Table of Contents
Healer
Russ: I am a healer. can you speak of the concept of the decision in light of uh the transmutation process that the human species is going through at this time?
Elan: Your body exists within your consciousness and is a direct reflection of your consciousness. Now your decision can work and get the effect of either approach.
One approach is that your consciousness is within and a result of your physical body.
Therefore, in order for your consciousness to express itself more fully, there need be a physical expansion.
Assuming that point of view, assuming that decision, truly will give you the effect and the evidence that yes, I made a physical transformation.
Now I can house more consciousness.
However, it is just as valid to understand that your body exists within your consciousness, and as you shift your consciousness, your body shifts accordingly.
If you wish to be most accurate, it always first begins in consciousness.
Even when a person winds up achieving the effect—“I can now expand my consciousness because I have evolved my DNA or whatever”—they will experience a shift.
They will experience more of their consciousness.
It will seem, or seem to be supported, that it was the physical change that allowed this.
But here’s what I ask you—and ask such an approach: Where did more of this consciousness that you’ve become come from?
[clears throat] …manifestation and outcome.
So therefore, I share this with you to introduce the notion of reveling in, embracing unexpected outcomes as they occur when you redefine, when you redecide who you are.
For that attitude—that relationship with unexpected outcome—allows you to begin to look forward to something that you formerly considered interruption, a hurdle.
“Oh, this is a roadblock.”
Sometimes you will say, by understanding that a roadblock is simply a turn in the expected road that actually has nicer scenery, you allow yourself to begin to revel in what an unexpected outcome delivers.
You begin to dive into desiring unexpected outcomes.
Unexpected outcomes will deliver results that did not seem to be possible at that timing. Will deliver results that would have seemed impossible with the circumstances. But only when you are willing to recognize unexpected outcome as part of the process, part of the manifestation, and not an interruption in it.
The very same unexpected outcome will only be experienced by you according to your particular definition, interpretation of that outcome.
And should something come along that is unexpected, and you define it as extraneous, a roadblock, you can only get the effect you label “interruption.”
However, if you revel—if you dive into an unexpected outcome as, “Ah, how creative!
This cannot be the one thing that runs contrary to my decision.
Therefore, this unexpected outcome is a result of my decision.
Therefore, this unexpected outcome contains unexpected jewels, unexpected opportunity”—then you begin to achieve, or shall I say assume, the posture to allow yourself to find the advantage in that unexpected outcome, rather than to create interruption.
Same circumstance, different interpretation. One interpretation—“This is an interruption”—can only be an interpretation through an old decision which contained “I can be interrupted, inconvenienced.”
The new decision, assumably, if it is an empowered decision, will contain the understanding that everything is part of the process, and therefore unexpected is like a surprise gift.
Now I get to unwrap it.
Now I get to see how this is even perhaps better—in your terminology—than what I had imagined was possible with the circumstances that are in place.
So your willingness to approach your reality through the eyes, through the perception, through the senses of your new decision allows everything that you perceive to be interpreted in a positive way that supports the positive decision, as opposed to interruptive.
The circumstances themselves are neutral. They are a neutral set of props with no built-in meaning.
You assign the meaning.
You assume the trust in the meaning you have assigned.
In a sense, the assignment of meaning is deciding, making a decision, trusting that decision, acting on the trust.
And if it is a negative interpretation, only can you experience a negative outcome.
So be willing, if you wish, to begin to see through the eyes, through the senses, through the interpretation and perception of your positive, completely empowered decision about who you are.
And nothing—nothing.
Did he say nothing?
I think so.
Has any influence on you whatsoever except your decision.
Your interpretation is simply the receptivity that allows you to reassert your decision or change it.
But ultimately, your interpretation results in decision—in a decision.
Thank you for allowing me to share that distinction.
Most likely, it was unexpected, so you’re already doing just fine.
