Table of Contents
The many mechanisms, the many ideas through which you express yourself as physical beings, as lifetimes, as statements of reality, as your version of reality. And we have simplified many of the things we have discussed with you down to the idea that the bottom line is that your reality is not something that you exist within.
Your reality truly exists within you and is an expression of you. As you expand your consciousness, as you transform literally into more of yourself, your awareness expands to include the idea that the reality that you formerly believe to exist within exists within you. This is a characteristic of the expansion of your consciousness in that you realize that your consciousness is the reality. And the way that this plays out in your physical lives, in your approach, in your day to day interactions is that you express yourself in a very specific way. You decide who you are. I am this person. You decide. You trust in that decision no matter what the criteria is for having come to that decision. And you then act or perform a series of action or outward expressions that then seem to move the reality around to create an effect.
The action seeming to be the cause. This evening of your time. I wish to in that sense discuss briefly perhaps the idea that your creation, your reality, your expression is really quite automatic and effortless. And the preconceived notion, the previously expressed belief that you must make things happen, that you must force things to move, that you must push very hard against the characteristics of your reality in order to have an impact are in that sense, shall I say, a bit inaccurate. For you do not truly push or move or stretch or force your reality to express itself. If you wish to get quite specific and accurate about it, you allow your reality.
You express the allowance for your reality to express itself. Now when you do so as you say not fully, consciously or purposefully or knowingly then the results of such an allowance can seem to have many random effects that you say you do not prefer. But the idea that you can shift your reality, transform your reality by simply redefining yourself, redeciding who it is you wish to be, who it is you desire to be, is truly not an act of pushing or changing or forming or conforming or restructuring in a very effortful way. It is a matter of allowing, which is quite the opposite posture, quite the opposite approach as making, though it has, as you say, a more profound and far-reaching effect. Simply pushing is tightening up, contracting, seeming to need in that sense to gather yourself and explode outwardly.
Whereas allowance is simply allowing effortlessly assuming the posture of and then allowing the outcome of any particular idea. And when you come to the place in your life, in your reality where you decide to decide who you are rather than have circumstances, individuals and situations dictate who you are. You literally allow yourself through the same mechanism that you had created the initial reality to make that decision. You allow yourself to decide which is completely effortless.
You do not need to force yourself to change your decision. You simply need to allow yourself to be what you already are as opposed to forcing yourself to be something that you are not right now. Since you are the reality, the reality exists within you. You already are infinite potential personified. And in order to express any particular chosen nuance of that infinite potential, it is not a matter of flexing your muscles and pushing quite hard. It is a matter of simply choosing and allowing the results of those choices to manifest to express from you. As we have discussed many times, beliefs are not truly something that you have a belief and don’t have an opposite belief.
You contain it all. You contain all beliefs. So the idea is the belief that you express outwardly express act upon is what determines in that sense your outcome and you can allow yourself across the board. You can allow yourself to decide who it is you wish to express yourself to be. You can allow yourself in that sense to be something which you already are as opposed to needing to become something that you are not. And the mere recognition of this simple turning point, simple key can allow you to begin to allow yourself to be who it is you wish to be. You allow yourself to decide either consciously or again you say circumstances dictate that decision.
But you can choose what you allow. You can decide in that sense to allow yourself to be whoever it is you wish to be. For you contain it all. Then you can allow yourself to trust. Then you can allow yourself to act in the way that is consistent with the person that you say you are, that you decide to be, that you allow yourself to be. And part of that allowance of deciding I am this person is to allow yourself to act like that person. Now when that decision changes for instance you decide I wish to change either my entire life or some aspect of it. The first thing you do is allow yourself to decide who you are to redefine that decision and state that decision and then allow yourself the slack to have that decision be a statement of who you are. In that sense, it is up to you and it is not a matter of forcing yourself to decide who you are. You already know who it is you wish to express yourself as. Perhaps sometimes you see yourself expressing yourself in that way.
Other times perhaps you see yourself not expressing yourself in that way, but you can allow yourself to remind yourself who you are and to have that decision about who you are be conscious.
