Healing

Question 7: Healing as Illusion and Regrowing Teeth

Questioner: Hello. So in a manner of speaking, all healing ultimately is an illusion.

Bashar: Well, that is one way to put it, but that might be deceiving to say it that way to some people.

Questioner: Well, but I’m not concerned about other people actually.

Bashar: Yeah, all right. Because I mean, I understand how you mean that. Okay. So I mean it’s really just up to you. I mean the entire from you generated the imbalance, so obviously it’s up to you to generate the rebalancing. What I was going to say superficially is like everything from cut and chop Western medicine to like high magic is, and everything in between, is just in a sense yes. It is all the manipulation of perspectives of the self consciousness.

Bashar: What’s your favorite color?

Questioner: Blue. I brought this up this particular topic with you two other times, and I’m hoping this third time will be the charm. The first time our interaction allowed me to feel wanting quite a bit more. All right. And the second time I felt summarily dismissed. I don’t want a clue or a hint or be pointed in a particular direction or a suggestion. I want a big fat juicy crisp answer.

Bashar: We’ll see. No promises, no guarantees. Because it is not clear who is asking—your spirit, your soul, your personality, your higher self. We will see. Okay. And by the way, just as an aside, if you ask another fragment of my personality what the favorite color is, it might be different.

Bashar: It seems to be presenting itself as a joy or excitement that was cautiously desired that I’ve had for a very long time, which is to regrow another set of teeth.

I was in a car accident a number of years ago that disrupted my physiology, I’ll say. All right. I don’t want to—I fancy myself with a great deal of longevity.

I recognize a great deal of acceleration in every other aspect of my body except for this one part, and I don’t prefer it to be like this. Now I’ve asked and asked and asked: what’s the lesson, the karma, this and that, what am I supposed to learn, and what am I not chewing on, and what am I not looking at, da da da da da for 20 years. And I’m like over it, and I want to, and I want to replace them.

Questioner: Just a little bit more, you know. My imagination provides me with a great deal of technique. I’m very clear on the desire. I feel as though it’s coming from… you know, I mean as I’ve investigated, I’ve actually seen it as a challenge or a thing to bring me to a higher level of ability. All right. And your question thus is, straight out clear and simple: am I wasting my time or should I go for it?

Bashar: Go for it. That was easy.

Questioner: Is that the way you wanted to ask the question? Well, I mean, I don’t know why you just didn’t say that. The last two times when I asked that pretty much…

Bashar: Because you didn’t say what you said.

Questioner: Well, I don’t know if I was given a chance.

Bashar: Oh yes. So you are now being given another chance to say it in a different way if you wish, in order that it is absolutely clear to you. So any chance you may have felt you didn’t get before, you’re now being given another one right now. Right. So would you like to ask the question in another way in that you will know that once having asked it one way, a second way, maybe even a third way, you will know beyond a shadow of a doubt the answer that you’re getting. You have this opportunity now being given to you by someone. I understand. So would you like to ask the question again in another way?

Questioner: Well no, I mean I also recognize my talent of being a person or a master of looking at things from different perspectives, so I’m getting what you’re saying here.

Bashar: All right. However, you are being given directly a gift. You are being given directly without any obfuscation, without any side issues. You are being given an opportunity to get a straight answer to a straight question.

Questioner: Can I do this?

Bashar: Yes.

Questioner: Okay, that’s all I mean. That’s pretty much what I wanted to know. Now of course the question back to you: do you believe me?

Questioner: Yes, I do. I believe myself. I thank you. Thank you.

Bashar: Then that is what is okay. This and this will be interesting. This is an interesting little nuance to it.

Questioner: Yes. Do I take the regrowth route or do I take the materialization route? Now that is an interesting question, isn’t it?

Bashar: We find that there may be some vagueness in your belief system structure about exactly which way to go. However, we find that there is great clarity in some synchronicities that can be allowed to occur in your life that will show you in no uncertain terms which way would be best for you. Okay. So open up to the synchronicity of the symbolism that will show you in no uncertain terms which way will work.