The second half of this interaction, for specific reasons which we will not discuss, will be slightly shorter in duration than what you call normal—which to us is quite arbitrary.
Everything is either natural or not.
But “normal” is a judgment, a standpoint.
Therefore, I will allow you to interpret this in any way you wish.
Perhaps you will just trust me on this one.
Asker: I have a um sore throat, something in my throat, obviously something I can’t swallow or speak up about.
Asker: Um it’s from an old decision and u just need your perception.
Elan: Would you like to transform it?
Asker: Yes.
Elan: Is it necessary in order for you to believe that you are capable to transform it for you to understand every single reason that you made any other decision you have ever made? Or can you perhaps entertain the idea that simply establishing your decision right now can have the effect you desire in your life?
Asker: Then I have the trust issue.
Elan: All right. Well, you will trust again in something. And now understanding this, you can apply your trust consciously. So my question to you would be, who are you?
Asker: I am a fully conscious being creating positive aspects in my life with joy. Good health.
Elan: Now, how does your throat feel now?
Asker: I can swallow.
Elan: All right. When you are being such a being as you are right now, and I invite you to continue to create yourself in that way, your reality is not a hard pill to swallow. And your ability to express yourself is not impeded.
It is your gift and therefore you will not create the necessity to withhold or squalch it or create resistance. Swallowing in a sense digesting is simply a matter of deciding to accept your decision and understanding. Should you choose not to accept your decision, that is simply a fancy and divisive way of saying I’m going to make another decision.
I invite you to continue to be that decision and along with it will remain the idea you call physical comfort. For who you are is comfortable and only resisting who you are causes the friction that you often interpret as physical, mental, emotional, spiritual pain. How do you feel?
Elan: About decisions. Say we’ve made a decision and we’re living it just fine, but there are other people in the world that we have to interact with.
The other person excuse. Do proceed. [laughter]
Asker: You know now what you are simply sharing with me is something that you build into your decision. A supposition that you can experience but it is also an option to understand that anyone else’s process is synchronous to your own. And as you shift your decision your perception of other individuals will change so drastically that they will have appeared to change. If you have your decision be consciously inclusive of the allowance that all others decisions would never be able to interfere with your own and can only be synergistic with your own, then their process will never seem to interfere with you. You will not choose to interpret any aspect or result of their process as an interference or an interruption. Do proceed or does that answer the question?
Asker: Well, that’s pretty good. But what about…
Elan: Pretty good?
Asker: What about um you know, other people have made decisions or believe in things that are kind of opposite?
Elan: Well, they will experience that result regardless of you and your decision anyway. But need that be an interference in your process? Or can you understand that if you see something in another that seems to run contrary to your decision that simply allows you in no uncertain terms to remember your decision and therefore is a service has assisted you to realign to your decision. Now when you look at it that way, your attitude toward them changes. Your action toward them changes. Perhaps you’ll thank them rather than forsake them. Naturally, their response will have to change as well. And therefore, same set of individuals, one different approach, entirely different outcome.
Asker: I was just imagining actually thanking someone for arguing with me.
Elan: Do you in your statement of who you are? And fear not, I will ask you who you are. Choose to express yourselves as argumentatives.
Asker: No.
Elan: Is an argument only something perpetuated by more than one individual?
Asker: I will answer that guess.
Elan: Therefore, can an argument continue to take place with only one person?
Asker: Well, sometimes it seems like…
Elan: Absolutely, but that would not affect you and in fact may be quite humorous.
Asker: Okay, I could see that. Now the idea is this. What feels better to you? Remembering who you are? Needing to be right or thanking someone for assisting you to realign to who you are. Which feels more natural?
Asker: The second second one which is thanking them. Just reminding myself not to get involved in reminding myself to be who I want to be and not be them.
Elan: Does that not feel differently? Does that not then still allow another individual to have their process validate their process? But only can whatever your perception is reinforce your new decision. And in a sense, could you not make a case as you say for actually experiencing gratitude toward that individual for reminding you? Is it really that difficult to picture yourself thanking the individual or now that had it has been introduced to you, is it not actually an intriguing option?
