Billy's Mission

Ptaah speaks: A misunderstanding has crept in between my daughter and you, which please do not pay any further attention to. We are not immune to errors either.

Now, instead of my daughter, I would like to give you an answer to the letter there, which you are also to pass on to Mr Jacob: the accusations put forward do not correspond in any form to the actual circumstances. The author of the lines clearly tends to feel affected where he has no such reason. Everything in these lines points to a very vulnerable self-centredness that springs from a certain self-gratification instinct, which is undeniable.

The originator of the letter feels set back in many things and lives in the assumption that he is better suited for certain things than others, as in your case. This may very well be attributed to the economic and religious teachings he enjoyed. But since he thinks and acts in this manner, he does not consider that the teaching imposed on you throughout your life was so harsh that he would never have endured it himself. They would have appeared to him as unbearable tortures, and he would never have become master of them.

He must become aware of this and be content with the position to which he is entitled according to his abilities. No life-form is able to live in higher planes if it has not yet attained the knowledge and ability and wisdom of these planes. He must understand that.

But now that he has asked you to present his letter to me, I will not refuse to give him an answer through you.

So explain to him this: the words clothed in the letter are questionable and unjustified in every direction. It is quite clear from them that Mr Jacob is unnecessarily and thoughtlessly agitated by given facts because he feels equally unnecessarily concerned.

By his manifestly wrong behaviour with regard to the negation of the hard-sounding language of truth, it follows that he cannot bear the truth if it is not described and misused in a diplomatic form, which, however, truly does not lie in the sense of truth. In spite of your various efforts to explain this to him, which I am well aware of, he has not yet been instructed, which is clear from the fact that he accuses you of rude and uncouth language.

As I heard earlier, he still calls a ‘fine and diplomatic’ idiom better than your phrase, which in harsh words sets out the truth. It will be useful, advantageous and valuable for him in this respect if he finally learns that his view is just good enough for his professional activity, but that in order to spread the truth another speech must appear.

If he once tries to find old works, he will be astonished to discover that the language of truth has always been very hard and could never be paraphrased. But where this was attempted, the truth was falsified and changed beyond recognition, whereby the real meaning of what was said was lost.

This is of great importance for him if he wants to follow the Teaching of the Spirit and of the Truth and develop in them. This has already been explained to him several times and there is really no need for him to be told this again and again.

It must finally become clear to him that through the hard language of truth only those Earth-humans are addressed who in their development of consciousness and spirit have already gone beyond the usual predominant norm and recognise the truth in this form. Thus only life-forms are addressed by the hard language of truth, which have recognised or at least suspect the real truth.

But humans, who take offence at this hard language, are not yet ready for the truth and not yet free enough because they do not even suspect it and are trapped in cultic religions and in a deviant and unreal mysticism.

Therefore, let everyone recognise it himself/herself; if he/she endures the hard and undiplomatic language of truth and recognises its value, then he/she is on the true path of evolution, but if he/she does not tolerate it and is disturbed by it, then he/she is not yet capable of high spiritual teaching and effective truth.

Mr Jacob should try to understand this and strive for this fact, because he has probably absorbed certain spiritual truths in himself and developed very far in the last months, if he is also able to recognise and cope with these truths and the teaching of the spirit.

But he must learn to separate himself from his material intellect in all spiritual matters as far as this is necessary. Since he has not followed this up till now, even though he has been told to do so several times, it is absolutely inappropriate for him to complain – but also without any real reason.

But I also want to recommend him to read Semjase’s reports, which you write down later through their transmissions, a little more precisely and also to process them, because certain things in the letter indicate that he makes too little effort in this form.

It is in no wise as he writes, that the purpose is fulfilled if a language is adapted to the circumstances in such a manner that it leads to the best possible success in achieving the goal. This means that the path of least resistance should simply be taken. But precisely this form is unviable, and precisely by following this path the truth can only penetrate very laboriously.

The accusation that you tried to shift the blame for the lectures you did not give onto Mr Jacob is as unfounded as anything else. As I can remember very well, you have only mentioned statements that really correspond to the facts.