Questioner: I got that. Thank you very much. Thank you.

Bashar: You have given us a lot to chew on.

Question 8: Organizational Stress and Integrity

Questioner: Hello Bashar. You talked about stress today and I have been letting myself get under stress a lot, and it’s really been going on for months for me causing stress.

Bashar: Okay, delineate.

Questioner: I’m involved in an organization and have been for several years. I was pursuing avenues that were available and that were exciting to me to contribute in something specific.

Bashar: You mean your avenue specifically, or the organization specifically, and/or the contribution specifically, and/or all three? Are you asking me to name them or…

Bashar: I am asking you to describe more specifically.

Questioner: Okay. The organization is to help children. My activity involved getting new volunteers for the day. And the hook or the invitation was sports. So it put the children with the volunteers in a sports setting. Nice. Okay. There were also a program that my group voted to put on which specifically dealt in teaching children to recognize and report child abuse. All right, okay. So those are the two major things. As I’m pursuing these, I realized that there were people that were directly trying to prevent this from happening. People within the same organization who are all supposed to have the same goals.

Bashar: All right. And did you in any way shape or form discover why this might be part of their agenda?

Questioner: I have my own theory.

Bashar: Did you discuss it with them?

Questioner: To some degree, but not completely the way I would to my best friend.

Bashar: Why not?

Questioner: Why not? It’s because I felt that that would really back them off and that they would never ever ever admit to that.

Bashar: And well, I’ll tell you why. Yes, some of the stuff that I did when I went in front of the grievance part of this group and said, “Look, this is what I’ve got, this is what’s going on, it’s not cool, and you know I want to be here and I want to work with these same people, but why did this happen and is it going to happen anymore?” Some of that information that I shared with them was in what I would call black and white, you know, linear documented etc. And the response that I finally got back from them, which was much delayed and I felt manipulated in and of itself, didn’t even address the clear-cut stuff.

Bashar: Then what does that tell you?

Questioner: Okay. What does that tell? That they’re full of…

Bashar: Well, I suppose you could put it that way, although that’s not exactly what we were looking for. Well, you see, what does that tell you? That they’re out of integrity. And what does it tell you that the real you—okay, but the big you, the full you, what does it tell the joyful you?

Questioner: That I don’t want to play there.

Bashar: Thank you. Okay. Let me tell, let me just share what happened because I got to learn. I want to learn about me more. I found out this was going on and I found out that this person doesn’t want me around anymore. Either my cry, my ego, my spirit said I’m not going to let this person get away with this. When maybe half of the other people involved don’t even realize what’s going on, maybe I can let them know.

Bashar: May I stop you for a moment? Isn’t that interesting? Well yeah, that I would be that stubborn. Isn’t it interesting that what—your mode of communication kept going off when you were trying so hard to communicate? That’s the stress. It’s like, “I know this is right, I have the proof, why won’t you guys accept this and do something? How can you allow this to go on?”

Because it isn’t up to them. It’s up to you. It’s your reality. And if you find that this is an idea worth doing that is representative of your joy, why straightjacket yourself into assuming that they are the only ones with whom you can do it?

Questioner: Well, my judgment, my pride, whatever. What I was feeling was that these folks are supposed to—we’re all supposed to be on the same goal, on the same track toward the same goal.

Bashar: I see. And what other fairy tales would you like to talk about?

Questioner: Why is that a fairy tale? We have an actual statement that says what we’re supposed to be doing. I don’t understand.

Bashar: Because it isn’t about words, it’s about what people do. That’s why it’s a fairy tale. You already know that their actions contradict their words and their goals down on paper. That should tell you enough. Just as I’ll talk to you in very concrete terms, just as a businesswoman: you have seen enough signs that if you were behaving like a businesswoman, you would have A) stated your case as you did, B) watched for what kind of response you got as you did, C) acted according to the kind of response you got. And if you recognize that the response was not responsive, you would be on your way. Period. Knowing beyond the shadow of a doubt that the sooner you let go of a situation that isn’t working, the sooner one that will can come in.