Asker: I’ll probably try it.
Elan: Ah, if you try it, then you may get a result. But if you do it, you will get a result. Trying, once again, we have discussed this, is one step removed from doing. It is doing with a built-in allowance that you may fail. All the trying is not the doing of the thing, but simply the doing of trying. Now in light of that, are you going to try or simply understand truly foundationally fundamentally that individual no matter what their process is if you have attracted them does reflect a service back to you and that you may find it within yourself in how you create gratitude to thank them for it.
Asker: Thank you. Thank you. Well, not not in the bad way. Thank you.
Elan: Bad. Thank you. Good. Thank you. All right. Very creative. Understood. Do you understand what I am saying? And can you use this?
Asker: Definitely. Thank you.
Elan: Enjoy for understand in no uncertain terms. That is not the approach which you have formally taken. Gratitude, alignment, thankfulness, using everything to support your decision and therefore you are now embarking on something new, different, exciting, integrated and only can you get a corresponding new exciting and integrated result. And I would imagine if you are beginning to really accept this facet of yourself that it would be somewhat exciting and perhaps you will look forward to the next opportunity to not participate in argument. Perhaps you will find yourself disappointed. Oh, he’s not arguing with me. How can I align? [laughter] Fear not. You are still a line. But you are getting my point.
Elan: That was quite a bit. However, you don’t get away that easy. Who are you?
How do you spell that? U M I [laughter]
Asker: I am I am a person who does what feels best at any moment and okay now I’m a person who remembers who I am and doesn’t get led astray as at all.
Elan: All right. Perhaps again wording it in the positive, you remain focused rather than that you do not go astray. Not go astray still puts emphasis and focus on going astray. Remaining focused keeps you focused.
Asker: Focus.
Elan: All right. I thank you for the gift that you have shared not only with me, not only with yourself, but with everyone else who created the reflection that you just have contributed. Thank you.
Asker: Uh we understand that time is simultaneous. Is there a way in this physical reality to experience a certain degree of the simultaneity of time?
Elan: To some degree, yes. Through what you call your meditative state, you can get a feel for it. Part of the definition of being a physical being is that you do remain very finely focused in a linear point of view. And so therefore, it may seem as though that’s not the natural tendency. However, you are fully capable of experiencing that. However, in a moment that you would create that, you would no longer for that moment identify yourself as you the person and therefore if you are looking at it from the viewpoint of you the person may seem a bit perhaps confusing for you do define yourself very rigidly as a one thing at a time person before during and after. So again the answer is yes you can. You are a simultaneous multi-dimensional eternal being and you can feel this but having chosen to express a linear point of view it may seem a bit confusing for a moment therefore not advantageous to uh to consciousness depends how you look at it. It can be quite exhilarating, quite a wonderful reminder of the nature and extent of your consciousness. Or if you judge it and do not trust it, it can feel confusing and overwhelming. I assume you ask the question from the standpoint of simply experiencing more of yourself to create an inspiration to then bring into the linear reality.
In that case, it will be a positive experience. Simply understand that it is simply a beingness not something to achieve. You already exist on all these levels. You already have infinite consciousness and therefore you are not achieving, aspiring, creating, struggling, forcing. You are simply allowing yourself a glimpse of what you already are and what already exists. So that would be perhaps the best approach that understanding.
Asker: I also meant that as as much as expanding your own consciousness if that the possibilities existed to expand your own consciousness as it is focused right now.
Elan: Well ultimately again as a pinpoint experience when you in that sense begin to choose that frame of consciousness more consistently so to speak. Now we are speaking in linear terms about an infinite idea. So there are some difficulties in translating this but the idea is when you assume the approach to have an infinite consciousness be more germane more natural to your consistent state of experience then generally you will experience yourself in non-physical terms and no longer create the type of physical experience that you are experiencing. Does that make sense?
