Table of Contents
Asker
For the channel, perhaps you can tell him for us that there was a particular dream that he had whereby he perceived that he had agreed to provide an interaction of this type. But in the dream, he perceived that he personally needed to be responsible for the content and therefore created anxiety, created fear, created lots of relatives and interesting amounts of people coming to that particular interaction that he perceived he had no idea what he would say.
Elan
Allow us to simply share the symbology of that, and that is that when individuals are channeling, they need not take responsibility in any way for how another person takes the information. Period. That is the only message from that. All the channel can simply do is to communicate the concepts in a clear and fluid way that are coming through from our perspective. The concepts that we render are exactly the concepts from our point of view that will be of most service to an individual, but once they are shall we say put out, it is then up to any individual to do what they will. So you cannot truly be responsible for how someone decides to take and use or not take and not use the information. Simply this was a symbolical representation of that particular exploration. And we thank you again.
Asker
I’ve been experiencing flux in uh my business, personal, family, and domestic life. It’s it’s given me an opportunity to uh to define who I am in these matters and in these areas of my life. It’s also caused me to bring the question um uh to bring up questions like uh “What am I up to? Why am I here?” Uh, and well, all those questions lead you directly back to your excitement, exactly. For that’s the answer to these questions.
Elan
And what you are exploring, amongst other things, is: are you truly doing what you are doing because it excites you, or because you don’t think you have another choice?
Asker
And that’s the comment you have on this process I’m going through?
Elan
Well, that particular aspect of it. Do proceed.
Asker
I was going to ask for any prise that you had on this process that I’m going through in the last couple of weeks.
Elan
It is simply again allowing yourself, or perhaps in certain terms forcing yourself, to evaluate your situation and allow you to run through your situation in terms of what excites you, what is representative of who you are, what moves you and what does not. And then look at why you would continue to do the things that do not excite you.
Asker
Thank you. Uh, two more things. Um, in a sense you can say separating your wheat from your chaff.
Elan
Well, one one concern that came up in that regard is um I start doing something, say a project, in order to enable me to do another project. And I can get so wrapped up in the initial project that it it begins to expand out of proportion to its original concept and its original purpose.
Asker
Well, does this then not lead you to more exciting possibilities?
Elan
Well, it certainly could, but that’s one of the things I’m looking at. Uh, let me ask a specific question. I was um in the car the other day on route to transaction business, and I felt uh I realized that I was really low energy and I felt yucky.
Asker
Resisting yourself, well yes. I suppose so. But what I experienced was that I was surrounded by entities that were drawing upon me, were draining me, like low-life, yucky entities.
Elan
In a sense, you say that this is symbolically the removal of responsibility. You need not take it literally.
Asker
Okay. Well, what I did under the circumstances—you were commiserating with portions of yourself, so to speak. I shed them away.
Elan
All right. I shed them away, but again, to where? Well, exactly. Why not in that sense realize that they are your children, they are your creations as well? And rather than shooing them, embrace them and dialogue from your transcendental point of view at how they serve you, what their function is. Allow them to deliver their message, and then you will notice they will be on their own way with no shoeing. Interesting. Pursuing their excitement, which is part of, which is a reflection of me pursuing my excitement.
Asker
I uh another thing. Um, when you brought up at the last interaction the uh “time machine” as you put it—I was wondering how long this question would take. Do proceed.
Elan
Right. Um, upon hearing “time machine,” I flashed that uh that Lauren and I were board the time machine.
Asker
Oh, thank you. Revealing ourselves to ourselves in the present moment. Could not have said it better. Thank you for saving me the answer. But understand this—or perhaps you can say, and understand this—since we have discussed “buts” with you before…
Elan
A “butt”? Hey, we know.
Asker
It would be mechanically imprecise to say that it was from your direct linear future. It is a parallel reality future. So it is a part of yourself, but it is not linearly directly related to you. But it is an aspect of a probable future self that in a sense touched back and allowed you to see coming attractions—some of the possibilities. And are you to, in this linear dimension, go forward quote-unquote into a future and then travel in such a time machine, you will be skewing across to another parallel reality. We understand this does not translate well. Do proceed.
Elan
I follow. Uh, what is the significance of that occurrence?
Asker
Simply again, communications from your future self that say “you’re doing just fine, look at what’s just ahead”—a pep talk.
