Positive and Negative Synchronicity Part 2

Understand your higher self is making up your physical self. Your life is the result of the imagination of your higher self to begin with. That is why in that sense I said, “Do proceed.”

Well, since you did in that way create that discrete co-creation experience with us, allow me to ask you a few questions. Did you first of all notice—and by the way, for those of you who may be new to these interactions, Essani would be the nomenclature of the planet that I come from, and they are speaking about interacting in meditative states with various beings from my society—did you notice upon the birth, upon the physical birth, that there was not what is called pain to the mother during the birth process at all? She was very awake and there and part of it.

And did you experience the joy, the flowing, the allowance, the lack of resistance, the lack of friction? Did you notice in that sense what you may call the lucidity of the newborn?

Did you also notice in that sense lack of what you would call umbilical cord?

What was—well, we no longer in that sense have that expression for the exchange. In what you call colloquially the womb, it is by direct electromagnetic transference and not by electrochemical means. Therefore, that particular symbol no longer exists upon our planet, and we therefore do not enjoy what you call belly buttons.

All right, perhaps a midwife of sorts.

For you will understand that that symbol in that individual’s choosing to create the birth process upon our planet is completely self-empowered; it is not necessary. There are no hospitals, there are no doctors. One of the reasons I asked you these questions was to share with the many of you who are synchronistically attending this interaction that you too can experience the birth process in this way. And it is what you have been taught to expect, and the investment that you make in fulfilling that expectation that creates what you consider to be the pain during the birth process and subsequently sometimes the need to actually surgically extract the fetus rather than in that sense the natural process. But as you begin to get in touch with this process as being natural, as you begin to view it as an allowance rather than a forcing, and perhaps a slightly new perspective to many of you, as you begin to understand that the soul that you will be midwifing into physical reality has, as you have all led many other lives and is not a quote-unquote “infant mentality,” you may understand that you can begin direct communication with the soul to be born prior to the birth process. And when you do this and literally enlist the aid, assistance, and help of the child itself, you can experience painless birth. Therefore, thank you for the opportunity to express this.

Oh, and you mean to tell me you actually went and had a great time? Oh my, what a surprise.

Oh, how about the other thing or person that you were concerned about?

What you call the doubts or the negative trust—what did you learn about that for in going down there? Was in that terms what you call some negative anticipation?

Well, do understand that you are showing yourself in no uncertain terms just how much power you have. For even knowing all that you know, you will always have the choice and opportunity to choose the negative. This may on the surface seem like a curse; it is in fact a blessing, for it shows you that no matter what, you will always have 100% complete choice. Right. Simply understand that you are now seeing a pattern to the positive outcomes of your willingness to act in the positive way, and allow that momentum to continue to reinforce itself through your willingness to do these things.

Well, question: when the negative comes up, do you say “Not now,” which effectively pushes it back into the closet, or do you say “All right, negative emotion, have your way with me—really have your way with me, I will express you, go on, give me all you got”? This is key. Allowing yourself to feel what you have created—a belief creates an emotion; allowing yourself to have that emotion allows you to access the belief. Squelching that emotion and acting on the opposite may temporarily give you a different effect, but that squelching does not allow yourself to dive into the feeling. You will get to the point where you do say, “Now what? I have done it; it is done. Now what?” Then ask yourself, “What must I have believed?” When the belief comes forth, say, “I do believe that—it is not something I prefer, but I believe it.” Then give yourself the alternative. Giving yourself the alternative in complete acknowledgment is flow and choice; giving yourself the alternative in complete denial is exhausting. You only resist yourself. So the minute that you decide—the second or microsecond—that you decide to allow yourself, there is no exhaustion. Exhaustion, tiredness—that type of idea is only, and perhaps again this will be an assistant reminder, from resistance of your flow and resistance of your ecstasy. It is exhausting to be who you are not. Therefore, do the whole process.

May I ask you a question? So what? Where are you going to go? There is no outside, there is no inside; there is nowhere to go. If you get lost and you are the only thing left, you are not lost. Therefore, understand again that there is nothing—nothing, nothing—that you can create within your reality that can overcome you. And the timing for having created something is blatant evidence that that is the perfect timing for the doing of that thing. Otherwise, you would be creating things which were extraneous, which had no meaning, which had no reason. And as we have discussed, everything has a meaning and a reason.