When you begin to shift your decision, change your approach, change your expression, many times there is the apparency that circumstances, relationships, interactions have an echo of a feeling from the old decision. And therefore though you may state I am this integrated positively oriented person a circumstance may come along where you say well look at that if I was that person this wouldn’t be happening which is by the way a decision in that sense you decide that your first decision perhaps wasn’t true because look here’s the evidence now I remind you though your societal approach which is seeing is believing. That believing is seeing.
When again you begin to shift your decision, your initial response to certain circumstances may still appear on the surface to be that same old disintegrated response.
In our last interaction, we have discussed in somewhat detail that you then will perform an action after you interpret your reality, after you have that response to circumstances, individuals or interactions. And our suggestion was to place a pause before you act. Allow yourself to remind yourself of your new decision. Allow yourself to remind yourself how a person with that new decision would act even in this particular circumstance which seems to be coming up as evidence to the contrary.
One thing perhaps we did not emphasize, perhaps you can say adequately for the way that you play out and experiment with the expression of your reality is the fact that that initial reaction that you may have according to an old decision is all right, is all well and good. Allow yourself to feel that response. Attempting to squash that response is in a sense not allowing yourself to express your decision fully.
Ignoring that response and simply doing something else can have what you call a pressure building up within you that you simply are fooling yourself and not truly changing your reality at all.
Squelching yourself from having the initial response which many of you can experience as a buildup in pressure and frustration. So the idea that we wish to emphasize as an addendum perhaps is the idea that it is all right, all well and good in fact part of the very process to allow yourself without expressing or acting but allow yourself internally as you say to have that reaction fully. Do not squaltch it. Do not squash it. If you squelch something, if you attempt to stop it and do not allow it to express, you do not allow it to deliver the message that actually reinforces that the new decision is in place. By denying your initial reaction, you are denying yourself and your new decision in many ways.
By judging the reaction rather than simply allowing yourself to experience it, you prolong it. You draw it out. You make it seem to take more time. can last days, weeks, months in that sense of your time.
If you do not allow yourself to assume that even that response is not an interruption in your process is not evidence against the decision, but is supporting features and factors to the decision that have in that sense a shelf life. If you allow yourself to have a response, even if it does not seem like the most integrated response without again acting, without putting out, but simply realizing you are having this response and allowing yourself to have it, it plays out generally in a matter of what you call seconds or minutes, perhaps hours, but generally not much longer. However, when you define that response as extraneous, judge that response to be backsliding, not a representation of who you now are and perhaps judge yourself for having created it to begin with. You are not allowing it to play out. You are not assuming it to be part of your process. you are not allowing it to deliver the message that then you can pivot upon and realign, reorient, remind yourself to who it is you know you are.
So in saying do not act immediately, do not express and have an external output immediately, we did not mean in any way, shape or form that you should not allow the full response, look at the full response. Your willingness to look at it dispassionately, your willingness to look at it maintaining your unconditional self-love allows even that response to reinforce the new decision rather than present itself as evidence to the contrary. And so therefore to again reinforce the idea you can have a response. You can have an interpretation and the response to that interpretation and fully allow yourself to feel it. fully allow it to play out without walking around performing actions. With that as a foundation, without having negative discussion with individuals, saying the things that are not truly representative of the new decision of the you that you choose to be. You can be with yourself with that response. And if it is a negative seeming response and you allow it to play out, it plays out. you get all right now what? But if you attempt to interfere with it, if you place many more levels of judgment and self-beratement to it, it stretches out.
It doesn’t have the opportunity to be part of the process. And the decision winds up being that it is an interruption in the process. That your process is interrupted. That you are interrupted.
That your decision is nullified. Generally spiraling downward back to the completely disempowered point of view, which is always ultimately also a decision. No matter what you use as a rationale, when you finally say this stuff doesn’t work, you’re employing this stuff to provide the evidence that it does not work, which at least as far as my way of looking at it is a paradox and perhaps no judgment intended, an irony. For you are using the very power to prove you don’t have the power. And this is how all-pervasive your power is. You are so powerful a creator that you can actually create the assumptive atmosphere that you are completely powerless. Now I understand this may seem to many of you like word play, very clever, verbose interaction. And if that is your decision, you will get the effect of this being only that.
