Table of Contents
Questioner: My roommate has a cat, and she seems to always be screaming out and hissing and having some sort of problem that’s gone on for a really long time. I’m just wondering if you could give me any insight.
Bashar: Why are you asking for the roommate?
Questioner: Well, she’s not here for one.
Bashar: Is there any correlation you can make between the behavior of the animal and the behavior of the roommate?
Questioner: I don’t see the correlation.
Bashar: Let us ask it this way: Do you see any correlation between the acting out of the animal and the things that are suppressed within the human? How well do you know the roommate’s history?
Questioner: Pretty well.
Bashar: Then do you see any correlation between the animal’s acting out behavior and the roommate’s inner life or history in terms of what may not be being said, what may not be being allowed out?
Questioner: I suppose I could think on that and maybe see the correlation, but it’s not immediately obvious to me.
Bashar: It may not be territory that the roommate will allow you to go to. But the idea to understand in general, if this will be of any help, will be that animals through unconditional love are reflections of many of the things that the humans that they are in a relationship with are going through. It doesn’t always mean that the outward actions of the animal are one-for-one a mirror of the outward actions of the human. In many cases, the animal will be the outlet for what the human will not allow themselves, or what the human may be afraid of within themselves. Animals in general that exhibit the idea of disease in various forms will usually be reflecting aspects of their relationship to their human. Investigate this from this angle and see if you can discover a more apt and immediate and obvious correlation.
Do you know anything of your roommate’s wishes and desires for themselves in life?
Questioner: Yes.
Bashar: Are they living their excitement?
Questioner: In some ways no.
Bashar: Are they not living their excitement in major ways?
Questioner: Probably, yeah.
Bashar: Are you guessing or do you know?
Questioner: Yes, they are not.
Bashar: Have you ever heard the phrase “a cry in the darkness”? Have you ever heard the phrase “the dark night of the soul”? Do you understand the cat more clearly now?
Questioner: I just don’t know what I could do. Is there anything I can do to help?
Bashar: Love, support, sharing, exploration, communication—talk if the other is willing—exploration of what might be the things that this individual would believe are their heart’s desire, what excites them the most, an exploration of available opportunities that they can act upon and or create that will allow them to know they can live their joy instead of feeling that it is beyond their reach.
But it cannot be forced, and it cannot be undertaken in a manner where your energy says that they must choose that path. It must be an unconditional dialogue.
That is what you can do. And of course, the other thing you can do is to live your life to the fullest, act on your joy to the fullest, because then by example you radiate energy that might, if they are willing, rub off on them.
Biological Receivers and Inspiration
Questioner: Biological life is the best receiver. Is there other examples of this statement besides channeling and the crop circles that you can think of?
Bashar: Inspiration. You asked for another example of the effect of being a biological receiver—the effect of this would be what you call inspiration. Do you understand? Because that’s the best way to receive information—inspiration is the reception of information. Allow me to remind you: energy is information. Do you understand? When are you not receiving? Never. Then it is up to you at any given moment to tune yourself to the information you are always receiving, and in so tuning to find inspiration—being a reflection of the relationship you believe needs to occur at that moment between the self you consider yourself to be and the information you are receiving. Do that make sense to you?
What you experience as inspiration—ideas that pop into your head—is the result of how you define at any given moment your relationship, the self that you are, in its relationship to the information you are constantly receiving on all levels. The inspiration you receive or experience is the result, the effect of the definition of your relationship to that information—where you stand relative to all the information you are receiving, where you believe you stand relative to the information you are always receiving on all levels. Inspiration therefore is the slice, the bandwidth, the particular frequency that represents the third harmonic—the difference between and the correlation between the frequency that you consider yourself to be and the frequency of all information, which is the One.
The self you define yourself to be is a frequency. When you change the definition of yourself, that is a different frequency. The frequency of all information, the frequency of the One—that is a frequency. The relationship between the frequency of yourself and the frequency of the One is the effect and the experience you call inspiration. Does that make sense? Does that help you?
Questioner: The radio telescopes that we’ve created here on Earth as one giant ear around the Earth—are these pretty much a waste?
