Table of Contents
The 3D Perspective
Opening Remarks: Gratitude and The 3D Perspective
Once again, we take this opportunity to thank each and every one of you for allowing our civilization to interact with your civilization in this way. Each and every time we are allowed to interact with all of you, we are given an opportunity to experience through each and every one of you a new perspective of the infinite. And this expands our understanding of creation. So we thank you for this gift.
We would like to begin this transmission, this day of your time, with the following idea that we will entitle “The 3D Perspective.”
Many times we have talked about the idea, and many of you have heard it from other sources as well, about following your joy, acting on your excitement. But we also at the same time recognize that you are a polarized society. In other words, you experience a great deal of polarity: positive, negative, light, dark, yin, yang, as you say.
And as you have created yourself to experience reality through opposites, even including the idea of the creation of your brain being what you call left hemisphere, right hemisphere, and you attribute certain abilities to each hemisphere. Now, this is a generalization. Of course, there are more areas of your brain that handle more things than you may be aware of. But for the purposes of this illustration, in general, there is perhaps more of the so-called analytical modality or perspective on the left side, more of what you call the imagination or free association on the right side of the hemispheres of the brain.
This duality, this polarity, often creates a bit of confusion with regard to following your joy, acting on your excitement, because many of you from an early age are trained in one modality over the other. Not that you don’t necessarily exhibit both to some degree, but very often in your upbringing as children, many of you are trained to go in one direction, becoming either more analytical or more imaginative. And thus when you finally perhaps give yourself the opportunity to come to the realization that you can follow your joy and live your life through excitement, you will still have, as you say, a tendency from your training to choose to look at your joy, to perceive your joy through one modality or another. And in that sense, it is not that you are not seeing your joy, but you may in a sense only be seeing half of it or half of the ways in which your joy can actually be experienced by you.
For example, an individual who might be more heavily prone to use intellectuality may recognize what is truly their joy, but may not understand how the imaginative side of their being can also bring to them experiences of their joy in a mode that they are not familiar with. And as you say, vice versa.
The 3D Glasses Analogy
The analogy we would like to use is what you call your 3D glasses as exists in your technology with regard to your 3D pictures. The idea is that, for the most part, though there are various techniques, one of the primary techniques that creates 3D movies on your planet is the utilization of overlapping images. Two images on the screen at the same time. One image polarized in one direction and another image polarized in another direction.
These two polarized images thus then come to your eyes which are shielded with glasses that are also polarized. One lens is polarized to receive only the image from this direction and another is polarized to receive only the image that is polarized in this direction. Thus, each eye separately receives a unique image, its own image, does not see both images, and it is the brain that puts the two images back together to give you the sensation of the three-dimensional picture.
As such, the idea of looking at your joy only from the analytical perspective or only from the imagination perspective is like looking at it through one polarized lens and not the other. You may see your joy. You may recognize your joy. But you may be missing half of the full holographic three-dimensional picture by not allowing yourself to believe that the other side, that the other method, has anything to offer you or has anything at all to do with your ability to experience your joy.
So we would suggest that you allow yourself to expand in your understanding that there is always something for you to explore on the other side, in the other modalities, in the other ways of going about looking at your joy and looking at your truth, looking at yourselves and looking at your life, and do not allow yourself to necessarily think there is only one way to see your joy. Thus then you can expand your concept of what your joy may be and see how joy experienced in this way and joy experienced in this way can work together in harmony to give you a much more fully rounded picture and a fully rounded experience of all the ways that the joy that is you can be experienced in your experience of yourself as a physical being.
The Concept of the Dao
Now that is one thing that we would like to talk about in this transmission. But there is another. The second idea has to do with something that we have mentioned from time to time but also have begun to mention more often lately, and that is the concept on your planet that is often referred to as the Dao.
Now when we talk about the concept that in your language or one of your Earth languages is called the Dao or the Way, the principles in this concept are very similar, as many of you recognize, to many of the principles that we are talking about for understanding reality and how to live in the moment, in the center of your being, in present time, staying in the present.
But when we talk about the Dao and when that word is translated through the channel’s brain to you, we wish to make it clear that we do not mean to emphasize the idea of any particular religion on your planet. We are not talking about Daoism. The idea that humans will take the recognition of a principle and make an “ism” out of it is another idea altogether. But the Dao itself is simply one way to understand the nature of existence by whatever word you wish to call it. And there are of course many words to call it by. We are referring to it simply because that is one of the more convenient words that exists that does most succinctly express the concept as similar to the way that we understand it in our civilization.
So please understand that when we use the term Dao, we are not in any way, shape or form, as you would say, pushing a particular religion. Just a concept that humans on your planet have happened to turn into a religious system as has happened many times in your history.
We thank you for allowing us to share these two ideas and perspectives with you this day of your time in this transmission. And in return for the gift that you are giving to our civilization and allowing us to experience you through this gateway at this time, I ask in return: in what way may I and my world now be of service to you?
CONVERSATIONS
Conversation 1: The Tesseract Visualization and 12-Sided Geometry
Participant 1: You and then you. Number one, do you know who you are? Number two, do you know who you are? All right. Good day.
Bashar: Good day.
Participant 1: Uh, the night, the day of the tesseract party. Tesseract party. Yeah. Yes. Uh, when you led us through the meditation. Yes. I had a visualization and I’d like an explanation if you could give that to me.
Bashar: We will see. What is your visualization?
Participant 1: The visualization was a panel in front of me like 12 television sets, just, and they all had pictures on them of—I could not distinguish them, they didn’t come in clear enough, anything at all.
Bashar: Did you perceive anything at all? Any images at all that you could define or identify?
Participant 1: No. As I started to recognize that they were pictures, then it started to fade just a little and so that I could not distinguish anything.
Bashar: All right. And then—or is that it?
Participant 1: That’s it. I just wanted to know all right what they were.
Bashar: And the idea in general, first of all, is that as we have described, especially when dealing with geometric solids, you will recognize that the number 12 is a gateway of a particular sort. It represents a dimensional gate or doorway that is connected to other dimensions in a very particular way. And that is why this 12-sided gateway, 12-dimensional gateway, expresses itself twice in your geometric reality as what you call a pentagonal dodecahedron and a rhomboidal dodecahedron.
The fact that there are two 12-sided regular polygons is an indication of your ability from your dimension to connect through these 12-sided doorways to other dimensions of reality. What you were seeing as represented by the screens were in a sense the other doorways. Your interpretation, your mind’s symbolic interpretation, of the other 12 access points to other levels and dimensions of reality. And since you had no real reference for what those other dimensions are like, that is why the pictures were to some degree fuzzy or indistinct.
But what you were doing is allowing yourself to realize that those connections are there. And with further meditation along those lines in the manner that you were doing, utilizing the tesseract if you wish or utilizing the idea of the dodecahedrons if you wish, you can strengthen those images and gain more clarity of insight and to perceive information coming from any one or all of those 12 gateways or doorways that represent themselves to you in the information mode that humans on your planet are now most familiar with, and that is television.
Do you follow?
Participant 1: Yes. So, it’s like you’re giving yourself a symbolic reflection of the communication mode that you’re most familiar with and letting yourself know that this is how you can receive more information, how you can be aware of the gateways through which information can come. Does that make sense for you?
Participant 1: Yes. I wondered at the time if those were places that I could go.
Bashar: In some senses, yes. But you may wish to be cautious at first, not because you have to be, but simply because you believe you must in a sense be aware of what is going on at any given moment without going too far too fast. And you may wish to proceed by simply receiving information first rather than going to the places that that information comes from. Do you follow? But it is up to you. You may move as fast or as slow as you wish. But yes, it is possible to actually find yourself in those places as well because all those places are actually already within you. Do you understand that?