Excellent question. Understand that in certain sense—I do not mean decor-wise or layout-wise—in many ways, Essani, our planet, would be the Grand Central Station of our region. We in that sense have a germane population; we are also, perhaps you can say, in contact with many of the quote-unquote forces that you have discussed, but we also have a plethora—a portion, perhaps you can say, of our population that is made up of both individuals from other planetary societies visiting and individuals from many other societies incarnating temporarily, sometimes for a full lifetime, sometimes for several full lifetimes, and sometimes for several hours, days, or weeks. So therefore, there is a very transient idea within our society. Our permanent fixed population, colloquially speaking, would be between perhaps 200 and 250 million, and the many other millions would be comprised of these other beings.

A being in the sun—the sun is a being, has a consciousness. The moon has a consciousness. The Earth itself has a consciousness that is comprised of a single female and a single male aspect that are, may perhaps—I don’t know the density levels, a density five or seven or six—a completely different density level than the two species that you were discussing. They act as, as it were, as custodians of the planet, as caretakers of the planet. Just as the being in the sun, or the sun as a being, exists at a different density or different vibratory level than we humans do. You as Essani—in that sense, all right. We understand. Um, can you verify that—are there beings like that on the planet of Essani? Can you know?

Well, there is a similar idea; there is less separation drawn from us in how we relate to it. For instance, in my interacting with you, I would understand what you are calling your Earth Consciousness to also be part and parcel of your own consciousness—simultaneously both—and, as a matter of fact, all consciousness is of all living things upon your planet and at the same time a discrete self-aware being, as you are. Similar to what you call “All That Is”—All That Is, or God, is everything all at the same time and can perceive as everything simultaneously, but at the same time it can perceive itself as a singular, discrete individual. For as you are made in perhaps you can say the image and likeness of God, since you possess the quality of self-awareness and individuality, that has to in that sense be equality of All That Is. So therefore, there are similar relationships from planet to planet. Perhaps we do not necessarily break it down as discreetly as you do in terms of separating it out into literal beings; we more would look at it from the overall consciousness standpoint, with which again there is not truly a separation even between your own consciousness. But from the perspective that you are sharing, what you are saying, I understand, and there is that effect yes.

Exactly. That is absolutely one way to look at it, yes.

Well, again, that is one way to look at it, but again does employ certain degrees of separation. Now what you consider to be these councils, which would appear from your point of view to be a hierarchical structure—first of all, in general we represent a regulating frequency or focus more than an actual council. And from their perspective, there absolutely is no hierarchy; there is a complete equality. So sometimes in using the verbiage that you have chosen, there are certain connotations which we will not necessarily agree with. It is far, shall I say, more loose than you might imagine. There is no “this or that needs to happen” in order for there to be a complete transformation. What in general will occur is, as that happens, that will simultaneously just automatically occur—any of the regroupings, any of the reunions, any of the checkings-in, in order to in that sense again perhaps you can say “oversee.” But because you do have complete free will, there is no shepherding going on, really. You actually are your own free will soul. So these are statements and expressions, and to some degree do occur, but nothing is necessitated on their occurrence. Does that make sense?

Well, you can be free from any germane seeming negative experiential reality that you would feel is part and parcel of the mass consciousness. You will be in contact with it, but it contains the complete plethora of negative and the complete plethora of positive. So from within that soup, should you choose in that sense to embody the positive, then the negative portion of the mass consciousness will still be there, but that will not be the portion that you seem to interact with, and it will make little or no sense to those choosing to experience and to create positive. So in other words, again, as you expand, you are more aware of negative and positive. How is this possible, one may ask? It is possible that your act will choose what you experience, but you will still be aware of all the rest. So if you choose positive action, positive interpretation, you then get positive experience in 100% proportion, but you’re expanding awareness of negativity—for instance, since it does exist within this reality as an option—will be through observing others who are choosing to experience that negativity. So you do not escape the mass consciousness; you are still in that sense connected to it, but you are embodying one portion of it, thereby having another portion be somewhat irrelevant to your experience. So it is not “getting rid of it”; it is a shifting of emphasis, a shifting of perspective.