Asker: It makes sense to a certain point. What would happen to the physical body if you had achieved such a state?
Elan: Well, again, it depends on your reasons and your timing. In general, you will not and you will create the linear idea you call death and then create that experience more consistently. But theoretically, hypothetically, since anything you can imagine is possible, you would have the immediate transformation of your physical body into non-physicality and thereby seeming to those around you as though you had disappeared, so to speak. Hypothetically speaking.
Asker: Thank you.
Elan: I thank you as well.
Asker: And to you. I just wanted to say that I’ve been talking about in here uh wanting to write on personal growth and global transformation for about three years and at times getting down on myself for not doing it.
Elan: Well, your decision of wanting to has been flawless. Now, perhaps you will shift your decision to simply do it.
Asker: About a month ago, I I decided to do it. And I did. I got an article published on u on personal growth and stuff. And within like one week of doing that, money from an unexpected source showed up to pay off half my debt, and I was able to refinance another portion of it, like half the interest rate. So, it just seemed like by doing what I wanted to do, the universe was getting abundant.
Elan: All right, congratulations. You do not expect me to be surprised now, do you? [laughter]
Asker: I I often have been here talking about how, you know, things aren’t going the way I want them to. So, I thought I would just throw that one in there.
Elan: Ah, a testimonial. All right. Then you will be evidence for others. I thank you.
Asker: Thank you. And I uh also wanted to say though that in making that change, I’m also making other changes in my life.
Elan: All right. Are you making changes or are you simply deciding and being the change? Understand the reason for the timing of this languaging, the reason for the timing of this wording is to create the simple hinge pivot distinction fulcrum that will allow you to not consistently be making a change, but simply simultaneously and immediately being the change. So, watch your wording. Do proceed.
Asker: Well, um I’ve got a chance to go out to California and get trained in something that will allow me to go out and teach corporations about environmental responsibility, which is a good opportunity. And I’m letting go of other things in my life like uh eating meat and, you know, other kind of things that I used to stuff pain. And um I uh have been feeling kind of sad lately um at times. I’m just kind of wondering what’s what’s going on on a personal level. And I’ve also been feeling that we’re kind of on the verge of some dramatic changes in the world. And I’m wondering if it feels like there’s an energy or something going on. I’m wondering if that’s kind impacting on some of the sadness, the turmoil I’ve been feeling that…
Elan: Transformation in the air. E. All right. Why do you understand the sadness that you experience? What is your explanation?
Asker: Um, listen up everyone, particularly if you think this does not apply to me. [laughter] Proceed. It might have something to do with letting go of an old self-image that I’m that I’m comfortable with.
Elan: Ah, so built in to your clear definition is the idea that in order to be who you know yourself to be, you must let go of who you are not. Yes.
Asker: Yes.
Elan: All right. That’s one way to do it. However, by simply deciding to be who you are, does the person you no longer wish to be not simply become irrelevant to who you are? And is this not the shorter path, so to speak?
Asker: It does. And and I would like to do it that way.
Elan: Go right ahead.
Asker: It’s well, that’s the answer. Go right ahead.
Elan: That is how simple it is. I am not patronizing it. I am elucidating the degree of simplicity that you already employ to now make your conscious decision. Everything you are telling me about your process is decision making. Very specific. Nothing vague about it. And it works flawlessly. When you assume in your decision there is a process, there is the need to repent, there is the need to make amends, then yes, there absolutely is. But only because of the decision not being specific, not being the most empowered version of itself that simply takes care of all these contingencies. Again there is a distinction that I do not wish to be this negative person and I am this positive person. I am this positive person distances you from the negative person without having to release it, let it go, walk away from it, run at full speed away from it. So right now, if I were to assign you homework, it would be to be more mindful and specific with your decision, which segues me into the following question: Who are you anyway?