Participant 1: Yes. The information that you say I could get without going there—is that a contact with another entity?
Bashar: It is whatever you wish it to be, whatever your strongest focus is and whatever is most beneficial for the combination of belief systems that make up your personality structure at any given moment. It will change as you change.
Participant 1: After that, I went to see Contact, the movie Contact.
Bashar: Understood. And I don’t know why, but I got very excited about it.
Bashar: All right. Did you recognize the 12-sided geometric in that movie?
Participant 1: No. I—but I did hear him say tesseract. At one point he did refer to the tess—
Bashar: All right. But if you will remember in your visual imagery, okay, the capsule, the sphere that the individual entered—yes—to have the journey. The actual capsule was spherical, but it was surrounded by a 12-sided structure.
Participant 1: Oh, okay. That’s a pentagonal dodecahedron. Okay, I know what you’re saying. Yes.
Bashar: And therefore instinctively the designers of that particular object chose to represent what they knew instinctively was a connection to other dimensions. Do you understand?
Participant 1: Yes. Okay. Does that help you?
Participant 1: Yes. All right. Thank you very much.
Conversation 2: Hybridization, Physical Pain, and the 12 Children
Participant 2: Thank you. Hello, Bashar.
Bashar: And are you—good day?
Participant 2: Thank you. A few questions if I may.
Bashar: Oh, all right. You may.
Participant 2: Thank you. First, a previous conversation that we had—they informed me that I had 12 children. There’s that number again. And I would like to ask some questions about them.
Bashar: We may or may not be able to answer them specifically at this time, but by all means proceed. We will access what we are allowed to access. This is in some senses a relatively restricted subject for a variety of reasons, but we will always give you what we are allowed to give you on this subject.
Participant 2: Okay. I appreciate whatever you can. Thank you. First, I would like to ask because of the fact of having 12 children—I because I’ve had many different physical problems and I’m wondering if I’ve had a sense that a lot of the physical problems I’ve had are connected to the idea of the hybridization program.
Bashar: Yes.
Participant 2: Yes. And I was wondering if you could clarify that if my feelings about that are true or not.
Bashar: Your feelings about what?
Participant 2: About the pain in the physical body or in the abdominal area—is it from the experiments and from having all these children?
Bashar: Sometimes yes, not always, but sometimes. Yes.
Participant 2: Okay. When you say “sometimes,” does that mean in my case sometimes, or yes or what?
Bashar: Yes. In your case, sometimes. Sometimes the pain will be from having—yes. Sometimes it will be from the idea of your body having a memory of that idea. Sometimes it will be triggered for other reasons that are related to the process you are going through. That in a sense is being pulled from you by going through that kind of an experience as it relates to other things in your life that don’t necessarily immediately have to do with that experience but are connected to it because the experience draws them out of you. And thus you may experience some of that processing as pain even though it may not have anything to do with that particular experience.
You follow that?
Participant 2: I got lost.
Bashar: Oh, all right. Let’s go back. The map is simple. Sometimes the pain you are experiencing will actually be the direct physical result of the interactions and the hybridization process. Did you get that much?
Participant 2: Yes.
Bashar: Number two, sometimes the pain you experience will be a memory, a body cellular memory that gets triggered of the actual experience. Did you follow that?
Participant 2: Yes.
Bashar: Sometimes the pain you’ll experience will be the idea of the body processing other painful experiences that are not that one. Do you follow that?
Participant 2: Now I do. Thank you. Yes, that’s where I got lost.
Bashar: Oh, all right. Have you found your path again?
Participant 2: Thank goodness. Yes.
Bashar: Oh, all right. Thank yourself.
Participant 2: Excuse me. Thank yourself. Oh, thank you. No, thanks. Thank me. Thank you.
Participant 2: Is it possible to ask or get information? Is it possible to ask?
Bashar: It is always possible to ask.
Participant 2: Here I go then. For the 12 children, as to what species they are or where they are.
Bashar: Yes, they are in your terms half human, half gray. There is a little bit of mixture of other things for a variety of reasons, but that is, shall we say, insignificant according to your question as you asked it. Mostly you would simply recognize them as half human, half gray.
Participant 2: Okay. Do you follow that? Yes. Yes. Is there the possibility that there are other species out there who would want to have children with us besides the gray?
Bashar: There are a few others that are to some degree, shall we say, mixed up in that program on a variety of levels for a variety of agendas, and that is where some of the other mixture comes from as well as other places, but we will not go into that for now.
Participant 2: Okay. Am I allowed to know like where they are or names?
Bashar: Out there—they are in a ship. Do you understand? They are in a ship. They are all of them are in a ship. All of them are in a ship. Yes. Does that help you?
Participant 2: Yes. Are they coming with the first wave of 25?
Bashar: Who said there would be a first wave? Oh dear. Okay. Why do you ask?
Participant 2: Well, I probably want to make contact. Probably.
Bashar: Well, then they will probably be in the first place. Not probably. I would like to make them. All right. They will be in the wave that it is appropriate for them to be in. What difference does it make? Okay. Do you follow that?
Participant 2: Yes. Well, that I will be ready and I will know. Gee, I guess so. Does that make sense?
Bashar: Does that make sense?
Participant 2: Well, I would intuitively yes.
Bashar: Well, in what other way does it need to make sense?
Participant 2: Outwardly so that I make sure I don’t dismiss it.
Bashar: Dismiss what?
Participant 2: The thoughts, the feelings of this, of it starting so that I am aware. And are you saying that you would believe that something that would be that important to you, if it is that important to you, would be something that you would miss? Is that what you’re saying?
Participant 2: Well, I think—
Bashar: Are you saying that you doubt your ability to be at the right place at the right time? Is that what you’re saying?
Participant 2: Yes.
Bashar: Why? Why would you doubt that? Why? Why? Why would you doubt that?
Participant 2: Well, probably from experiences of thinking maybe I was not there, but—
Bashar: All right. From your training then? Yes. All right. Well, do you believe that your training controls you or do you believe that you can change into whatever you wish to be?
Participant 2: I believe the latter.
Bashar: Well, then does that answer your question?
Participant 2: Thank you. Is it possible to miss a date with destiny?
Bashar: No. Thank you. Okay. You have made the arrangement. The arrangements already exist. It is only a matter of the unfoldment of time to allow you to realize what already is.
Participant 2: Is that the unfoldment of time in general or my unfoldment of time?
Bashar: Do you remember how often we have said it is not this or that but this and that? Yes. Does that now apply to the question you have just asked?
Participant 2: Yes. Thank you. Does that help you?
Participant 2: Yes, it does. Thank you. Yeah. And I purchased a geometrical shape called a—that they told me was a tetragrammaton. Yes. Could you give me some clarifications—define the shape? Is it an equilateral triangle or is it something else?
Bashar: There are different uses of that word on your planet.
Participant 2: Ah, okay. That I’m not aware of. And the tetragrammaton we have often described would appear to be like a tetrahedron, a three-sided pyramid in a sense—actually four-sided, but if you discount the base, a three-sided pyramid. But the tetragrammaton is different from a tetrahedron in that you understand, like the tesseract, that each of the triangular faces is actually the base of another whole tetrahedron interpenetrating all the other tetrahedrons. So that if you were to have the ability to enter the tetrahedron through one face, you would be in one tetrahedron. But if you entered it through another face, you would actually be in another tetrahedron, not the same one. That’s the tetragrammaton.
Similar to the tesseract in that the tesseract is a cube. Each face actually being the entry point to a completely different cube, not just another entrance to the same cube. That is the way we have described the tetragrammaton. We are aware that the word on your planet and in your language tetragrammaton also refers to certain other structures that are also keyed into the idea of the tree of life and Kabbalistic terminologies and many other kinds of configurations. Which configuration are you describing?