Therefore, if he blames you for putting him in the wrong light with us, with regard to our conversations in connection with your emotional world, then this corresponds to a statement that you should actually take as an insult, because this already corresponds to an insult and untruth.

If Mr Jacob had really tried to study the reports you gave him very carefully, he would have realised that you were not guilty of any of the things he accused you of. We seriously discussed all things and facts without hiding even a single letter in the reports.

The meetings that were not mentioned in the reports were of a completely different nature and did not involve any persons at all.

There can be no question of Mr Jacob not having known that he would be responsible for organising the lectures, because we know very well from our monitoring that you have addressed him on these matters several times, and indeed in the presence of various other group members.

However, you too have made certain mistakes in this respect, for when Mr Jacob spoke negatively about the lectures, you simply kept quiet because you were too emotional in certain respects.

With regard to the statements of his acquaintances who have spoken judgementably about you, he should endeavour to name all given facts. Certainly, some judgements were partly of a negative nature, but these were made as a result of ignorance of the facts or as a result of not possessing the capacity to judge or as a result of bias in unreal mysticism, etc.

Other judgements, however, were quite satisfactory and some persons have even acquired a lot of knowledge in the meantime and are very grateful that they were able to acquire this knowledge with your help.

But when he speaks of reactions, as for example in the Straubinger case, then this is absolutely illogical, because he knows very well that this life-form has fallen into a Christian fanaticism, which will make them very strongly dependent on the cult religion in their next life as a new personality by means of memory bank impulses which it will recall.

This fanaticism is so pronounced that, according to our probability calculations, it will neutralise itself only after its fourth revival as new personalities in the memory banks.

That he attaches importance to the judgement of such a life-form in such important things is not only completely incomprehensible and illogical, but also absurd.

From this form it also becomes understandable that he accuses you of being beguiled by some praises and that you are not objective enough to be able to recognise a tendencyless and bare truth. This debate is devoid of reality and testifies to Mr Jacob’s extremely poor judgement.

The truth in the present important magnitude cannot be spread in great masses and among the ignorant people. The seeds of truth are currently being sown first in the meagrely prepared soil, which is still alive with many vermin that devour many seeds.

Only very little seed will fall in small circles on better soil and take root, grow and ripen into fruit. But it is precisely the fruit of these small circles that is of the greatest importance, for it is they who will let their fruit ripen and inseminate the soil around them anew, which will become a little more fertile again through their existence in the immediate vicinity.

So gradually the whole soil will be fertilised and brought to life. From this it can be seen that only the few seeds of highest importance that thrive and ripen in small circles are of the utmost importance.

So when Mr Jacob speaks of an unobjectivity, he is speaking only of himself, because it is not we, but he, who is not objective.

With astonishment I must further note that he accuses us of ignorance of his person, if I have understood correctly, because he states that we are ‘wrongly led’ regarding our knowledge regarding his person. Even if he mentions my daughter by name and in the same form only Quetzal, I feel that his words are also related to me.

As sorry as I am, I have to say that I find these words presumptuous, even if he does not know our possibilities of person analysis. But let me explain so much to him that we know him very well in all areas and know very well that he shows himself facts in various things that are not his own.

If he really knew only a small part of himself, he would also be able to make an objective judgement when he is spoken about or certain things are made known to him. But since this is not the case, he feels hurt and attacked on many occasions.

He should therefore really be honest in his efforts to accept and digest the hard words and idioms of the truth, because this is the most important factor that gives him a hard time.

He also speaks of a threat which I myself am said to have made against him with regard to a group exclusion. Also for this I would like and can only recommend to him to study and process all reports very carefully and to see and grasp the given words as they really are given.

It was clearly and unambiguously stated by me at that time that he would have to be excluded from the concerns of the purely organisational side of your group if he really did not make serious efforts to organise the lectures. There was never any talk of a group exclusion on the whole, even if he now explains it so.

So there can be no question of putting him under pressure. That is his unobjective view alone.

I can only answer his statement about some human warmth and a constructive love by saying that we must be very objective and real in all things and concerns, because only in this manner can we fulfil our mission.

