Superphysics Superphysics

Propositions 1 to 10

by Spinoza
5 minutes  • 912 words
Table of contents
  1. Thought is an attribute of God, or God is a thinking thing.

Proof: Particular thoughts are modes which express God’s nature, in a certain conditioned manner (Pt. 1, Prop. 25, Coroll.).

  • God therefore possesses the attribute (Pt. 1, Def. 5) of which the concept is involved in all particular thoughts, which latter are conceived thereby.
  • Therefore, thought is one of God’s infinite attributes, which express God’s eternal and infinite essence (Pt. 1, Def. 6).
  • In other words, God is a thinking thing. Q.E.D.

Note: This proposition is also evident from the fact, that we are able to conceive an infinite thinking being. For, in proportion as a thinking being is conceived as thinking more thoughts, so is it conceived as containing more reality or perfection.

Therefore a being, which can think an infinite number of things in an infinite number of ways, is necessarily infinite, in respect of thinking.

As, therefore, from the consideration of thought alone, we conceive an infinite being, thought is necessarily (Pt. 1, Def. 4 and 6) one of the infinite attributes of God.

  1. Extension is an attribute of God, or God is an extended thing.

Proof: The proof of this proposition is similar to the proof of the last.

  1. In God, there is necessarily the idea of his essence and also of all things which necessarily follow from his essence.
  1. The idea of God, from which an infinite number of things follow in infinite ways, can only be one.

Proof: Infinite intellect comprehends nothing except God’s attributes and his modifications (Part 1, Prop. 30).

Now God is one (Part 1, Prop. 14, Coroll.). Therefore the idea of God, wherefrom an infinite number of things follow in infinite ways, can only be one. Q.E.D.

  1. The actual being of ideas owns God as its cause, only as he is considered as a thinking thing, not as he is unfolded in any other attribute.

That is, the ideas both of the attributes of God and of particular things do not own as their efficient cause their objects (ideata) or the things perceived, but God himself in so far as he is a thinking thing.

6. The modes of any given attribute are caused by God, as he is considered through the attribute of which they are modes, and not as he is considered through any other attribute.

7. The order and connection of ideas is the same as the order and connection of things.

Proof: This proposition is evident from Part 1, Ax. 4.

The idea of everything that is caused depends on a knowledge of its cause.

Corollary: Hence, God’s power of thinking is equal to his realized power of action.

Whatever follows from God’s infinite nature in the world of extension (formaliter), follows without exception in the same order and connection from the idea of God in the world of thought (objective).

Note: Whatever that can be perceived by the infinite intellect as constituting the essence of substance, belongs altogether only to one substance.

Consequently, substance-thinking and substance-extended are one and the same substance. These are comprehended now through one attribute, now through the other.

Likewise, a mode of extension and the idea of that mode are one and the same thing, though expressed in two ways.

This truth seems to have been dimly recognized by those Jews who maintained that the following are identical:

  • God
  • God’s intellect
  • the things understood by God.

For instance, the two are one and the same thing displayed through different attributes:

  1. A circle existing in nature
  2. The idea of a circle existing

We find the same chain of causes whether we conceive nature:

  • under the attribute of extension, or
  • under the attribute of thought,
  • under any other attribute,

That is, the same things follow in either case.

God is the cause:

  • of an idea, such as the idea of a circle, as he is a thinking thing.
  • of a circle, in so far as he is an extended thing.

This is simply because the actual existence of the idea of a circle can only be perceived as a proximate cause through another mode of thinking.

That mode of thinking is again through another, and so on to infinity.

As long as we consider things as modes of thinking, we must explain the order of the whole of nature, or the whole chain of causes, through the attribute of thought only.

And, in so far as we consider things as modes of extension, we must explain the order of the whole of nature through the attributes of extension only; and so on, in the case of the other attributes.

Wherefore of things as they are in themselves God is really the cause, inasmuch as he consists of infinite attributes.

8. The ideas of particular things, or of modes, that do not exist, must be comprehended in the infinite idea of God, in the same way as the formal essences of particular things or modes are contained in God’s attributes.

9. The idea of an individual thing actually existing is caused by God, not as he is infinite, but as he is considered as the ultimate cause of its cause.

Corollary= Whatsoever takes place in the individual object of any idea, the knowledge thereof is in God, in so far only as he has the idea of the object.

10. The form of substance does not appertain to the essence of man. In other words, substance does not constitute the actual form of man.

Any Comments? Post them below!