Participant 2: What is the shape? Describe the shape. It’s—they are triangles that are all connected and there is like a tetrahedron in the center that’s even hanging down from that.
Bashar: All right. Then in that sense it might be an expanded form of tetragrammaton.
Participant 2: Yeah. And they’re all connected. Yeah. And does that mean that in each one as I look at it, I can—am I going into the same—
Bashar: No. If it is a tetragrammaton, then every time you look at a different facet, you are looking into a completely different tetrahedron or triangle.
Participant 2: Okay. So I can be going into a different place, time. Can I go and then I can go into several different places.
Bashar: When you know that all of those things are inside you, you can go anywhere you wish when you know you’re going nowhere at all. That’s the paradox. Everything is inside you. There is no real space out there. There are no real dimensions elsewhere. These are convenient perceptions based on your linear third-dimensional ability to perceive. But the idea is that when you understand that all of that is actually within your consciousness, then you understand that the secret of going anywhere is to know that you’re not actually going anywhere at all, but that it’s all within you—when it just takes a slight shift of perspective to see another reality that is already here and now within you. That’s how it works.
And these—these devices are helpful in training you to understand. They simply give you experience, practice looking at things from different perspectives. But that doesn’t mean that you’re supposed to be looking at things from different perspectives out there. You’re supposed to understand the idea that when you look at something from a different perspective, you’re looking within yourself from a different perspective. Does that make any sense to you in your language?
Participant 2: Yes, totally. Thank you.
Bashar: Thank you. You good day.
Conversation 3: Secret Societies, Control, and the Nature of Secrets
Participant 3: Um, we had—uh, how what the hierarchy might be all about. I did say that. And basically there are some secret societies that have kept some of the secrets of the nature of reality. Are we back to that? Well, but we know what they are now. So they’re no longer a secret. No. All right. Well, to not to everyone, but—
Bashar: Well, all right. And basically that’s the deal is getting the word out. All right. But remember, remember, remember, remember the fundamental principle behind all such concepts as you are now talking about—the secret is that there are no secrets. Okay. You understand? Allowing people to believe in the concept that there can be secrets is what makes it possible. But if you understand that each and every one of you have the ability to access whatever knowledge you need to know about anything at any given moment, then you know that the big secret actually is there are no secrets. And that’s the big secret that anyone who wishes to play secretive games wishes to keep from everyone—that there are no secrets. Right?
Participant 3: Okay, that makes sense. All right. Now, what now? We’ve got an elite at the top, you know, very hungry for money on this third-dimensional reality.
Bashar: Well, all of you in a sense have voted them there.
Participant 3: Well, I don’t—I don’t know that it even comes down to voting.
Bashar: I think it’s—I mean it in the most general terminology. You are structuring your society and have structured it in such a manner that makes such niches possible.
Participant 3: All right. Well, I think that the niches have been there throughout our history and that—
Bashar: Well, that depends on how far back you think your history goes because that’s not true.
Participant 3: Well, I’m talking about the secret societies that literally are beyond nationalism and create this planet sort of a chessboard.
Bashar: But there were times when there were no such societies, you know.
Participant 3: Well, yeah. Well, then you cannot say all of history.
Participant 3: Okay. Well, let’s save the last 3,000 years.
Bashar: Oh, all right. Actually, the last six, but who’s counting?
Participant 3: Now, at the top of the secret society, we know that there are some very rich families. There are some power-hungry types, but is there something above them that might be interdimensional, might be alien in nature, that is even in control of that particular factor?
Bashar: I will only give it to you this way as we have given it to you before: like attracts like, and there is no end to what you can attract to yourself regardless of the frequency. Right? Whatever frequency you are, it’s what you will attract. And there are more than enough entities on a variety of levels that are willing to reflect, amplify, magnify, and interact with those even of the idea of the kinds of frequencies you have mentioned. So in that sense, yes, those relationships to some degree do exist, but it is not exactly mechanically in the way that most people on your planet think of them or describe them. That is a very overly simplistic way of describing it that that hierarchy controls this or that. It is handled very differently on those levels.
Let me put it another way. Many of you are familiar with a book on your planet called A Wrinkle in Time. Are you?
Participant 3: I’ve heard of it.
Bashar: All right. Well, fascinatingly enough, that book deals not only with tesseracts, but deals with the idea of the ultimate form of control in your dimension of reality. The ultimate form of control is to take responsibility for another. And the idea of the ultimate evil controlling entity in that story is the entity that comes along and says, “You’ve been working so hard for so long. You look so tired. Let me take over for you. Let me ease your burdens for you. Let me live your life for you. So you have no worries anymore. So you don’t have to think about things.”
Participant 3: Thank you very much. Sounds like mind control.
Bashar: It’s not really. It is simply the idea of playing upon individuals’ feelings of being disconnected from their own self-empowerment. Right? It is not really mind control. It is actually mind agreement. You see that, if you wish to use the word, that is the insidiousness of that kind of quote-unquote control. It’s not control without agreement.
Participant 3: Yeah. Well, I guess I would hope to be that optimistic that we still do have that control over our own mind.
Bashar: Well, as long as you only hope that you will be that optimistic. Yeah. Okay.
Participant 3: I realize that that limitation. Oh, and by the way, congratulations.
Participant 3: Oh, thank you. We hopefully we’ll never have to talk about that again.
Bashar: Hopefully, hopefully, hopefully, hopefully, hopefully—I’m remaining optimistic that I can—
Participant 3: Why do you have to be optimistic? Are you—it’s been challenging.
Bashar: Oh, all right. I understand that and that’s all well and good and I’m not going to take that away from you. But the question is, are you someone who used to smoke or are you simply someone who never did? That’s the question. Because if you actually know you’re someone who never did, not that you have to be, but if you really know you’re someone who never did, where is the need for the optimism? Where in that sense does stamina have to come into it? If you are, however, defining yourself as a person who used to smoke, then I can see exactly why you’re having the kind of challenge that you’re having. And if that’s what you’re having, that’s fine too. I’m not going to take that away from you.
Participant 3: Well, it hasn’t been as bad as it could have been. That’s for sure.
Bashar: All right. Then you must in some senses slowly but surely be redefining yourself closer and closer and closer to the definition of a person who simply never even thought about the idea of smoking.
Participant 3: Yeah. Well, I also noticed that as I’m sort of purifying that, every little thing that I’m still doing is almost twice as detrimental. It’s like I—amplification principle.
Bashar: Yes. It’s the more you accelerate, the more sensitive you become to vibrations that are not you, the more amplified things that are not you will seem and the more detrimental they will seem to you because they are so unlike the vibration you are becoming. They will stand out.
If you have in an art gallery a huge blank white wall and there is a tiny black spot somewhere on that wall, where is your eye going to go? Yeah. Do you understand the principle of the spot? Exactly. All of that expansive white wall will be forgotten. You will focus your entire attention on that little spot. Therefore, anything that is not of the energy you prefer will grab your attention like nothing else. And everything else that is the energy you prefer will be forgotten until you allow yourself to find a way to allow that spot to blend within the rest of the idea. Do you follow?
Participant 3: Yeah. It’s the 11th hour. There’s no turning back. I feel—I mean I’ve changed my diet actually.
Bashar: 11:44. Well, it’s challenging, but I’m going for it. Well, yes, of course you are. Otherwise, we wouldn’t be having this conversation. So, in that sense, bravo.
Participant 3: Thank you, and thanks for staying on my case, as much as I hated it.
Bashar: I will always be delighted to stay on your cigarette case.
Participant 3: Um, let me ask you just a couple more quick things. Have abductions been going on throughout our history? And like when I say history, I’m talking 3,000 years or so.
Bashar: 3,000 years. Yes.