I already explained that the truth sounds very hard, and I now explain that it cannot be clothed in emotions. If we were to act contrary to this, we would have to put a very quick and often painful end to the erroneous doings of many Earth-humans, for our feelings would degenerate into compassion, which would never and under no circumstances be justified in terms of complying with all creational laws.

We feel love and warmth for all life-forms, also for the Earth-human. But we have to be very reserved with him and prepare him very slowly for what he so eagerly longs for, just for this warmth and love.

But the first condition for fulfilling this wish is that the Earth-human himself/herself must become aware of true love before he/she can demand it from others. It is not given that he/she only always demands and pays no price for it himself/herself, as it was the case with him in manic form until now.

Mr Jacob himself provides the proof of this fact, for countless things we have already given him, but he has only kept on demanding without giving what we should have demanded of him, namely, the final conversion to the recognition of incontrovertible facts.

But we did not demand it from him, because we knew very well, through our later overseeing and monitoring, that he needed a lot of time for this turnaround, because he is still too much biased in worldly material and strictly religious concerns, but he is not reproached for that.

In a single point of his letter, he is right if he finds us guilty, namely that we do not know the Earth conditions in concrete form. That is indeed the case, and we are therefore making every effort to remedy this situation.

It seems, however, that by naming this error that we have made, he estimates himself to be of higher value in his own value than is the case with him in truth, for otherwise he would not be able to speak in this form.

There is still a great deal to explain about this letter, but that would go much too far. I will therefore leave these remarks at that and take into consideration, in his favour, that it is very difficult for him to cope with the new teaching that has broken over him and that for him everything is very new and strange.

He should therefore not take my explanations as reproaches and not as malice, but only as what they really are, namely statements.

According to his letter, he himself wanted to hear an answer from me, which I have now given him. Before he again expresses himself in thoughtless and unobjective words, I suppose I can assume that he thinks about everything very carefully beforehand and processes everything just as precisely.

It would be very careless of him if he continued to stand by everything in such a negative and unobjective form, for he would thereby deprive himself of all possibilities of a tremendous progress in this life.

He himself has worked out an opportunity for an evolutionary leap, which he himself threatens to destroy again, which would be very unfortunate and which we would also regret extraordinarily. We all appreciate the steps he has taken so far and thank him for this. However, this must never tempt one to become agitated and vocal in an attacking and unobjective manner.

He may bear in mind that I am many centuries older than him and that he may trust my judgment.

May he therefore consult with himself and may he also speak with you in calm form in order to gain clarity about all things which have already been advised to him once, as I know.

But there are two things I must mention about which he must be made clear: there is no form whereby it can be claimed that the faith of the church should be switched over to you, as he interprets it. Let him be very clear that such statements are devoid of all given facts and that he should not name such things.

Often in earlier times such statements were the reason for falsifications, whereby good and conscientious Earth-humans were transformed into saints, etc., in some missions imposed on them.

He may therefore be very well aware that you are only a new prophet and that you have to proclaim the truth and other true necessities allowed to you. The only factors that may therefore be mentioned are first and foremost the Creation itself, then the knowledge in the truth, the truth itself, the universal love, the wisdom and the relative absolute fulfilment of the final culmination point, and the associated spiritual teaching.

You yourself only play a role in the importance that you are the mediator, but never more, which you know as well as Mr Jacob, by which he himself accuses his statement of untruth.

The second point is this: Mr Jacob may be very clear that you have certainly completed your evolutionary leap without the slightest damage. But he may also be very clear that you have worked hard and with difficulty for nearly 40 years for this evolutionary leap, and it is therefore not true that you simply absorbed the knowledge he objects to without having worked it out.

This has been said by him very imprudently and quite obviously he has not worked hard enough in these matters to gain the necessary knowledge.

It is now up to him to decide for himself and to go his own way or to really try to take care of our interests. We cannot and do not want to force him in any form, because every life-form has to follow the path of its evolution itself.

It may be said to him here, however, that the warmth and love of which he spoke and which he was not able to find and recognise is sufficiently present in all of us and that we also send it to him.