Bashar: They are not all listening to the same frequencies. Nothing is a waste of time or effort—everything can be learned from. However, in terms of what you may call the practical answer to your question, there are almost no intelligently organized radio waves in your immediate neighborhood to be received at this time. Those civilizations which were producing radio wave transmissions that are in any way, shape, or form nearby enough for the radio wave signal to have reached your planet have long since stopped producing radio wave transmissions, and the radio waves have long since passed your position. Other civilizations still producing radio waves are so far away they haven’t reached your civilization yet. You are in a radio desert. Do you follow that?
Now this is not to say that some of your radio antennas have not from time to time picked up little bits here and there, but that is mostly because sometimes the radio waves are deflected by various gravitational and electromagnetic anomalies and shunted back toward your planet. But in terms of direct line of sight as you put it, you are in a radio frequency desert and will not really pick up much with those instruments right now. So this effort is best reflected, don’t you think, in the communication that’s going on with ears of corn and not ears of steel?
As we have said, biological receivers are more sensitive to different bandwidths, and there are many more kinds of them on your planet that would then allow there to be broader reception of a broader spectrum of transmissions—especially plants. Trees, growing crops are great antennas for picking up certain bandwidths and spectrums of transmissions of energy.
Questioner: Have trees ever changed?
Bashar: In what way?
Questioner: In a sense of receiving the same kind of energy as crops?
Bashar: They do not receive the same kind of frequency of energy as crops, but they have changed. In response to what? What do you think evolution is but a response to new information? Does that make sense to you? Have not the trees on your planet along with everything else evolved, changed over time, over millennia? Yes, that is because they respond to new information. Does that help you?
Cats, Babies, and Other Dimensions
Questioner: A friend of mine once postulated that there was a universe that existed at the same time and within the same space as this universe.
Bashar: All universes exist in a sense here and now. I understand.
Questioner: He said that only cats and babies could see these universes.
Bashar: For the most part, they are very receptive to other dimensions of reality. It is not impossible for others to see this, and other life forms on your planet do perceive them in a variety of ways, but the cat is the general symbol on your planet of that consciousness that is in a sense innately capable of looking through dimensional doorways, as of course are children, since they have not yet learned how not to.
Questioner: If babies can indeed see this and adults generally cannot—in what adults generally will not—what is the mechanism in which this is lost and how can it be then regained?
Bashar: Did I not just tell you more or less?
Questioner: I’m looking for specific learning. So what is the process of unlearning?
Bashar: Redefinition of belief, because learning is simply the imposition of definition. To understand that definition is arbitrary, and to impose a new definition and to allow the new definition. Reality is in that sense then the unlearning and the new learning that will allow you to perceive whatever it is you wish to perceive. Does that make sense? So then it is choosing a definition which works.
Not just the choosing of the definition, but in the choosing, the knowing—the knowing without doubt—the knowing that the choice automatically is real and not just something arbitrarily imposed upon another definition you actually believe to be more real. Does that make sense?
Question 8: Unconditional Love and Disappointment
Questioner: Being that I’m a believer in the creation of my life, that all things that manifest in my life are my creation as a result of my beliefs and my thoughts, I want to know why I think I’m creating a space for unconditional love from another person in my life, yet I keep attracting very conditional love.
Bashar: How much space have you created for unconditional love from yourself to yourself?
Questioner: A lot.
Bashar: “A lot” means there is room. Listen again, for the answer is in the question. Do you give unconditional love to yourself?
Questioner: Mostly…
Bashar: There is no “mostly.” It is unconditional or it is conditional. Be honest.
Questioner: I guess not then.
Bashar: Then is it a surprise that the reflections are conditional? Understand: if you require unconditional love from someone else, your love for yourself is not by definition unconditional, because you require it from someone else. That’s the definition. The definition of unconditional love contains that you do not need it from someone else—otherwise it’s not unconditional. Paradoxically, as soon as your love for yourself is unconditional, it is likely that you will receive the unconditional reflection from others around you—but you won’t care if you do or not. That’s how it works, because it’s a self-fulfilling system. Does that make logical sense?
Questioner: My next question is: if in following my excitement, and the excitement contains another being, I feel myself following it and I have openness toward it, but then within a short time frame it turns into the biggest disappointment that was once the excitement. So why do you disappoint yourself?
Bashar: Well, I’m trying not to have expectations in following my excitement.
Bashar: You’re trying not to have expectations. When will you actually not have expectations?