Asker: All right. Um, I am unconditional self love of self, myself, and others.
Elan: All right. Is that all?
Asker: That’s all I thought about. I’m I’m more… I follow my heart.
Elan: Are you stagnant or are you productive?
Asker: I’m productive.
Elan: Are you fulfilled or are you sad?
Asker: I’m fulfilled.
Elan: All right. Are you inspired or are you paralyzed?
Asker: I’m inspired.
Elan: All right. Being willing to define your decision in these terms, again, not from the perspective of who you no longer are, but simply from the perspective of who you know you are, will remove the vestiges that you are speaking of as being process-oriented. You have already done this one day. You decided I am a writer. You sat down and did what a writer does: Wrote from what you are telling me. Getting off the fence and making that decision, trusting that decision, acting on that decision worked with no necessity of process to allow you to make that decision. So you’re an expert. Simply now apply this more broadly. Understand?
Asker: Yes. But there’s something scary about…
Elan: Oh, yes. But Oh, what?
Asker: Well, like I could relate to what Jim was saying earlier in there’s some predetermined plan that we have here. I’ve often felt like there’s some judgmental god.
Elan: All right. Well, again, there is in one way of looking at it and there isn’t. So, what do you decide?
Asker: The deciding to say that there isn’t one there and that I don’t have any pre-plan to fulfill in my life and that I can do whatever I want and be empowered and follow my excitement and be abundant is somehow scary.
Elan: I suggest that it is not a scary prospect to be who you are. That where the fear comes in is when you pivot on your trust and include in your decision the possibility that you could fail which you cannot and never have. Always has your reality been 100% reflection of your decision, trust and action. So you have the track record to understand that where you are most constructively focused is in defining that decision very very succinctly and again this would be homework that I would allow you to have fun with: Write two or three sentences not as an affirmation of who you wish to be but as a statement of knowing yourself and consciously deciding to be that version of you. Fear does not come along with that.
Asker: Well, okay. I wanted to ask you um just two more questions.
Elan: Ah, all right.
Asker: In terms of um deciding uh to be who I am, I will often find myself um I’ I’ve heard you say that before and I’ve applied it a number of times, but very often as I go through through my life, I’ll find that I’m unconsciously or without being aware of it into the old me or like worrying about what other people are thinking.
Elan: Question. Do you notice when you do that?
Asker: Sometimes.
Elan: Well, ultimately all the time. In order to be noticing it, you must be entertaining the new positive decision and seeing it from that point of view to see the distinction. And your ability to so-called catch yourself is a function of alignment is a function of applying the trust. Ah, in this moment I had been functioning from an old decision. Well, thank goodness I realized that. Thank you. Old decision. Ah, here’s my three sentences. I state them. This is who I am. Feels right. Feels good. I’m back. Do I have to keep consciously affirming who who I am, deciding who I am, or will that become automatic as the old things needs to be automatic?
Asker: Absolutely. As we had shared at the beginning of this particular segment, it becomes automatic very quickly. Perhaps within what you call weeks of your time. Now understand it can become automatic immediately. But because of your preconceived notions generally you will create a lag 3 days, 3 weeks, 3 months, generally three weeks. But this is very arbitrary, not necessary. And we only mention it to work within your preconceived notions. It is truly instantaneous transformations on a gradient but we will not get into breaking it up into complex terminology.
Asker: Okay. And the last question that I had is um a friend of mine asked me to ask you this question. She’s a uh a teacher at Taber Academy and and a boy who graduated from there last year was on the BEu hockey team and I think last night or the night before was out in his first game uh playing and in less than two minutes into the game he he uh missed the check and went into the wall head first and uh broke his fourth vertebrae and the doctors say he’s paralyzed for life. This everyone says what a wonderful guy he is and everything. The question is how can if you were talking to him how would you help him to accept that and reframe his life so that he could foresee a positive future for himself?