Questioner: Okay. So what is my—if I will character default—what is the…?

Bashar: It is only the typical thing that many of you have learned on your planet, and that simply is this: that you think that this is the only place it’s going to work, so you got to make it work and got to make it work and got to make it work beyond the boundary of your knowledge that you know it won’t. The idea is to always give something a chance, always be fair, always communicate and allow everyone to come back into alignment if for some reason they may have gotten out of alignment when they say they want to work together. But if you recognize that they simply will not come back into alignment, and when you gain enough experience in business, you know how to recognize the signs very quickly—be on your way as fast as you possibly can. Otherwise you do yourself and them a disservice, and everyone that you are attempting to help a disservice. You have learned what you need to learn. Chalk it up as the experience you needed to have as part of your training, which is more important than many of you realize to recognize more quickly than you have in the past been willing to recognize something that isn’t you, and do something about that recognition rather than hanging on and trying to make it work when you know it is well beyond coming back into alignment because you think somewhere unconsciously that this is the only game in town. Look at the town you live in.

Questioner: You know what, Bashar, I already knew from a long time ago that this isn’t the only place that I could contribute. Yeah, quite the opposite. Although now I’m temporarily a little bit jaded, whatever. But what I’d like to know is what is it about for instance my personality or the way I present myself that may have caused a reaction in these other people to not want to support what I was doing?

Bashar: Individuals who in your terminology—and again I’m just going to be colloquial in your language for a while—individuals who like to look good by rendering lip service will always be afraid when they encounter someone who’s actually willing to do something, because they know they fear they can’t really perform, and you are forcing them to face the fear that they can’t really go as far as you are letting them know it can be gone. And so they will retract because they want to remain looking good and feeling good about what they are doing, and they are feeling pushed beyond the boundaries of what they believe they are capable of doing. And thus in that sense, because they are not necessarily functioning realistically, they resent you for pointing that out to them.

Questioner: So it’s not that I’m particularly brusk with them or there’s anything specific that I should change?

Bashar: No. You are a threat. You are a threat to their insecurity. You are a threat to the revelation to themselves of the insecurity they refuse to face and integrate.

Questioner: Now thank you. Now I just have to get over accepting this, and I have to get over a certain amount of caring what these people think. And if the other people that weren’t involved directly in this communication you know heard about this, I mean I have to admit I do care to an extent what might be said about me and when I’m not there anymore and how this is all going to…

Bashar: It is in a sense on one level all right to have within your overall vision the desire for a sufficient amount of compassion on the part of everyone to be able to really understand what everyone is all about. But again, in the way that you are saying it, yes, you are caring too much about what they think of you.

Questioner: I’m sure that’s true. Is there any—I know time will do it. Do you have any little…

Bashar: Time will do it since you are willing to move in that direction, but of course it is up to you as to exactly how much or how little time that takes. And that is the clue you need from me really. Because your planet has created such a high degree of insistence on certain things and doing things in a certain way, then you are the one determining that it requires that amount of time until you are good and ready to feel shall we say simply fed up with something that you know is not feeding you.

Questioner: For instance, I’m still running the dialogue in my head constantly. I’m making the arguments that you know what I’m saying—obsessed, yes. Yeah.

Bashar: But it is a wonderful opportunity to laugh at yourself.

Questioner: Um, one more thing on this whole mess or lesson. When it would manifest when I would think about it, about in the center of my body—and I can’t remember if it traveled up or down about 5 or 6 inches in and around I think what we call between like the heart area and the solar plexus—and it felt like fear. And I don’t know if there’s anything more.

Bashar: When was this?

Questioner: This would be like right before I’m getting ready to make the communication, to deliver the evidence, to make the phone call, any of that.

Bashar: Yes, it is a yeah. It is that caring too much in the sense that they care too much or don’t care about you. It is that vestige within your belief system consciousness structure that is still requiring a little more love, a little more self-love, a little more self-worth. It’s that echo of a resonance.