Questioner: Tomorrow. Will you put that on your calendar?
Bashar: Yes, I will.
Bashar: Do you again please remember that the idea of disappointment is that you are taking yourself out of the driver’s seat. You are disappointing yourself. Reappoint yourself as the one in charge of your life, and remember that all circumstances are neutral. The only way you would experience what you are calling disappointment is if you are putting an automatic meaning to a situation that doesn’t necessarily have that meaning. Do you follow? Does that make sense to you?
Questioner: How do I stop?
Bashar: You will stop when it no longer serves you in your estimate, because you do not do anything you really don’t want to do. As long as you continue to do something, it is in your definitional estimate that it serves you to continue to do so. When it is your definition that it really doesn’t serve you, you will stop, because none of you do anything you don’t really want to do—that you don’t define as something that serves you. None of you do anything that you define doesn’t serve you. So if you’re still doing it, you define that it serves you. When you change that definition, you’ll stop doing it. I guarantee it, because that’s the way you work. Does that make sense to you? That’s how you stop. It’s not a matter of process, it’s not a matter of effort, it’s not a matter of having to do anything special in order to overcome your tendency to choose this or that. You choose what you choose because you have decided that you are making the correct choice according to what you define as serving you the best. Change your definition of what serves you and what doesn’t, and believe me, you will instantly choose something different—instantly. There will be no effort involved at all. Does that make sense to you?
Question 9: Fervent Passion and Daily Maintenance
Questioner: I want to thank you for the enormous help you’ve given me over the last few years.
Bashar: We thank you for helping yourself. And now as I’m coming face to face with myself…
Bashar: Do you like what you see?
Questioner: Yeah, more and more.
Bashar: More and more. Exploring what it means for me to play.
Bashar: Remember that what it means for you to play is determined by the meaning you choose to give it. The meaning isn’t built in.
Questioner: I’ve noticed that usually it involves being in the moment.
Bashar: Unless you are choosing to play at not being in the moment—that’s the only exception.
Questioner: And usually it involves me keeping my word to myself, me giving my word and keeping it.
Bashar: For only you give yourself reasons not to, but then you are keeping another kind of word. Remember that you are never not really keeping your word—it’s just that sometimes you change what the word is that you’re keeping. You never don’t trust, you never don’t have faith, you never don’t keep your word—you just change the word you’re keeping. Decide what word you want to keep and keep that.
Questioner: One of my most fervent passions is to communicate with animals and take care of them.
Bashar: Are your actions commensurate then with this passion?
Questioner: Usually…
Bashar: There’s the “usually.” All right, I knew it would sneak in there sometime. But you know, the maintenance—the daily maintenance. May I remind you that even though I understand that following your passion will not always result in exactly the same opportunity for the same actions all the time, I do want to remind you that in a general sense, the term “fervent passion” and “usually” don’t go together. If it is a fervent passion, then it is always—not usually. You’re getting the point.
Questioner: How can I redefine the drudgery of what it feels like sometimes?
Bashar: What are you defining as drudgery? Cleaning the cages and picking up the poop and all that stuff. Why is that drudgery sometimes, and why is it fun sometimes? What’s going on within you when it’s fun that’s different than what’s going on within you when it’s not?
Questioner: I’m being lazy.
Bashar: What does that mean? I don’t want to do it. Why not? I want to goof off, I want to water the lawn instead. Why is that goofing off? What—watering the lawn? That’s more fun. Why is it always fun? I’ll ask you it this way: do you believe that if you then go and water your lawn, that somehow the animals will be neglected?
Questioner: Sometimes yeah, I feel like I should be feeding them and I’m putting off feeding them.
Bashar: Do you know why you are having this dichotomy? Because you are creating there to be a dichotomy between the idea of different things as expressions of your joy, and you’re not trusting that if your joy in fact does shift into another action, that somehow that means something else is being neglected—which means you don’t trust your joy exactly. So why do you have that definition?
You said once here that if you’re doing your joy, then it doesn’t matter at the end of the day—then you’ve done everything that you need to do that day. But going into it the way you’re going into it doesn’t allow the timing to work itself out synchronistically because you’re putting a specific spin on the idea of what you’re doing. If you were truly trusting that your joy in its shifts was really all right, then everything would work itself out and you would find yourself with the correct amount of time and being in joy with the things that really need doing.
