The Recollection

You are infinite, eternal, and multi-dimensional beings. And this means, in the truest sense of the word “eternal,” that you have no beginning; you have no, therefore, middle or ending in the overall sense of your being. However, within that infinity, within that totality, there are many diverse ways that you express your beingness. And one of those ways—just one—is in this particular reality you call the physical reality, within which there is, shall we say, to some degree, an agreement between beings to create the notion of the unfoldment of the forgetting and subsequent remembering of before, during, and after. And this, in a sense, again, is agreed upon by all individuals in a reality in terms of synchronizing that creation according to a certain rate, according to a certain timing.

Now, you as a society are, in that sense, agreeing to be synchronized in a time stream. So with, shall we say, minor individual variations, you generally as a society experience time in a similar fashion. Now, very often, even during your, shall we say, day-to-day reality, you may, in that sense, shall we say, create time in a slightly different flow—perhaps less of it, which you then perceive as time flying by, or perhaps more of it, you perceive then that time is dragging along. But it is your creation, and there is the standardization to some degree between all individuals within a given mass consciousness in a society.

Our particular society is also to some degree synchronized to itself in that we still, to some degree, create time. Our relationship to that time and our experience of that time is far different. However, we still do create it, and there still is a rate or a flow at which we synchronize with each other for some degree of a common experience. We have spoken to your society many times about the fact that we exist in a different dimension of experience and that this is why you would not, at this time, physically perceive our star without, shall we say, a few adjustments in that dimension.

What we have not often shared is one of, shall we say, the nature or the natures of that difference in dimensionality. And although this, to some degree, will have particular extensions into our physicality, which we will not discuss at this time, one of the, shall we say, more obvious differences that, in a sense, has us existing in a different dimension that is not synchronized to yours—and therefore, in that sense, does not allow us to physically perceive each other without the adjustments—is the fact that our particular stream of time, in, shall we say, reference to your own, in comparison to your own, is approximately—and this is again quite arbitrary, quite approximate—but 10 times faster than your own.

Therefore, what you perceive to be, in that sense, 30 years of the passage of your time would translate into our history to approximately 300 years of time. So therefore, without a synchronization, there simply would be no sense to be made from one dimension of experience to another, such as the difference in the experience and creation of time itself. When we, in that sense, interact with you, we do so from our particular relative stream of time. So it may seem to us that simply days have passed, but in a sense, it is synchronized when we interact with you to your time stream as to seem to make some type of sense to you and to seem to have some continuity in that sense from one interaction to another. But it is not necessarily the one-to-one relationship that you might imagine.

For instance, you will perceive many times that we have had, for instance, four or five particular discrete interactions, but from my end, we may, in that sense, perceive them as one, shall we say, interaction. So there will not always be a one-to-one correspondence, though we can tap into where and when our communications are coming through to you and make some kind of logistical sense to it in your terms—before, during, and after other sessions. So therefore, again, even this is quite an arbitrary creation, but allow us to move on to your creation of time.

We will use the following analogy. You have what you call to be a theory you call your Big Bang. And what this represents from our perspective is the intersection of, shall we say, consciousness itself, which is transcendental, and physical reality itself. That intersection, the point at which they meet, so to speak, creates a spark. And in that sense, initially speaking, that spark will be perceived in a particular given space of physical reality as initially nothing, and then perhaps you can say something—but one something. Now, again, this is all quite colloquial and is more for the purposes of analogy than direct precise information, but simply follow along, and you will understand the analogy.

First of all, again, allow us to extend the definition that even your society, even your physicists, shall we say, are understanding that space and time, formerly believed to be two discrete ideas, are simply two sides of the same coin. And even in your science, it is now labeled “space-time” rather than simply each individual component. Understand that this makes sense, for in order, or shall we say, with the creation of space, then comes the necessity of time, so to speak, to transverse it, to be able to make some sense out of it. And this is one of the, shall we say, presentations that time itself will represent.

So, following on the analogy of a singular point: at that singular point, at the time, shall we say, of its manifestation, there is no time, for there is simply one point. There is no, shall we say, space to cover, no where to go, nothing to do. So therefore, there is not the need for the creation of time to do it in. But when, in that sense, that one point does, in a sense, again as an analogy, explode out to, shall we say, many billions and billions of separate ideas, shall we say, radiating out 360 degrees in all directions, you then from that center, from that singular point, begin to create between that singular point and the point of dispersion—space. Space from a point to another point. And as, in that sense, you create more space, also simultaneously is the creation of time itself. Again, perhaps colloquially speaking, you can say “time in which to traverse the space” itself. Obviously, if everything is all one idea, there is again no necessity for time. But the moment there is a single separation, the moment there is a single divergence from a single point, there is then the necessity within realities that contain this idea of time. Is this clear so far? Yes.

Now, understand as you separate from the one in the aforementioned analogy, you create more space, and you create more time, and you also then, by definition, create more separation. Therefore, allow us to now, shall we say, bring this analogy home, so to speak. We have discussed with you many times the idea of limitation, separation, and also of limitlessness and integration. In that sense, were you using the again aforementioned analogy of Big Bang to begin to contract the points back to the center, you would then correspondingly create less space, so to speak, between the points and therefore less time necessary to, shall we say, extend to each point.

This will directly relate to your life, to your personal, shall we say, experience. For as you are exploring separation, limitation, you are, in that sense, creating more space. The more separations you create from who you choose to be, the more time, in that sense, you then need to create to experience those separations, to experience each discrete idea as a separate idea. So therefore, as you embark upon your reality from the perspective of separation and limitation, you automatically create more time to do so. Therefore, you will always have, shall we say, colloquially speaking, enough time to explore each and every minute corner of each and every minute separation that you have created.

Now, this works in the inverse way, or the opposite way, as well. For as you begin to represent who you are and understand that you create your reality 100%, 100%—what that 100% means is that everything in that reality, 100% of everything, fits; 100% of everything is your creation. As you begin to act upon this knowledge in the way that you begin to use these creations, you integrate them one at a time. And in the integration, it is as if, again, the many points are contracting back to the center point. The more you allow everything in your reality to deliver the message in a positive way that you have created it to deliver, the less time you then need to create.

So therefore, remembering that these creations were made by you, perhaps from unconscious beliefs in your past before you knew you had a choice, before you knew you could consciously choose your beliefs, there may be some, shall we say, you sometimes refer to it as extra baggage to, in that sense, incorporate—it seems like extra baggage. But the idea is that it is not; it is part of who you are. And in a sense, you can open those suitcases and repack the contents within you, which is the taking of the many parts and integrating them back into the whole.

Therefore, an attitude of separation is an attitude of creating more time to experience those separations. An attitude of integration begins, in that sense, to allow everything to come back to center, begins to allow the space between the many fragmentations that you present as your discrete physical personality to decrease, thereby again decreasing the time necessary to explore each and every one of them. So therefore, as you do acknowledge, perhaps, the creations created unconsciously, created from unpreferred beliefs, and use them in a positive way—use them to nail down the foundational primary beliefs that still limit you, acknowledge those beliefs, decide after acknowledging and appreciating what they have allowed you to do and served you, to choose the new preferred belief, acting as though you already have the new preferred belief—you integrate the separations one at a time. You integrate the space in the totality of your consciousness that then necessitates time, in that sense, to experience them.

And as you begin to own your reality, acknowledge your reality, express gratitude for the creations that you had formerly labeled negative but obviously also contain the jewels of positivity and self-reflection, you begin to literally change the rate of your creation of time in, perhaps, what you can say, relative terms to the creation of time of your society as a whole. And sometimes, again, to use the analogy, you simply then begin to perceive that time is flying by quite quickly. But again, we remind you, when you say “time has flown by for I have had a good time,” it is not truly that the time has passed any faster. In fact, because in having a good time, quote unquote, you are being fully who you are, you are expressing less of the separation, and therefore, in that integrated state of awareness, literally creating less time. So if one or two hours has passed by your mass consciousness clock time and you have seemed to experience only 20 or 25 minutes, your body and your consciousness, so to speak, mentally, have only aged the 25 or 30 minutes.

So therefore, obviously, you can see that this would have far-reaching effects on your physical body itself. This is why your lifespans begin to increase when you begin to honor and validate who you are by beginning to grant the validity to the things with integrity that move you, that give you passion, that excite you, for they are representative of who you are. They are representative of your willingness to act as an integrated whole rather than separate parts, collecting each and every part back together, which can take a long time. Do not worry; you will make all the time you need to do so. But what we are suggesting is that should you wish to experience, to create time at a flow that represents your integration, your physical age, your physical lifespan will increase. And understand now that even if you are to define that your physical lifespan is 100 of your years, from our particular understanding of your physiology, this is but one-third of the potential of the lifespans of the body that you create. For 300 years is, in and of itself, the possible, shall we say, amount of time that your bodies can live. And your reaching but one-third of that is a direct result of your style of creation of time.

If you are spending, shall we say, a majority of that one-third of the time in misery, in self-denial of your creations, you seem, in that sense, to create, shall we say, the two or 300 years’ worth of the passage of time. But in a sense, because that is not synchronized to your particular society, you seem, in that sense, shall we say, to only have lived the hundred years—or perhaps quite a bit less in some instances. But understand that this is all there is to it. And your willingness to stop denying your creations—as in, “Why is this happening to me? Poor me! What will I do? What did I ever do to deserve that miserable thing?"—that is a perspective, that is an approach, that is an attitude. Now, in a sense, we are making light of it in order, in that sense, to allow you to enjoy these interactions. Understand that we are not criticizing it when we do so, but simply sometimes members of your society seem, in that sense, to appreciate that particular approach of hearing, perhaps you can say, how it sounds from a third person’s point of view. But we are not making fun of you, and we are not saying that what you are doing is any worse qualitatively than what we are suggesting, but simply having some fun in the course of communicating these ideas to you.

But understand that when you do that, you remove your ability to use your creation. For if you deny it—“Why is this happening to me?"—you are not looking at it as your creation and then cannot treat it and transform it as your creation. You approach it as an external idea. When you simply understand, “Well, all right, all right, all right, here is the creation that I have created, but it is not one that I prefer,” so therefore, I am not looking at it as my creation. Were I to simply assume that because I created all, this is not the one exception—were I to assume that this is my creation, I would understand that anything I create, no matter how it looks, contains both potentials for positive and negative manifestation. So therefore, since I know I created it, and I know on some level as I create levels what I am doing, I will simply approach it from the perspective: how does it serve me the way that it is presenting—not if it was this, if it was that, but exactly the way it is. When you do that, when you simply shift your perspective one minute bit to this particular perspective, you then give yourself, shall we say, one of the only chances to integrate it rather than deny it. Denial is continued separation. Denial is the pushing, the partitioning of parts within you. Acknowledgment, acting from the acknowledgment, is integration itself. It is the glue of unconditional love within you that allows you to collect back what you have formerly labeled separations within you, allows you to recollect yourself into a discrete singular being with a singular integrated presentation and experience.