Questioner: When I first asked you about this in the middle of this process, you said that most of the people I would be speaking in front of—you agreed with me that most of the people I was going to be speaking in front of had integrity and that wanted the best thing. And that’s what I felt going in. And then when I got the response, I’m not clear on how many were involved in that response. And even if the person in question that I was complaining about that was holding stuff back was perhaps the actual person who wrote the response letter…

Bashar: All right. You must understand something. Most individuals do have integrity. That doesn’t necessarily have anything at all to do with the fact that they may be surprised to discover they have limitations they didn’t know they have and simply do not find the strength to go beyond. Do you understand?

Questioner: Well, I was thinking that you mean by that when they got in the group that the integrity kind of just went with…

Bashar: Well, yes, but you obviously had a particular definition about what integrity meant, and we simply kept it simple as the basic definition of integrity being that an individual knows themselves best only based on what they consciously know about themselves.

Questioner: To me, when I mean when I say integrity, I mean that they’ll tell the truth, they say what they do, they do what they say.

Bashar: Yes, and they did, up to a point. At that time, yeah. At the beginning in a sense, they were all willing to have absolute integrity up to a point. Now you have found that out. And if that limit is below the limit you prefer, then go on. You understand?

Questioner: I understand what you’re saying. There’s one more gathering of this group and one more phone call that I promised on the debate.

Bashar: Well then by all means make your phone call if you promised, but don’t necessarily bring with it the expectation that it has to accomplish anything except what it needs to accomplish for you in perhaps allowing you to free yourself up to be more you, and to trust that you synchronistically will wind up where you need to be, and that this is really all about your own integrity, not so much theirs.

Questioner: Well, what about my integrity?

Bashar: Yes. Well, your integrity means being true to yourself. That’s really what integrity means: being true to yourself. I want to point out that in a sense, even an individual who is negatively intended can actually function with a type of integrity as long as all their actions are congruent.

Questioner: Yeah, like they talk about the mob guy, you know, they have their set of rules and they’re real strict about it and they go out and murder a certain particular way.

Bashar: In some senses that can still fundamentally mechanically be said to be integrity because they are being true on all levels to that idea. Therefore that will give you a broader understanding of what we meant when we said that everyone had integrity. But now it’s all about what do you define your integrity to mean, and what has to be in your life to represent what you deem your integrity to be defined as, regardless of what anyone else’s definition of integrity might be.

Questioner: Well earlier, much earlier on, I felt like I wanted to leave this place. I had already had my fill—just a couple little however, however, however. The big but—I already had offered me three stuff that kids were going to enjoy.

Bashar: Oh, you’re always going to give yourself a hook. You’re always going to give yourself a test. And after this, the stuff came down and I’m still not satisfied. I recognized in myself yes that because this person who I feel is out of integrity wanted me gone because evidently I was raising flags and causing commotions—because she wanted me gone, I was going to stay.

Bashar: I mean, that and then that means you are completely controlled by that person. Rebellion is the allowance of allowing the other person to control what you otherwise would be free to choose to do. So you have in that sense succumbed. That’s not what you want. Make your choice freely as a free person, not as a reaction to a reaction. Otherwise you just create another chain reaction.

Questioner: Does that help?

Bashar: That helps.

Questioner: Is there anything else that you’re just getting if you want to tell me or that you will tell me about this whole?

Bashar: It might be of assistance to you when you feel you need to make a decision to take a moment before you make the decision and spin for a while. Put your arms out and just rotate around in a little dance that allows you to feel a little bit lighter, perhaps even a little bit giddy. And then from that feeling, allow yourself to recognize what’s the real choice you want to make, and drop away as you spin through centrifugal force all the things that don’t belong to you.

Questioner: That’s wonderful. Thank you.

Bashar: We got it from you. Oh, we got it from the you. You are becoming. She told us directly, she said, “Tell her that the spin sisters spin.”

Questioner: Spin sister. Yes, you see? You are she. Already otherwise you would not have concocted that title for yourself. Well, well, thank you very much. Happy spinning.