What about the idea of like all of a sudden you’re in the middle of something, something else seems more exciting at that moment to do, and then you don’t complete what you’re doing?
If you understand how to trust your joy, then you will know and you will experience that when your joy shifts, it will do so in such a way that it will create the time you need to do the other things in a joyful way. Your assumption that it won’t is what’s creating the dichotomy in your experience. Thank you. Understand? Yeah.
Question 10: Hybridization and Human Origins
Questioner: My research has been very exciting, very fascinating. I have about a million questions. I want to know if there are other agendas or reasons for the hybridization process besides the possibility of somehow advancing the species of Grays—like perhaps we may face a catastrophic event of some kind and maybe part of our civilization will be in some way destroyed or extinct.
Bashar: To answer your question, yes there are other reasons for the hybridization agenda.
Questioner: Can you give me some of those reasons?
Bashar: No.
Questioner: I’m very interested in the origins of humanity as well. Is it possible that each and every one of us on this planet are in contact on some level with our creator gods—extraterrestrials?
Bashar: I will put it this way: each and every one of you is in contact in some way, shape, or form.
Questioner: When first was man made sentient in terms of being divine—physiologically or spiritually?
Bashar: If you are speaking spiritually, you are talking about the One, and there is no time there, and everything creation is part of that One. Everything is conscious. If you are talking about the idea of the inception of spirit into materiality and the ability of the material vessel to express the sentiency of spirit, that has a fixed point in linear time according to your history of several million years ago.
Questioner: Can you pinpoint the species that might have been in charge of that particular?
Bashar: Yes I can, but since that was your last question, I won’t answer this one. Don’t be mean.
Question 11: Dream of the Rose Quartz Shrine
Questioner: I had a very interesting dream. We found a shrine made of rose quartz in Africa. The energy around this shrine was something having to do with the family of Moses. We had to do some restorative work on it and we were all very happy that we found it. The end result was that it was a symbol of the son of Moses, and that the son of Moses was in some way a Christlike figure. I’m just wondering what symbolism that is for me.
Bashar: It is connecting to ancient information that helps you feel more complete in the present, helps you complete your sense and idea of self, your sense and idea of your path and patterns. It is the very idea itself of ancient wisdom, ancient knowledge that allows you to feel that you have a foundation that allows you to draw from that foundation in your present and onward into what you call your future. So you are making connections within yourself to re-establish a conscious link to the idea that you have foundations that will allow you to move forward, to expand and discover the idea of the Christ awareness or Buddha nature within yourself.
Questioner: The sense was that this shrine was like the Holy Grail—it had all kinds of information.
Bashar: Your own Holy Grail, yes.
Questioner: I got a pretty major energy adjustment from some beings who I’m hoping you might identify for me.
Bashar: You are hoping we will not.
Questioner: Ah.
Bashar: Hope in that sense, in that context, shatters knowingness.
Question 12: Prenatal ET Connection and Dream Symbolism
Questioner: You had suggested that I needed to do some digging and uncover some things for myself, and I’ve been projecting that along the lines of the ET connection that I was very hesitant to really get into. You had said at one point that there was a prenatal connection. Can you tell me more information about that at this time? I woke up from a dream last night where Jesus had turned into the gray form of the alien. Can you say anything about that?
Bashar: What I can and will say about that is to understand the correlation between one symbol and the other as it relates to the concept of collective consciousness and the relationship between what you perceive to be two distinct collective consciousnesses that are not really two. This is one of the biggest clues we have ever given you.
Questioner: I’ve been clear intellectually, but then in the sleep state I still have these feelings of terror and fear.
Bashar: What we have just said to you will alleviate the terror and the fear if you understand what we just said to you. Ponder what we have just said, and in understanding, the fear will dissolve in the light of understanding.
Questioner: Is this the area that I need to do the digging?
Bashar: Yes, but it is not digging so much as it is allowance of what is right in front of you and what is really obvious on a higher level. The symbols of collective consciousnesses that seem to be two are not two, and therein lies understanding and the dissolution of fear.