Participant 3: They actual abductions. How about the hybridization process?
Bashar: Yes. Though again, there have been starts and stops.
Participant 3: Okay. Because it seems as though it’s been people have become awakened to the fact within the last 40 to 50 years.
Bashar: This is the time of acceleration.
Participant 3: And is it because of our consciousness switching that? Are you going to ask me a this or that question?
Bashar: Well, no. I realize it’s all of the above. I guess I’m just—
Participant 3: What are you—I really want to get clear on exactly the area of research in terms of abductions and mind control and this and that are so muddied with incidents that sort of overlap into one another. It’s very challenging to walk down each of those roads because they all take so much time.
Bashar: And then why do you need to?
Participant 3: Well, because I want to really be clear about what—
Bashar: What makes you think you cannot be clear in some other way?
Participant 3: Well, I know what my experiences are.
Bashar: All right. Do you remember what we talked about when this transmission first began? How sometimes because of your training, you feel there might be only one way to look at information.
Participant 3: Oh, no. I think there are many answers. That’s for sure.
Bashar: All right, then. Don’t be so insistent that the only way to perceive that information or to be clear is the one way you have been told to explore those concepts. There are many other ways and it won’t be necessarily as confusing if you lighten up on the idea that you can only receive that information or be clear from one particular direction.
Participant 3: Well, and I don’t think I come from one particular direction. I mean, I—which you are right now. Well, no. I do research and I come here and ask you and I go, you know, to a lot of other lectures and—
Bashar: But that’s not what we mean. The idea is that you can do many different things that are still all within the same basic approach. The idea is to change the approach completely. Not just do many different things that are all part and parcel of the same fundamental approach.
Participant 3: I’ll have to listen to that.
Bashar: Let me give it to you this way if you’re willing to play along. Okay. Are you willing?
Participant 3: Yes, I am.
Bashar: All right. Thank you. Right now, give me, if you will, a definition, a definition of being clear that works now for you with regard to these subject matters.
Participant 3: Being clear about the abduction scenario. Yes, perhaps. Give me a definition of clear that already works with what you’re doing instead of assuming that you need another definition in order to become clear about it. Give me a definition of clear that already fits what you already know.
Participant 3: The abduction phenomenon is something that has been ongoing. I am not asking you for a definition of the abduction phenomenon. I am asking you for a definition of the concept clear. What does it mean to be clear? That’s the definition I’m asking you for. What does it mean that you would be clear? Define clear.
Participant 3: That I would know. Know what? All aspects of whatever I am looking to discover that you need to know.
Bashar: Yeah. Well, and of course I have—I know everything I need to know or I wouldn’t—then you’re clear. Okay. You know at any given moment everything you need to know. You’re clear. In the next moment you may know other things, but you will be—and here’s the hitch—no clearer than you are right now. Do you understand?
Participant 3: Because it brings up more questions. But I have a question—
Bashar: That’s all right. But I have a questioning mind.
Bashar: That’s all right too. But you are assuming that because you still have questions that you’re not clear.
Participant 3: Well, no, I don’t because I have implants. I think I have an implant and I don’t know whether it’s extraterrestrial. I don’t know if it’s military.
Bashar: So what? That doesn’t mean you—but not knowing doesn’t mean you’re not clear.
Participant 3: Well, there are things that I’m not sure of.
Bashar: That still doesn’t mean you’re not clear about what you are sure of.
Participant 3: Not enough.
Bashar: Not being enough doesn’t mean you’re not clear. Now, that’s the only point we are making.
Participant 3: All right. I’ll try to digest that.
Bashar: What we are attempting to communicate to you is that your fundamental assumption that there is more to know—your fundamental assumption that there is more to know means you’re not clear—is what is hanging you up. It is all right for you to know that there is more for you to know. But at the same time, understand that right now, whatever it is you do know and whatever it is you don’t know doesn’t mean you’re not clear. All right?
Participant 3: But I still—there are things I still want to know.
Bashar: That’s fine. But do not continue to do your exploration under the assumption that somehow you’re not clear just because you don’t know yet.
Participant 3: All right. Well, I’ll try to make that distinction.
Bashar: I don’t try. I will. Well, are you clear? Do you want to be clear?
Participant 3: Absolutely.
Bashar: Then you’re clear. Do you not understand the paradox I am attempting to give you? If you know you’re clear, you will know that at any given moment, you know what you need to know. And knowing that you know what you need to know at any given moment will allow you to know more.
Participant 3: All right.
Bashar: Sounds—I am giving you right now your version of what I gave her. Ellie, I am giving you your version of what I gave her. I am forcing you in a sense by your invitation to move to a higher perspective of how you see things. I know it doesn’t make a lot of sense to your intellectuality right now, but I am giving you what I gave her. It’s going to probably turn you upside down and inside out.
Participant 3: I’m already—
Bashar: Oh, just wait and see.
Participant 3: Oh, God. More. More.
Bashar: Oh, great. But then there will be more clarity, won’t there?
Participant 3: Absolutely. Yeah.
Bashar: All right. I am giving you now your version of what I gave her. She has broken the ice for you. So, don’t worry. It’ll be all right.
Participant 3: Oh, you’ve bro—I’ve broken the ice for a lot of people.
Bashar: And you have. So, now it’s time some ice was broken for you. Tell me what your definition of clear is.
Participant 3: I am that I am.
Bashar: So that’s—love to know that, and in knowing that is all things. All knowledge is in knowing that one thing. And when you really know that one thing, you will know everything you really need to know. And maybe for you more importantly, you will know what you don’t need to know.
Participant 3: Well, I’d probably know a lot of that.
Bashar: I give you this last bit of advice. Sometimes getting to a place where you finally discover that you don’t really need to know something will all of a sudden allow you to discover just exactly how clear you are. Because when you don’t need to know something, then you’re clear as you are.
Participant 3: Yeah.
Bashar: I and remember—and remember one of the things that we also shared with the icebreaker is the idea that you’re really getting close to being who you are when you know that you don’t know.
Participant 3: Oh, I definitely know that I don’t know a lot.
Bashar: But you see, it’s not just meant that way. When you know that you don’t know in the way that we mean it, which connects to knowing that there are things you don’t need to know and you’re all right with not knowing them because you know that not knowing them will allow you to be clear. Then you will know everything you need to know and everything you need to know will change and change and change and change and you will know other things. But at any given moment you will know there are things you don’t need to know and you will be all right with that which is what will allow you to know what you need to know. The clarity of what you want to know will come from the clarity of knowing what you don’t need to know in your case. Okay. End of conversation. Okay.
Bashar: You good day.
Participant 3: Good day.
Conversation 4: Knights Templar, Freemasons, and the Ibis Symbol
Participant 4: Good day. Do I seem less roly-poly today?
Bashar: Oh, a little. Okay, we will see. I liked the information you just gave Pamela. Makes me got a reflection there to me as far as—so I did want to ask you about something that I don’t need to know, but now you’re being clever. But there will always be things that will bounce off of any of the crystals that you are and might get picked up by other crystals in the room. Okay.
Participant 4: Continue. Can you tell us anything about the Knights Templar Society, the Freemasons?
Bashar: There are many things that can be told, but there are also many things that do exist in your literature.
Participant 4: Well, specifically as far as the control they exert on the world.
Bashar: I’m not going to talk about the idea of any such control that they exert well on the collective in terms of—no, no, roly-poly. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, roly-poly. Okay. The idea of your masons, your Knights Templar, goes all the way back through the pharaohs and back to the Egyptian kings. The idea of the lineage is that when the understanding of what made a king a king and a queen a queen—when the understanding of the vibration that made a king a king was lost, then there were only pharaohs, which in a sense, no judgment intended, but in your own concept, was a poor substitute, only a fill-in, only a stand-in, was the pharaoh for the king because it was no longer remembered how to make a king.