But if you are willing to entertain the idea that no matter what you will make a decision, that decision will stick. You will trust that decision and you will act as though that decision is. No, you can in that sense realign to the idea that you are still using the mechanism when you are willing to have your allowance be purposeful, have your decision be purposeful, then your reality can begin to express purpose, can begin to express Your desires can begin to express the fulfillment of who you know yourself to be. In taking this one step further, the idea you call love, we expand the definition to be unconditional love is also something that you in a sense allow or perhaps you can say disallow. If you are willing to entertain the idea that you can allow for unconditional self love. Unconditional love by definition is love that is not contingent on any behavior. Love that is not contingent on any particular outcome. It is literally the stuff that reality is made of.
It is literally what you may refer to in your vernacular as the love of God or All-That-Is. Because true and pure love is simply the knowingness that everything exists within you is a part of you may reflect things that you desire and things that you do not desire, but it is all you. And your willingness to unconditionally love simply is the willingness to express that everything has the right and reason to exist and belongs. Although that does not remove your sense of discernment, that does not in that sense remove your sense of approving in that sense of certain ideas and disapproving or having certain ideas still be valid but not relevant to you. When you judge yourself,
You and only you allow that judgment.
it is a matter of allowance. You cannot judge yourself unless you allow yourself to judge yourself. And one way to look at the idea of judgment is that perhaps you are intermittently loving yourself but it is a form a very strong form of conditional love. If I do this I love me. If I don’t do this
I’m an idiot.
There is no external council or panel or group or consciousness that judges you. Now there may be individuals who seem to judge you. That is simply their external reflection of self-judgment. But only will you feel judged no matter what the external appearance is when you join in on the party. When you match the vibration of what you perceive to be external judgment, only can you feel a negative effect of something that someone is sharing with you if you match that vibration within yourself. Judgment is not something you feel from outside. Judgment is something that you create a version of and then strongly identify often with something occurring outside. But if you do not join in, if you do not judge yourself, if you do not place the conditions upon yourself, if you allow unconditional selflove, then anything else that anyone offers to you is simply a gift with a receipt to return it. Either it applies to you and you keep it or it doesn’t apply to you and you don’t. Period. And again, should an individual seem to judge you and you simply refuse to join in, you simply refuse to express anything to allow anything for yourself but unconditional selflove, you will not feel that judgment. And perhaps what you will feel is a deep compassion for the individual. For just as when you judge yourself, you create the idea of a negative feeling, so when you judge others, you create that same feeling within yourself. For judging others from the most integrated consciousness point of view since everything is you is judging yourself is momentarily removing so to speak. You never really do. But there is the apparency of removing the self-love or placing conditions upon the self-love when you unconditionally love yourself fully and perhaps find yourself doing something that is not an accurate expression of who you determine yourself to be. It is simple enough to simply use that opportunity to realign. Allow yourself to remind yourself of who you are and not create full-blown self-judgment out of the idea. And part of the idea of expressing self-love is to cut yourself the slack, to allow yourself to have responses, to allow yourself to seem to have reactions. If you do not act or express these reactions, you will not create an outer echo reflection of it. And all of the ramifications of that reaction will be internal. You allow them to play out. They resolve. You realign to who it is that you know yourself to be for you have allowed that to play out. You use that reaction to reinforce that you absolutely refuse to change your decision no matter what. And then you act. Then you speak. Then you reflect. You have not squaltched anything. Nothing has built up. No pressure. No frustration. Simply perhaps at first you may be excusing yourself from the room a lot. But that is all well and good for that is a perceived action on the parts of others. And though they may at first scratch their heads, when you come back in realigned, they will see an example that when a person makes the decision and allows themselves to maintain that decision purposefully.
Nothing can change that. It is now a reflection of who you are.
And you now become a living example to the other individual. Not that you are any way irresponsible for them, but you are being responsible to them by being willing to be a reflection of who you are. And what may be perceived as you being rude and leaving the room will come to be appreciated as the process of realignment, maintenance of the positive decision. Now, where this all leads is as you begin to use your responses rather than negate them, rather than judge them, rather than create guilt, which is lack of self-love about them, they deliver their message. They play out an idea. They reinforce your new decision and they disappear from your presence. Your response will only continue to seem to be the same if you do not allow it. For what you are truly allowing it to do is serve a purpose. You are allowing it to deliver a message.
