Love

Asker

I want to focus on the most powerful force in the universe.

Elan

Of course, love. I totally accept and understand and believe in the ideas of that we’re all equal, that we all have divinity within us, unconditional love, and likes attract. I understand and accept all that. What I want to focus on is those special relationships that somehow or other seem to have a magical aspect to them. and end up somehow with a passionate romantic relationship. What is the source of that?

Asker

The source of that special situation is yourself, your recognition of celebrating yourself and your approach as to whether you look at a relationship as the opportunity to attract another complete individual to both share this idea with. in which case you are creating an empowered situation or whether as many individuals often also do you see yourself as half a being needing to attract your other half. So the idea is by completely stating who you are being willing to be who you are consciously and then allowing that relationship to be a reflection of that wholeness. The relationship takes on the characteristic of wholeness. And in terms of why you attract one individual versus another, again it depends upon how you are choosing to express yourself and again therefore vibrate and as to whether that vibration will harmoniously allow someone to seem to stand out in relief. So the more willing you are to be yourself fully, the more likely you are to attract a direct reflection that will complement that idea. The more you are resisting yourself and expressing yourself in a broken series of intentions. Only can anything you attract reflect that. So you never get away from yourself. And a relationship need not be something you escape to but simply a celebration of what is.

Asker

Then with the idea of vibration that you just mentioned um does and you used the word earlier tonight a resonance take place.

Elan

Absolutely. Can you not feel it

Asker

and then that builds up into a synergistic sort of a thing with the passion and the romance and so forth.

Elan

All right. That explanation will do. Yes.

Asker

But you have to have similar vibrations, I guess, for all this resonance that take place.

Elan

Generally speaking, yes,

Asker

is there something underlying this question?

Elan

Well, let me let me come at it with a different angle here.

Asker

Ah,

Elan

a couple of years ago, somebody asked a marvelous question. Ah, a couple of years ago since the last marvelous question. All right. By the way, I enjoyed them all.

Asker

It wasn’t my question.

Elan

Ah,

Asker

but I was jealous of the question. What it was was

Elan

to have heared the question or even have perceived it. You must contain it. So, pat yourself on the back and proceed.

Asker

They took the words out of my mouth. uh of the roughly 6 billion souls on this planet, the question was about how many oversouls account for and you know for those six billion and after a pause and you’re checking your database and so forth the answer was roughly 2.8 billion

Elan

roughly. It is an arbitrary figure and perhaps I would even retract it

Asker

but it’s useful. My next question.

Elan

Oh, all right. Then I give it back out.

Asker

Let’s say an average of like two two people on this planet per oversell. My question is, does my oversoul have somebody else on this planet right now besides me?

Elan

In a sense, yes. But you must understand when discussing these types of mechanics that it all depends on your point of entry of where this discussion takes place. What you refer to as the idea of souls, separate souls from the one All-That-Is or God is only a point of view. Ultimately, you are all the same one oversoul. There can be the apparency if you are exploring a similar type of overall theme in a physical reality that you would share an oversoul that is separate from the one oversoul. But it is truly perhaps you can say somewhat inaccurate and somewhat of a description which lends itself to separation. Therefore, the most integrated answer is you are all one being. The other way to look at the supposed breakdown, which are simply elucory designations with which you group certain explorations by, is you can experience the apparency of having souls that are separate from the All-That-Is that then have oversouls that then have oversouls that ultimately wind up being the one All-That-Is oversoul. But this gets quite complex. You need not relegate the marvelous creation of unconditional love flowing in two directions to simply a linear explanation that is contracted compared to the more expanded realization that you are all one being

Asker

and nothing gets closer than one being.

Elan

No wonder you wanted to take back the answer of 2.8. We are less apt and inclined to perpetuate answers which were provided for a linear standpoint and now become more or less obsolete as your view becomes more infinite if you’ll pardon the term more infinite.

Asker

Well,

Elan

so you may from time to time hear a retraction here and there. It is not a negating. It is arising to the level of what you are now willing to accept and explore. And again, I remind you, it is a romantic notion. I and this other individual share this oversoul that is separate from everyone else’s oversoul. But it is just as romantic and passionate a notion to be reflections of one being. That is intimacy.

Asker

That was the question I was trying to lead up and corner you on.

Elan

Trying and cornering. Very crafty. And that was this magic that somehow pops up into a relationship. Could it be might that they have the same oversaw? And if they did, would that account for such a special magical feeling?

Asker

For the purposes of wrapping this up and being very very accurate, if you say so.

Elan

Do you understand?

Asker

If I believe it, then that’s true.

Elan

If that is what you wish to express, then you can experience that.

Asker

Do I have that going on in my life right now?

Elan

From what I just answered, you will need to tell me.

Asker

I know what I I prefer to believe.

