<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Book 1 on Superphysics</title>
    <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/rousseau/social/book-1/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Book 1 on Superphysics</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.superphysics.org/research/rousseau/social/book-1/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Men are Slaves</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/rousseau/social/book-1/chapter-01/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/rousseau/social/book-1/chapter-01/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- BOOK I&#xA;I mean to inquire if, in the civil order, there can be any sure and legitimate rule of administration, men being taken as they are and laws as they might be. In this inquiry I shall endeavour always to unite what right sanctions with what is prescribed by interest, in order that justice and utility may in no case be divided.&#xA;&#xA;I enter upon my task without proving the importance of the subject I shall be asked if I am a prince or a legislator, to write on politics. I answer that I am neither, and that is why I do so. If I were a prince or a legislator, I should not waste time in saying what wants doing; I should do it, or hold my peace.&#xA;&#xA;As I was born a citizen of a free State, and a member of the Sovereign, I feel that, however feeble the influence my voice can have on public affairs, the right of voting on them makes it my duty to study them: and I am happy, when I reflect upon governments, to find my inquiries always furnish me with new reasons for loving that of my own country. --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Man is born free yet everywhere he is in chains.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Right of the Strongest</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/rousseau/social/book-1/chapter-03/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/rousseau/social/book-1/chapter-03/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The strongest can only be the master if he transforms:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;strength into right&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;obedience into duty.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;This is the basis of the right of the strongest.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- , which, though to all seeming meant ironically, is really laid down as a fundamental principle. But are we never to have an explanation of this phrase?  --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Force is a physical power, and I fail to see what moral effect it can have.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Conventions are the Basis of Authority</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/rousseau/social/book-1/chapter-04/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/rousseau/social/book-1/chapter-04/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;No man has a natural authority over his fellow. Force creates no right.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Therefore, conventions are the basis of legitimate authority among men.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Grotius says that an individual can:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;alienate his liberty&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;make himself a slave&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Why could not a whole people do the same and make itself subject to a king?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>We Must Always Go Back To A First Convention</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/rousseau/social/book-1/chapter-05/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/rousseau/social/book-1/chapter-05/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- Even if I granted all that I have been refuting, the friends of despotism would be no better off.  --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;There will always be a great difference between subduing a multitude and ruling a society.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Sovereign</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/rousseau/social/book-1/chapter-07/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/rousseau/social/book-1/chapter-07/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This formula shows that:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;the act of association comprises a mutual undertaking between the public and the individuals&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;each individual, in making a contract, with himself, is bound in a double capacity&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;As a member of the Sovereign, he is bound to the individuals. As a member of the State, he is bound to the Sovereign.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Real Property</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/rousseau/social/book-1/chapter-09/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/rousseau/social/book-1/chapter-09/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Each member of the community gives himself to it, at the moment of its foundation, just as he is, with all the resources at his command, including the goods he possesses.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