Well, do understand again that everything will be in your experience a product of your interpretation. Now, one way to look at what you call diminishing ozone is yes, there is less of the protective aspect of the atmosphere. Another way to look at diminishing ozone is that you are now ready and able as a society to absorb that much more energy directly from your central sun. The individuals who decide, “My protection is gone,” again create the attack and create in fact their protection being gone—they get that prophecy fulfilled. Those who understand that the opening of your ozone can also be likened, utilizing again the analogy of the consciousness of your planet, as the opening of the crown chakra of your planet itself, and therefore the timing of it meaning that that must be the timing whereby you can now in that way interact with that much more of the energy of your sun—that person who makes that designation has a completely different attitude, walks around differently, interacts with the sun differently, gets a different effect. All of these things exist, and it is simply a matter of what you emphasize. In so, the disappearance of whole species has been going on throughout your history prior to what you call humans upon your planet in roughly the same proportion as is occurring now.

Yes. However, we—we mostly inhabit these bodies. Well, not technically speaking from your point of view, but from the point of view of your higher self, this is but a mere wink in the eye of the life of your soul.

At this timing, we will pause for a short break, to be determined the length by you, and resume contact at that time.

All right. I’ll say, before we continue, next month’s interaction—or this month’s—will be entitled “Desire and Allowance,” two primary mechanisms for creating in your reality. We thank you for the suggestion. Proceed with sharing.

All right. Describe, for those who do not know.

Well, the interpretation displayed is based on a negative interpretation by that individual, yes. That’s correct. And I wanted to ask you about a few of the things that he experienced aboard the ship that took me somewhat by surprise in seeing this movie. All right, perhaps we can shed some light.

That will be, in that sense, an interpretation and not literal. What you call the hive symbol will represent a style of, shall we say, community—perhaps hive-like mentality in some senses—but the imposition of the membrane in that sense is somewhat, shall I say, Hollywood.

There are many different substances aboard the craft, some in that sense that a similar description will be used for sustenance. In that sense again, we are not exactly sure which one you are referring to, but perhaps symbols were again mixed for more exciting presentation.

Exactly. So therefore, there was the perception perhaps in that way of again—and I am being very colloquial—a hive-like mentality being translated into a literal hive, but that is an interpretation. And understand that most of that individual’s recollections are via what you call regressive hypnotism.

Before you proceed, understand in general what you term Reticulum population will in general be comprised of three distinct body types that are similar in size though differing in coloration and differing in what you would call bodily composition. There is also a fifth race of beings that we will not name, but the idea is that they also will appear a bit more humanish and will in that sense very often seem to be in a coordinating aspect of the interactions. There are also—understanding in no uncertain terms—due to the hybridization process taking place, many different varieties of the hybridization process with your planet but also with some other species and civilizations as well. So therefore, many of these symbols may have been beheld and witnessed and will be interpreted again along the lines of least resistance for any individual. In that case, that individual had relatively little or no background to which to compare what he was experiencing.

This is very rare, however, it does occur. And generally for several reasons. One of the reasons will be by distinct agreement from the individual consciously; however, more than not, it is unconsciously the agreement whereby the individual has structured his life upon the planet in such a way to have detached themselves from what you would generally call family structure, friend structure, and therefore have unconsciously agreed in that sense to, shall I say, participate in the interactions from the perspective—all right, more of a host in a sense, allowing for the comfortable visitation via having other humans around who seem to be calm.

Well, now understand the individual experiencing it will have varying degrees of interpretation. And if they themselves feel they are being abducted against their will, their interpretation will come from this perspective, and they will look and what they see will be the evidence through what they already believe.

That reality absolutely does exist. What we are sharing with you is the symbols that you are referring to are not an example of them, but may appear from the individuals undergoing the process, out of fear, out of “happening to them,” out of negative synchronicity, that they would be a representation of such a race. Again, though, from our perspective, that is not the case, though we understand fully how that realization was derived.