Therefore, what we are sharing with you as the recollection is, on the one hand, the recollection of this information that we are sharing, which you already know on some level or you would simply not understand a word that I am saying. But also, the literal literal recollection or recollection of what you have denied within you. When you talk about a subconscious closet—not the subconscious, shall we say, portion of your consciousness that allows for the automatic, shall we say, pilot of your body and so forth—but the closet that you stuff things into, so to speak. What allows the stuffing and filling of this closet is denial itself. When you deny something, it does not go away, for again, you are all of creation; there is nowhere to hide it, there is nowhere to put it, there is no outside. So you tuck it, so to speak again colloquially, into a closet you call the subconscious, shall we say, a portion of your subconscious that is as a closet, or perhaps a dungeon. But understand, you can smash the walls of that dungeon; you can thrust open that dungeon door and one at a time acknowledge your creations. But not from the perspective of “why me?” but from the perspective of “all right, I now understand that this is a creation that resulted from an unconscious belief that I no longer prefer, but I wish to acknowledge it. I wish to see what the belief is, because I know I cannot change it unless I first see it, unless I first own it.”

So calling forth, shall we say, members of the dungeon allows, shall we say, things to come to the surface so that you may now reinterpret them in an integrative way. Now perhaps at first, perhaps at first it may seem a little overwhelming if you shall we say open the door all the way. So therefore, feel free if you wish to use the analogy of a door to simply crack it and at least allow things a bit at a time to seep out. If you deny those things, worry not, they will be put back in the closet and you will get a chance to look at them later. But if, in that sense, you acknowledge them, you will slowly empty out the closet and perhaps eventually shut it down. But it is up to you. The creations you stuff back in the closet, however, have a particular tendency that you in your particular perspective label disturbing. That particular tendency is: the harder and farther you push them into the closet—because they are your creations, because they are part of you, because you cannot truly deny anything about yourself—the louder they will knock, the more they will rattle their chains, the more they will bang on the walls, and the more, in that sense, you will be aware of them.

So your willingness to simply invite them one by one as your children rather than your prisoners will enable you to see why you created these children, how they serve you, what it is they allow you to discover about yourself that you can use and transform yourself in a positive way. And we remind you, there is absolutely nothing—unless your definition says that there is—there is absolutely nothing that you can find out about yourself, no matter as you say how awful, that you cannot use in a positive way. Are you willing to approach it from that perspective? You can use it in a positive way, so there is no need to fear anything in the closet from the perspective of using it. From the perspective of its negative interpretation, we understand the fear and intrepidation. But from the perspective of what it has to offer, this is a different perspective, and this is what allows the symbols to deliver a message that you can use in a positive way.

When you call forth an idea from your subconscious closet, acknowledge it, appreciate it. It may be outdated, it may be obsolete, but appreciate that it has led you to this point and choose a new one with eyes open, having equalized it. It does not go back into the closet; it integrates into your totality. It becomes a part of you that is no better or no worse; it has no less or more weight than anything else. But because you are choosing a positive perspective, the negative aspects of it will simply be irrelevant. Remember, you contain it all. And if you are creating a reality, as you are, of positive and negative, you contain all of both. So it is not a matter of ever escaping the negative; it is part of you, for it is a polarized expression of the reality itself. But when you choose, as an intention, a positive perspective, that negativity becomes irrelevant to the experience of your life. So awareness of it you may have, but you will never experience one drop of the negativity. Your awareness of the negativity, because you are again in a world that contains that negativity, will come in the form of the awareness of quote unquote negative things quote unquote happening to other individuals. And from your perspective, you will understand that that is not negative that is happening to them, but you will understand that they are interpreting it as negative, therefore creating the negative experience. Therefore, you will perhaps again still perceive negativity but not experience it at all.

And again, in that particular vein, we remind you: you can think anything you wish. It is not the thinking of something positive which gives a positive reality; it is not the thinking of something negative which gives a negative reality. The thinking, shall we say, strata of your being is simply the library, and in that sense, you can read any book you wish—scary, happy, angry, sad, miserable, ecstatic—you can read them all. But the ones you check out are the ones that are your life, for the ones you check out are the ones that you act on. And it is the actions that you take and the books, to continue the analogy, that you have read as a manual for those actions which determine the reality. So if you do not act with the negative perspective, you can never—did he say never? I think he did—never get a negative experience. Only can you experience a negative experience if you first interpret it that way, assign that meaning, and then act with that interpretation and negative attitude. Then yes, you may experience things that you will find very simple to label negative. But it works the other way around. And as you begin to use them in a positive way, all your creations, you also change the rate and flow of your creation of time. Therefore, it’s about time that you perhaps began to look and to invite and to embrace anything that you have denied. For all these things again are ideas or symbols within you, none of which can destroy you, none of which can have any negative effect on you—no matter how overwhelmingly negative they seem—if you simply choose to assume and maintain the positive perspective.

We had at the end of the last interaction made a simple suggestion; we will repeat it before proceeding to the exchange. Whenever you are proceeding and find yourself perhaps after deciding to create a life of positivity functioning from seemingly the old negative perspective, first of all, that’s all right; you are simply having an attitude, you are simply having an interpretation. If you stop at that point and do not act, you can mull it over as long as you wish. Our simple, simple, simple suggestion is that before you act—again, you can roll this around as much as you want; you can cry, you can be miserable, you can fully explore the negative perspective of “this is happening to me”—but before you act, at least from your positive perspective, which now exists within you just as well, provide one alternative. See in your imagination, in your specifically aligned tool that you can never lose, see the preferred you, state the belief of that preferred you, feel how it feels—not the negative old you, but the preferred new you. When you feel that feeling, then in your imagination, hand the situation over to the new preferred you. See how that new preferred you handles it, see what they do, see how they act. Then you have two choices: the shall we say automatic negative choice, but also now, having emotionally reattached and resummoned up your referential preferential you, two sets of actions. And we suggest that, were you to lay both these sets of actions down on the table, you will perhaps every time have no difficulty choosing the actions of the preferred you. So obvious will it be that those actions are more representative of who you choose to be. And you get to be who you choose to be if you say so.

One of the only things that allows you to do this, that allows you to maintain enough of a centered frame of mind to do so, is your willingness, when an old tendency seems to come along, rather than saying “there I go again, oh I have failed, all my metaphysical training down the drain,” you can simply substitute these two words: “so what.” So what? Here is one idea; it is not an idea that I prefer. Therefore, I need not judge myself for having come up with it. Presenting as many options as I will gives me that many more choices. So what? I thought that, as you say, big deal. Now I will summon the referential preferential me. I will now see how that me would act. I will lay them side by side. If the miserable alternative looks more appealing, I can still do it; I haven’t lost it. But now I will be acting as a creator and have used the fact that I had that tendency, quote unquote, to my advantage. When we say “use your creations,” we mean them all. And this will also be your creation of self-invalidation and judgment, for that paralyzes you, that nips your ability in the bud, so to speak, to do anything about it. But the moment you simply, instead of saying “oh dumb me,” say “so what?"—“is this what I intend to do? Is this representative of who I am now?"—no, it will be obvious to you that that has been of service to you by simply reminding you in no uncertain terms who you prefer to be, perhaps by giving you an example of who you do not prefer to be. But that is one way to do it, and you can use that as well.

Therefore, in recollecting the many separations within you that you have created in the form of denial, have a good time. For you literally can start right now to have a good time rather than assuming that when you do this, this, and this, you will be where you wish to be, which sets up the time by separating that idea from where you are right here, right now. You can simply be that right now. One unit, no space, therefore not the necessity for time. Understand, when you exist, you exist right now, and never was there a moment in your life when you would not or could not say “it is right now.” That one moment, in a sense, is the spark itself. As you begin to speak about a past having a hold on the present, that is a separation. And the further back that separation is in your estimation, the more time you need to create in order to walk all those steps. So therefore, the present need not be considered a result of the past in an experiential way. The moment you let go of the separation of the past—which you recreate in the present—the moment you let go of where you will be, which is not where you are—a separation from where you are—that in and of itself will change your perception of time. That in and of itself will seem to accelerate everything to the point where right now is where you experience it. You simply need decide if you wish: right now, I am who I prefer to be. Right now, and from this point forward, simply when something comes up that seems to be a representation of an older, unpreferred version of you, simply look at some of the things that we have shared, for you will find—if you do so, we don’t insist that you do—that it will come in handy. And you will, from this moment forward, not become who you wish to be, but simply in deciding, be who you wish to be. Be right now, which is the only time there is.

Before we proceed to the interaction, allow us to share that in your society, in your shall we say relative proximity, you have had the occurrence of what you have called bad weather, and there has been perhaps some destruction, though minimal loss of life, which is noteworthy. Of many ideas is within that bad weather. Allow us to share that as you begin to live right here, right now, and understand that your past has been a recreation from the present of that past—and not even generally a precise recreation, by the way—that as you let go of that past, you give yourself the opportunity to be right here, right now with no distractions and no self-imposed separations. Therefore, in this, this is the transformational age, and many, many, many individuals will begin to see their power, will begin to understand that they function from the moment. Will perhaps, in not understanding much of this consciously, in many different ways, if they are unwilling to do so, force themselves to let go of that past. Therefore, you will find in, shall we say, the rubble, so to speak, of what has occurred from your weather patterns that there will have been much the quote unquote loss of personal items. These personal items are, in a sense, the museums of the lives of the individuals, giving them very strong identifications to their past through certain objects, through certain mementos, through certain nostalgic material. So there, many individuals simultaneously—thousands, in fact—have again unconsciously chosen in that sense to force themselves through that symbol to literally obliterate their past. This, in a sense, although it can perhaps from the general perspective of your society seem like a bummer, will have the overall effect of allowing those individuals to begin anew. And the letting go of many of these past ideas which literally bind you is one of the liberating ideas.

