Wednesday, 23th June 1976, 20:54 hrs
Billy: Today I have another question concerning the ice ages of the Earth; something seems not to be clear about the last answer to the question. Look here, so I asked you the question: How many ice ages has the Earth gone through, and what exactly are these?
The question of this person is very stupid. If they had asked the question honestly, then they would also have received an appropriate answer.
His question, however, indicates that he is very taken with himself and does not take honesty very seriously.
On average and to some extent every 700,000 years a great glacial period takes place on Earth, which corresponds to the value of a great ice age. Between these great ice ages there are different interglacial seasons, i.e. interglacial ice ages or small ice ages. Their cycle is about 350,000 years on average.
The glacial periods usually cover ⅙ to ¼ of the Earth’s surface, while the interglacial periods cover ¹⁄₁₅ to ¹⁄₂₂ of the Earth’s surface, although for both ice age types enormous differences can occur both in relation to the area covered and with regard to the timings of the occurrences here and there.
It is now easy to calculate from this that this misguided geological person, also with his new assertion that there have been 10 ice ages on Earth in the last 3 (three) million years, again makes a false and misleading assertion without truth, because with 2,800,000 years their 4 Great Ice Ages and their 8 Interglacial Periods have caused new transformations on Earth.
In total it can be seen that 12 ice ages covered and changed the Earth alternately during the last 2,800,000 years, while the Earth is now preparing for a new interglacial or stadial period, which will reach its peak in about 160,000 years.
The second subsequent ice age, for which the Earth must already prepare itself by terrestrial and extraterrestrial influences, finds its climax in approximately 500,000 years, whereby this will then again be a great ice age.
Earthly geological science lives in the misconception that a planet has only one real ice age, which always repeats itself, and that the interglacial ice ages are only extensions of the glacials.
With the repetition now, namely the ever-reappearing of the glaciers in the cycle of about 700,000 years, they have recognised the truth, but they, the scientists, are unaware of the average 700,000-year cycle. It is, however, completely alien to them that the cyclic interglacial periods, which we also call small ice ages, are also actual glacial periods. They therefore live erroneously in the assumption that the interglacial are only glacial ancestors. But in reality this is not the case, because the interglacial periods are true cyclical ice ages, which have nothing in common with glacier migration, although these actually take place in a cycle of about 70,000 years. However, these are pure glacier advances and glacier migrations, which have an Earth regenerating effect and which also occur due to climate changes. These glacier advances and glacier migrations can be described as small-glacial, i.e. small-glacial periods, but they can also be divided into two different forms, namely larger and smaller, with a period of glacial degradation prevailing at present, which scientists will also establish over the next 20 years. Thus the last large glacier advance of this form took place on the Earth about 60,000 years ago and will be repeated already in 10,000 years, to which the forerunners on the Earth already now make themselves felt, just by the forthcoming rapid dismantling of the world-wide ice masses, also in the Arctic and Antarctic. The small glacier advances or forays have a cycle of about 35,000 years, with the last such event occurring about 18,000 to 25,000 years ago. After the cycle can be calculated, thus with the next large glacier advance also a small advance follows, whereby however the surfaces of the Earth covered by the ice masses will be in different places. That answer should really be enough. On the other hand, I do not know any more about it either.
Christ is the German version of the ancient Greek term Christos. This term is a direct reference to ancient ritual acts of mystical form.
This means that the term Christos was used for all cultic and unreal actions as the designation for the cultic act itself when ointments and oils were applied.
And when I speak of ointments and oils, then I do this only for the sake of better understanding, because in the old days, when these cultic and murderous acts still took place, no ointments and no oil were used for them, but small children and virgins were slaughtered bestially, their blood was collected in vessels, kept liquid or thickened and then the consecrations for the idols were smeared with it, whereby these consecrations were usually again human sacrifices.
It was not until later that human slaughter and human sacrifice were slowly expelled and blood was replaced by fragrant ointments and oils, while human sacrifice was replaced by animals, fruit and vegetables, etc., which has unfortunately been preserved to this day.
The cults have received no change to the progress of evolutionary form, but have remained in the traditional evil, so an anointing or oiling in the present time still possesses only a ritual worthlessness.
Therefore, even today the term Christos or Christ means the absolute negative and evil with the numerical value 666. This was also the reason why Jmmanuel resisted the name ’the anointed’ when he knew that it would be attributed to him.
It is similar with the naming of Jesus. Therefore, when the Earth-human speaks of Jesus, of Christ, of Christian or Christ-consciousness, etc., then they act extremely negatively and conjure all negative forces into an ausartenden form. [ausarten = to get very badly out of control of the good human nature]
They should therefore never speak of a Christ-consciousness or in similar word formations if they want to address that which is equalised, because by naming and accepting these word formations they promote everything negative towards that which is Ausartenden.
Earth humanity must therefore be urged that all word formations in connection with the names Jesus or Christ, etc. be erased and renamed to the actual value if they find a true name in the value of that which is equalised.
So one may only speak of a Creation-consciousness and the like, but the knowledge in this regard should also be formed.
Leave a Comment
Thank you for your comment!
It will appear after review.