Question 13: Human Consciousness and Other Dimensions
Questioner: I’m wondering if you can help me to better understand the relationship of human consciousness to other dimensions of reality. It seems that certain dimensions are well within our reach like the three-dimensional realm, some of the electromagnetic realms. I’m wondering what dimensions lie just outside of our grasp but within our reach, and perhaps what lies within our intuition but beyond our reach.
Bashar: There is nothing that is beyond you in the intuition sense. There is nothing that is beyond you in the manifestation sense of experience in physical linear space-time. Yes, there are a few dimensional frequency domains that would not translate into your dimensional experience, but beyond the idea of physical manifestation, nothing is withheld from you in terms of your ability to comprehend and have an internal experience of awareness of how you are, how these other dimensions are contained within you—not really are they beyond you. The fuller realization that what you call other dimensions are within you rather than beyond you is the igniting trigger to allow you to experience them in your intuitive center.
Questioner: Are you saying then that most of these realms of experience are electromagnetic in structure?
Bashar: No. Is there something beyond that? It is a different kind of energy. It is not beyond your ability to interact with, but in the interacting with it, you create an interim energy that you can understand such as electromagnetic energy. So that you do not necessarily receive the energy you are interacting with directly, but indirectly through an interpretation that makes sense in your reality domain called electromagnetic energy. Did that make sense?
Question 14: Who You Choose to Be vs. Who You Are Created to Be
Questioner: Can you tell me what the difference is between who you choose to be and who you are created to be?
Bashar: There can be great difference and there can be no difference. There is great difference between who you choose to be and who you were created to be when your definitions of yourself are out of alignment energetically with your core. There is little or no difference between who you choose to be and who you were created to be when your definitions are in alignment with your core. In other words, when you experience fear, you are experiencing your energy flowing through definitions that are out of alignment with your created self. When you experience your energy as joy, you are experiencing your energy as flowing through definitions that are in alignment with your created self. Does that make sense to you?
Maybe let me add a little bit more to that. The idea to understand is that who you actually are is specific to different lifetimes with regard to an overall agenda you may have imposed upon yourself that sets up certain parameters that you will not go beyond. There is always this ability, when you are offered an opportunity to change, you can allow yourself to say and check in with yourself in this way: “Is the thing that I say does excite me truly the thing that excites me, or only the thing that I think should excite me? Am I projecting it as such, or is it truly representative of who I am? Am I afraid to allow something else to be my excitement, or is it truly not my excitement?” You can always check in with yourself and as honestly as you can determine for yourself whether something really is or is not who you are. But give yourself the opportunity to find out whether you are just believing that it’s not, or whether it truly is not, because sometimes you can convince yourself that something shouldn’t excite you when in fact it really is indicative of who you are. So always take the time to find out and check in to make sure you’re not just projecting a filter on top of your excitement to make it seem as if something does not excite you, or to make something else seem as if it does when it really doesn’t.
Questioner: Does your core self come from all that is, or does it come from yourself?
Bashar: It is both. As we said in the beginning, when you find that you surrender to your true being, then your will and the will of all that is is the same will. Do you follow? But of course, semantics especially as these concepts translate into your language can be confusing, because in a sense there can be many ideas of what the core self is relative to living a physical life. When you impose upon yourself physical limitation, you will create definitions that are limitations that are for a purpose, and therefore there can be a core self that is this physical core self, but there can also be a bigger core self that is beyond it.
Let us say you are simply pure consciousness without limitation whatsoever. Now let us say you choose to experience yourself as a physical being. This by definition imposes what you call limitations on the unlimited self. Yet that doesn’t mean that for the purpose of the life you are not being true to your core self as you invented yourself to be for the duration of the life. Just because you are limited in comparison to the unlimited self doesn’t mean you’re not being your true core self or being true to yourself, just because you are following the limitations you imposed upon yourself for a purpose. Did you follow that? Does that help clarify the idea?
Question 15: Ayahuasca and Consciousness
Questioner: I wanted to ask you a little about the South American hallucinogenic drug ayahuasca. Could you give some description of what it actually does to the human brain or the body?
Bashar: It allows there to be transference of associative chemicals across synapses that usually inhibit such transference.
Questioner: Does it wake up an unconscious area?
Bashar: It allows there to be more expression of an area you call unconscious. It doesn’t wake up an unconscious area—it allows there to be a medium for the expression of what you typically call more of your unconscious self.
Questioner: Does this actually connect you into another area of existence?