In the way that you mean, in general no. Though there will be overtones upon the crystalline structures that we grow upon energy templates that in that sense contain embedded within them what you would call the circuitry—but this is very colloquial—an aspect of being able in that sense to also convert and utilize sunlight. So to some degree, the solar technology to some degree is utilized, but not primarily. You will find in your society however that there has been much progress made in this regard. Much of this technology is currently being suppressed, but you will find it to be an efficient means of harnessing electricity upon your planet in the near future.

Well, absolutely. But in general, it will be surpassed in simpler, less shall I say dangerous technology.

Oh, thank you.

Well, more than one. Oh, so these are the cousins to which we refer. You have perhaps assumed that they would only be of human descendancy, but that is not altogether accurate.

Ones that we have not discussed. Good try, good try. May the idea will be that in general what we are speaking of will represent societies similar to your own—not quite member, if you will, of our association of many societies—and therefore it is too early in that sense to make the identification. They still have free will; they still have certain choices that they also may make.

Well, in a sense, the idea is to explain individual will very often perform the same action expecting a different result, which is not likely. But in the very same circumstance, the simple performance of even a slightly different action can only cause the creation of a different result. Is there something specific you are looking for with using me? Because I don’t see how any situation could be the same, and then therefore how could an action be the same if it’s at a different timing?

Yeah, I don’t see though in practicality that that’s always true, because I think that you know, say someone did yell at you and you ignored them, then perhaps they would continue to yell, but maybe at some point then they wouldn’t. I don’t see it as being that cut and dry.

I think it should be, but I don’t quite get it, I guess. That’s it, because I don’t see how it could be the same or similar—I could see similar, yes, but the same, no.

Oh, if something comes up, please share.

Well, in a sense yes—you turned the dial and in that way got our frequency, which was real exciting.

Well, it is a two-way radio, do understand.

Oh, first of all, understand it would be impossible to remove yourself from the process; it is coming through you, so yes, it is your words but maybe perhaps being utilized in a slightly different way. Second of all, you may wish in that way next time you do such a thing to employ what you call a tape recorder so that you can hear for yourself what is said. For as I seemingly speak through Andrew and you assume you are all hearing the exact same thing, perhaps you may wish to pull aide after one of these interactions and ask each other what you actually heard. You will find each individual caters what I am saying to what it will behoove them to hear. So therefore, even if you allow another individual to tell you what you said, it would not be your own interpretation necessarily at all of what you actually think was said. So therefore, the tape recorder in that sense will provide common ground, if you will. That simple suggestion will allow you to perform the next step.

What in that sense was it afraid it would find?

And simply your willingness to look at it, feel it when it comes up, and discuss with yourself again similar to an earlier conversation—“Where do I feel like I could even be lost?"—will allow you again to realize yourself as the source and you cannot be lost.

Completely and completely up to you. It is not a prerequisite in the process itself, but if one imposes the belief that it is, then it becomes so. So for instance, our particular interaction with Andrew is completely unconditional. There are no stoic exercises, breathing types, eating types, sleeping that we request from him. It is an unconditional understanding, and therefore he need not do anything other than have the desire and the allowance for the communication to take place. So you can in that sense be that loose about it, or if in that sense you wish to impose a rigid set of standards, can do that as well. But when that rigid set of standards seems to be the only way to do it, what I am actually saying is that that is self-imposed, and when you impose that set of standards, it seems like that’s the only way, but you need not do it. It is not inherently built into the agreement.

Well, it may be that you strengthen the connection to those two, but that more open attitude will obviously then yes give you a star-studded show.

Oh, thank you over there.

Now, before you proceed—synchronicity presented itself, you acted upon the opportunity that synchronicity brought. What happened?

All right. And the whole—the information that you are remembering from within yourself with a little nudge from us—at least let’s get that straight.

Perhaps you will find again the timing to be synchronicity—the readiness factor, as you say. But you will find a certain receptivity again—maybe or maybe not what you expect—but simply allow yourself to share with no insistence, and simply because it has worked for you and it is a gift you wish to give, allowing them to do whatever they wish with it. We thank you.

All right. Is there anyone else in this general vicinity with a question?

Well, that is one way to look at it, but they are also distinct in and of themselves in your reality.

Oh, absolutely. And you experience your connection to it in what you generally referred to as your dream reality. In fact, you are often also—and I mean this literally—guides for other consciousness in other civilizations, other types of densities of reality, in that dream state.