The idea is that the ritual, the ritual of the shift from king to pharaoh is the ritual, the transitional ritual that is preserved through many of the Druidic societies, the Knights Templars and the Masons to your present day. Now yes, obviously as this is a long lineage society in a sense with many offshoots but nevertheless stemming from a single core. Yes, of course over time on your planet many of the members of such a society have of course entrenched themselves into many of the social structures, governmental structures, political structures, financial structures, religious structures on your planet. And of course to that degree that there are members entrenched in that way and to the degree that they choose to cooperate with each other for any particular single agenda, then of course in that sense in your terms they will seem to exercise certain inertial control.
But the idea still is that it doesn’t matter if you as an individual are of a frequency and you hook up with other individuals of like frequency and the frequency that is your preference is a frequency of flexibility and freedom and non-restrictive de-structurization with minimal guidelines, self-empowerment and so forth, then it will not matter who is pulling strings over there because those strings will not be ultimately attached to you.
Participant 4: Any idea why then when that was brought to my conscious attention recently that would have caused me to vibrate in such a fear that I wasn’t vibrating in previous to that—
Bashar: To show you that you still in fact do have those definitions. It doesn’t matter whether one day you are vibrating in fear to that. The point simply always is that if that button can always be pushed—if it can ever be pushed—then it still exists within you as a definition and being brought to your attention allows you the opportunity to deal with it and transform it. Doesn’t matter that you didn’t feel it yesterday. The point is that if you feel it today, then you are defining yourself in such a manner that contains that button and that is a button that can be pushed and so it has been pushed to bring it to your attention to decide for yourself whether you want to hold on to that button or whether you want to change it. That’s why it was brought to your attention.
Participant 4: Well, it wasn’t just for myself personally. I don’t care. But that’s all we’re going to talk about is you right now. Okay.
Participant 4: And one other thing, the image that I showed Daryl—yes—which I got during a meditation. Can you provide any insight as to what that is?
Bashar: It is connected to exactly what we have talked about now because it is the image in one sense of an ibis. Look up the ancient ibis-headed symbolic archetypal god of the ancient Egyptians. You will find it is called Thoth. T-H-O-T-H. See what the symbology means for you and how it is germane and connected to the experience that you have relating to the idea of fear and control and all those ideas.
Participant 4: But that actually came—I don’t care. I don’t care. I don’t care. You’re being linear. Okay. And you don’t need to be linear with this. I know I don’t because I just proved that remote viewing works even when the target isn’t set until after the session’s done. Yes. And it was amazing.
Bashar: All right then. Now you understand reflection of that. All right then. Now you understand. So you don’t have to say, “Well, but it didn’t happen this way or but that happened before or after this.” It doesn’t matter. All time is now. You are beginning to experience more breakdown of linear time. So, it shouldn’t really matter anymore to you what happens before something else because it all happens simultaneously and that’s what you’re beginning to experience. Does that help you?
Participant 4: Yes. Thank you.
Conversation 5: The Tesseract Meditation
Participant 5: Good day. I wanted to ask some more questions in regard to the tesseract meditation.
Bashar: One more question. Yes. One.
Participant 5: Okay. I wanted to know if I—if just listening to your meditation tape will be enough to help me to make the contact—
Bashar: In that you ask the question, the answer would be no. Then do you understand the obviousness of my answer to you? If you have to ask the question, the answer is obviously no or you wouldn’t have asked the question. So if you ask, “Is it enough?” then that means no, it’s not. Or if you say it is enough, then it is. But it doesn’t have to be. So if you say, “Is it enough?” and it means no, it’s not, then allow yourself to understand that your imagination is capable of providing you whatever you need to fill in any spaces that might remain and then that will be sufficient. And at any moment it might change and if it changes that will be sufficient. Use your imagination. It’s up to you. I have only given you a guideline. It doesn’t have to be enough. It can be enough, but it doesn’t have to be. And if you ask, “Is it enough?” then in the asking of the question, obviously the answer is no or you wouldn’t have asked. Do you follow that logic?
Participant 5: I do. I just wondered if I needed—I just answered it. Okay. Okay. Thank you. I said one. Okay.
Bashar: Bashar. You then you, number two. Do you know who you are? Yes. All right. Number one.
Conversation 6: Hybrids, Astral Planes, and the Fake Invasion
Participant 6: Good evening, Bashar.
Bashar: Good day. I have a question about the hybrids. Yes. I have a number of questions actually. One is—the humans, the non-human half of the equation—is that just genetic material that’s being—as opposed to—
Bashar: As opposed to—an individual gray as parents?
Participant 6: There’s like the female humans—the grays do not have reproductive capabilities, thus it is only genetic material if that is how you meant the question.
Bashar: Okay. And the genetic material—is it taken from an individual gray that is thought of as a parent or is it just—
Bashar: Yes. So the hybrid children would have a gray as one half of their parentage. That usually yes, that stays with them and raises them and it’s okay, so to speak.
Participant 6: All right. And of that time that they’re growing up, how much of that time would they spend on average with their human parent?
Bashar: It has changed over time as the program has changed and it will be different for different individuals. It is generally now a range of between 5 to 15%. Do you understand that?
Participant 6: I do. All right. And it will increase as—and eventually some of them will be on Earth for sort of full-time in a sense. Yes. Then in a sense the agenda will shift, the responsibility will shift.
Participant 6: Is the sort of non-physical structure of the hybrids similar to humans? Non-physical structure—so you mean their spirits?
Bashar: Yes. Astral, mental bodies and so on.
Participant 6: Yes. On that level there is more similarity between all beings, though there are still differences the closer to physicality you get.
Participant 6: Okay. And I have some questions about that particularly in terms of humans. Those of us who do out of the body have had the experience of going somewhere in the physical, seeing, for example, two physical third-dimension people having a conversation and being able to connect to some part of one of those people and have a simultaneous conversation with them—some part of them. What is that part that we’re conversing with that their physical self is totally unaware of?
Bashar: The same that you exhibit. In other words, as you just, to speak colloquially, project your astral part, you are speaking to their astral part. Like vibration to like vibration. Okay? And at some level also of course you are speaking to the core essential self on a higher plane that is always going on. But in terms of delineating the specific level that is acting as the receiver, so to speak, you are dealing with exactly the same level as is the projection itself. I understand. Does that make sense to you?
Participant 6: It does. Now that part—I’ve heard of people that make the transition after they die if they, for example, have been in the hospital for a long time and take a lot of drugs and so on—are very confused when they get to the other side. They’ll still be in a sort of drug stupor sometimes—yes—
Bashar: Because it may have imprinted the pattern of the idea—the energy may have imprinted itself on many different levels because the lower astral realm is still a kind of quasi-plastic material energy level and still can be imprintable or impressionable. Similar to the idea of clay. Thus then some of that residue or residual resonance may last and may take a little while to dissipate even in the lower astral realm of crossover. When you go into higher plane, however, it will be dropped more rapidly. It depends upon the momentum that an individual may bring with them during crossover as to exactly how far, how fast they may go and how quickly they may drop that disorientation should it exist.
Participant 6: Okay. So they may be in an astral plane world where they’re sort of—it’s a while before things clear up and they’re more of their higher self.
Bashar: That level does exist. Yes. And that is generally the level from which you experience the entities you know as ghosts. Right? Because they are still to some degree connected to the lower vibrational physical plane. This is just physics. It’s just very simple physics.
Participant 6: And what is the physics of the sort of—you hear stories about some entities crossing over and they go to a part of the astral world, I guess, where they can create whole towns and sort of reproduce our earthly life. Yes. And around what you would typically call middle astral, right? That’s what I’ve heard. But now, how does that fit with the concept of people rejoining with their higher self, going to the light and that sort of thing?
