socrates when he said that sight (made possible by photons) is not the proper way to measure movement in outer space:

Socrates

The starry heaven is wrought on a visible ground. The most perfect of visible things is far inferior to the true motions of absolute speeds which are relative to each other. They carry with them that which is contained in them. These are to be apprehended by reason and intelligence, but not by sight.

Let’s Fix Relativity!

The first step in fixing the theory of Relativity, is to recall that the Standard Model of Physics divides all forces into four categories which we arrange in a hierarchy:

Gravitation
Electromagnetic
Weak
Strong

Material objects are made possible by atoms which are held together by the Strong force. The movement of such objects is governed by the classical mechanics established by Netwon, such as F = ma and the law of conservation of mass. This means that you can force-push a ball-mass to move it.

The movements by the Weak and Electromagnetic forces, such as those in radioactive decay and magnetism, were observed later. These were established by Maxwell’s equations and the law of conservation of energy.

Unlike matter, you cannot force-push electricity to make it travel farther. Instead, you use a capacitor to gather the electricity in coils and add strength and let it “flow” more.

The difference between the movements of matter and electromagnetism was then thought to be caused by a mysterious semi-material thing called “aether” which permeated space.

Lorentz

The state of the aether which is the cause of gravitation is propagated in a similar way as that which exists in the electromagnetic field.

The Ego Hates the Aether

Einstein’s ego led him to become a determinist who disliked* the unpredictability of Nature. This unpredictability manifests as “quantum nonlocality” in Quantum Mechanics.

The mystery of the aether irked him just as the idea of a superior, immaterial God irks materialists.

*This is evident in the EPR Paradox

Einstein

But why must I distinguish the non-moving K body above all moving K'`` bodies by assuming that the ether is at rest relatively to the non-moving K` body? I think that such an asymmetry.. is intolerable.

Ether and General Relativity

Einstein found the Aether intolerable, just as Hitler found the Jews intolerable. Both lived at the same bigoted period in Germany

To get rid of the aether, he used light as the semi-material thing to “bridge” the behavior of objects and electricity. This is because he realized that light has 2 properties:

Particle-properties, as photons
Wave-properties, as spectrum waves

He called this unification as “special relativity” leading to mass-energy equivalence E = mc ².

Einstein

mc ² does not contain the velocity. It is not needed if we are only asking how the energy of a point-mass depends on the velocity... Before the advent of relativity, physics recognised two conservation laws of fundamental importance, namely, the law of the conservation of energy and the law of the conservation of mass.. Through the theory of relativity, they have been united into one law.

Relativity

E=mc2 — Thanks to the egotistic Einstein, the aether is out of reach, and with it the solution to fusion, anti-gravity, and nuclear war. The fact that Einstein pushed for nukes is consistent with such a type of ego

Not so fast, Einstein!

Instead of using a natural immaterial aether (substance 1) that confined materials (substance 2), Einstein used light which had 2 properties.

He destroyed the natural division of labor of Nature in favor of a single monopoly under the power of the physicist.

MSQ — Superphysics respects the division of labor of the 5 Layers or Elements which we call Aether, Spacetime, Radiance, Transformer, and Matter

He then extended this theory, as General Relativity, to the movement of objects in outer space which was really governed by the aethereal force of Gravitation.

Einstein thus removed the aether and its hierarchy, replacing it with the duality of light. Because of this, gravity no longer is a force. Instead, it is an effect of the curvature of space, exposed by light.

Without the aether, a lot of problems came up.

General Relativity:

theorizes wormholes without them ever being found
is unable to:
- explain dark matter and dark energy
- explain the Hubble Tension
- create anti-gravity or teleportation of masses

Special Relativity:

is unable to explain the discrepancy between
- the W Boson mass
- muon g2 discrepancy
actually failed to explain entanglement with its hidden variables theory

Probably a German Quirk

Einstein’s sophistical reasonng is very similar to that of Kant. Both of them overexplain a simple thing and then create a totally new concepts to support that overexplanation.

In contrast, Socrates explains that the universe is intuitive and not-so-complex. His principle states that in observing the heavens:

there should be no constant
light should not be used to build the core principle

Socrates says that future astronomers would likely violate these maxims due to a predisposition towards mathematics*. That’s exactly what happened to Einstein**.

*This is why we invented Qualimath

This is evident in his 1905 paper:

Einstein-sophist

a mathematical description of this kind has no physical meaning unless we are quite clear as to what we understand by “time”.. We have so far defined only an “A time” and a “B time.” We have not defined a common “time” for A and B, for the latter cannot be defined at all unless we establish by definition that the “time” required by light to travel from A to B equals the “time” it requires to travel from B to A.

On The Electrodynamics Of Moving Bodies, 1905

Einstein did it because his ego couldn’t define time metaphysically. Instead, he covered it up a physical (mathematical) definition, inevitably leading to circular reasoning:

einblah

Two lightning flashes occurred simultaneously at A and B seen by an observer at the middle. [We thus define time as simultaniety, and define simultaniety as light appearing at the same time.] It would thus appear that we are reasoning in a logical circle.

Relativity, Section 8

This is very different from other physicists who had egos that were subservient to Nature. This kept time subjective or metaphysical and never objective or physical:

poincare

We have not a direct intuition of simultaneity, nor of the equality of two durations. If we think we have this intuition, this is an illusion

The Measure of Time

Here, we expose Einstein’s ego as the cause for the flaws of Relativity. In this post , we will explain the actual implementation of that flaw, as the use of the speed of light to measure spacetime.