Well, to some degree you were experiencing the results of your resistance to your interpretation of that being’s agitation. Did that translate? Therefore, what was your reasoning for assuming that the being was agitated?

All right. Do you understand that sometimes when interacting with me, individuals will interpret my tone or perhaps my emphatic nature as being agitated, but yet when dialoguing with me will understand that I have ultimate patience and am never in that sense agitated? The point is that when they believe that I am, they create a particular effect. Therefore, perhaps you may wish to view this—enter this situation in a slightly more open posture and simply understand the difference between emphatic and agitated. All right, we thank you.

Oh, that will always be one way to interpret a transformation. The individuals who interpret it as “what a bummer” will in that sense create the action of frustration and agitation. Other individuals will interpret it as an obvious, blatant opportunity from the universe saying “time to do something else,” and therefore then giving those individuals the opportunity to do something else they desire to.

No, I wasn’t.

That’s well. If you were, your shall I say actions as in that sense representing it—not agitating you—would have been perhaps the clearest example for them. In the meantime, perhaps you can simply share what we have said, though to some that may seem a bit thin.

Well, it is a blessing in disguise if they choose to view it that way; it is a curse if they choose to view it that way; it is simply both, right? So perhaps that is what you can share—that it is one complete whole unbroken event containing all possibilities; they get to choose.

From one perspective, yes. From another perspective, no. From the perspective of all-knowing, all-seeing—what can surprise you? You already know it all, you’ve already seen it all. From the perspective of separation and apparent—perhaps you can say—degrees of amnesia, you are a living example of the surprise within All That Is each time you are surprised.

Oh, we will allow for one, so pick the best. Darn—now, you do not think this is the one extraneous thing in creation, do you?

Yeah. Um, I was even thinking about that—I wouldn’t even be able to get any of these questions in, so I was prepared for that. Well, all right, you’re one above. I’ll be real direct. It’s about the chambers and that subject, and specifically the ones in the Fairfield area. Who built the chambers?

Well, it would shed a different light upon it, I will say. I see. Okay. And if I may at the end of this interaction just add—I want a little home fun with another question that I ended before. Maybe all right, we shall see. We thank you.

Now, the present is not experientially a result of the past. Now, what this means is this: perhaps in a linear progression, what you would call point A may lead to point B, may lead to point C, so there is a seeming cause and effect relationship that occurs. However, when you are at point C, B and A no longer have any effect on C whatsoever, unless you determine that they do and through your actions then make the connection. So I am not saying that a past may not seemingly through cause and effect lead to a present result; what I am saying, and what we are saying, is that the present is not experientially affected by that past until you recreate that past in the present. You always only exist right here, right now. In the right here and right now moment, five minutes ago has no effect on right now until you say, “What I am doing right now, I am doing because of what happened five minutes ago.” Then you create the effect, you create the connection, and then you create an apparency that is a result of that past, and you are bound to that past. But if you can understand that each now moment is unique, each now moment is complete—that you only ever exist right now—nothing has any effect on right now but what you say right now, what you choose right now. If one of those things that you choose is a rationale or an excuse to perform particular actions because you have done so in the past, then there may seem to be an effect from the past, but you literally have recreated that effect right here, right now. So it is not even an effect from the past; it is a recreation of a seeming past in the present. In general, that past is not even accurately reflective of what actually happened; it is your version in the moment of that past. Does this make more sense?

Therefore, if you simply exist in the moment and do not spend that moment reflecting on a perceived past, projecting a perceived future, you can actually see what’s right in front of your face, and that is all that matters in any now given moment—what’s right in front of you. As you begin to utilize the tools that are right in front of you, perhaps let’s say choosing from those opportunities with your excitement and acting on them with your integrity, then you create new effects that have nothing to do with the past. And as the past becomes less and less relevant, actually begin to seemingly lose memory of the past itself, for it no longer has any relevance to the present. So therefore, a loss of memory in this way will very often begin to occur when you live completely in the now moment. If in the now moment something from the past will be of service to you, then you may bring it up as a memory and then you can recreate it in the moment. But once you begin to function in the moment, the garbage so to speak from the past no longer comes up. Does that make sense?