Elan: There would be many different ways to approach this, but one of them would be that ultimately the paralysis was not caused by the so-called fourth vertebrae, but was caused by the decision using what was appearing to be overwhelming evidence that the paralysis was etched in stone. From my perspective, regardless of the physical circumstance, the paralysis is not a necessary result from my perspective. It is eventually a decision that is agreed with. Now you will create society degrees of evidence. Well, this evidence perhaps I can relabel this evidence perhaps I can see through the new eyes but everyone knows that evidence is the way it is and therefore the decision embodies that particular assumption. One other assumption, AIDS is incurable. That is a very erroneous assumption, but it is perpetuated so consistently throughout your method of communication, your media, that it is expected as part of that club. However, it need not be the case.
Asker: How can you reverse it?
Elan: Well, simply deciding to is a start. Then he will attract the means. He will attract the support system that will enable him to reflect that decision because it would seem to go against your societal grain. There may seem to be societal resistance at first and it will be up to him to maintain that decision throughout that idea, the societal influence. Ultimately, the other approach would be if he accepts this is what I’ve created and I will now function and explore through these so-called limitations. It is up to him. But where it is a disservice is for you to feel sorry for him assuming that he himself does not create his own reality and then supporting his disempowerment. It takes strength not weakness to create disease. Ultimate strength and honoring that strength allows the individual to be bolstered, which is a more conducive framework toward making or creating or manifesting positive transformation.
Asker: Aside from the physical healing, how can he how can he go forward psychologically or to view his future life?
Elan: Well, again, to keep it simple, to keep it, as you say, on topic, simply be willing to make decisions and not have them in that sense relegated or delegated to him. All right. I thank you. There will be time for but a few more sharings.
Female: I was going to ask and it’s about pain. Um in this technique that we’re being told about tonight, um I would like some clarity or some methodology to transform pain in the moment. Let’s say I’m experience it experiencing it like I stub my toe and it hurts a lot and I say I I am a perfectly healthy human being and I am not experiencing pain or I’m experiencing pain. Oh wow, it hurts and then can I transform it in that moment?
Elan: Absolutely. Well, the idea and again to keep it simple is the tendency in your society with pain is to assign a linear cause, a purpose, an initiating factor that you then continually refer back to, thus recreating the pain seemingly from a singular quote unquote event. And that takes the general form of a statement: Oh, there’s that pain again rather than here is a completely new moment. I am experiencing a sensation. This sensation may be similar to sensations that I have experienced before. However, I know I create my reality 100% in each and every moment. Therefore, one other way to look at it is that it is something different. Now, how does it serve me? And allowing yourself to experience it will focus you on how it is of service or what it is telling you or what particular alignment it is allowing you to make ultimately resulting in your decision being reestablished.
Female: It seems sometimes that the pain is is interfering and distracting from being able to focus on whatever it is the message is.
Elan: Understood. But again it is along with the bag of assumptions here comes that pain and giving that pain a birth, an infancy, a childhood and adolescence and eventual demise as being a continual single source event which it is not. Chew on that for a while. Okay. [clears throat] And who are you?
Female: I’m an empowered creator of an incredible journey.
Elan: Oh, how exciting. Happy trails.
Asker: It’s on.
Female: On the um the action stage of decision making. I’m not quite clear on what that that stage is.
Elan: All right. To keep it quite simple, when you decide who you are and that decision is perhaps a new decision and you begin to trust that that decision is registered, that decision sticks, that decision is now who I am, receptivity toward opportunities that allow you to express that person and willingness to act on those opportunities is how this falls in translating that into the framework.
Female: So I’m not wanting to go back on the old way of the old.
Elan: Well, again, being the new way, right? Not not being the old way. But when you make the new decision and know that decision is who you are, obviously since it is a new decision, new circumstance will arise. New opportunities will come up that would not have been there before. And that is where it is up to you to act on them through allowing, through seeing being willing to be open to opportunities and diving in and moving around and doing what that opportunity affords.
