I’d like to explore a little bit with you about abundance – the discrepancy for me comes between need and want. Could you expand on that a little bit?
Abundance is the ability to do what you need to do when you need to do it, we refer to the needs that are created by what excites you. So therefore, in a sense, you can understand that when following your excitement with integrity, that ability is always there, that whatever needs come up they are immediately filled.
And on the other side of the same coin, should something not come up within a particular timing, you can assume that that is not necessary for that moment. But that does not mean, in that sense, that you need to quell your desire for such an idea, simply that you can utilize the situation as part of the timing.
Understand you are the perceptor, you are the percepted, and you are the perception as well. Therefore, your interactions with your environment, with your reality, are representative of interacting with portions of yourself. So therefore, if you can allow the feedback from those other portions, you can understand that if something is not there in a given moment, that is the feedback from that portion of yourself to allow you to know that that is not the moment to most fully be able to appreciate and desire the thing you say you wish.
So therefore, it is a matter of trust in timing and your willingness to exercise your ability in any given moment to the greatest degree possible within that moment. And it will always, again, involve acting upon what you can act upon and factoring out what you cannot act upon in that moment. Does that help?
It does help, but it also leads me to wonder whether or not “needs” is a perception of scarcity rather than abundance.
It depends how you wish to use the word. Saying you have need—a need in that sense—perhaps you can say that, but saying that there are certain necessities in order for something in that sense to be able to culminate, that is how we mean need, okay? In other words, for instance, in order to walk from place A to place B, you need to have a surface to walk upon, for instance, to keep it as simple as possible. So therefore, it is not that you have, in a sense, a scarcity by having that need, but that is part of the definition for what need be present for the interaction to take place. Is that clearer?
One of the, um, explorations that Richard and I have begun is love—unconditional love. And in love, and defining these terms by our dictionary, is very nebulous to say the least. can… would you assist us with some definitions?
When we speak of love, we speak of unconditional love. And that is a willingness to validate all realities. How exciting, the lights go on, they go off. Yes, they do. But you are always still enlightened. Perhaps you can move that so that does not occur again. Now, even that was no accident. Oh, lightning up.
Unconditional love is the primary vibration of creation itself. It is the prime frequency. It is All-That-Is. Therefore, everything, you can say quite literally, is made of unconditional love and allowed into existence from unconditional love.
Unconditional very simply means that no matter what, there are no conditions. You will always have that love. Therefore, because you are made in the image and likeness of Infinite Creation, you too have the capability to display unconditional love.
Love on your planet will sometimes mean conditional, and this can translate very loosely to: “If you do this, I will love you. If not, you stink.” And that is only one perspective. This is the perspective very often that individuals will judge themselves from and by.
So therefore, when you feel judged by the universe, you can always understand that the universe, being unconditional, is therefore by extension, by definition, non-judgmental. And the judgment that you feel is the judgment and the vibration of judgment from your own self. You see, “judge not lest you be judged” means that when you judge, you will feel the effects of that judging.
So therefore, again, unconditional love is your willingness to utilize everything within your creation in a positive way if it applies to you at all. It is the ultimate identification as other aspects of your external reality. Does that help?
It is simply a matter of semantics. If you mean it in a particular way whereby an individual, feeling incomplete, is infatuated with the idea of another person that will make them complete, perhaps that is sometimes what is meant by “in love.”
But in our society, “in love” simply means that that unconditional love is expressed to ourselves and to all other individuals, and therefore we are literally in love with each other, with no exceptions. We are also in love with our reality, in love with our planet, in love with absolutely anything that we interact with within physical reality unconditionally. For we understand it all serves us, and everything we create can be interpreted and utilized in a positive way to accelerate our growth and expansion of consciousness. You can too, otherwise you would not understand the word that was just said. If you understand it, you contain it.
Imagination
Parkinson’s disease
When functioning according to his excitement in every given moment, remember to only choose from what is available even within his particular situation.
Do not overshoot, in that sense, the mark. Allow himself to begin at whatever level is right in front of his face. His willingness to move at all in that direction will have an immediate and obvious effect.
There are many. It is:
- invalidation of the very thing he chose to do in this life.
- a hesitation moving ahead, hesitating in a microscopic fashion
Lack of clear intention, clear definition, desire, and deservability, and of course, clear action.
Closing
You are all teachers and you are all learners. There is truly no such thing as teaching without learning and learning without teaching. There may be a lack of receptivity by one or both of the participants in this way, but automatically, your willingness to interact with another individual is an equal exchange, at least from the cosmic standpoint. Therefore, in a sense, entitling this interaction “Equal Exchange” was a bit redundant. But we wish to remind you that from our perspective, we are your equals. We are no better than you. No, we are more expanded in our choice of consciousness, but more or less expanded is not better or worse—simply different choices, different experiences, different options. And the good news is you get to pick whichever ones you want in the overall scheme of, so to speak, your soul. Therefore, we thank you for your willingness to begin to boldly interact as equals, for as you do, you add that much momentum to the mass consciousness interacting in such a way. And when there is enough unitization in this direction, it will make it possible—though it is not necessary from our perspective, it can be quite pleasant—it will make it possible for your society and our respective societies to interact face-to-face. Keep your eyes out when you are so inclined, without obsessing of and with the idea. Also, keep your eyes up. We thank you for your willingness to share in this way and bid you a most fond and loving good evening.
Leave a Comment
Thank you for your comment!
It will appear after review.