We have voluntarily assigned ourselves to this task, to which we are incumbent, here on the Earth, endeavouring to transmit very much worth knowing to the Earth-humans and also bringing, together with you, a valuable teaching as well as knowledge and wisdom. This, too, is warmth and love, and these correspond to much more than we are actually creationally-based obliged to.

Further things probably do not have to be explained and elucidated, because it is clear where the fault really lies.

This will be so, but I cannot praise him if he has not become deserving of such, although he expected such praise. If he finally devotes himself objectively to all things, then he must realise for himself that he does not deserve praise.

It would be much better for his development if he would face the events and the constantly arising things than to keep away from a juxtaposition in his somewhat peculiar manner. It may be explained to him that he has to face the facts and cannot simply pursue an ostrich policy, as you on Earth aptly say for avoiding the truth.

Personally I will recommend to him to speak with you and finally to be instructed, if he turns to the truth in necessary and given form. However, he must learn very intensively that the language of truth always works very hard and can never be offered in diplomatic form. The teaching of the spirit demands a completely different language than is usual in everyday life.

In this he must finally realise that he must separate his religious, professional, economic and recognition-seeking, sociable form of language from that which has become known to him as the teaching of the spirit [now termed ‘Teaching of the Creation’], of love and truth, and of wisdom and knowledge.

He cannot continue to evolve if he thinks, speaks and acts in the same spiritually doctrinal form as is usual in humanly sociable as well as religious and professional forms. Here he must finally become aware of a hard separation of these factors: the language of truth is hard only because it is the language of truth.

But the truth again sounds hard to the Earth-human only because he/she perceives it as annoying, as insulting and intervening in his/her own personality. Further, the language of the truth also sounds hard to him/her because its form openly exposes to him/her the mistakes he/she has committed and has not yet rectified.

It is precisely in this that the Earth-human finds an injustice, presumption and loutishness, as Mr Jacob calls it, because he is of the opinion that, on the one hand, a form outside his own personality has no justification whatsoever for making his mistakes apparent to him, but on the other hand, the factor that the Earth-human makes himself/herself arrogant in this form and is guilty of the erroneous opinion that he/she is not guilty of any mistake, also plays a role. He/she just wants to be faultless, and thus deceives himself/herself. That is the manner of thinking of the Earth-human in this regard.

In his diplomatic form of speech Mr Jacob may, at his own discretion, communicate religiously, professionally and humanly-sociably with his fellow human beings with whom he must maintain contact. This is the language of your worldly-material and religious life. This language, however, is unclear, confused, feigned and dishonest, since in most cases it serves only to gain an advantage in religious, professional or purely material terms.

Mr Jacob calls this diplomacy and does not consider that this very form of language is one of the greatest evils of the Earth-human, which again and again leads to deadly misunderstandings and plunges your world into devastating wars. Diplomacy is to be equated with lies and deception, because in this linguistic form the effective facts are described, changed and falsified and never those hard words are used which absolutely unambiguously and unquestionably call the facts in their full sense.

But precisely this must not and never be the case in the proclamation of the truth, for the truth is not lies and deception, but the reality of the creational laws and recommendations as a whole. But these can never be described in diplomatic form, for even the smallest of them would change the meaning.

Mr Jacob calls this form ‘rude language’ and I understand very well what he is trying to explain with it. However, here too he is not objective and does not give any thought to his statement. For if he had ever engaged with it in a mental and feeling-based manner, he could have defined his own manner of expressing himself, because ‘uncouth’ means that something is raw, unpolished, natural and not embellished and levelled by being planed.

As an example, serve Mr Jacob an ice rink: if an ice surface is uneven and rough, that is, unplaned and unpolished, then it is covered with many small undulating and jagged elevations. On this ice surface a person is able to walk very well without slipping or falling, because the natural unevenness, roughness and unpolishedness of the ice field causes a laborious walk on it, but it prevents slipping and falling.

A human walking on such an unpolished and coarse ice field feels the unevenness under their feet, finds it annoying and pays close attention to it. But he/she also knows that it is precisely the unevenness that prevents them from falling, so they gladly accept it.