Bashar: Could you describe that a little bit? We do not know if there are words in your language for that, which is why the experience must be visceral. But we will make what attempt we can with your language.
Can you in your imagination—and you can all play along—can you in your imagination feel what it would be like if your consciousness existed only within the hairs of a cap? That is a close analogy to the explanation of that reality and that realm that you are connecting to with that particular substance. It is such that it takes the perspective of consciousness, explodes it, and yet at the same time allows it to be uniform but in a specific way. In a sense, it takes you out of yourself, allows you to experience the periphery of yourself, yet in a way that feeds back to the totality of yourself.
Questioner: I was wondering if it allowed you to connect into more of a sort of kachina type of energy.
Bashar: Yes and no. It has the ability to loosen the hinges on certain doors that may connect to those realities. It does not in and of itself place you there. It still requires an intentional choice to walk through those doorways after the hinges have been oiled.
And remember that like all such substances provided for these purposes by the Earth, it must be utilized with great respect, and it must not be assumed that the power exists within the substance, but that it is only a reflection of the power that exists within you, and is not always required for the duplication of that experience—just a catalyst.
It is very strongly connected to the energy of the animal called the cat for a variety of reasons and in a variety of ways. And when in the midst of that experience, you will find that one of the strongest guides—when used properly and with great respect—will be the jungle cats. Do you follow me? Does that help you?
Question 16: Health and Healing
Questioner: I would like to know if my healing procedure is going along. I was told this week that I’m anemic, and I’ve been taking mesra supplements and eating a lot of foods that are rich in iron, and they obviously aren’t having a sufficient effect.
Bashar: They are, but not sufficiently. If you will allow yourself the ingestion of whatever substances you desire into your body to be taken in conjunction with cayenne, then it will be in your system more readily and more rapidly. There is in your system an impedance that allows for lack of absorption. If you will allow yourself to take these supplements—natural in form as possible—with cayenne, then it will be shunted into all areas of your system through the dilation of your blood vessels more rapidly, more quickly, more effectively. Do you follow me?
Questioner: In terms of healing my scar, can you recommend either aloe vera, vitamin E, or the MSM lotion?
Bashar: You will find that in many ways the aloe will be most beneficial for you at this time. And again, in the ingestion of the cayenne and the dilation of the blood vessels, this substance will be more readily absorbed through the skin.
Question 17: Praying Mantis and the Grays
Questioner: Can you talk about how the praying mantis creatures relate to the Grays? Are they a leader, are they the ones that lead them or guide them?
Bashar: As we have said in the past, the idea of leading is a misnomer in this context. It would be the same thing as saying or asking, “Does one part of your brain lead the other?” They are of one mind, yet there are different components that serve different functions. They may represent what you would call a more organizational aspect, but they do not lead any more than your index finger leads your small finger on your hand when you grasp something. Do you follow this analogy?
Questioner: Could you go into it a little more? I’m not quite…
Bashar: If there is difficulty in this, it is probably because you are an individuated consciousness and do not understand the hive mentality. It is a single entity. Do you understand? If it is a single entity, how then can any one component actually be called a leader? It is one entity. Different components may have different abilities to organize the information within the one, and the Mantis as you say is a higher order organizational aspect. But it does not correlate to what you in your civilization call a leader, for there are no leaders and followers where there is only one that acts simultaneously within itself in all components at once. Do you understand the difference? It may seem subtle, but it is not—it is a profound difference.
Question 18: Future Contact and Channeling
Questioner: When you stop—when Daryl stops channeling you—we know no one else is going to be channeling you. But are any other sanyasi going to continue to be channeled, like Lawn, or is there any other?
Bashar: No comment.
Questioner: As individuals? No comment. Will you elaborate as to why?
Bashar: No comment.
Questioner: When you do decide to make contact with us when the timing is right, is there a way, a place for us to look? Will you make radio contact? Will it be such a public announcement, or will the government try…
Bashar: Are you speaking of my actual physical presence? You will know.
Questioner: How will we know?
Bashar: You will know.
Questioner: Is there a place that we should be paying attention to?
Bashar: You will know. Believe me, you won’t miss it.