When message is delivered, messenger has no reason to hang around. And so therefore, it is not a matter of constantly fooling yourself that things have changed. It is a matter of allowing yourself to express the change and using everything in your reality to reinforce the change. And as that occurs, your response changes for it does become dated and obsolete. What we are addressing is the fact that when you first shift your decision, it often does not seem so obsolete. There’s that reaction again. I thought I changed. I thought I was an unconditionally loving being. Here I am an idiot again. That is a process that you allow. You allow things to seem extraneous. I submit as I often have in interacting with members of your society that nothing is extraneous. Everything is part of the process. Nothing is an interruption in it. Unless you say so, in which case you create the apparency of being interrupted. You create the apparency of something out of sync with the process. But again, the paradox, the irony is that is part of the process. And as you continue to label it extraneous, you do not allow yourself to see how it is part of the process. You seem to reinforce, oh well, extraneous things happen. Which is another version of a statement you have. I will not repeat the idea of allowing is to relax to let go to experience things and accept that though on the surface at first they may seem to run contrary to a new decision that you’ve just made that they don’t. The moment you make the decision, you allow the decision to be who you are. The reality shifts immediately. And therefore, anything that occurs is a reflection of the new decision no matter what. But only if you choose to interpret it that way and use everything. If you understand that nothing is extraneous, everything is useful.
And when something would seem to come along that would not seem to be useful and your first reaction is, what possible use can this have in my reality? By all means, allow yourself to feel that. Allow yourself to get righteously indignant. Allow yourself to think, “Oh, woe is me.” But when you it plays out, ask yourself, “How does this serve me? How does this reinforce my decision? How is it actually allowing me to see where I still may have the old approach and not not express that old approach?
Now, one of the ways that we have defined this process whereby you make a decision, something comes along, you have a response, a definition of the thing that comes along as being absolute evidence that your decision didn’t stick that you then cave in and reassume a decision, generally a less empowered decision, but nevertheless, always Are you performing these steps so to speak
automatically, effortlessly? You allow yourself to cave in. Caving in is not something that happens to you no matter what the apparency is.
Generally you then resist that caving in. And what we are suggesting is that if that is how you choose to express yourself and respond, allow yourself to cave in. Or even caving in can be used. Even caving in has a shelf life when you allow it and seems to extend itself when you resist it. Perhaps a simple rule of thumb is that allowance creates instantaneous expression and what you call resistance seems to stretch out expression. There is often the idea that something could come along that is so overwhelming that if you allow it, you will simply explode. I submit to you that this is an apparency and that it is actually the fear of the fear that you are feeling rather than the idea itself. If you are afraid to be afraid, that is vastly different. That is another layer altogether than simply feeling fear, allowing yourself to feel the fear and then having a dialogue about how it serves you, how it reinforces your new decision rather than negates it. So you can purposefully allow And it is all a matter of choice.
If you allow your life to be random always that is a direct result of deciding all right I give up. Life is random and still you have your decision that is registered and because it may have been an old tendency the responses and the circumstances seem very quickly to support the disempowered notion. But when you change to the positive decision, allow the responses to be part of that decision. Refrain from action until you are able to use that to realign to who you are and then perform actions consciously, purposefully, abley, then you see a change. One other thing because you are linear beings. We have discussed the idea that consistently maintaining your positive decision about who you are can make changes very quickly in your life and that were you in that sense to even do so consistently without fail for but three of your days, there will be noticeable evidence. We did not say this in that way to challenge you. And we did not say this to set up the atmosphere. Oh, show me.
I can do that for three days. Prove it to me.
Because the very posture of prove it to me actually has an underlying assumption that it is not likely or true. And because that is the underlying assumption, how you will respond and interpret the evidence will support that underlying function. So perhaps you can loosen up on time frames. Understand that you will see changes but not if you focus on evidence to the opposite. Then the changes that do occur are apparent perhaps to others around you will not be apparent to you. And the idea is to begin to entertain the idea of not needing to test your reality. Up till now your reality has been a marvelous exam. This is the trial run if you will. This is the statement. And if you challenge the universe, show me.
I remind you the universe is you.
