The Fallacy of the Riemann Zeta Function

The Problem with Primes

Prime numbers are numbers that can only be divided evenly by 1 and themselves: 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, etc.

For example, if you divide:

• 3 by 2, you get a non-whole number as 1.5, with the 0.5 as the extra bit.
• 5 by 2, you get a non-whole number as 2.5, with the 0.5 as the extra bit.

In other words, they are messy to divide. As if dividing them leads to unfinished business. In Supermath, we call it as “unclosed”.

From listing them, you might imagine that there is some pattern or sequence.

• Sometimes they’re close (11, 13)
• Sometimes they’re far apart (23, 29)

A mathematician who has nothing better to do with his life will wonder if there is some specific pattern or “smoothness” to primes.

Many have tried, even wasting supercomputer time to try to prove the smoothness yet it could never be proven by brute force.

Riemann’s Wild Goose Chase

Bernhard Riemann invented a special “machine” — the Riemann Zeta Function — that turns the prime numbers into a smooth, wavy curve.

Mathematicians, beginning with Euler started plotting infinite curves from Cartesian planes into polar grids as circles (which we call the aethereal Cartesian plane) that go round and round.

This makes patterns visually cuter, which then drives interest into what they’re doing.

The polar grid or aethereal Cartesian plane necessarily needs an imaginary number, which we call a unit void or unit spin, depending on perspective.

Riemann uses this cute looping shape, with imaginary number, extending via “analytic continuation”. This is to justify a Riemann Hypothesis that proves a smooth distribution.

One finds this number of real roots within these limits and it is very probable that all roots are real.

R

Riemann On the Number of Prime Numbers less than a Given Quantity

This leads to a “critical line” that matches the hypothesis.

But this is really just a result of its own rules from the “functional equation” of the Zeta Function.

Unlike Euler’s product which was based on real numbers, Riemann’s hypothesis is entirely imaginary.

It is therefore just another Zeno’s paradox or a non-problem like a trick that wastes the time of curious people who don’t know that abstract numbers should only support real ones!

Time Waster Just like String Theory which is Unprovable

These deceptions by the Negative Force is also seen in Physics as:

• Einstein’s field equations which relies on Riemannian geometry, creating Loop Quantum Gravity
• the useless String Theory that uses Riemannian’s Zeta Function

We can say that Physics died when it became infested with abstract Mathematics that was disconnected with reality.

The mathematicians of the Berlin school have devoted themselves to constructing this continuous scale of irrational and fractional numbers using only the integer. The mathematical continuum from this point of view would be a pure creation of the mind in which experiment would have no part.

H

Henri Poincare The Measure of Time

We fix both Riemann and Einstein with Supermath and Qualimath which relies on spin, as fractals, and relationalities or ratios instead of numbers and geometry. Unlike math which can be totally abstract, Supermath and Qualimath always have a relation with real perceptions. In fact, all fractals are anchored on the person making the equation as the self-fractal.

Unlike Riemann Manifold which assumes space is continous, and Riemann Zeta Function which relies on abstract and infinity, we use:

• spacetime slices that are independent, but glued by the self-fractal (as timespace)
• abstract and imaginary numbers that support real ones

We use prime numbers primarily on Chemistry where the atomic numbers represent qualitative instances or physicalization of numbers.

This will reveal harmonies of the elements that can produce useful compounds, because Superphysics is supposed to be useful and not a time waster like shallow Math.

This is why we regard:

• the Riemann Hypothesis as a non problem caused by mathematicians who have nothing better do to
• Einstein’s Field Equations as a scam that blocks away the true nature of Nature

Both of these are against Nature and so anyone who does them ends up merely wasting time.