Question 9: The Prime Radiant Concept - One Particle Theory

Questioner: Hello Bashar. I ran across some reading recently about in physics about a theory that postulated that all the physical universe was made up of exactly one atom, one electron, one neutron, etc.

Bashar: This is what we have talked about and called the prime radiant concept. And I remembered you having talked about it, but at the time when you brought it to Las Vegas it was a bit over my head, and I would love if you would repeat that principle so that it would be within my eyesight.

Questioner: All right. Thank you. Now of course, before we begin, do remember that even your own scientists know that when they use words like particle and electron, it is to some degree symbolic. You understand? Because the idea of a subatomic particle actually being a solid little chunk of something is erroneous. It is in a sense more of an energy fluctuation that creates an effect that you perceive as being solid. So even they know that when they’re talking about solid subatomic particles, they don’t really mean it literally, but it will do to describe an effect.

Bashar: Is that clear so far?

Questioner: Is that what they’re referring to by waveform particles? Yes. I understand complementarity I believe it’s called, or many different appellations have been given to this concept, but you don’t really need to understand that—just to understand that we don’t necessarily mean this as literally as it may sound, but it will work in your physical world as a good analogy mechanically. So have you got that before we begin?

Bashar: I believe so.

Questioner: So for the sake of the analogy, it’s all right to think of subatomic particles as actual physical solid particles. It will work. So as you say here goes:

Imagine now then that there is this one particle—just one—in all of the empty void. There is only one. Have you got that?

Bashar: I’m with you. Thank you.

Questioner: Imagine that this particle has the capacity to move so fast that for all intents and purposes it can move at infinite speed. Have you got that?

Bashar: Yes.

Questioner: Knowing then that if something by definition can move at infinite speed, that means it would be everywhere in the void at once. It would fill in a sense all the space up, would it not? Correct. It would be next to itself so quickly that it would appear to be two, three, four, five, an infinite number of particles, but it’s all the same particle moving so fast that it just appears to be more than one particle sitting next to itself and interacting with itself so to speak. Have you got that?

Bashar: Yes.

Questioner: Does it follow in line with what we currently theorize about time as it reaches the speed of light—becoming no time, infinite time?

Bashar: Photons moving at infinite speed simply because they’re outside of our perception or our vibration. In some senses, there is an aspect of this that fits that idea in the sense of knowing that this is essentially—again, this is a terminology utilized by your physicists—a massless particle, which is how it can move at infinite speed. No force acts upon it, no inertia does it need to pay attention to. It really has no mass, thus there are no laws that it is breaking by moving at infinite speed. Does that make sense to you?

Bashar: Yes. Except for…

Questioner: Well, I’m not finished. Oh, I’ll wait. Thank you.

Bashar: So the idea is that to begin with, being massless for all intents and purposes to your senses, it would be fundamentally invisible, imperceptible. The only way it becomes perceptible or apparently more solid is by in a sense crossing its own path in such a way that it reinforces its reality in a way that you perceive as becoming more and more and more dense. The more times it crosses its own path in a certain pattern, where it does not cross its own path in that pattern, it remains as what you perceive to be energy or empty space, and only appears to be solid matter where it crosses its own path in a certain pattern. Thus, the idea is that as it becomes more densified vibrationally in terms of frequency, it slows down and creates the threshold you call below the speed of light. And above the speed of light, those things that are above the speed of light are the same particle but less densified, crossing its path fewer times. But it is all the same particle undergoing all the same interaction, just creating different strata of itself by how many times it interacts with itself.

Questioner: Does that make some sense?

Bashar: It does. But when we get to the lower than speed of light vibrations and we see our mass reality around—our mass oriented reality—are we to infer that the gabillions of electrons and atoms are in fact one?

Bashar: Yes.

Questioner: And how did we ever get to the conclusion that we are seeing these billions of atoms that make up all of reality? How do we get there?