And a challenge has an underlying supposition that failure is very possible. Therefore, I again thank you for allowing me to interact with you to be a reflection of where you are now at. For although you may think you all hear the same thing in this interaction, I guarantee you there are as many interpretations of what I am saying as there are individuals present both physically and non-physically. For you experience the version of your reality, the things that you notice in a string of words you call a sentence are contingent upon your approach, upon the things that stand out to you, upon the way that you have expressed what you call your tastes, your desires, and your particular approach, your particular evidence gathering. And so therefore when I interact with you, when we as a society interact with you, we do so putting out an overall intention and then allowing that particular message and communication to serve as many purposes as it will no matter what the outcome is with no investment in anyone embracing or in that sense rejecting any of this. My responsibility to myself is to simply share what I know to be true for me and trust that whoever I attract are just the individuals that will benefit from it. However, that is the extent of my involvement. How you interpret it, how you use it, if you use it or not consciously is not of importance to me. For I honor you as a being, as a sovereign consciousness that makes your own decisions, no matter what those decisions are. And for me and members of my society, disempowered decisions are still an expression of your overwhelming power. And so we can find fascination in any decision. Your responsibility is to interpret this in whatever way you are. Trust that you have attracted things for a reason if you wish to and use it in whatever way you see fit, unless you wish not to use it at all. In which case, all right, ironically, you’ll be using it anyway. allowing other individuals to have their own interpretation. Allowing those interpretations to be valid for those individuals without taking them on yourself and remaining minded and grounded in who you are also will allow your decision to seem to register a visible effect. For if you are depending on the reactions, the responses, the interpretation, the evidence, the belief expression of others, all you are doing is using those others as a symbol, as a relief valve for your own decisions, your own beliefs anyway. So they only act as mirrors. Whether you create those mirrors to be shiny and true or smoky and dark. Responsibility two is simply being who you are.
Responsibility four is then taking on the added responsibility to make sure everyone else gets it, which is completely impossible. Remembering this allows you to let go. allowing everyone to have their own point of view and allowing yourself to maintain your own. As you consciously decide who you are, because that is what you say, that is who you know you are, your reality shifts immediately, instantaneously and completely in the moment of that decision, allowing everything that occurs from, as you say, linearly that point forward to be part of the process, a reinforcement of the decision. And looking not as to how something is interfering, but how it reinforces the decision allows that decision to be reinforced most quickly.
I will now in that sense allow for what you call interaction for this is though it may seem one-sided to this point a dialogue that takes place. And the dialogue is in a sense as though we are a room full of all right mirrored balls all reflecting off each other from different facets, different directions, catching the light from individuals that allow you to reinforce who you are. Catching the light from individuals that may not be a reflection of who you are. All of which serves to allow you to continue to know to define who you are.
And so everything is of service. And when we interact with you, this is what we get out of it. We get the reflections that assist us with our particular point of view, with our particular orientation. And the gift that you give us in interacting with us, whether or not we so-called speak is a great gift that is held by members of my society in high regard. And in honoring your sovereignty, we also honor our own for your willingness to allow us in the expression of this honoring fest. We all gain and we all see things about ourselves that we are now ready to expand to. And it truly is an interaction and not a one-sided event. for everyone is both teacher and learner. Everyone. And if you begin to allow yourself to see this, you will know when it is your turn in that sense to contribute. You will know when it is your turn in that sense to gather and to reflect and to define. So if you wish, you may now purposefully allow that your decision has registered and that everything from this moment forward, as you say, is a reinforcement of your decision, no matter what has ever happened to you up to this point. for your past or your perception of your past, which is often inaccurate, is one of your greatest rationalizations for continuing to make decisions in the present that are not empowering and not representative of who you say you wish to be. The past has served its purpose in the moment that it occurred. In the now moment that any event has occurred, it’s over. And if you insist on bringing it into this moment, it is not the past. It is a recreation in the moment using elements, using puzzle pieces from seemingly other things. But you are creating it right now. And therefore, the past has no hold on you unless you rigidly and completely insist that it does. Then you will create the apparency that it does. So as we move into the interactive phase of this communication, I remind you that you are now in the moment. You now create in the moment and it is up to you how you will continue to express yourself. Nothing is kept from you if you will but purposefully allow yourself to experience it.
Questions
Leave a Comment
Thank you for your comment!
It will appear after review.