Now, if you are willing from this point forward—which is the only point there is—to begin to let go of the past as an excuse consciously, you will then not need to force yourself through a symbol to do so. Therefore, if you do now begin to do this—and many of you have to a very large degree; we are not taking away from that—but if you continue to do so, you will then not need the symbol to force it upon yourself, as shall we say in our perception during the transformation of the next few years, perhaps many, many more individuals will. Therefore, now let you know the overall reason for the creation of the symbol; you can simply get down to it, as you say, without needing to create the symbol to force you to do so. And this is true with everything in your closet. For shall we say, the loudest knocking of the things that you deny the most, that shall we say build up enough momentum to force their way to your conscious awareness, very often do so because of your denial, because of your cutting off yourself from yourself in the manifestation you call disease. For disease is a symbol which forces you to look at a certain idea, or you die. Therefore, many individuals will choose to look at the idea in lieu of dying. But you need not do it that way, and the more you are willing to acknowledge what you believe within that, the less would be any tendency or need to create disease. For all disease is again not functioning as an aligned whole being. And again, needless to say, when you chop up portions of your conscious awareness and tuck them into different compartments, this is not integrated. Therefore, it’s up to you—it always will be—and your ability in recollecting this material to recollect yourself out of choice, out of preference, because you say so, because you know you can only grow and learn, and because you know when that closet is empty you will be living in ecstatic joy. We assume in that sense that this has a certain attraction to you. Therefore, we share it as an option, as everything that we share is, for we never insist that what we are saying is better than what you are doing. But should you choose to find that you are in synchronous alignment with what we are sharing, please take it and please use it. It is an option and will have the effect that we are sharing should you choose to do it, and it’s up to you.

We thank you for your willingness to co-create this interaction with us this evening of your time. We thank you for your willingness to open the many doors that you create between sections of your consciousness within your particular reality. We thank you for your willingness to interact with us as equals, and that equalization is all that is necessary in the gathering of yourself, in the recollection of yourself, understanding that the concepts that you have denied are equal to all other concepts. Then it simply becomes a matter of preference: do I prefer it? And not a matter of “this is better than that,” for everyone knows that that is separation. Judgment, the unequal assignment of weight, is separation. Validation, equal validity and acknowledgment, and then perhaps deciding if you prefer it or not, but then not invalidating the symbol that you do not prefer, is integration. It is understanding that life does not happen to you; it happens through you.

Therefore, in return for this willingness, we ask you now: how may I be of service to you?

Shutting a… I feel both bold and equal tonight.

Oh, thank you, and therefore I want you to know that the channel’s voice tonight is noticeably louder than usual.

Well, perhaps what you are perceiving is our increased excitement and enthusiasm.

Oh yes, it shows.

For we are in that sense very excited about certain transformational tendencies within your planet and within your society itself. Though on the surface perhaps individuals aligned to seeing the negative will see the remnant bubblings up of the rest of negativity upon your planet, which is only now possible because of the mass agreement to not nuclearly annihilate yourself. It gives individuals certain liberties to, shall we say, do limited military engagements without the fear of global annihilation. This is equalizing itself out; this is having a homogenizing effect on your civilization. And we perceive most strongly that you are moving in unity; you are moving toward, shall we say, although it is a diverse definition, a common goal. Therefore, yes, we are very excited, and thank you for noticing.

That’s wonderful. Since this is a relatively small room, I humbly suggest that you do lower the channel’s voice volume a little bit.

All right, thank you anyway.

[Laughter]

Would you like it a bit louder than that?

Much louder.

Just having some fun. The volume of material will be the same no matter what the volume.

That’s about right for me, thank you anyway. During some previous sessions, you’ve made reference to your motherships. In one session, you even assisted the group to visit one of your motherships. And since I am an engineer, I find very fascinating the subject of motherships and would welcome more understanding and some information. Question number one: all right. Number one: what is the overall purpose of motherships in general?

It will be to explore, shall we say, distant regions from our particular, shall we say, home world location, and also in doing so, to transport many individuals with many various types of, shall we say, smaller craft, which in general will exist in the outermost layer. Our crafts, for those who, shall we say, are new to these interactions, mother crafts are cylindrical. They are from 1 to 10 miles in length. They are a tube within a tube within a tube. The center point being “up” for all decks, and the outermost deck will house what will colloquially—and this is very colloquial to your language—but correspond with the hangar bay skin that allows smaller craft to enter into the hull of the craft. And that particular outer layer will correspond to a section that we reserve, so to speak, for the formation of artificial environments that will accommodate those that visit. So there for, shall we say, individual societies that choose to visit our mothercraft will be quite comfortable, even if the components of the atmosphere of their home world differ quite greatly from our own.

Shaped like a cylinder, maybe as long as 10 miles. Now, in general, the one that I am associated with is approximately one mile in length, but there are larger vessels for various reasons, and that will depend upon the region being explored and, shall we say, the demographic location of the populations of said region.

How large might the diameters get of that cylinder?

Now they will vary. One moment. Approximately what you would call 600 of your feet in diameter.

I see. How many people might be on that largest mothership?

Tens of thousands. Again, our permanent population of our planet is 200 to 250 million, two-thirds of which at any time are generally, shall we say, upon mothercraft.

And what portion of the population of one of those motherships might be the ones that go out on scoutcraft?

A high percentage. That will purely depend upon the explorations. Shall we say a percentage not necessarily high. Understand that being spontaneous, we have no agenda, we have no schedules, we have no, shall we say, laid-down plans. So therefore, this becomes quite arbitrary and quite variable.

So each mothership has no one person in charge, the captain not really.

There will be perhaps what you could sometimes… it does not translate, for any terminology that we use through your language will seem like a hierarchical structure.

I was going to be saying “command center,” but in a sense it is more a coordinating center.

I see. Can these motherships relocate instantaneously anywhere in the universe?

As much as we have discussed with our particular technology, by surrounding the craft with a particular field that isolates it in time and space and inserting, if you will, another location coordinance into what would translate—again, and this is arbitrary—as our main computers.

Do your motherships operate or can they operate in more than one dimension?

Absolutely, and that is one of the reasons for their particular, shall we say, orientation. That is also one of the reasons for the triangular shape of our scoutcraft; it is, shall we say, a very stable structure for what you might call interdimensional penetration.

I see. A traveling pyramid in a sense.

More like an equilateral triangle flat.

On July 26, were there any of your motherships in our neighborhood?

As well as three of our scoutcraft around your planet itself. More than one of your mothership? No. And was, shall we say, one mile in length and was a craft that we have sometimes discussed that the vibration of the name of the craft—and again this is arbitrary and for the convenience of societies, for we have no language—but would in your particular language translate to “Solar Wind.”

Did any humanoids see that mothership?

No, and in general they will be too far to actually see. Though it is our perception that several individuals did perceive the scoutcraft from time to time.

Now your motherships are cylindrical. Well, in the movie “Encounters of the Third Kind,” what at least the last 10 minutes of the movie or so, it was sort of more like a typical saucer shaper disc or…

Well, understand perhaps that is an analogy to what you would call a city ship, which is again similar to a mothercraft, and not precise to what exists. But there are many different presentations of how societies will create city ships or mother crafts.

One last question. All right. The source of energy, are there more than one?

Sources: light itself. Not electromagnetic? Well, it is converted in a sense. You can perhaps say by a method—and again, this does not translate into your language precisely—but perhaps you can say “cold fusion” via a particular device we have created called a “Flash Matrix,” which in that sense allows for the transposition in time and space. For also, again, being that time and space are one idea, the ability to traverse space in this particular way also immediately then enables one to traverse time in the same way, for time is also a vibrational coordinate of the object itself. And again, as a recap briefly: our particular understanding that has enabled us to travel in this way is understanding that objects do not exist within time and space, but that time-space is a property of the object itself and therefore can be measured in that way, factored out, and a new, shall we say, time-space coordinate plugged in, thereby resulting in the immediate taking up of residence at the new coordinates with no quote unquote corresponding travel of distance in between.

Did I know all that that you just told me in the last 10 minutes now? Obviously, or the channel’s mouth would be moving and you would hear no words. If you hear them and they make sense, you contain it.

I’m smarter than I thought I was.

Well, you are smarter perhaps than you have acknowledged up till now, but you are now acknowledging it, and we thank you.

Wonderful. Thank you very much.

And who you sharing? Female. Than you. And who you? Okay. I just wanted I have a sharing then a couple of questions.

Oh, thank you. We always in that sense honor and respect and request statements as well as questions. Do proceed.

Okay. Just recently I am visited the ship via the You Home meditation, very clear, and I got into it instantly. Any… I was created by a being called Maya or Mayan in a sense. Okay. I didn’t get the feeling that this person was um like my future self.

No, it was in a sense a past recognition from your own planet.

Okay. So who is Maya?

In a sense, you may understand it to be an individual, perhaps you can say in guide form, that in a sense was reestablishing connection with you and has direct ties or direct connections to the Mayans themselves. Therefore, should you choose to continue to explore this particular individual will facilitate as guide, and perhaps you will again relive quote unquote some of your past life.

Okay. There are certain, shall we say, aspects within that life that you can now call upon. Not that you need it, not that you cannot do it without that, but that may be an assistance in recognition to you to proceeding with something that you are about to embark upon.

Thank you. Thank you. You know, there was another question now. I saw what I perceived to be a picture frame hanging on a wall, and I had stripes of colors in it moving, but it was like it was moving with water in a sense.

What you are perceiving would colloquially be called an expression of a type of technology that we possess that is many times used in an artistic form, hence your particular interpretation of “framed,” which it was not, and is referred to as “liquid light.”

And I also felt that it was reacting to my energy as I was there.

It is a mirror of sorts, and in a sense you become the art, and your appreciation itself interacts with the actual, shall we say, presentation.

It’s amazing. Also, is it giving off any sound?

In a sense, for you may understand that its vibration, its particular frequency, is not only reaching into what you would call visible light spectrum but also encompasses, though you cannot quote unquote see this part of it, for your perception of this frequency is hearing. But in a sense, may say it contains more than just one or the other frequency; it contains both. Did that translate?

Yes, thank you. Okay. While I’m on the subject, then I remember meeting Bashar. It could be my symbol, but he was in like a circular seat, half half laid down. Now, what is this? Is a symbol for me obviously.

Well, first of all, perhaps you will interpret it as a symbol, but that was literal; that was Bashar.

Okay. Also, I visited with… and I saw a child in the middle, the center of the room, not in a crib, but the baby was suspended with a light, a white light, just suspended in the air.

Did you notice, in that sense, the infant as being surrounded by three individuals?

No.