Question 19: Alchemy
Questioner: I’ve seen something on the Discovery Channel about alchemy, where the Ancients used to be able—claimed to be able—to turn mercury into gold. Recently they have actually proven that this can be done with a linear accelerator. I was wondering if you could tell us anything about how the Ancients did this.
Bashar: Through the transmutation of self and the connection of self to all matter. The true change of the Alchemist was the purification of the self, and in so doing, the raising of the personal vibrations that then could affect the material of those substances and allow them to transmute.
Questioner: They actually did use chemicals, I believe, didn’t they?
Bashar: This only in a sense as a catalyzing agent or as the assistance of process. The highest Alchemists needed no such things and allowed their energy itself to transmute all other substances.
Questioner: Is there a way that we could connect with this ourselves now? Can you suggest any practical method for that?
Bashar: What is your physical age?
Questioner: 35.
Bashar: Meditate every day for one hour until you are 55—every single day without fail for 20 of your years. By doing that and being in a pure state of balance for that hour every day for 20 of your years, you will then be at the appropriate frequency level to transmute in the same way that they did. Now that’s a practical suggestion.
Questioner: Are there any other things related to alchemy as far as dream symbols or any other shapes or things that are interesting to you and that would be educational or useful to us that you might like to share?
Bashar: Only the circle—only the unbroken circle.
Also, remember as has been said in many disciplines upon your planet: it is the emptiness that makes the vessel useful. What is a cup without the emptiness within? With no emptiness, it is not useful as a cup. It is the emptiness of a thing that makes a thing useful. Therefore, in what you believe to be emptiness, you will find all usefulness. You will then become the vessel, the crucible of transmutation, when you are completely and utterly in touch with the core of your own emptiness. You will understand that everything comes from that emptiness, and by being at one with the emptiness, you will be able to transmute all things that come from it, for you will be able to shape the emptiness into whatever form you wish it to take. You will understand the relationship of emptiness to form. That is the alchemist’s understanding and the pure state of the Alchemist.
Question 20: MSM, Toxicity, and Kinesiology
Questioner: He does kinesiology and he tested the MSM and said it was toxic, and he’s found that it was toxic with most people.
Bashar: This is not the case. Do you know why he’s picking that up? Yes, and we will not go into it.
Questioner: I’m gaining a lot from working with him, and I find that some of the ideas—like he thinks kombucha is toxic sometimes to people because of yeast or something.
Bashar: Sometimes it may be, but it depends upon the other things that are in the person. Toxicity in that sense again is, as with everything, the product of a relationship to other things, and that is the thing that is being missed in these statements and that is the thing that needs to be looked at. A thing is not in that sense toxic in and of itself, but only in relationship to other things.
Questioner: Can you say if the MSM that I was…
Bashar: I will not say.
Questioner: I enjoy working with him and getting a lot out of it. I’m wondering how I deal with things like what we just talked about—the MSM and other opinions.
Bashar: If you are still wondering how you deal with this, nothing I can say will help you, for we told you all of this long ago. You must stop your wondering. End of conversation.
Question 21: Out-of-Body Dream Experience
Questioner: I had a dream experience where I became conscious when I was coming out of my body and then I started to experience great acceleration and I experienced going through a wormhole similar to in the movie Contact. This was something I’ve never experienced before.
Bashar: Congratulations.
Questioner: One of the things that was really exciting about it was that as I was accelerating through this wormhole, I sort of drew on my experience with Space Mountain and I learned from Space Mountain that I was actually able to—instead of being nauseated by the speed—moderate it and it was comfortable. Then you caught up to a portion of yourself. I wanted to stay with it and I stayed with it for quite a while, and then a thought entered my consciousness which was something that I feared. It took me right out.
Bashar: Very good. You have given yourself an unmistakable energy lesson—very clear, very precise.
Questioner: While it was something I was consciously aware of, I didn’t realize the degree to which it was still impacting my life.
Bashar: No, you do so. But it only impacted your life to that degree at that moment, and it impacts your life to that degree at no other moment. That’s your next clue.
Questioner: So it was bringing it into consciousness and looking at it, and then I could let it go?
Bashar: Yes. If you understand it only impacts your life to that degree at the moment you were looking at it, and impacts you at no other moment. Rather than think there is no real such thing in that sense as autonomous belief systems—they do not continue when you don’t look at them. But if you believe they do, they will act as if they have.