Female: I guess what I’m asking of is that the energy is when the decision is made and the action stage comes into play somehow there’s universal energies that are probabilities.
Elan: Well, your whole reality shifts when you make the decision and then what you attract supports the decision which is why we are calling them opportunities to express the decision. But it generally will come in the form of something to do, something to say, something to think, something to be, something that would have you move your body and do something otherwise being staggered. Place for now that will do as an explanation.
When you make the decision only can new opportunities arise. Knowing this sets up a positive expectancy and perhaps a level of excitement. Ah opportunities are forthcoming which you say you enjoy. Therefore, the only other aspect of being completely engaged and committed to your decision is your willingness to act on the opportunities as they come up. Perhaps in your old decision, you would see an opportunity and not do it. But your new decision doesn’t leave room for that. For you are productive, you are active, or whatever your decision entails that allows you to energetically move through your reality. And therefore perhaps at first it may feel as though you are motivating yourself to do motivating yourself to be active in the opportunity but that is short-lived. Fairly immediately and even directly immediately if you allow it, the opportunities will simply be so compelling, so overwhelming, so attractive, so doable, so effortless for you because they are opportunities that represent who you choose to be that there will simply be no question this is what I need to be doing. Period. That is the action.
Elan: And who are you?
Female: I am a conscious creating lightbeing.
Elan: Sometime this evening, uh, could you tell us who you are?
Female: Ah, brings to mind your saying, turnabout is fair play. I thank you. Perhaps I ask a question.
Elan: Ice. Now I am having fun with you. Allow me to simply say I am a joyous, productive, serendipitous being who marvels and revels at unexpected outcome and is engaged fully and committedly to the creation and experience of my reality and all it entails.
Female: That’s what I was going to say.
Elan: Oh, all right. [laughter] Then allow me to say to you, WELL PUT [laughter] A question. By the way, laughing through the channel, the channel laughing is a form of alignment. Were the channel to laugh literally there could be a momentary break in the connection so to speak. I will not go into the mechanics of this now. Simply accept that. But do understand that though there may seem to be a consistent demeanor within what you perceive to be the channel that we do laugh, revel and enjoy these interactions. Allow me to thank you for sharing that. Do proceed.
Female: Um uh I have a relative who’s uh who has cancer and she’s given no chance of of living uh by the medical people. She has small children and I find it easier to understand if it was just her. But uh when I think about her leaving her children, I I have a hard time with it. And I and I’d like to know if you want to comment on maybe what what the message is. As you said before, this sickness is a message and if the person who gets it gets the message, then there’s no need for the sickness. Do you…
Elan: Do you perceive that this individual has even entertained that a message could be gotten?
Female: I don’t have any reason to believe she has.
Elan: Then assuming that that is not her approach, this would simply then fall under the category of her timing and the timing of any other individuals that attracted such a scenario. What is the question?
Female: Well, the question was going to be what might the message be specifically for her or if that you didn’t feel comfortable answering that then…
Elan: Again it is up to the individual and I would be so bold as to ask her for even asking in such a way to honor her sovereignty of choice as an individual may seem to her to be a new approach and may be liberating in and of itself regardless of if it seems to have any physical result. But again, perhaps another way to answer this is you’re asking the wrong person, right?
Female: Thought you might say that. So, so then I was going to ask you, um, with something as severe as this, what types of messages might might there be in general?
Elan: Again, there are as many different messages as there are individuals, but it would seem to be on the surface that this individual is simply ready to manifest transformation known as death. And that allows her to explore what she will explore in that particular scenario as well as any of the children, family, friends, and relatives what they will explore about it. Do not mean to be vague, but there are reasons for the style of this answer.
Female: Okay, thank you.
Elan: Oh, I thank you as well. I have done nothing.
Shing mail over there: Eli. Vincent here. Greetings.
Elan: Greetings to you.
Vincent: I had an interesting thing happen today.