All right. This is in a sense part of, perhaps you can say, a process. I refrain from calling it a process, for it is not ritualistic, but that in a sense had to do with the crystallization of that particular, shall we say, infant’s consciousness in a particular way as to result in a stronger identification with the body itself. For in our society, as well as your own, there is a very loose relationship of body to consciousness. Shall we say, individuals three years and younger are out and about, to and fro, and loosely connected to the body, and that is generally locked in at approximately three years of age. However, there are exceptions whereby, through particular symbolic means, individuals will choose to be crystallized before. This is quite rare, and you have in that sense discovered and taken part in that process.

Okay. Now, is that child my future self?

No comment.

Now, okay. I knew I knew that the child… I know the child is now. How do I communicate with this being that is so young right now? Or am I just getting screwed up with time?

Well, “screwed up,” I don’t know. For in our sense, our progression of time, as yours is linear and not spiraling, however, do understand that you need not treat it as a child. And simply your approach as an equal will in that sense allow you to communicate directly. For understand, in no uncertain terms, I, though I have learned perhaps you can say a few words, do not speak your language, and that is not necessary to communicate.

Right. Okay. Now, all along I’ve used that as not a barrier, but I couldn’t figure out in my mind, being third density, how the hell I could have a chat with this child who I knew was my future self. So I’m glad to finally ask that question.

We’ll also understand the following: that particular process, being that that child is younger than the three years, in crystallizing the consciousness with the body, in a sense facilitates your ability to do so, which is one of the reasons you were there. And now, from this point forward, you may understand that though you might find a degree of difficulty in communicating with a child of the lesser age than three in general because of the lack of crystallization, that in this case it will be more possible. Does that make sense?

Yes, thank you. Aloha. Oh, thank you. Also understand that should there be the desire of that, when we next meet at this same location next month of your time, again if it is requested, we will take another excursion. That will be up to you.

We thank you. I enjoyed that, thank you. And you as well.

Over there, may I? Greetings.

Who’s the board tonight?

This particular, shall we say, day as it is upon my planet, is myself—is male individual—that we have not discussed, and is female individual that we have discussed as mostly relating to my counterpart consciousness. And we will, shall we say, provide a label for this evening, and that label will be… Ana.

Greetings, Ana.

Received and returned. And the male… can you tell us anything about the male at this time?

Only that this male is also involved with communicating to your society and in a sense is deserving. Any specific relationship to myself? No, it is, shall we say, a relationship with someone that you would consider from this particular proximity to be in a remote location of your planet.

Thank you. Few things, Alan. Could you at this time give us more information on the Flash… on the Flash Matrix?

Not really. There will be some forthcoming information along our technological lines, but for specific reasons not this evening.

Even even? I’m glad you brought up the idea of your time stream being 10 times faster than ours.

One moment. We will add, however, that for the purposes of instilling some idea within you to be able to grasp the later sharing, that you have a particular electronic component that you call a capacitor. It is, in its function, an object which in a sense builds up a charge to a particular assigned point depending on the value of the mechanism, and then when that particular charge point is reached, discharges as a whole. The entire concept in a sense that will do as a foundational analogy to the Flash Matrix; it allows for a very controlled reaction.

Thank you. And to you, Alan. When I experienced you and Aloda flying your craft in Kansas, before I perceived the craft, I saw what I perceived at the time to be a small cloud, and it was there for a good period of time. I can’t tell you if it was 5 minutes or 20 minutes or an hour, but a good period of time with the car. Then it appeared that the cloud resorbed, and then there was a craft.

That will sometimes be the interpretation of the isolation field we create rounding about our craft. If, in that sense, individuals have not seen such a type of field, the place, the frame of reference that they will in general store it is as cloud-like. Also understand that from time to time there is what you perhaps can say a particular vortex of electromagnetic energy that is created with the transposition from one system to another, and sometimes there will be the physiological, shall we say, conglomeration of cloud mass around such an interdimensional gateway. Did that translate?

Yes, it did. And what I’d like to ask is, in our time frame, how long does that cloud phenomenon persist when you’re inserting yourself into another dimension or time-space reality?

It will vary again according to your perception and your creation of time at that moment. Our particular experience, in a sense, you can say is 5 to 7 minutes. That’s your experience? Perhaps you can say the entire trip from our particular end takes perhaps you can say 15 to 20 minutes, and this is not again the actual transposition but the preparation and the, shall we say, dematerialization of the field itself.

So assuming I was very interested in this phenomenon because this cloud was keeping up with a car that was going 100 miles an hour, I could have perceived the craft as a cloud for perhaps anywhere from 10 minutes to a half hour. Is that correct?

In general, again, that will be a bit longer than you would generally perceive it.

I see. Okay. So very phenomenal, but again interpreted as long time. Okay. When I was up on the cape, Lauren and I took an excursion, a walk into the dunes of near Provincetown. The dunes span about a mile and a half from the highway to the ocean, and we walked in probably somewhere between a quarter and a half a mile. It was a very dry evening; the sand was dry, the foliage was bone dry, and walking the dune required quite a bit of effort—at least at first. I found a perfectly shaped and perfectly dimensioned walking stick. Actually, I found a stick at first; I perceived it to be a stick about cane dimensions that was laying on the dry sand. When I picked it up, it was dripping with moisture. The moisture was not sea water because I tasted it, and it was not urine because I’m not human urine. Now, I assume from the reaction that this is particularly, shall we say, significant to the members within this room. Do proceed.

Well, the reason why I was so curious of course is here’s a dripping wet stick—drippy wet, cane-sized stick—in a very dry area with no explanation for how it could possibly be wet. I picked it up, stuck it in the ground, stuck its tip in the ground. We walked off perhaps another few hundred yards, spent maybe 10 or 15 minutes. When we came back, the stick was almost bone dry. I grabbed it and realized that where I grabbed it was perfectly formed for my hand. It had been very carefully cut at the top; it appeared to be a beach limb, and it was perfect height for a walking stick. It was then that I noticed I felt a sense of power from that stick. And as I began to walk with it, I got the analogy of feeling like Moses leading the people through the wilderness. I mean, I actually had that sense of “this is a special moment, this is a special time, this is an unusual stick. It was meant to find it.” And I had a sense that it was awakening within me a sense of purpose, almost a sense of destiny. It certainly was serving to align me in the sense that I felt integrated and on purpose and focused. Would you please comment on this?

You just have, and there is simply nothing to add. You have given yourself the answer.

I’ll ask for some feedback. My perception is that… and I felt this as soon as I felt the wetness of the stick—that this stick was of interdimensional origin.

Now, that is not necessarily our perception. Not to, as you say, rain on your parade, or perhaps upon your stick, but understand that that no less means that you are connected to it as a symbol, that no less means that you have created it as a symbol, and that perhaps you can, shall we say, derive many ideas from it. But ground yourself; it is a representation of grounding itself. Therefore, you need not search for, shall we say, extraterrestrial or dimensional origins.

Can you make some comment then on how the stick came to be dripping wet?

Not really. Understand that we do not know everything, and if there is something that is not in our immediate awareness, it simply has no relevance to us and in that sense will not assist you for us to reflect to you. So we simply trust that in this case.

Thank you very much. And to you over there. Male? Okay. Thank you. And to you.

Hello, greetings. It’s great to be with you.

Great to be with you all as well. Thank you. Yes, it’s great to be with this group. Yes.

It’s been an incredible month for me. Oh, thank you. Without looking at the past because it is the past now, but I feel like a snake shedding its skin. All right. And it’s been quite a journey so far.

That shedding, in that sense, not only allows you to redefine who you are but also gives you some space to grow.

Yeah, it’s been quite a process. It still is.

If you create the need for a process, right? But you can simply have instantaneous result.

Yeah. Well, as I’ve been learning, I’ve been listening to the tape from last month, and I’ve been using the five ideas of so-called membership to the association that you spoke of. And I’ve been thinking about those, and they seem to really pull a lot of things together for me. I just had a question about synchronicity. All right. Could you define it in an example, for instance?

All right. Everything is synchronicity, and synchronicity is everything. Synchronicity is not something which occurs within, and synchronicity is simply the synchronous occurrence of all ideas as interconnected, interwoven, and therefore having something to do with each other. All things being connected means everything has a reason, everything has a particular perspective, right, and reason to exist. Therefore, your recognition of synchronicity as seeing anything that happens as part of the process and not, in that way, an interruption in the process, allows you to be consciously aware of synchronicity in your life. Your willingness to then act as though that is so then brings, by cyclical progression, more awareness of synchronicity. So being aware that everything is synchronicity, acting that way, then makes you more aware that everything is synchronicity, giving you that much more ability to act that way, and so on and so forth, till you are simply automatically assuming that synchronicity is how everything is. And the assignment of positive meaning within your synchronous awareness and recognition gives the positive outcome, the positive response. So therefore, you begin to create a momentum that replaces the self-denying momentum. And should you again choose to look at everything as belonging and treat it that way and create actions that represent that, you then will literally have an ecstatic explosion of coincidences, interrelated incidences which seem on the surface unrelated, delivering to your life all the things you say you prefer in the most unexpected of ways. For everything that you wish to have in your life can be there and can be there in a timely manner. When you project and assume you can only achieve something in a particular way, that prolongs the process, that sets up the separation, that creates more time. When you simply understand that everything is interrelated and that you can deliver what it is you wish in the most unexpected of ways, but a way which is available in a given moment, you begin to more instantaneously manifest the things you prefer. Does that assist you?

Wow, you always come on so strong. It’s amazing. And that is because I believe what I’m saying. Yes, yes. And I love your excitement and your volume, by the way. I love yours as well. Fine with me. Thank you. Oh, thank you.

Okay, then let’s for an example on my end of it: if I bump into somebody in the grocery store and our groceries explode all over the floor, how synchronous?

Now, now you can understand that should you react in a particular negative way, you will obviously get a negative effect. But should you, shall we say, take advantage of your creation in a positive way, you may find very often important life-changing ideas can occur because you are accepting something that you thought was extraneous as belonging. You can then see why you created it and have the eyes to use it in a positive way. Perhaps that person is, shall we say, owning the very business that employs people to do the things that excite you the most. Yeah, but you would not know that if you said “you jerk, I didn’t do that.” It didn’t happen, and I didn’t do that. But understand the analogy.

Yes, I do understand it. It’s better. Great. Thank you. Now, when we say everything fits, we mean it all. That therefore everything is significant. Shall we say, if you are in a line in your grocery store, the clothes the person before you and after you is wearing means something; the dirt on their shoes means something. Everything means something. Now it may have varying degrees of relative significance to your life, but understand that these are co-created situations. So therefore, somebody within that situation will find direct relative significance. If it is obvious how this serves you, allow it to serve you in that obvious way. If it is not obvious, assume that either it will unfold or was significant for someone else, and therefore you perform the service in that way by being an enhancing example for someone else.