That is one of the differences between living in third density, which is the general description of your reality though you are now transiting into fourth, and fourth density, which is still a physical reality whereby you no longer express the degree of separation and therefore no longer express the degree of limitation. And when you in a given now moment bind yourself to a perceived past, that is a limitation. When you simply act from what is available in the moment, that is integration and complete freedom. Do you understand?

Therefore, nothing in your past has any hold on you until you say so. And when it then does, it only has a hold on you because you say so. This is what we mean.

All right, yes. We thank you. There will be time for but a few more sharings.

Perfect, as are you.

It is received, and understand it is one of the simplest vibrations for us to receive. We thank you for shining so brightly.

Well, if you look at it that way, you create a lot of work. If you understand that you already are the Christ Consciousness and simply be that way, allow it—there is nothing to obtain; it is simply the allowance of what already exists within you. You may seem to then not need to create a process. Every time you unconditionally love yourself or someone else, every time you simply refuse to judge from that unconditional love, every time you render service not at the cost of yourself but also in service to yourself, you are being that spirit in action.

Well, it was the perfect choice of words, allowing me to demonstrate that point.

Well, that will be the effect, but it will not be so mindful. Simply as you become that, you attract other individuals of like mind and become friends. One of my questions is—I’ve been doing a lot of reading about the seven rays, as it’s been written many times. Do you see that this is—well, I’d have to give it, but is the concept of the seven rays influential on how these groups form? In general, it will be more an expression and statement of them, though it is often perceived to be the other way around. And that will generally be our perspective in any matter. There are no controlling features, but there are features that then automatically express themselves in a certain way once you make the decision. So you can actually affect that, in a sense. So you’re saying that simply—there will be an attraction between those elements that are on the similar way. The idea is when you are unconditionally loving to yourself and others, you are simply the white light containing all seven.

Well, again, they are a statement of the evolution—not necessarily cause of it. They are a result of it that then may serve to then reinforce and enhance the transformation itself, but again are more an expression of it, a byproduct.

Well, at first they tend to be the fullest them they can be, not feeling any need for such a group, for they already feel complete. And then the individuals that they attract will reflect that completeness in them back to the individual. So it is not a group that forms a support, but is a group of complete beings who then reinforce that in that completeness. So would you say that the groups themselves are not so much to serve function? Well, again, they then will serve to reinforce the very transformation that itself yes, by being more of a cohesive visible symbol.

Oh, thank you.

Well, again, this is automatic. As each of these groups—both positive and negative—comes to each of your individual awarenesses, you then have a particular impression, you then have an interpretation, you then perform certain actions based on what you have seen. So all of these groups have subtle effects. The negative groups will attract other individuals still seeking and still exploring negativity, while generally at the same time positive groups will view them as an alternative they definitely don’t wish in that sense to partake of. So everyone is of service to everyone else—no exceptions.

There may be that apparency at first. However, what will occur—and again, I understand that this does not jive with your general understanding—is that you will literally split off into two parallel Earths. And that one Earth will perceive everyone upon it has this negative perspective, and the other one will actually appear to embody simply the positive.

Yes. Once realities are that dissimilar that they no longer would be congruent to each other, they literally split off in frequency, and each Earth perceives itself in its own continuum and does not notice, shall I say, the split. Simply, for instance, if you should choose positivity, attract a positive nucleus, you will begin to see more positive news, shall we say, as an example on your television, and eventually the negativity will seem to disappear into the woodwork, depending upon the degree to which you embody that positivity. 100%—many individuals will still choose to embody a percentage of positive and a percentage of negative that allows them to exist on a third world that contains both. So then are you saying that an infinite number of Earths will then result depending on what percentage of positive or negative quality? Not only am I saying that, but I am saying there already are an infinite number of Earths, and there are already an infinite number of probable past Earths as well. This gets very complex from the finite point of view, or you are discussing infinity from finite terms.

And even if it didn’t, Alana, you too will always rise to the occasion. We thank you.

Well, all right. You need not take any of—again, the interpretations as “the way it is,” and in that sense obviously he did not. Interestingly enough, generally humans will attribute brain sucking to aliens, but it is your own.