Elan

Well, what is that? But yeah, I have some relationships that are have some real magic in them and there’s something special and I’m I was just trying to understand the source the cause the possible cause of it.

Asker

All right, then I will not negate any of that and I thank you for your willingness to share it. Do ponder the intimacy of all being one oversoul. You need not minimize that. And that does not mean that certain facets or aspects of the whole cannot do a very beautiful and wonderful dance within the expression of the whole that has meaning, has passion, has fullness and fulfillment and is a relevant statement in creation.

Elan

Well, listen to this tape.

Asker

Ah, listen to the Oh, you are the tape. At this timing before we depart, we simply request a question from our friend Theodorable.

Elan

Thank you a lot. Uh, a question, not a statement

Asker

or both.

Elan

Well, that was a question and a statement now, wasn’t it?

Asker

Perhaps if you’ll allow me a statement.

Elan

All right. Thank you. We always honor the idea of someone willing to put something forth purposefully as an expression of who they are. Do proceed.

Asker

Okay. In that we are mirrored balls. It’s important to recognize it seems to me that we mirror to a great extent what is termed the mass consciousness. Yet often it’s not understood clearly what mass consciousness is. Mass consciousness in my view has a base in certain doctrines. By the way, it does because you say so for you

Elan

just to keep it on an empowered basis.

Asker

Do proceed.

Asker

Okay. Currently, our civilization appears to be based upon u a basil paradigm I call uh materialistic scientism.

Elan

Define

Asker

scientism being science as religion.

Elan

All right. Materialism being a

Asker

Seeing is believing.

Elan

Yes.

Asker

Seeing is believing. Yeah.

Elan

All right. Proceed.

Asker

Okay. And materialism being um the idea that only the material is really real.

Elan

All right. Seeing is believing.

Asker

Okay. Um in terms of specifics, uh it is the Darwinisms that constitute the basil paradigm. Classical Darwinism 1859, social Darwinism which expresses at state socialism in our century and neodyarwinism. In the view of the neodyarwinists are orthodox biologists uh life is a struggle. These guys see even the genetics as involved in a struggle for dominance. So that is what our mass consciousness is currently. But

Elan

all right, a valid way to describe one version of it. Do proceed.

Asker

Yes. Um I think what is coming is a new basil paradigm. I call it scientific holism.

Elan

One moment. Basil basic underlying paradigm change. Do proceed defining terms.

Asker

Right. I believe that uh the new terms in the paradigm will be understood in this way. Creator being the wave form of All-That-Is. Creation the particulate or particular form of All-That-Is. The process of one becoming the other involving desire/allowance where uh where desire is definable as an expression of purpose the whole process summarized in a phrase purposeful allowance.

Elan

All right. If indeed you define creator as waveform, what creates the waveform?

Asker

In that model,

Elan

I believe a waveform is the primary thing.

Asker

Is that separate from the idea of creator?

Elan

Are you perhaps speaking about vesicles of physical creator?

Asker

specifically when referring to it as waveform as opposed to primary creator

Elan

possibly I’m using the analogy of light having basically two for

Asker

understood

Elan

form in particular

Asker

understood

Elan

the visible or physical universe is the particulate aspect of the all

Asker

or the creator way

Elan

I understand the analogy

Asker

what is its usefulness What is its purpose?

Elan

To collapse the separateness between the idea of creator and creation.

Asker

How does defining one as a wave and one as a particle do that? Does that not perpetuate the separation? Is another way to look at it not at all invalidating what you are saying is to understand that particle and wave are simply different aspects of the same phenomena. both of which emanate from creator and within which there can be seemingly vesicles of separate so to speak in terms of physical reality creation vesicles.

Elan

For those of you who feel that this is very technical, bear with us. Describe then the result of your new paradigm as you describe it.

Elan

The result is the clear understanding as basis of mass consciousness that each of us is part of the whole.

Asker

Would not perhaps the next step in realization be the idea that the whole is you without any longer relegating yourself to simply part of a larger hole.

Elan

Yes, I can I can have that too. And that would fall in line with the the idea that the memory of the whole system would be encoded in each particular aspect of the system.

Asker

Ah, holographic model.

Asker

So as this new basil paradigm comes into existence.

Elan

By the way, just to get technical, it’s not new, but do proceed.

Asker

Okay. It has been occurring in versions in pockets in aspects throughout physical reality throughout all of what you call time. But I understand that it is generally from the way you are laying down this discussion a new approach to what you are referring to as a mass consciousness which I assume your definition of is the conglomerate energy of individuals.

Elan

That’s right.

Asker

Once this is truly scientific, I believe it will be just so much easier for each of us uh to realize whatever ambitions we might have uh more and more on an accelerated basis.

Elan

So can we then summarize this idea to be previously and heretofor the approach of the mass has been seeing is believing. The new idea that you are beginning to in that sense express and expand toward is believing is seeing. Period.

Leave a Comment