Yeah. Okay, that’s great. I’d like to move on to the next thing.

Well, we would wish in these particular interactions to, shall we say, at a stretch, limit your questions to one or two so that we can, shall we say, sample some more that are available. And should we find the tendency and momentum, we will then share with you again.

Okay, all right, great. Do you again… we have asked you this before, but trust us on this.

I do, ‘cause I think I know why. Oh, fine.

Over there, sharing. Wow, I have taken the library book out a little too long for my taste. Oh, all right. Now, do understand that you have a return policy. I’d like to explore the symbol of having amoebas. I found out today that I have a parasite in my intestines, and I’m open to exploring the positivity of that. All right, and not negative. I could feel myself going “oh, I’m really sick,” and immediately I felt sick, and I didn’t feel sick before that. So that was interesting. So I’d like to explore the symbol of it. I’m not… I have an idea of what it may mean.

Well, now in general, what you would label “parasite” assumes by convention that something exists externally, as though you are not the entire universe, crept in there and is sucking off your energy, so to speak. That’s therefore now extending this analogy to your practical life.

Tell me that that’s exactly the analogy I got: my idea, my belief that others can suck off my energy.

Now, we have discussed to some degree before that that is up to you, but your performance of the service that you have to offer other individuals need not deplete you and only will seem to do so if you take responsibility for how they then integrate what you are sharing, rather than leave it off as your responsibility of being responsible to them by simply sharing what you have to share.

Right. And I seem to be learning this very rapidly.

Well, in a sense, again, you are forcing yourself in no uncertain terms to do so. So simply consciously decide from this point forward to do that, and that symbol will simply again then, having delivered its message, have no reason to hang around, and then symbolically you will physically create the immune response to, shall we say, integrate that symbol even physically. But it always comes first from consciousness, for all reality is an extension of consciousness; no exceptions. Not even you.

Right. And as we’re saying that, I’m hearing the… pardon me, that says “some days I can do that.” Oh, the part trouble.

Well, you are writing the rules. Do you like those rules?

No, not at all.

All right. Well, nobody has forced them upon you. And your simple recognition that “part of me says this” can be rephrased. We have shared that you are not a collection of parts; you are a whole integrated being. When you say “part of me says this, part of me says that,” that is truly in that sense impossible. And how you can use these “parts” as an integration is to simply change “part of me” to “a choice within me,” an option. Therefore, that is one option of how to look at it. The moment you even say it that way, that presupposes in your orientation that there are other options or choices and then lifts the weight from it being a, shall we say, etched-in-stone part of you. You are not a collection of parts; that is simply a belief, an emotion, a thought within you that is one choice. Here is a choice: do you wish for that to be the choice you choose? Yes or no? No. What is the opposite choice? State it right now.

The opposite choice is that I’m there to commune with another in my healing work and share the gifts that I have to share, and then it’s up to them whether or not and how they use those gifts.

Yes. But also you were saying “sometimes you can, sometimes you can’t.” Rephrase that.

That I have a choice whether in each moment whether to act as the preferred me or not.

And you can always, in a non-interrupted fashion, choose to interpret it in the way you wish. Now, close your eyes. Take three deep breaths. Now state the new preferred belief. Assert it. Speak it with conviction.

Now, the new preferred belief is that I’m there to offer a gift.

Now state it with conviction; sound like you mean it.

I am there to offer a gift. I always have this ability, and it is my responsibility to be who I am and also to allow those I interact with to be who they are.

Now, having stated that through me, how does that feel? Describe it.

It feels very strong.

All right. Now, in your imagination, how do you see yourself with this feeling, with this conviction, with this assertion? How do you see yourself carrying your body?

Very straight. My solar plexus very strong.

How do you see yourself when the option that “sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn’t” comes along?

Bent over.

Now, with the straight-up perspective, right, with the new belief in place, when the old choice comes along, how do you now speak to it?

How do I speak to the old… feel the new you. Feel it. See it. See yourself standing up straight. The old voice, quote unquote, comes along. What does the new preferred empowered you say to it that will acknowledge it, appreciate it for offering its choice, and then choose what you wish? How does the new you handle that?

The new you says… the new you says… oh, what do not want to get too confused… says to the boy, “oh, thank you very much for sharing. Thank you very much for sharing that. You have allowed me to see that this is not what I prefer. Thank you for that. Thank you for teaching me that I have a choice, and this is the choice that I prefer in the moment.”

And how are you now holding yourself, having made that conscious commandment?

Straight.

You now have the template; you now have the model or mold to proceed when and if that should ever happen again. Right now, you are approaching it as the preferred you rather than the unpreferred you trying to become the preferred you. You already are.

Thank you. Thank you. That’s great. Is there something else?

Yeah, I have one other actually to a sharing. Last week, on my birthday, August 20th, I led a workshop on Pleasure, and I was told that I would channel a dolphin, which you did. Which I did, definitely. And the dolphin’s name was Dreamer, and I’m not sure if that was a particular dolphin or it was…

A particular dolphin, though there are several that function in that capacity and will all generally be called by the same name: Dreamer.

Yeah. I was told to go to a particular beach—I live on Nantucket—and on that day, I started to swim, and I could feel the dolphin energy around me, and he said that he’s there for me any time I’d like to teach me to how to live in pleasure and have pleasure in my body.

Well, they have a lot of practice at that, right? So also, perhaps as a point of interest, they were physically quite close to you.

And that’s what I… because the beach that I was led to, I had never been to and never even knew existed, and I had gotten lost earlier that morning looking for something and having to find this beach. There is the possibility for direct interaction at that location. I felt that very strongly. I have never been prior to that drawn to the dolphins in that way, and it was very exciting to me, to them as well. And it felt very familiar. The fact that I had in previous incarnations, perhaps in other realities, interacted with them…

You have. That was my sense. And related. And one more: I just wanted to share one other thing. The last time I had an interaction with you, which was in July, I believe, speaking to you about the White Brotherhood, and you had said to me that on occasion a White Brotherhood will manifest in physical form and that I shall meet one very soon. And two things that had happened: the day after, I had a healing session with a person who actually part of them who was I believe the White Brotherhood incarnated as I was standing there. And I also have been channeling the White Brotherhood, and I channeled Christ last week. And I’m feeling—and this is a little… part of actually, okay, there’s an option of me that feels a little afraid to say this because I feel a little presumptuous—but no need to, but do proceed. When you said I would meet a White Brotherhood face, the face I believed, what I’m feeling is that part of that is me.

Now, understand you need not feel in any way hesitant to share this. For the Christ Consciousness literally exists within you all. It is the mass consciousness itself. And though from time to time has manifested as a singular individual to relate, shall we say, as one-on-one to other singular individuals, the, shall we say, prediction of the second coming is the manifestation of the Christ Consciousness through the masses. Therefore, you are one example of allowing that perhaps somewhat before other individuals. And your willingness to channel that unconditionally loving perspective into the actions of your life will have you being that type of master.

Right. And that was what I’m was getting is that the White Brotherhood, some of the masters so to speak, have been around me in my healing work and in my daily life, helping me to integrate the Christ that’s within me to emerge. And since you are part of the process, it is you. You need not separate it to create more time to then need to reintegrate it later on.

Right. So that tying that in with me taking, or old me taking responsibility for others, is me bringing this gift of the Christ Consciousness communing with others so that they can have their Christ Consciousness emerge within them. And that will take the form of unconditional love, which can do no harm to anyone.

It is perhaps you can say your versions of conditional love which result in the tumult upon your planet. But when you remove those conditions and act as a reflection of unconditional love, you have nothing but something to offer.

And it seems that there is something to offer is manifesting in my excitement to manifest this in channeling workshops. Well, how exciting. And you will always know if it is that energy if there is no judgment within it, for judgment is the imposition of conditions, and unconditional love is not, shall we say, something that yields judgment.

Do you have a suggestion? Vibration level to me is extremely high. Relax. And my body was reacting a little bit to the new vibration.

That is the judgment itself. Relax. Take deep breaths. Allow yourself to allow. There is no effort necessary. Great. We thank you.

Thank you very much. At this timing, we will pause for a short break of 10 to 15 of your minutes of counting and resume contact at that time.

All right. I’ll say continue shedding over there, male.

Alan, I contacted a belief or belief of mine earlier in the session, which… well, congratulations. Thank you. It was in the form of a judgment that I had, listening to one of the other participants here describing her connection with the future self and her experience on a mother ship, and catching myself with this belief or judgment that “that is all well and good, but we need to get down to brass tacks and the essential things to do with the planet here now.”

Do understand that that may be that particular individual’s way of doing so, but do proceed.

Well, I see this as a constricting—felt it as a constriction inside, as a judgment, which I perceive now is one of the things that I’ve utilized to close doors for myself.

Oh, yes. And constriction in a sense would be the byproduct of the cutting off of that aspect of yourself, for you are that individual, and in judging that, you are judging that portion of your own self. So yes, the restriction does not lie externally but is experienced as internal.

Yeah, yes. Well, having recognized this is my internal restriction and wishing to reclaim this part of myself, presently I feel compelled. I want to investigate my connection with a brother that I had when I was growing up.

All right. Do share.

Well, my sensing of my world growing up: he was a year younger than me and he lived till about three and a half years of age. And my experience of being in the world to the point of his leaving was of just magic, of the sun being bright and the world being full of life. This child was quite, quite extraordinary, and his delight in life—he was bouncing and bubbly and just spontaneous and full of this unconditional love—which I am in proximity of reclaiming into my life presently.

All right. How long will it take?

For as you maintain it outside of you as a separation, as we have shared, you will create the corresponding time to give you enough time to step toward it. But should you simply decide you are that idea, then there will be no necessity for the creation of time to experience it, and you simply will reclaim—will recollect that portion of you again.

In your society, it is the tendency to view external beings as being separate from you. You are in a world with them, but more literally speaking, they are you. And now that you know that, you cannot truly lose anything; you can choose to not be in proximity with it, but it is who you are; there is nowhere to put that either. So now you give yourself the opportunity, by first recognizing and acknowledging how you are limiting yourself with certain beliefs, the opportunity to reclaim or recollect his, shall we say, symbol within you.

Proceed.

