Superphysics Superphysics
Chapter 3

The Precepts and The Table of Existence and Presence

Icon
4 minutes  • 725 words

5 The interpretation of nature has 2 divisions:

  1. The creation of axioms from experiment.

This has 3 divisions:

  • To the senses
  • To the memory
  • To the mind or reason
  1. The deriving of new experiments from axioms

A complete and accurate natural and experimental history is first needed. We must discover the acts and properties of nature.

But natural and experimental history is so varied and diffuse.

  • It confounds and distracts the understanding unless it is fixed and exhibited in due order.

We must, therefore, form tables and co-ordinations of instances.

To support this, we must have true and legitimate induction, the very key of interpretation.

  • We must begin, however, at the end, and go back again to the others.

11 The investigation of forms proceeds thus:

  • from a given nature, we first present to the understanding all the known instances which agree in the same nature, even if the subject matter is considerably diversified.
  • this collection must be made as a mere history, without any premature reflection, or too great degree of refinement.

An example is the investigation of the form of heat.

Instances agreeing in the Form of Heat:

  1. The rays of the sun, particularly in summer, and at noon.
  2. The same reflected and condensed, as between mountains, or along walls, and particularly in burning mirrors.
  3. Ignited meteors.
  4. Burning lightning.
  5. Eruptions of flames from the cavities of mountains, etc.
  6. Flame of every kind.
  7. Ignited solids.
  8. Natural warm baths.
  9. Warm or heated liquids.
  10. Warm vapors and smoke, and the air itself which admits a most powerful heat if confined, as in reverberating furnaces.
  11. Damp hot weather, arising from the constitution of the air, without any reference to the time of the year.
  12. Confined and subterraneous air in some caverns, particularly in winter.
  13. All shaggy substances, as wool, the skins of animals, and the plumage of birds, contain some heat.
  14. All bodies, both solid and liquid, dense and rare (as the air itself), placed near fire for any time.
  15. Sparks arising from the violent percussion of flint and steel.
  16. All bodies rubbed violently, as stone, wood, cloth, etc., so that rudders, and axles of wheels, sometimes catch fire, and the West Indians obtain fire by attrition.
  17. Green and moist vegetable matter confined and rubbed together, as roses, peas in baskets; so hay, if it be damp when stacked, often catches fire.
  18. Quicklime sprinkled with water.
  19. Iron, when first dissolved by acids in a glass, and without any application to fire; the same of tin, but not so intensely.
  20. Animals, particularly internally; although the heat is not perceivable by the touch in insects, on account of their small size.
  21. Horse dung, and the like excrement from other animals, when fresh.
  22. Strong oil of sulphur and of vitriol exhibit the operation of heat in burning linen.
  23. As does the oil of marjoram, and like substances, in burning the bony substance of the teeth.
  24. Strong and well rectified spirits of wine exhibit the same effects; so that white of eggs when thrown into it grows hard and white, almost in the same manner as[123] when boiled, and bread becomes burned and brown as if toasted.
  25. Aromatic substances and warm plants, as the dracunculus [arum], old nasturtium, etc., which, though they be not warm to the touch (whether whole or pulverized), yet are discovered by the tongue and palate to be warm and almost burning when slightly masticated.
  26. Strong vinegar and all acids, on any part of the body not clothed with the epidermis, as the eye, tongue, or any wounded part, or where the skin is removed, excite a pain differing but little from that produced by heat.
  27. Even a severe and intense cold produces a sensation of burning.[83] “Nec Boreæ penetrabile frigus adurit.”
  28. Other instances.

This is a table of existence and presence.

12 We then list instances which do not admit of the given nature. This is because form should:

  • be absent where the given nature is absent
  • be present where it is present.

If, however, we were to examine every instance, our labor would be infinite.

Negatives, therefore, must be classed under the affirmatives.

The lack of the given nature must be inquired into more particularly in objects which have a very close connection with those others in which it is present and manifest.

This we call a “table of deviation” or of absence in proximity.

Any Comments? Post them below!