Elan
I get it. Let me ask this: is it possible for us to take a journey aboard that craft?
Asker
In your imagination or your dream reality, or if you in that sense allow it, the astral state at this point. But physically, it is a possibility in your quote-unquote future. That is what it was telling you. So remain grounded at what you can do right now, and if that is attractive to you, simply maintain it as an expectant see.
Elan
Well, more specifically, if a craft from a parallel future shows up, is it possible for me to go aboard that craft and take a journey?
Asker
Ace, it is possible. It is possible in general. That will go against the grain of the agreements of such travelers, so unlikely. But there is in a sense a non-interference approach from them. But it is possible.
Elan
And they weren’t stretching the rules of B just to show themselves to me?
Asker
No. It will always be your opportunity to believe that you saw it or not. If you are physically taken aboard a craft, perhaps it will not leave you opportunity any longer.
Elan
I see. Did you comment on the unusual configuration of the craft and the equipment?
Asker
Simply that that particular arrangement, that particular array, that particular sensor arrangement is conducive for time travel—that particular shape, rectangular. And this craft very definitely does not move through space and time; space and time moves around it. Is that so?
Elan
Ace, very good. Now, also since you brought up these distinguishing characteristics, our particular craft are triangular versus your general usual saucer because triangular is the most conducive shape that we have found for interdimensional penetration.
Asker
Due to what property?
Elan
Untranslatable because of the non-existence of technology on your end to use as an analogy.
Asker
Does it have to do with lines of force?
Elan
In the precise way that you mean, no. I see. Now, does this craft move through time and space—I’m talking about the time machine—does it, uh, does time and space move around it according to the same principles and or technology that your craft moves into dimensionally, into retiring space?
Asker
There are similarities, but there are many differences, and there are shall we say two sets of propulsion to that craft. And one does enable it to physically move within a reality at what you would call sublight speeds. And when they actually move through time and space or to a different time and different space, do they do so by altering the uh locational and time coordinates of the craft itself?
Elan
In that sense, it is similar to our own craft in that they isolate themselves and reinsert, if you will, themselves vibrationally.
Asker
Yes. And is it—does it done by consciousness interface, or is it done by sometimes mechanically generated magnetic field?
Elan
Well, interestingly enough, from our perspective, consciousness interface. From your perspective, or from the humans using it, mechanically. But we do not make the removal if the consciousness pushes the button. From our perspective, the consciousness in that sense is responsible.
Asker
So they’re using, they’re uh relying upon a computer to—uh, in a sense you can call it that. It is perhaps you can say more self-aware, which the understanding of many of your scientists now is that that would be impossible for a computer. So perhaps it would be renamed.
Elan
Have they reached the point where they can interface their consciousness with computers of war craft?
Asker
As you do not—as we do—to some more of a surface-oriented degree, there is the beginnings of that now in that particular stream.
Elan
And uh is this craft more of a mechanical construction as opposed to yours being grown out of a living crystal?
Asker
Yes. Okay, thank you very much.
Elan
And to you.
Asker
Over there, a venue. Hi, greetings. I wanted to mention that um Andrew’s t-shirt, if you can get a mental image of it, is illustrates what the transcendental point of view of two hands and literally tells you that you draw yourself into your reality. I really like that Andrew put that on for this today.
Elan
All right. And um I just wanted to um tell you there’s so many things. Thank you for the added energy for getting my car. And um that it, talking to Tony about the consciousness of the computer just made me laugh because my car has consciousness and um is very excited to be all with.
Asker
Thank yourself, or it was the actions based on whatever information you perceived you had that created the reality, and nothing that we did.
Elan
Oh yes, thank you. And you as well.
Asker
And um, well, I just wanted to talk about a little bit about another sort of dream that I had, which was all right—sort of “how dream” all right. He—it was a person that I interacted with for the first time in dream state, as I perceive it, in this physical form. And um, it’s a person that I’ll be meeting—is I’m meeting—I am meeting in a parallel future. And he is very close to me, and we have a lot to do together in this lifetime. And I wanted to know if you’re in contact with him at this moment.
Elan
No. Okay, but you are.
Asker
I know. I—I was under the impression that I would meet him through my excitement in my journey in the with the extraterrestrial.
Elan
Yes, but not necessarily directly through them, but from the excitement of the journey itself.
Leave a Comment
Thank you for your comment!
It will appear after review.