All right. It’s my sensing in coming into connection with the ideas that you’ve presented and which I began to assimilate over the past months that this same lightness and sense of magic of the world is coming back into my life—that I’m feeling a renewal of how it was for me as a child. And learning, in fact, that it was a choice—albeit perhaps ill-advised—to cut yourself off from that to begin with. Not something that was imposed. Again, when you do not know it is a choice, it seems like it happened to you. But now that you are reclaiming that, life occurs through you. And again, understanding that you cannot lose anything, simply allow it to change its shape. You can now utilize that symbol in a positive way as it is relevant to provide strength for yourself now, right here and around it, as you have shared.

Therefore, how will you now express this reclaimed portion of your joy and ecstasy?

Well, I’m not planning anything. All right. I think I will just allow myself to celebrate it in the moment as I go through my days now.

Oh, thank you. There’s quite a lot of gifts I have a sense of coming into my life, and I’ll open it one by one.

Well, you know that from our perspective, that answer will do just fine.

All right. I was… I did have a question: was my younger brother connected to your society, or does he have a connection with your society?

Loosely, in that we are able to perceive that style of consciousness more readily, for it approximates more our own. As we have shared, you can only experience a reality you are the vibration of. So we only experience, when interacting with your society, the positive outcome, the positive experience. And perhaps you can say individuals that choose to live that way—and again, this is colloquial as an analogy—shine that much more brightly within our vision; we can find them, so to speak, more readily. But this applies to all of you, or we would not be having this conversation. So in attitude, but not necessarily a direct linear connection. For in that sense, he has served as guide for you in this life from behind the scenes, and that was one of, shall we say, the agreements between you. And by acknowledging what you are sharing with me now, you are fulfilling one of the major purposes of that particular agreement.

Good. Oh, thank you.

Does that make sense? However, yes. Therefore, have a good time. All right. That is how he would wish it, so to speak.

Yeah, I’m sure he would. Thank you.

And who you?

Female.

You. I’m a kindergarten teacher. Congratulations.

I have met a little boy that would be coming into my classroom next week—this week—and he has a very rare disease where his body is literally devouring itself, and his name is Brian. And I wanted to ask about the synchronicistic significance of his coming to me as a student at this time.

Well, again, it will be a reflection of your ability to be responsible to him by responsibly being who you are, or being responsible for yourself without needing to be responsible for his choices, but allowing you to be responsible to him by allowing him the option of what you have to offer.

I also got the sense for meeting his mother that not only is significant for me to meet this child and what he’s going through, but the example of how his mother has made the decision to put him into school—although if he gets caught measles or chicken pox, it could kill him—and she’s made the decision to, not knowing what’s going to happen with him, bring him into as normal of a childhood life as she can help him create. And I was so impressed with her, and I realized when I met her that one, two, three years ago I would have been terrified of what her experience is with a child.

You reassert their differences, they manifest those differences, shall we say, that much more blatantly. When you are able, in that sense, to reassert the similarities, you allow them to unfold into that as well. Now, not to make you all clones; you will still have individuality. But the idea is that many times with these particular scenarios, factors into the relationship how the child is treated. If they are treated as they are ill, they fulfill that prophecy. So therefore, your particular approach that will assist that individual is that he is just as empowered. And even if his choice should be to only live a life for so long, that choice is an example of his power. And the quality of the time that you spend together is up to you.

I have one other question about another student that’s coming to a class this year that has been thought about being autistic.

Now, the same answer will very strongly apply. For you will find that segment of your population, in particular, get in response to their particular choice a very typical type of treatment and a very typical type of, shall we say, attitude toward them that reinforces the limiting aspects rather than what they have chosen to focus on at the cost of the general, shall we say, focus—mass focus.

I don’t really have any other questions about it; I just thought it was very significant to me that I’m getting these students now.

Well, that’s the only time there is. But understand that that is the only time that you can make a difference. And self-empowerment is a difference to the general approach in these matters, so you can have a profound effect in the situation. Now, not that you need to put a burden on yourself that you must, but in the being of who you are, there can, by coincidence—incidences occurring at the same time—be a profound transference of empowerment which will strongly raise the quality rather than the quantity of the life. And we thank you for your willingness to extend yourself in such a way, and again remind you that you cannot be responsible for their decision but can derive great joy in being responsible to them in having made such a decision that acknowledges your willingness to interact with him that way, acknowledges their choice as just as valid as yours.

We thank you.

Female back there.

Yes, hi. Greetings. Well, I guess it’s about memory.

Well, may I ask you: is it about memory, or are you only guessing?

It’s about memory and other things too. All right. What were we talking about?

Are you having a good time?

Some people have very vivid memories of their childhoods. Well, often you will find these to not be direct representations of what did occur, but, shall we say, updated representations to be consistent with who they are now. But we understand that this seems and is presented as a vivid exact memory. But do proceed.

Well, nevertheless, they are memories of some sort. Anyway, I happen to be one of the people who have little to no memory of childhood, and up until now I kind of said, “Well, it’s because it’s not relevant to who I am right now. I’m not the same person who I was then; I’m changing, so it’s not relevant to my life now, so I don’t need to remember.” Or sometimes I’ve also said, “Well, maybe I wasn’t totally conscious or of the same consciousness that I’m of now, so I actually was a different person.”

Well, you are always, always a different person in every moment. But perhaps in this instance, part one of your summation would be more appropriate. It simply is that those particular instances are not relevant to what you are exploring now. And in a sense, your seeming quote unquote inability to recall them is to your advantage.

Okay. Yeah, basically that was the third part of the question is that… well, did not mean to jump ahead, but go on.

Am I filing things away, putting them in a closet that were difficult to deal with? I mean, is that a possibility?

Well, understand that to some degree yes. But understand also that you are now allowing them to come up and facing them as they do, and this is what will accelerate the integration of you. But also, and again we remind you, these are not bottomless barrels; you are finite beings, and these closets are finite. Therefore, as you empty it out a bit at a time and integrate what you had formerly denied, there is an end in sight to the quote unquote process that you seem to create.

How do you know when you’ve hit bottom, when there’s nothing else in the closet?

Because you know, I thought I’d come to like the end of a lot of it and I was fine for a few months, and then all of a sudden stuff started coming back up.

All right. When you quote unquote, to use your term, hit bottom, or perhaps you can say your barrel is empty, you simply will no longer have the tendency to interpret anything in a negative way—much as you perceive I do when interacting with you. For no matter what anyone shares with us from your society, we never interpret it in a negative way and can always, shall we say, provide a positive alternative viewpoint. And such will be the perspective of you as you allow that to integrate within you.

Well, that would be nice.

Yeah. Well, okay. But if you say “it will be,” you put it off. If you say “that is wonderful right now,” then even the quote unquote process of these ideas coming from the closet can be part of the joy, because your willingness to redefine them and then have them immediately have a new positive effect is in and of itself very exciting, in and of itself very energizing. So if you simply decide you are that you right now, there is no lengthy process, and it will simply be automatic processing. So when you have a negative interpretation, simply look at “this is a neutral set of props with no built-in meaning. I am obviously assigning it a negative meaning. All right, so what? I have done that; I am noticing it, and I will use it now.” And we assume there will be a particular situation in place with very particular parameters. “What must I believe in this situation to be having this negative interpretation? Oh, I believe that. Oh, thank goodness I found that out. I couldn’t change it unless I owned it. And that is the joyful process of transformation. Now that I have equalized it and acknowledged it and thanked it for it has led me to this recognition, what is the belief I wish to have? All right, I will state that belief. I will feel what it feels like to have that belief. While I feel that, my imagination is stoked, as you say. Therefore, how am I now acting with this new belief? Well, look at that, I am doing something far different than I would do in the situation I was about to enter. Oh, joy, a new option. I am this me. Oh, joy.” That simple. Can you do that?

Yeah. May I rephrase that? You can do that. Will you?

Yeah. I just want to ask one other thing. All right. Is it the beliefs only? Are there specific occurrences that you have to look at now?

One belief is that there are specific occurrences that you need to look at, but that is only a belief. Ultimately, foundationally speaking, it all boils down to the belief system. And when you change that and act as though you have changed and get the reflection of what has changed, any other thing that would behoove you to look at that is relevant to the new you in that situation will simply be obvious, and you will simply look at it and you will simply move on.

So I really don’t have to go back, don’t have to look back at anything or remember anything, because I can discover what the beliefs are now.

No. And interestingly enough, as you allow them to come to the surface, many times what once—acknowledge—not before they are nebulous and slippery before you acknowledge them, but once acknowledged, it is not uncommon to have what you call a flash recognition of a particular past. For once you acknowledge the belief, there may be the presenting to your consciousness of a particular scenario that is perceived was the cause of the installation of that belief. But whether or not that happens, you will get the same effect by acknowledging it, thanking it, and choosing the new belief. But there is no laid-down process necessary; it is simply automatic once you have decided to be that you. Does that make sense?

Yeah, perfect. Can you use that?

Yes, thank you.

Oh, thank you.

Male back there.

All right. I have two questions. One’s for a friend. All right. It deals with July 26th. We were on our way up to Upstate New York; it was supposed to be a four-hour ride; it took us six because we kept getting lost. And she would like to know what is the significance of riding all over New York?

Perhaps you can say it was an elaborate example to provide to yourself that nothing is extraneous. And in judging that something is extraneous, you place your attention upon the negative aspect of what you perceive to be extraneous and can literally then perpetuate and prolong it. Were you to simply say “all right, this has a reason. What does this mean to me?” and use it in the moment, in general you will then find the correct turn as an analogy. Does that make sense to you?

Somewhat, because I have my own answer for this.

Well, will you share it, please?

Sure. I will. This lady has been at the point where she’s realized that she wants to live her life for herself instead of for her husband. And I’ve only known her in that aspect. And this long drive, we got to know each other—something we have never done, known each other for quite a few years now.

When you shared that with her as a reason, what did she say?

I didn’t get a chance to do that.

Oh, all right. Then that is not her reason yet. But again, you may in that sense point her to thinking why she believed that it was extraneous, why she believed something was happening to her from somewhere else.

I thought it was just she was wondering why it was taking so long and why we kept making wrong turns, or I kept making wrong turns ‘cause I was driving.

You will find the frustration that you are speaking of is again in assuming that something is extraneous and that what is happening in the moment is not exactly that which will serve you.

Okay. So now you have two ideas to discuss with her. Great. Thanks. Oh, thank you. The second one: I’ve been noticing lately when I’ve been falling—just ready to fall asleep—I’m hearing the phone ring even though it actually isn’t. It rings once, and that’s all. I hear is somebody calling. Can I ask who?