Bashar: That is in some senses part and parcel of the actual transition process itself before they get there.
Participant 6: Oh, the tunnel.
Bashar: It’s the connecting tunnel in a sense, just to put it in those symbolic terms. It is perceived by you as a tunnel, but it is simply the connecting conduit that in a sense gets you there.
Participant 6: Okay. I want to just for a second go back to—I saw someone named Dan Sherman, an Air Force fellow, was in a program called Project Preserve Destiny. And he was trained by the Gray program, it’s called, in the Air Force to mentally receive messages from what he was told was an alien race, and they gave him various—it was practiced to be a conduit for telepathic information in times of crisis where electromagnetics aren’t working. And why then—so he quit the program eventually because he was disturbed by some of the data that the aliens were transmitting. Was it coming from aliens? Well, that was my question because the data was about abductions and it would be like residual pain levels of subject, so and so, and things like that. So my question is, was he getting information from—
Bashar: Sometimes, sometimes not. But you have to be specific.
Participant 6: Well, the ones that were transmitting data about abductions—were they in fact—
Bashar: Sometimes, sometimes not. You have to be specific in each piece of data for me to be able to tell which in your terms is accurate or not.
Participant 6: Well, then my question would just be, of the ones where it wasn’t transmitting abduction data, what alien are they—grays? What might be one faction? There are many factions of grays—
Bashar: There may be many factions of grays that may be in a sense transmitting data of that nature. There may be many other different kinds of species that are transmitting data of other nature. You have to be specific with each specific piece of information for me to know the difference. Okay, and I don’t have that—
Participant 6: There’s a lot of babble out here, right?
Bashar: You understand? I do. It takes some time to narrow down the particular bandwidth and make a discernment on any particular piece of transmitted data. So the more specific you are, the more specific we can be, right?
Participant 6: And I don’t have any specificity on that. I do have a question though, the last one. There’s so much information coming out now about an impending man-made fake alien invasion.
Bashar: It’s been given up. No more. It’s been given up. It was discussed. It’s been given up.
Participant 6: Glad to hear.
Bashar: It is whatever temperature you want it to be.
Participant 6: Oh, and the last question was going back to something you said earlier—that the secret societies go back to 6,000 years ago. I’d always heard they go back—
Bashar: You will say that. Oh, then I misunderstood. You were only talking about 6,000 years worth of history. Oh, I see. But the idea is that there are certain societies that do go back even further, like through Atlantis. Yes. But they are not really of the same ilk. All right. The idea of the secret societies begun after the destruction of Atlantis. They took on a different temperament because of the destruction and because of what happened sociologically and politically as information was lost over time. Does that help you?
Participant 6: It does. Thank you.
Conversation 7: Zen, Panic, and the Squirrel Symbol
Participant 7: Thank you. Number two. Hi Bashar. How are you? Good day. Well, I seem to be experiencing some of these Dao or Zen—yeah—experiences. All right. Why in that—things that I hold a lot of stock in or that mean a lot to me—you always stock in something—yeah, myself. What—that these things that came up this week were things that meant a lot to me and at the same time things that you have given a lot of meaning to. Yes. All right. And being in the position of having to let it go. Oh, all right. And then having it come back. Oh, all right. I thought that was the way out.
Participant 7: I’m amazed at how my mind just vaporized.
Bashar: Why—congratulations?
Participant 7: Yeah, that must—perhaps you have achieved pure Zen. Oh my goodness. Oh, is that what it feels like?
Bashar: Sometimes. Sometimes it feels like—you know the cliché—chopping wood, carrying water. Oh, you know, but that’s fun too.
Participant 7: That’s exactly the point. It is a part of life like anything else, at least on your planet. Will that help you? Yeah. And about this idea about the idea of panic. Panic. What is panic?
Bashar: Panic from what you call your old archetypal symbology of being like unto Pan, which is being like unto—the idea of experiencing a type of primal, instinctive, resonant, vibrational energy in your society. This primal, instinctive, vibrational, resonant energy is often filtered through the idea of fear definitions that allow you then to experience that primal energy as total detachment, total isolation from the all that is. And that is the experience you call panic. Did you follow that?
Participant 7: Yeah. I was thinking about like when I was in the ultralight and for the first 10 minutes—yes—I knew my panic would kill me if I let it get bigger. Yeah.
Bashar: Panic is sometimes an interesting transitional methodology.
Participant 7: Yeah, because I do from life. You said—panic is sometimes an interesting methodology that many of you use to transfer from physical life into death. Yeah. So I think I’ve focused on the idea that facing panic or not panicking—which is easy for me to choose—
Bashar: It is all right to face it and in that sense experience it and you can at the same time understand that what you’re simply doing is looking into the pure unknown, into what many of you call the abyss. But the pure unknown that for a split second in the way that you humans have been trained to look at things allows you to feel completely, totally, utterly alone, experientially alone.
Participant 7: Yes, I felt that within the infinite—that is the root of the experience that you call panic. But when you connect to it in a positive and constructive sense, then you are calling forth very primal, instinctive recognitions of your connection to nature and the infinite. And it is then that it gives you the freedom of total expression of your naturalness, like unto Pan, the symbolic ancient god on your planet of nature.
Participant 7: Wow. Oh, all right. That’s as good an expression of totality as anything. Oh. That I can really do something with that.
Bashar: Oh, all right. Then by all means, go right ahead.
Participant 7: And I will. And you know what else happened? Detail. Well, I was talking on the phone to Ellie—yeah, it’s Icebreaker—and Icebreaker Ellie. Yeah. This second time something strange has happened when we were talking.
Bashar: A moment if you please. You do also realize, don’t you, the synchronistic and symbolic reference we are making to the idea of cutting crystals, don’t you? Ice breaker. Ice breaker. Cutting crystals. Yes. Thank you. Now you do.
Participant 7: Okay. So, here we are. We’re talking on the phone and then all of a sudden they were talking about something that was highly energetic. Highly energetic. And suddenly I saw something like fall on the patio in front of me. Right. And it fell on the back. And it looked like it fell out of the tree. And I walked over and I looked and it was a dead squirrel. Oh, what? And it was really dead. I mean it was not just dead but really dead.
Bashar: An interesting differentiation.
Participant 7: All right. And stick squirrel—and I looked at that. Now that was really strange. And I think a strange stick squirrel. Yeah. I think a white bird was swiftly flying by and dropped it. All right. And so, how does this reflect symbology and meaning in your life?
Participant 7: Oh, and you know what? The night before—yes—AJ had these dreams where he was lucid and he heard these incredible explosions. Yes. Where he thought it was like a volcano or something. Really shook his tree.
Bashar: Oh, I shook his tree. Yes. And then did the squirrel drop out?
Participant 7: Well, actually, Mara dreamt about squirrels—dead squirrels dropping out of trees.
Bashar: There you are. A mass mind connection and a realized symbol reflected in physical reality from the manifestation of the etheric realm. The squirrel is willing to do that, to be a representation that you can both manifest from the etheric into physicality that quickly in what you call the mass consensus reality, and at the same time to show you that no longer do things have to be hoarded or secreted away. Do you understand the symbology there? It’s like a squirrel hoards nuts for the winter. Yes. You do not have to worry about doing that. Do you follow? It is a reflection of the idea that everything will work out. And that there is always the support you need in any season without having to squirrel anything away out of panic and worry.
Participant 7: Oh, so let that symbol drop dead away. Okay, I will. Thank you. Does that help you?
Participant 7: Oh, so so much. Don’t worry, it doesn’t mean you’re nuts.
Participant 7: Pretty exciting. Except in a positive way. Yeah, definitely. Thank you.