Elan: I’ll bet you did. [laughter]
Vincent: My copier would not copy a document. It kept getting jammed. The [clears throat] paper kept getting jammed.
Elan: All right. A synchronicity story. Do proceed. Did you assume it to be extraneous or did you assume it to be part of the process or perhaps did you assume both one and then the other?
Vincent: Part of the process.
Elan: All right. And what occurred?
Vincent: I took the document out of the machine. I said, “There must be some reason that I can’t copy this thing.” And there was a mistake on it. I fixed the mistake, put it back in the machine, took another look inside, there was a piece of paper in the way, and I didn’t see it the when I checked before, pulled the paper out. It worked perfectly. Now, can you explain how I did that?
Elan: For what reason? You already understand it. It is simply utilizing something that heretofore would have been a roadblock and interruption as part of the process and in fact deriving great service and shall I say accelerating your process along on its way by accepting everything, everything as part of the process then you act like a creator and so you did.
Vincent: Yes, it was fun. Now, do you think you can duplicate that [laughter] in everything in your reality?
Elan: Yes.
Vincent: Then perhaps you are now the machine. All right. I I find myself doing that more and more now.
Elan: All right. Feel free at any time to simply do it always, but more and more. If that is a comfortable gradient, by all means, take your time. Shows up every now and then. All right, we thank you.
Vincent: Would you like to know who I am? [laughter]
Elan: I suspect whether or not I would, you will tell me. [laughter] However, of course I would. Yes.
Vincent: I’m not going to tell you.
Elan: All right. [laughter] I pull one of yours.
Vincent: I’m a student and a teacher. Often times I hear people talk about uh things that are happening and things that are going to come uh like the problems in the inner city uh that are happening uh the economic shifts that are happening or the earth changes that are coming, you know, and they talk about these things as though they’re external. They’re inevitable and they really are not looking forward to these things and they experience them by the way in this way for it is built in to their decision and there is no one the future. There is an infinite number of probable futures. So everyone gets to experience the results of their decision without disturbing anyone else.
Elan: Precisely.
Asker: Uh it’s it seems fair to say that there’s an infinite number of possible realities. And while we all experience our own subjective reality reflected back to us by the people around us, uh there is an apparency that that the that many of us are in agreement as to what’s so and we experience a reality that has many common elements would seem similar though it is only truly an agreement apparency. But do proceed.
Elan: Exactly. The assumption, however, on the part of many is that in fact we’re all within a reality with specific parameters and there’s very little flexibility.
Asker: Absolutely. The assumption is that by many, not all. You know, however, it’s obvious that we’re never going to experience anything other than what everyone’s always experienced if one by one we don’t take responsibility to go outside the paradigm, push the bubble back a little bit and create things in a way that we prefer.
Elan: Recreate the bubble altogether.
Asker: Exactly. Rather than pushing against it, you know, such that these things that we foresee like earth changes and economic shifts and the like from retrospect or from the viewpoint of the future looking back on it, we realize how it was absolutely perfect that these things occur and that in fact rather than being the catastrophe we thought they were, they would they did in fact facilitate the transformation that we’re all saying we do want to experience. I thank you for noticing. And that’s who I am. I I’m a stand for the possibilities.
Elan: All right. I already knew who you were, but thank you.
Asker: Thank you. And it’s good to be visiting with you.
Elan: All right. At this timing, allow me once again and for the first time for I create myself anew in each and every moment as well to thank you for your willingness to give the gift of the expression of the reflection of your decision of who you are. This brings me enrichment and understanding about myself as a being. And your particular approach is how I chose to reflect that to myself. And so to me, these are riches beyond measure. As you say, I thank you for your willingness to unwrap yourself and share the gift that you are with me and with other members of your society. And for now, we’ll bed you adios fond and loving. Good evening.
113
Trusting The Decision
114
Right Now
Leave a Comment
Thank you for your comment!
It will appear after review.