You can ask.

Okay. I’m asking.

All right. Next sharing one moment. Do not mean to hang on cliff so… finally. However, when you pick the phone up, say “who is there?” Then tell me.

All right. You sound a little nervous.

Oh, no, excited.

All right. Then boldly accept the call.

Hello. We assume you did not just hear it ring, but as you say—and I am using your slang purposely—good.

See, I’m headed in the right direction.

We thank you. And we thank you for lightening up, for that is, shall we say, the particular open response that will allow for the placing of the phone call without the reversal of the charges. And we thank you. Good night.

Female, yes.

Thank you. I had a large triangular craft go over my house, and I went out underneath it, and I said “I know you, I love you,” etc., etc. And I’ve never seen that thing before to my knowledge. All right. What if you say so? To my conscious knowledge. Now, recently I’ve been having visitations at night.

Now, before you proceed, can you describe what you would perceive to be the bottom of the craft?

It was dark gray, it had red lights on the… it was equilateral triangle, was about as big as a shopping center. It had blue, white, red, and green lights. And it had a response to me in that I said “if you can hear me, blink your lights”—it blinked the light. I walked underneath it and I said “oh, I know you, you’re the same one that knows Whitley Strieber.” I mean, I was like free-flowing; I don’t know where this stuff is coming from.

Well, by the way, in that particular instance, it may not have been the same race, but do proceed.

Okay, great. So then I ran across the road, and everybody was screaming “come back, Linda, you’re going to get beamed up.” And then I had the psychic impression that it was going to be somewhere. So my daughter and I got in the car, we went up the road a couple miles, took a left, and it was behind this house, and I saw it going off towards Mount Mohawk. And then I had some strange—what I consider strange—phenomenon, like a blue chrome ball on my dresser in the middle of the night, and also some… I excuse me, I call it “cosmic snot” because that’s what it looked like. It had on like little… how fascinating. And it rang like a phone. Oh, God, help me.

May I say to you that never before in interacting with your society have we heard such an analogy. And how creative.

Now, understand where I got that?

Well, do understand that from my end, they are laughing with you about this. Thank you very much. Now, I cannot do so or I will break the link, but I assure you later on I will.

Now, can I ask the second question?

You may.

There’s an entity that comes in my room at night, and… it’s… pardon? Proceed. Okay. You had said entity comes to room. Oh, Lord. I said not quite. Is that from the same craft?

Describe the entity.

All right. Is it… male? Feels like male. All right. Approximate height? I don’t know because I’m always on my stomach and it’s in the back of me. All right. Do you perceive that individual to be “snot-like”? No, no. It has solidity. All right.

All right. I think it’s taking… eggs? Why do you think that? Because it’s having intercourse with me.

All right. Okay. Now, understand from again our perspective… all right. What you are perceiving as the energy is, shall we say, slightly different from the craft sighting that you had. They are two, shall we say, different ideas altogether. From our perspective, the craft that you have perceived would in that sense correspond to a slightly larger research vessel from our society. In terms of the other visitations, I will simply invite you to turn over on your back next time and ask.

I would like to do that. Then go right ahead.

Do I know this being from another lifetime or dimension?

Well, in a sense, you are, shall we say, very intimately acquainted. But I will allow you to establish with that entity the connection. And when you are willing to take that next step, that will open up for us—all right, to use your slang and have some fun—a whole another kind of worms.

Okay. Would that have anything to do with the particular… I call it the “blind pattern” because it looks like Venetian blinds in the air that I see? Is that a stepping process that I’m supposed to go through? Is that representational?

In a sense, but turning over and consciously relating and speaking will be the most direct, shall we say, skip of a few steps.

All right. Will they allow me? Because they freeze me with an electrical energy.

Now, what you are perceiving—oh—is, shall we say, a paralysis that results in you forcing yourself to move. Simply rather than trying, as you say, to move, allow yourself to move. Like an out-of-body experience.

Exactly. Oh, okay. Is that same energy with me when I have an out-of-body and meet beings?

From time to time. Although again, that will be up to you. For that particular frame of consciousness is rather multi-dimensional and can from that perspective access many different realities, many different dimensions of experience.

Why? What is this purpose with me?

Well, what I am sharing is what you would call the astral state itself.

Oh, all right. Is it a guide? Would you consider a guide?

In the way that you mean? No. Did you say “god” or “guide”? Guide. Guide, yes. But even, shall we say, more direct than that. And by asking, you will find out.

Okay. Thank you. One more question: there was a being of light that came to the foot of my bed, and I think I moved astrally, but he spoke to me about love being the most important thing in the whole world and something else, and I forgot the message. And I wondered if you could…

Well, understand that you will remember portions of what you perceived to be the direct message. But again, there was the explanation that unconditional love rather than conditional love is the love that they were speaking of. And also that this applies as strongly to your willingness to unconditionally love yourself, for that is what expands your ability to unconditionally love all others—not the other way around.

Is that an angel?

Do you know what an angel is? We understand what you are sharing. And simply scanning, our perception in that instance of the glowing being is that that would represent your interpretation of a physicalization and an externalization of your higher self itself.

I have some beautiful thoughts then. Oh, thank you.

Do you wish to share some more of them?

Oh, yes, one more. I know I said “one more” before. When I was 15 years old, there were two craft that came over my house in New Hampshire, and I don’t have any memory. I know a lot of little craft came out; my whole family was involved.

All right. Before you proceed—before we have enough information—yes. These crafts relate more directly with what you are perceiving as your nighttime visitations and are distinctly separate from our triangular craft.

So I know that. Oh, yes. So do we.

We are in a sense relatives.

Oh, who are they? Can you tell me their names or anything?

In that particular instance, what you would call beings that stem from Reticulum society—Zeta Reticulum. The little guys, if you wish to call them that. They come in three… it is similar, but do understand that what you are reading is an interpretation many times through fear. Oh, yeah. Therefore, the more quote unquote negative aspects of what you are experiencing are but interpretations. It is not inherently in any way, shape, or form negative, and it is not intended from their end as negative.

That relieves me so much because I don’t want anything negative.

Well, perhaps the emotional detachment from those beings can sometimes be interpreted by your society, being that you are rather emotional, as indifference. It is not; it is their form of direct communication. And, shall we say, one moment—direct observance.

Okay. We thank you. Thank you very much. Give him a kiss for me, by the way.

When you say “I must then contain some beautiful thoughts,” then yeah, we again remind you: you can only ever understand or appreciate something at all to begin with if you first contain it. So the moment you see or hear something and say “my, that is beautiful,” that is your beauty. You could not perceive it or see it or make sense of it lest you contain within you the analog. So that tells you that you have that within you. Therefore, you may rejoice and begin to use that to turn that unconditional love inward, for you contain it.

Do I have three other children on other planets?

We will not comment on the precise number and will for now… okay. And this interaction, and we thank you.

Male.

Greetings. Wonderful interacting with you in this format as always.

It is our joy to interact with all of you, dear ones. Thank you.

Recently, I have the great privilege to meet and listen to the Hopi elder, Thomas Banyacya, and to become a spirit brother of sorts with an Algonquin chief, Running Moose. I learned from Thomas that the Hopi have knocked on the doors of the House of Mica, the United Nations, now four times and have not been permitted to speak to the peoples of the earth. But perhaps this is changing. This is what I was going to ask, because the Hopi themselves feel now as if there is only darkness ahead—purification and so forth. Now, some do, but some do not. And what perhaps will increase the chances of the interface will be the ones that actually believe in the positive outcome, unifying for a singular purpose of world peace, reunifying, re-supporting each other, not outcasting any individual for being willing to function in that way.

Unity is the key.

I say they are the Hopi; they represent the possibility for peace on Earth.

Yes. The Hopi means “peaceful people.” And they can, in that sense, shall we say, achieve, for lack of better terminology, that peace. But not by budging and matching what they perceive to be the warring mentality, only by maintaining their inner peace and embodying peace. Again, the hating of war is the vibration of war and hate itself. The loving of peace provides an alternative rather than, shall we say, another self-righteous party matching the warring mentality. So therefore, their willingness to shine as an example of peace as an alternative, living peace, will have an effect. Now, in particular, because of the transformational tendency within the mass consciousness of your society, this is the timing. Right. And there will split the Earths whereby one, perhaps you can say, Earth will have the dark end, and the other that you are all upon will emerge, so to speak, into the light—or at least realize that it had never left the light.

I see. I see. I would… is it possible that the House of Mica referred to in the prophecies is not strictly the United Nations but the physical universe, and indeed the Hopi message has been and is being heard?

Well, yes, that is in that sense an astute analogy. But perhaps in this case, the direct physical analogy will apply, for that particular body does represent one of the institutions in place that can allow, should things move in a certain direction, for a global, shall we say, coordinative body.

Yes. Well, one thing that I hope… you do not appear to know now is of the separation that is coming: the positive planet and the other planet.

Individuals will generally interpret it as one or the other, not realizing that it is both and they get to choose. And that should their choice be unconscious through fear—which is believing the reality they do not prefer is most likely—they will still live, shall we say, the result of their choice. But you, in knowing this, can bring many things and will find much openness in that sense and understanding from that particular stream if you approach them in such an unconditionally loving and embodying peace way.

Thank you. And would I suppose that some of the great Earth changes, or perhaps most of the great Earth changes that are being predicted by a variety of sources, are already occurring?

Already occurring, yes. But when the Earths separate, I would think that the Earth of the great positive influence would probably be the one to suffer the most physical damage.

In… repeat. There is a split. A positive planet with all of its positive influences is being born. There’s also a reality that is left behind—a status quo planet, as it were. Now, understand that is not literally the way it is viewed. Simply that you are on that positive Earth is the perspective that allows you to then embody the attitudes that allow you to simply be on that positive Earth. So you perceive no split, and you only know that you are on the positive Earth by drawing the dichotomy. You then, shall we say, open up the possibility of choosing one or the other. Did that translate?

This does translate, yes. Well, I have some attention on the matter of the other Earth, whatever its nature. All right. What will happen to this Earth, to our brother Earth?

Understand, for the purposes of convenience, we have allowed you to utilize the analogy of the splitting into Earth A and B. But there are literally an infinite number of splitting Earths with every gradation in between. Therefore, whatever positive idea you wish, in that sense, to participate in, simply bring that feeling into your now moment. You can have anything from one extreme to the other and any slight gradation in between.

Thank you very much. Oh, thank you. And I will take this beautiful message back to the American indigenous peoples.