Conversation 8: Past Lives, Marriage, and Following Joy
Participant 8: Good. Uh, I have a really wonderful question to ask, but I do have a friend here that I brought tonight—two friends who have been trying to ask before the time is off for this training session. So could I please introduce one of them, John?
Bashar: Thank you. And then come back to you at the end. Maybe you might have just given up your turn. Anyway, thank you to Rabia and also to Bashar.
Participant 8 (John): Good day. I have a question which is—I want to find out about my past life.
Bashar: Just one? No, no, no. We started there from—why? Because I’m interested to believe it or to leave it. Believe it or leave it. Yeah. But which do you prefer? Really? I don’t know.
Bashar: All right. Let us explain first of all this idea. Do understand that even though from a linear time perspective, yes, you have future lives, past lives, alternate lives, other dimensional lives and so on—you know what I mean? Yes, that all exists. But the idea is that they also all exist now simultaneously because there is only one moment now. There is only one place—here. Here and now. All your lives exist now. So in that sense, they’re not really past. They are just in a sense overlapping the one life you perceive at this moment. Does that make sense so far?
Participant 8: So far.
Bashar: It is similar to the idea of what you call your television set on your planet. All the programs are there at the same time at any given moment, but you only see the one that your channel is tuned to. It doesn’t mean the other programs don’t exist at the same time. Do you follow that analogy?
Participant 8: Very much indeed.
Bashar: So this is how the idea of past lives exists. It’s all right here overlapping, interpenetrating right now. Now because each life is a particular frequency and that’s what makes it a different experience of the one whole now consciousness that you are on a bigger scale. It is frequency that determines how you can connect or perceive or create a connection to a so-called other life. So if you change your frequency, change your energy level, you can connect to the idea of a different experience that from your physical perspective you may call conveniently a past life but which does exist right now.
The reason why anyone may want to do that can be for a variety of ideas. But the idea we wish you to understand first is that no matter what or how many past lives you may have, the you that is having them is not this personality you. The you that is having all these other past lives is the bigger non-physical consciousness you that is also having this life at the same time—it’s having all the other ones.
Participant 8: So that makes sense so far.
Bashar: So far. But make that question again—like if I live before, like live now, yeah—why I don’t remember them?
Participant 8: What of living? You have a focus. If you are watching your television vision, why don’t you want two programs at the same time? Why don’t you want channel 2 and channel 4 at the same time on your television set? Why?
Participant 8: Because I can only focus on one.
Bashar: Thank you. Because it would be confusing, wouldn’t it? You wouldn’t know what information belonged to what program, would you?
Participant 8: Okay, that’s correct.
Bashar: You understand now why you are focused on one life at a time. Now from a higher level you will be able to experience more than one life at the same time. But the idea of physical experience is to experience it this way. That’s simply what the definition of physical experience is. It doesn’t mean that you can’t tap in from time to time and get some sense of what past or future lives are all about, but experiencing it all at the same time would be counterproductive to the very idea of why you’re living physical lives. Does that make sense?
Participant 8: Yes. Then that’s why leave the past time behind and go to the present in a sense.
Bashar: Yes. It doesn’t mean that you can’t find out and it doesn’t mean you can’t explore that idea or make some connection from interest and curiosity and imagination to what some of those other lives are. Sometimes other lives as you key into them will act as teaching reflections for some of the things that may be going on in this life and they can be helpful in that way. But fundamentally, you don’t need to know about any of them in order to live your life fully now. Because this is where you are. This is who you are. And you have everything you need to be who you want to be and make any decision you want to make all with you in this present life. Does that make sense?
Participant 8: Yes. Can I have some question for this present life as well?
Bashar: Yes. But before you continue, we would like to address your first question and that is that there is a very strong Phoenician life that contains a lot of elements and energies that are connecting into some of the things you are exploring in this life. It is not your last life linearly. It is a few lifetimes back. But that life contains certain experiences that key strongly into some of the things you’re exploring in this life. And therefore from this life you are making a connection to that Phoenician life to draw upon some of the experiences there to help you understand things in this life. Does that make sense?
Participant 8: Yes, it does. All right. Now, what is your other question about this life?
Participant 8: Okay. Do I get married?
Bashar: Do you want to?
Yeah. Will you tell me her name, please?
Understand something very, very clearly. There is no such thing as a prediction of the future. No such thing. Doesn’t exist.
When you hear what you people call a psychic prediction, it’s not a prediction of the future. It’s a sensing of the energy that exists now at the time the prediction is made. It’s a sensing of the most likely path that might come to be if your energy stays on the same path it is now. But if you change that energy, your future changes because there is no one future. Just as there is no one past.
So we can sense now that there may be a high degree of probability you will get married in your present life.
Right now it seems to be somewhere between 63 and 75% as things stand now. But if that changes tomorrow, then you’ll have to ask all over again.
The point, however, is this: you determine what you’re going to choose and what you’re going to do. You don’t need anyone to predict that for you. Follow your highest joy and trust that whatever it is that excites you the most, if you are willing to have the faith to act on the thing that excites you the most every moment, then your life will unfold exactly as it needs to and you will always be attracted to the right places, the right times and the right people with whom you need to interact.
When that occurs, all you have to do is ask yourself, “Is being with this person truly representative of my highest joy, my highest good, my best service to all? Yes or no?”
If the answer is yes, then just act on it and you will have answered your own question.
That’s the nature of questions and answers because every question is simply an answer disguised.
Atlanteans, Vibrational Medicine, and Nutrition
Participant 9: One question is about the 24 civilizations as you talking about the 12 great. So as the Atlantis people and as the Ashen—you were talking about definitions to my friend Ash—were the people who were artistic and creative and all of that.
Participant 9: I was going to ask if you—your civilization, the Sass—is from the 24 civilizations.
Bashar: We are connected in one way but I’m not going to give you a straight answer on that.
But you’re connected. We are connected. The not necessarily how you may think. It doesn’t matter. I’m not really, you know, connecting myself. I do not mean to be mysterious about this. It is simply not time to explain or describe in detail what we mean by this.
Participant 9: Okay. The Atlantians. Atlanteans. Okay. Did they use—I know that they were very advanced scientifically.
Bashar: In some ways yes.
Participant 9: What about the medicine?
Bashar: In some ways, though it was mostly vibrational medicine.
Participant 9: Vibrational medicine. Yes. Did they change organs and change the physicality? Did they get to that point?
Bashar: They did from time to time. Although the idea of moving organs around is not necessarily something that’s all that sophisticated.
Participant 9: I see. What about changing the physical on the same soul?
Bashar: Yes. From time to time they were able to do that. It was not necessarily common, but from time to time they were able to do that with enough intention and vibration and the right kind of environment and energies. They were able to do that from time to time. Yes.
Participant 9: Is anybody in this civilization at this point on planet Earth at this year able to do that?
Bashar: Yes. You’re not going to get a name? No, I don’t name. But yes.
Participant 9: Okay. That’s really incredible. I’m very interested in learning about that.
Bashar: Then maybe you’re one of them. Okay. Remember that your interests, all of you, are always indicative of what you’re capable of doing. If that’s what you intend and that’s where your excitement lies.
Participant 9: And also this one last question. Oh, all right. Then last question about the—you said that when I’m going to follow my vibrations about nutrition and about changing the diet to become a fruitarian after a few years—right—you said follow my vibrations. So that’s the only advice I can get is to really tune into my body and not really care about what things say rather than just follow my vibration.
Bashar: You can always explore and you can always invite advice, but weigh it, examine it. You don’t have to be too overly analytical. Trust your instincts at the same time. But fundamentally, yes, as long as you are clear that what you’re actually doing is following your joy and not just following anxiety and disguising it as joy. As long as you’re clear that you’re really following joy, then yes, that is the fundamental thing you need to do that will always lead you exactly to where you need to be led and bring to you automatically and synchronistically whatever information actually serves you best.