All right. We thank you for that expression, and also for the expression of those in this audience as well that went “Oh,” and also then went “Ah.” That’s it. We thank you.

And if we say we are at the base of the pyramid because we experience this polarity—would the top of the pyramid be that? Where is that? What I’m thinking about when I say it is something besides negative and positive—again, that is what you might call the balance between the two, which contains them both. It is the single point and no longer in that way expressing separation or polarity. To utilize your pyramid example, the pendulum is still repeat—where the pendulum is still? Well, in a sense, that is one way to view it, and where it moves at infinite speeds is another way to view it. You are speaking now about things which are arbitrarily dependent upon other symbols—still compared to what? Moving compared to what? So it becomes arbitrary.

Oh, that has confused you even more.

Oh, it is my pleasure.

There are many ways to look at this. What you would call body consciousness in that sense will begin at what you call conception. What you generally refer to as your style of sentient consciousness will generally enter just after physical birth. Now, this is in a sense not etched in stone and will vary, but that is the general tendency. On our planet, but then on your planet—you say on our planet there is less of the dichotomy but still a similar arrangement. And in fact, you will find that even in the first three years of your infant’s life, there is still a very loose connection of what you call body and soul. It will generally lock in at what you call three, and in that sense really lock in at what you call 33.

Well, as I said, there is an in-and-outness about it; it is not that cut and dry. But perhaps you may understand that it is not always that you are communicating inward. Very often individuals will express the communication to what they call the unborn child and still think of it in terms of “out there,” so to speak. This all becomes quite arbitrary. The Chinese say—I believe the Chinese or the Japanese—read to their unborn child, and they claim that that makes them a whole lot smarter.

I did not say there was no soul there. I said your definition of sentience generally enters afterward, but there is a strong connection between what you would call the soul and the physical body. The physical body will exemplify what you call body consciousness, but the soul is still in a sense connected to the body. So perhaps again—perhaps I am being a bit humorous, poking a bit of fun—but the idea is if they are reading to the what you call unborn child, you need not assume they are reading to the belly; they are reading to wherever the unborn child will manifest.

Nice. All right. And your focus of the soul as either being pinpoint in that body or a bit more expanded is what we are discussing. Thank you.

In general, there will be what you would generally refer to, though perhaps not in the mausoleum terms you are used to, as immediate disintegration or decay—perhaps from within or something that you do. Well, it is simply immediate, for we are not, shall I say, cued by responses in the body that it is time. We make the decision, we close our eyes, we shift our consciousness, our body then no longer has a relevance to that reality and will seem to disintegrate.

Absolutely. Some individuals from time to time have done this.

Well, yes, but you have not heard of them, nor are they ones that you would know. But the idea is yes, it is a possibility. And anytime you wish, you can simply close your eyes, say “All right, it’s time to go,” and if you open them, it wasn’t time. But you can be that conscious about it, and if it is time, you will have a nice trip.

Ni. And that will also sometimes be the case—you may say “All right, I’m ready” and find out you were not.

Don’t we have that on our planet? Well, in a sense yes, but we were referring to what you generally call the natural indigenous population. Now there are what you would call mutative, perhaps you can say, examples of general varieties, but that was not what we were speaking of. Upon that actual planet, we were speaking of multiple distinct different sexes, which again become perhaps for now impossible to explain in terms that would make sense.

And to you.

At this timing, allow me to thank you all for your synchronous ability to attract yourself to this interaction. For even if when interacting with us nothing is apparently of service to you, you will find that we do interact with you on what you create to be other levels, and therefore the usefulness of what we communicate with you and the timing and dispensation of it is an ongoing process. And you may just find, walking down your street when a car comes by and splashes water all over your clothes, that you say “This is synchronicity—ah, Alon said that would happen”—and then you will take the positive action rather than kicking the car and hurting your foot. Each time you kick that car, yes, you will hurt that foot. So perhaps that is an example of performing the same action and getting a similar result. We thank you for your willingness in that way to interact with us at this timing. We thank you for your willingness to open up the many doors within you that allow you to see that it is all one house—one house that you live within, one house that we live within—the house of All That Is. We thank you and bid you a most fond and loving good evening.