Simply our particular message would be: to those who have maintained the peaceful frame of mind, you have done so for hundreds of years. You have maintained this aspect of your tribe. You have done so for a reason. Now is the time of awakening. Now is the time of unfoldment. Now is the time for the fulfilling of the peaceful purpose. But not by matching the negativity and not by assuming the same tactics as what is perceived to be the negative brother. Therefore, maintain the path of the peaceful warrior, having that warrior simply being expressed by the sword, by the spear, by the arrow of your positive conviction, for that is what will forge the new Earth. That is what will make way for the new age of man, which is already occurring. We thank you.

Thank you. And we thank you all.

Yes, I’m surprised. Oh, thank you. I just… I just thank you for allowing me to speak with you all. Right. Will you do so a bit louder so that your gift will not be missed by one? Yes. Thanks. Oh, thank you.

I have a question. I have two questions about an experience I had recently. A few weeks ago, I went to this woman’s house who has the Max crystal skull—the Hedges skull. And the experience was a little different than what I expected.

Well, how exciting. Congratulations.

That is the standard reply on our planet for such a statement. Okay. Oh, not as you expected. Congratulations. Do proceed.

There seemed to be two very different versions of the origin of the skull. All right. One—or what I would call a whole group of them—is from a book that I read previous to going there, and people who were psychic had perceived that the skull had been crystallized using… was an actual priestess from Atlantis. It was the first skull.

That is not our perspective. Okay.

Another perspective: it was artificially, shall we say, created by members of your society utilizing, shall we say, lost, so to speak, technology and created with the purpose of encoding the crystalline structure itself with particular ideas, which has occurred. It is a key, but it has upon it a safety valve, so to speak. Therefore, when looking into its eyes, if you are open and not fearful, it will reflect back to you certain things which may, in that sense, unfold over the course of time. But should you, in that sense, display any fear or hesitation, the safety valve in a sense cuts that off.

Is the safety valve love?

Well, again, the safety valve is just that: because it is such a direct and strong mirror, should you, in a sense, approach it with fear, it in a sense will turn off. Love, in a sense, is the key that will integrate fear and allow it to function in its, shall we say, intended way.

Is its purpose then to bring love and healing to us at this time?

That would be from your perspective like the encapsulation of it. That may be an effect from unlocking that portion within yourself. But in a sense, you can say that it is a storehouse of much information, including what you would label to be historical information of not only the Mayan culture but Atlantis itself.

Okay. And if I were to want to tap into that information, I would… through time just have that desire within myself.

But should you, in a sense, for a particular, shall we say, symbolic action wish to access it, you can simply look into what you perceive to be your mirror and with your imagination superimpose the skull upon your own face, look into its eyes, ask a particular question, and then quiet down, listen for the answer. You can more directly access what has been downloaded, so to speak, into your consciousness in that way—direct participation.

Thank you. I’m going to do that now. Have a good time. Do not be so serious. Have some fun.

I’d like to ask about a second aspect of my experience with it. Do share.

Your advice was to be very clear, and so I had done these meditations, and a person here, Kim, had worked with me in a healing sense, and it was very beautiful. And when I went to see the skull, I joined with another person, and the contact with that person and then leading up to, and then that person was with me with the skull—for me was emotionally really upsetting. And the interaction with that person was very upsetting. And so my initial feeling about the whole thing is that I had failed, because I had gotten emotionally involved and was… now, do you understand why you have felt the results of seeming to have failed? What happened then I can utilize in the sense of utilizing all my creations? And my guess is that I was in this situation because, in a sense, was this person showing me what not to be and maybe what things that I had myself done in the past?

Well, in a sense, what was the nature of what you labeled to be the upsetting emotion elicited from you?

Okay. From my perspective, this person was really negative. I thought they were really abusive to me. And they were talking nonstop and invading my sense of myself and privacy. They were talking nonstop, at which you interpreted and allowed it to be an invasion. Yes. So perhaps what you are sharing is that in that moment you were not willing to assign that everything was just as it should be; that the judgments that arose, shall we say, resulted in you feeling as though you had not accomplished your goal. But understand that when we say you can use your creations, this is an ongoing ability. So right now, what you are doing is integrating those ideas, integrating that it’s all right for him to be that way. It is not, however, what you prefer. Therefore, you will not be that way and provide an example to an individual such as that of another way to be, without insisting that they must be that way. Now that you have integrated this within you, you may now simply allow yourself to access the information that you succeeded in attracting. Now that you have removed your label of failure and the reason for that label, you may now understand that you did not fail.

Thank you very much. Well, thank you. I have done nothing for helping.

You’ve helped me tremendously with understanding those things in the past and right now.

Well, you have created me to do so, and I thank you. I would like others to know that the experience with the skull, I believe, has helped me to feel the sense of my beingness, and that I’m—I think that I’m more aware of it. And also during the experience itself, I had a serious sinus infection at the time, and physically, while I was there, it was sending me healing energy to my sinuses, which by the way was a reflection of your own healing energy. Do proceed.

All right. And then the one thing I noticed about the sinus infection is that when I am emotionally—you’re going to—upset, or I’m reacting to situations and certain types that I’m beginning to see, I get these serious headaches and sinus congestion and pains. And now that you know that you can act rather than react, you may breathe easy.

Thank you so very much. One moment. A suggestion. Now, anything that we ever share with you is only a suggestion. We do not insist that you do it, and you will be no less should you choose to do anything. Every option is equal. However, a suggestion: if it is even possible, call up that individual and thank him. For that will be the action that will acknowledge that you are using the creation that he has graced you with in a positive way, regardless of his intention. And again, perhaps that may leave him scratching his head, but it will show him an example—a living example—an alternative. It is up to you.

I would thank them for teaching me, thank them for reflecting to you who they were and allowing you to make certain decisions about yourself that you have drawn service from interacting with them.

Thank you.

And to you. I’d like to share with you that what you spoke about in the beginning of this interaction has been a tremendous service to me. There are a lot of questions now that I don’t have to ask.

Well, thank you. Do you know what questions are?

Yeah.

They are answers that you have within you that you place outside of yourself for validation. So in not any longer having the question, you are simply willing to be responsible for validating the answers already within you, and we thank you.

I have a sharing regarding July the 26th. All right. I did as he suggested and did what excited me in every given moment. And the day was rather overcast and hazy, and at the end of the day it began to rain, which was not a real good situation to drive in. But coming home, it was just the gentlest, finest rain that I think I’ve ever seen. And it occurred to me at the time that a lot of American Indian tribes refer to rain as either male or female. Male rain is very hard driving rain, and female rain is the very gentle nurturing rain. All right. By the way, they are transposable, but do proceed.

Well, I just thought that was my interpretation of it, and I thought that it was real interesting that… he should be graced with this very gentle and nurturing rain.

And being that female can also represent receptivity as well on that day. But also, paradoxically, now is the time that you are exploring your male aspect as well, for that is the grounding, that is the action, that is the willingness to assert. And again, in your language, assertion can sometimes be, shall we say, linked with aggressiveness and obnoxiousness. But that need not be the concept; there can be a sweet assertion. And that is why they are transposable.

Distinguishing. I have one question regarding timing. Often when you tell people to pay attention to their dreams over the next three nights of our time, from time to time, and I’m wondering what the significance of three is. Is there?

Well, in general, interacting with us in your dream reality, due to the structuring of what you label to be the nature of your personality at this timing, will not be remembered, so to speak, upon waking. So therefore, from time to time, we will point out particular areas at which we intend to interact with you most blatantly in your dreams. And by suggesting even the placing of attention upon that will, shall we say, increase your likelihood of retaining even the mildest symbol of having interacted with us, which will generally be just that—a very small idea or symbol that will have a large usefulness in your life. Now, do not berate yourself if you did not feel that you had full interaction each night. That is not the nature of what we are sharing, though that is a possibility as well.

That’s not really the nature of the question. I’m wondering what is the significance of three nights as opposed to two or five or something like that.

That is simply, shall we say, the concentration of the amount of time when interacting in this way that we choose. We also are fond of the number three. We find it to be a very stable number—the tripod, the stability, the positive and negative polarity with, shall we say, the base of the integration of the two is very stable.

One other question. We had a continuing conflict on our planet in the area which used to be Yugoslavia—the provinces. In a previous interaction, a Bashar interaction during the Gulf conflict, Bashar had said that that conflict was the playing out of residual negativity on our planet and that that location was significant because it had been the location of an infusion of negative consciousness. Yes. Can you describe a little bit more fully what that infusion of negative consciousness was?

Now, we will be brief. One of the particular, shall we say, systems that we label “Orion” in a sense has had some interaction with your society, but not directly with craft. Well, that is another story, but not in general with craft. It is reincarnational. And in general, for the reasons of quote unquote escaping the negativity of a particular scenario within their own society, when in that sense reincarnating into your society, however, shall we say, they in that sense brought many of the tendencies they were quote unquote escaping from. Now, historically speaking, in that area is the coming of the, shall we say, destructive warrior—perhaps you can call him that—you have labeled Sargon, that in a sense historically speaking will represent some of the earliest infusions of Orion consciousness onto your planet. And did occur in that particular area, which in a sense is symbolic of a crucible to allow the concentration of many of these negative ideas to bubble out and in a sense siphon them off from other places on the planet. That is still, shall we say, a very strongly charged area in this regard.

So the conflict in the Balkan area is also an offshoot of that?

Well, in a sense, that is more directly related to, shall we say, demonstrating to your society in no uncertain terms the result of complete intolerance of another population. These are issues which are coming to the forefront in your society as we speak. And there will be the option to buy into intolerance and exclusion, even in your legitimate government. But there will also always be the option to begin to release these ideas as outdated. And you will see the examples and results of that intolerance. So perhaps you can make, as you say in your language, a sober decision.

At what time period did this infusion occur?

The reference that is available is the Sargon reference. There is not, shall we say, the juxtaposition of time frame in the channel of this, so you can look it up. Do that.

We thank you. At this timing, allow me to once again express to you all my and our unconditional love and appreciation for your willingness to continue to open up the doors that you consider to partition your consciousness. You are one whole, unbroken, homogeneous consciousness, even if you express that wholeness in fragments. Therefore, it will be your option at any given time to decide—simply because you say so, simply because you desire it, simply because it is who you wish to be—to, shall we say, recollect those fragments and allow them to integrate into you in the form of acceptance, acknowledgment, appreciation, utilization, and transformation of the things you do not prefer, which results in the integration and expression of yourself as one unbroken consciousness. We bid you a most fond and loving good evening and say pleasant dreams.