Conversation 10: Icebreaker, Children, and Ship Locations
Participant 10: Thank you. And icebreaker. Banding icebreaker means cutting crystals. What does that mean?
Bashar: It’s just a playful euphemism. But in that we were referring to the idea that we chose you first to experience the kind of shift that you experienced recently and that makes you in your English language another kind of icebreaker. We simply chose to match that kind of nomenclature to the other kind which you also synchronistically are. Yes. Okay.
Participant 10: You had mentioned—you had told me about the 25 children would be the first wave—right—you—
Bashar: I didn’t tell her—she told me—you see, I didn’t tell you—okay. I thought there was something more to it than that—there may be, but I will simply give you this. And the idea is, and I’m not saying this is the case either. Sometimes when I tell one person something, it doesn’t necessarily apply to anyone else. Sometimes it does, but sometimes it doesn’t. So when you go telling someone else what I said to you, you have to also perhaps let them know it may only apply to you, but it may not. It must always come with that qualifier.
Participant 10: Yeah. All right. And so, all right. Other thing is you had said you have four craft and you had said that’s here above Earth and you had said one is over in the ocean. Well, things have changed a little bit. Yes. But not in that they have rotated around a little bit. Yes. Oh, I was just—you never mentioned what ocean.
Bashar: Is one over the Pacific Ocean at this time. Yes.
Participant 10: Okay. Have the children—I get information that the children had moved energetically in alignment with placement of being closer here in some senses energetically. Yes. Okay. Because I had Daryl read last week about the information—the first item about that. So that was accurate.
Bashar: In some senses there may be assumptions you are making about what it means that may not necessarily be completely accurate, but in some senses it is. Yes.
Participant 10: What senses?
Bashar: Well at least in the sense that energetically there has been a shift that brings about closeness, though they are not physically closer to you.
Participant 10: Oh okay.
Bashar: It’s a—you’re physical and they are—we are physically closer. I and my ship and the three other ships are physically around your planet, right? The children are still in another vibrational dimension more often than not. Though there has been an energetic shift that allows them to be closer vibrationally to the reality coming up. They are not actually any physically closer if you’re just going to measure such things in that way.
Participant 10: Jed up another energetic. No, I now—and my ship and the other ships are now 2,997 miles.
Bashar: You went up further away. Further away. Why is that? Because of us. No. Oh, there are things that need to happen in the collective consciousness that sometimes are best handled from a little bit of distance. Okay. So, that’ll keep shifting. Oh, yes. Contact time. Yes. Yes. Yes. It’ll be kind of like what you call two steps forward, one step back. Oh, yes. And it will fluctuate. It will not always be exactly that pattern. And who knows how long I will be exactly at this position. Oh, you can be—you’ll be changing around. In fact, I am now 2,995. What you’re getting is a kind of abdomen reading of the fluctuation of the energy of the collective consciousness of your planet. Right. And you’re still over Sedona. I am. Yes. I am the pivot point. Okay. And your other ships have moved. They have rotated. Do you want to tell us where they are? No. No. Okay.
Participant 10: I am finding this—living in this moment. Yes. And non-action. Non-active action. Yes. Yeah. Non-active action. Yes. To be quite a interesting challenge. Yeah. It really is.
Bashar: That is what is meant to be. Yeah. Yes. It’s—you’ll get the hang of it as you say.
Participant 10: Yeah. And like you were talking about not knowing—there’s things I’m just living in that not knowing.
Bashar: Have you been reading your Dao book? I do pick it up from time to time. From time to time open up a page and keep it up. Okay. That will serve you.
Participant 10: Oh, all right. Yeah, that’s what I’ve been doing. All right. And I just—I’m just going along and just doing in the moment. There doesn’t seem anything predominant. I have still the big vision. Yes. And have the big vision that encompasses more than just what you call the present moment. But stay in the moment because everything that you envision, no matter how big it is, does only exist in the here and now. Right. I’m staying in that home energy, which is the expanded me. Yes. Very good. Very expanded me. And I just stay very expanded—you. Yeah. Expanded. Anyway, that’s what I’m doing. Does that serve you then? Yes, it does.
Conversation 11: Trusting Your Own Interpretation
Participant 11: Thank you. You then you, number two. Do you know who you are? Number two, do you know who you are? Number two, do you know who you are? Number one, good day. Good day, Bashar. I’d like to speak with you about the class that I’ve been taking. Yes. And how I’ve been, let’s say, reacting. Yes. How have you been reacting to it? How have you been reacting to it? I—the exercises are, I feel like, are going—are very helpful and very helpful. All right. But I have something going on and what it is—I feel like I don’t trust, let’s say, the interpretation of what’s going on.
Bashar: You—and trust your own. This is an opportunity for you to trust your own interpretation as you know you need to hear it. Yeah, that’s in some senses what the class is about. But you’re not being told that because you’re supposed to find that out on your own, right? Oops. I’ve just given away a secret. That’s why I gave it away—secrets. Okay. I mean it’s as simple as that.
Participant 11: Many of you are sitting on the smartest part of yourself.
Bashar: Maybe you can hear like—and so and so—from the other end, from the other end, the god of the spectrum. I’m sorry, Pamela, to bring you down. I was—am I projecting my own distrust of my feelings?
Bashar: It is more than that. Okay. You are giving yourself an opportunity to recognize what you do and don’t prefer. Right. And some of it is a projection of your own distrust of self. Yes. It’s a combination. Okay. Okay. One from column A, one from column B, as you say. Okay. Because I am going to go through that and—well, you are going to fulfill your responsibility. And we will see then if by doing so you can learn to respond by fulfilling responsibility instead of react. Reactable. Yes. Right. You want responsibility or reactability?
Participant 11: Responsibility.
Bashar: Thank you. And I want you there instead.
Participant 11: No, I know this is another part. I mean, the reason why I chose to do this is because I know I needed that reflection. All right. But if you want me there, then be me there. Be me there and I will be there. Okay. You understand? Yes, I do understand. That is the point. Okay. Does that help you? It does. Can I ask you about—I would like to ask you about a dream. All right. Okay. I will be very brief. I dreamt about my niece. Yes. Who was 7 years old and every time—
Bashar: One moment. We will discuss this another time. Okay, that’s fine. Save it. I will save it. Thank you. Number two, be brief.
Conversation 12: The Self-Proclaimed “One in a Hundred”
Participant 12: Wait for the magic stick. Okay, thanks. There’s a person that I just met who says that he’s one out of a hundred only on this Earth and he is descendant—he’s—
Bashar: Only stop. Okay. Zero. Go back to the beginning. No, it doesn’t mean anything. Thank you. Each person is going to have their own understanding of their own connection to many different things and for them that’s going to be their truth even when it changes tomorrow. But the idea simply is no one needs to call themselves out to anyone as anything special—more special than any of the connections that you have. Absolutely. That kind of idea is always generally reflective of an individual in that sense who is still in the process of integrating themselves. And it is an opportunity for you to decide whether or not that is a resonance that you wish to associate with. We are now just going to be general about this. We are not going to delve into specifics, but we know you get the point. Absolutely. Absolutely. And you’re perfectly right. I was going to talk about his abilities of dealing with dematerializing and changing physicality and all of that. Yes. But really the point is that if someone does it, they don’t need to talk about it. But unless they’re teaching or they’ve been asked, yes, but that’s not what’s coming across here. What is coming across? I just told you. For now, the idea is that going back to the concept of the Zen and the Dao, the best teacher teaches when you don’t know that’s what they’re doing.
Leave a Comment
Thank you for your comment!
It will appear after review.