Questioner: It is kind of unnerving to realize that there is something going on that you’re not conscious of.
Bashar: I just told you there isn’t.
Questioner: What you’re saying is you bring it to the…
Bashar: What I am telling you is that the idea that there is something going on that you’re not conscious of is in and of itself a definition you all buy into, but is no more real than the definition. So it’ll just appear in your consciousness at a time that you need to look at it, and it will bring with it the apparency of having been there underground waiting for you, when in fact that’s never the case. It only brings the illusion of having been there because that’s the definition it represents.
If all things are now, there is no past. But what you call the past will look like the past when it appears in the now because that’s how you define it to be.
Questioner: I was under the impression that because I was accelerating—my frequency was rising at that moment—something came to the surface.
Bashar: That is how you interpret it. But what you did was test yourself to see how the new frequency would handle looking at that belief system as you created it in the moment. The belief system overwhelmed the frequency—you by definition chose to allow it to do so. But that was how you chose to look at it, how you chose to define it.
Questioner: I was experiencing a lot of fear when I woke up.
Bashar: Yes, but that is how you chose to interpret the experience.
Questioner: So I could just use it?
Bashar: Yes, but understand that it doesn’t exist except as you created it in the moment. And when you create it in the moment, it will come with all the linear paraphernalia it needs to make it appear as if it has continuity in linear reality.
Questioner: It really surprised me that it came up.
Bashar: Just as a photograph that you look at in the present will bring with it all the apparency of a picture you took in the past, because it has to in order to fit your preconceived assumptions of what linear reality is all about. If however you chose to create that photograph to be completely in the present, it would not look as if it were taken in the past.
Questioner: You’re saying that I created it just to show myself what could take me out of the experience that I was having, so I could be more clear on it, and to show yourself that the past is an illusion?
Bashar: Yes. It is created in the moment. That’s true.
Questioner: Although it does at times seem like there are unconscious influences.
Bashar: That is because of the definition you create there to seem to be. There is no unconscious self truly—you are one unbroken consciousness. But you create there the seemingness of unconsciousness that hides from yourself, and so in conjuring it, in allowing yourself to create that, you create there to be a game of hide and seek that then allows an apparent portion to be capable of being discovered.
Questioner: It is kind of distracting actually.
Bashar: As we have said in the past, you are 100% consciousness and you are using 100% of your brain to make it seem as if you’re only using 10%. This is the game you all have played with yourselves for generations. You are a one unbroken consciousness. Anything else is what you create in the moment, but what you create will come with the apparency of the game you are playing because it is nothing if not obedient to your creation. If you say it is from the past, it will bring with it all the marks of the past to make it seem that that is where it comes from and has been laying in wait for you—hiding. But those are the qualities you give it in the moment, and those qualities do not exist before the moment you have created it to seem so.
Questioner: Would it be beneficial to look at how it might apply to the present or how I might feel in the…
Bashar: Would it? Maybe yes, maybe no. Very good, now you’re catching on.
Questioner: Been having a lot of challenges physically and emotionally.
Bashar: And this is all related to what we have just said. You are now beginning to break down your definitions of consciousness, and as these definitions bang into each other, it creates and sets up this cacophony that you are now experiencing and attempting to integrate. But that is all it is—all these definitions banging into one another that allow you to then decide what shall be the definition of the present and what shall not be.
Questioner: Is there a visualization that comes to you that you might share with me?
Bashar: Yes, though you want me to share it with you?
Questioner: I’d love you to.
Bashar: You would love me to share the visualization with you? I’m not so sure you would allow you to access 100%. I’m not so sure you would want me to share the visualization with you right now.
Questioner: At any time, at any time ever… Oh now I’m really intrigued.
Bashar: Are you sure?
Questioner: Yes, I’m intrigued, I’m intrigued. Go for it.
Bashar: Is your curiosity up?
Questioner: Oh very up.
Bashar: Not quite enough. Do you believe that your curiosity is capable of handling the image we will then throw at you?
Questioner: Yes. Why do you know this?
Bashar: Because I’m very strong. How do you know this?
Questioner: Because I know this.
Bashar: Then no image is necessary. The image is the image of pure nothing.
Can you handle pure nothing?
You may ponder that.
Leave a Comment
Thank you for your comment!
It will appear after review.