If, on the other hand, this ice field is smoothed and polished, it becomes a dangerous treacherous trap, a dangerous black ice that no longer offers any support and on which falls can no longer be avoided. The ice field is now flat and beautiful to look at and to walk on without visible unevenness, but now death, destruction and misfortune lurk.

The human being who walks on this ice field knows this well, tries to protect himself/herself against it and yet will be powerless against the malice of black ice. Despite their attentiveness, they will suddenly slip and fall, injure themselves or even suffer death.

If Mr Jacob finally considers all these things in a reasonable form and lets himself be taught, he will finally grow in consciousness as well. Unfortunately, physical adulthood is not enough to achieve the fulfilment of life.

It would be very painful and very alarming if Mr Jacob were to go his own way, as he called it. We would all be very sorry about that, because he has made admirable progress in recent months, in and of himself much more than was to be expected.

But the fact that he periodically lets himself slide back into the old trajectories should not happen to him anymore. It is well known to me through our monitoring that not only his personal concerns, thoughts and feelings lead him to this respective response, but that he gets too involved with the judgements and statements of others, according to which he then falls back into his old negative forms of thinking.

I am very much aware of the fact that this was also the case during the night of the 11th to the 12th of October, because at that time we were exercising further monitoring upon him. That he then later wrote this letter, however, has escaped us, because we had to interrupt our monitoring for much more important reasons.

But especially in his case I may explain to you that we have been particularly concerned with him so far and have researched him. Therefore, it is absolutely inappropriate of him to accuse us of not being accurately informed about his being. This actually corresponds to a presumption, because we really know him very well.

If he would have the opportunity to find out about our evaluations of him, he would be deeply astonished, because we know his most secret emotions and know very well about his unfulfillable desires, hopes and impulses. He should be aware, however, that these are unattainable for him in this life, because he is only following the path of slow recognition, which has no connection with what he has worked out as a novice, in worldly schools and professional teachings, etc. He should also be aware of the fact that he is not able to fulfil them in this life.

It is very much to be wished that he will finally be instructed in all things and face the realities. The form of his action with the letter is not correct. On the contrary, it indicates incorrectness and a form of shirking oneself and evading the truth. This form, however, is not worthy of praise, but worthy of criticism.

We are well aware of his various efforts in our matter, for which we can praise him, but I have already mentioned this. It is not appropriate, however, that we should give praise to ourselves for all our achievements, only because he, as an Earth-human, assumes that he needs a hymn of praise for his good deeds.

He must learn to do the good, the true and the loving and wise as a matter of course and not only out of the urge that he be showered with songs of praise for it.

If, however, the Earth-human thinks in such a manner and is only oriented towards the praise that he/she wants to attain, then in every respect he/she strives for one thing or one act only for the sake of praise, but not because he/she has come to the realisation that his/her thinking, doing and acting have become a creational matter of course in the consciousness of fulfilling one’s duty.

This is just like the warmth and love mentioned by Mr Jacob: if one works only to gain warmth and love from outside one’s own personality, then this arises only from an egoistic thought and feeling, if warmth and love are not felt and relayed by the demanding person himself.

Mr Jacob should become clear and aware of these things, let himself be instructed in them and act and align himself accordingly in the future.

If he threatens us that he wants to go his own way, then this threat is completely inappropriate, because the mistakes were not made by us and not by you, but by him. But if he really wants to go his own way, then that is his free decision and his own doing, but also his own harm in the form that he thereby inhibits and maliciously neglects his evolution.

But he may also be aware that his threat does not impress us and that we can only feel sorry feelings for him. If he really wants to leave, then this falls under his concerns and his own decisions, and he is not irreplaceable either.

If he simply wants to pass on his responsibility, then we will find a replacement for the tasks that were intended for him. Even if this may take some time, it will still be so, because we cannot wait many years for him to finally come to his senses and let himself be instructed.

Time is running out and pressing, even for him, and it is not acceptable for the necessary work to be left unfinished. May Mr Jacob be clear about this, if it is now at his discretion what he wants to do.