Bashar: Because the very definition of physical densification brings with it the concepts of space and time, thus immediate compartmentalization in your perception of the one. So you see the one on physical levels as many. That’s how you perceive the one, because there is only one moment, there is only one particle, but it is in that one moment everything it can be all at once. But the only way you can perceive that from a physiological point of view is to see it next to each other or one after another, because there’s no way by definition to perceive the whole oneness from the physiological perspective, because that’s the definition of physicality. Right? Right. Does that make some sense?

Questioner: Yes. Yes. In fact, this probably ties into why all the ancients, the great wisdom teachers, would refer to the one, and they might be literal the one.

Bashar: Oh yes, absolutely. Even in physical reality, everything really is one. So literally, literally, the atom, the subatomic particle that makes up the atoms of your body is literally the same particle—not the same kind of particle, literally the same particle—that makes up the farthest star. So literally every change you make changes everything everywhere, because it’s all the same particle, and any alteration you make in the path changes the path for all to some degree, even if only infinitesimally, it’s still a whole new path.

Questioner: And when we look around at others, we have to recognize that we truly are ourselves, or we’re looking at ourselves, simply because it’s all literally you. You live in a hall of mirrors.

Bashar: That’s great.

Questioner: It is all reflections back to you.

Bashar: Wow, Bashar. Yes, that is the appropriate response for understanding. We believe that there is a saying on your planet that is put forth by one of your physicists that has something to do with your “wow” response, and it goes something like: if you do not have that kind of response when quantum physics is first explained to you, you didn’t understand it. By saying “wow,” that means you got it.

Questioner: If I can sneak one more in: science seemingly doesn’t want to take this concept past what it’s been able to discern through its experimentation.

Bashar: Well, now that’s not really being fair when you lump everyone into one general category called science. Conventional science, yes, there are many individuals who are in your terms quote unquote “cut and dried” scientists who are very willing to take it in different directions. But we understand the overall paradigm that you call science is usually reluctant to move in unexpected or untested directions until such time as it becomes obvious and they have no choice, really.

Questioner: Yes, I understand. I fact, I don’t need to take it any farther. I understand exactly what you’re trying to convey.

Bashar: Last one: there are several people here in Las Vegas that would be very honored if you would be willing to help them in one way shape or form in developing their own channeling capacities—i.e., telepathic capacities. If you would possibly present some information that could help in a focused session, a seminar-like session when Daryl is in Las Vegas say prior to his evening work that you’re doing now—would there be or do you have or can give us permission to orchestrate something like that where you would be our instructor in developing a channeling afternoon, say?

Bashar: It can be done and will be done, but not until what you call after the threshold of your year of 1997.

Questioner: Very good. How would you like us to go about asking?

Bashar: Each and every month or after the end of the new year, first discuss it among yourselves to find out what you would call your level of interest. And by the time your 1997 rolls around, the momentum and the acceleration behind the concept will allow the natural synchronicity to unfold. You have it.

Questioner: Thank you so much, Bashar. And it’s always a pleasure.

Bashar: As it is with us.

Question 10: Pleiadian and Mantis Being Encounter

Questioner: I had a visitation from a lot of activities going on the last week or so. I had a visitation from a Pleiadian on I think it was Monday, as well as an insect-type being, and I was curious as to what type of being this is—a very friendly being.

Bashar: Can you be more specific about the definition of what you are referring to as an insect-like being?

Questioner: It looked like about a six-foot tall multicolored praying mantis.

Bashar: All right. You are referring to what might be euphemistically referred to as the upper echelon of the Grey strata. But also, you are referring to one presentation only—one presentation only of an interface structure, an interface creation, an interface consciousness, an interface being for the founders.

Questioner: Really?

Bashar: Yes. But it is often referred to by those that have seen it as the Mantis, since it does have that kind of presentation in the way that you would draw an analogy to the insect on your planet.

Questioner: Well, it wasn’t exactly that but I… yes. It was whispering in my left ear and I couldn’t quite understand all the words, and I was curious if he could reiterate some of those.

Bashar: We will check. One moment. One moment. One moment. It was something about your childhood, something about helping you recall an incident from your childhood. Do you recall an incident from your childhood that stands out?