Circumstantial Evidence

All right, I’ll say I bid you greetings this evening of your time as you create time to exist. How are you all? Thank you very much. Allow us to begin this interaction this evening of your time with a statement that indeed you do—indeed you do create your own reality. This has been, shall we say, a very main theme of our discussions with your society.

We shall for a moment get into the idea of the mechanism by which you do so, and illuminate ideas about how you in a very automatic sense utilize your belief systems to create your reality. Understand as we have said that Infinite Creation—what you call God, what we prefer to use the terminology All-That-Is—is the prime frequency, the prime vibration of creation, in a sense if you choose to look at it that way. Therefore, as we also have stated, the idea that enables what you label to be individuality is variations in a sense from the prime frequency—different frequencies, different rates of vibrational resonance. And this is what indeed you are as a physicalized being: a particular frequency of consciousness. As you do in a sense divide yourself, colloquially speaking, down from the prime frequency, the idea again of how you create your reality is through your belief systems.

Understand this idea also: belief systems are also vibrational resonance, harmonic resonance in a sense. They are again another subdivision from the frequency that you are that defines your reality. The idea is this: you have what you may label your primary belief. In a sense it is your statement of what you believe your reality is or what you believe reality to be. The primary belief is a particular frequency, a particular vibration. As such, as all vibration has all frequency, it shall we say congregates, aggregates around itself beliefs of similar frequency slightly in and out of phase with the prime frequency. And in effect what you get is a nice neat little package of beliefs. The idea that allows your primary beliefs to stand out is this aggregate of similar beliefs that in a very real effect creates a background by which you may perceive the primary belief. For no belief exists within a void; therefore you create a background. One way to look at this idea would be to consider the primary belief or frequency to be the originating sound, and the background aggregate—shall we say entourage—of beliefs, the echo. In a sense the way you have created time and recognized time is your creation; you continually perpetuate creating time from your perspective. The primary belief occurs first, and therefore since that is followed by the idea of the aggregate beliefs, you may consider that they are an echo, a background for the primary belief to stand out in relief.

When very often you begin to recognize that you do create your own reality, one of the ways we have observed that your society does in a sense trip itself up is not making the connection between the idea that when you change the primary belief, by definition the aggregate surrounding background set of beliefs also changes. May be a very subtle change, but by definition they do change—the whole entire picture does change. Individuals in your society when beginning to recognize that they may change their primary belief however look not to the idea of the primary belief but the background from which the primary belief stands out to see a change. And what has occurred is the idea of redefining your primary belief but comparing it against the same old background of beliefs. And in a sense what this does is cancel out the change, for you are using the echo to validate what you are experiencing rather than understanding that when you change the primary belief it all changes.

Therefore what you do get from this system—that background, that echo—allows each belief system to be self-sustaining, self-perpetuating and contain a system of self-logic to make it seem that—and this is your perception of the background beliefs—that’s the way it is. That is only the way it is because you define it to be the way it is. There is no per se “that’s the way it is.” It is all again neutral occurrences. Everything that does occur is a neutral prop. You plug in according to your conception of your background, according to your perception of your primary belief, the meaning. The polarity you plug in—positive meaning, negative meaning—determines the effect you get out. If you do change your primary belief because you now understand that you may interpret and understand that although you may be aware equally of positive and negative, you need only experience positive. Do not compare or validate that positive change against the old negative background. That again cancels out the change you desire to make.

Therefore again it is a matter of trust, a matter of recognizing you always have 100% trust even if it isn’t a reality you do not prefer. Therefore you are good at trusting, and you may recognize that as we have said, believing is seeing and not the other way around. Therefore if you maintain a belief system, you will by convention create the background reality to validate that belief system, to provide the evidence from each circumstance. Therefore nothing is truly evidence of any idea—only the echo of your primary belief. Is this translating adequately into your language? Thank you very much.

The idea then again being: when you have changed your primary belief, you may now recognize that it has all changed—not atom by atom, one bit at a time; the entire reality has changed. Therefore when you find yourself using external circumstance as evidence, you may choose to use it as evidence in any way you wish. You may look out there and use what is out there as evidence that it is not working—it is up to you. Or you may understand that everything has changed and therefore if you are getting a meaning, a definition which does not support the change, it allows you an opportunity to re-view that piece of evidence and recognize you are only gleaning from that externalized circumstance a meaning from your old background.

Again, to simplify this idea: when you create a background from your belief systems, it in a sense is a filter through which you will only see things that are consistent with that belief system. When you change your belief system, the filter changes. New things with the same seeming outer coincidence, outer circumstance, will take on new meaning, for you will in a sense refuse to allow it to be evidence for that which you do not prefer. This is what will break what you call that cycle of negativity. When you do begin new trains of thought, new belief systems, from time to time and you do allow outer externalized neutral situations to be evidence that you are backsliding—“this is the old me, I have lost my progress”—understand that you have not. You are now able to view it momentarily from that old belief system to decide if you would prefer to resume the old belief system, but you do not have to. You do not have to accept it as evidence, for you now understand that evidence is simply the echo of your belief. If you are viewing it as evidence that things are negative, look again at your beliefs. Nail down the belief that is still having you view it in that older perspective—you will find it. Mostly it is very obvious.

When you are changing your reality, the only thing that you need to do is allow any of these quote “setbacks” to be opportunities to view what it is that you are still believing from the old outdated belief system. Therefore do you take anything that happens as an opportunity to put it right in front of you, to nail down the last vestiges of a belief system which allowed you to create in your life things you don’t prefer. When you do recognize that by virtue of the fact that Infinite Creation has bequeathed upon you the idea of existence, that you deserve to exist, that you deserve because you desire—are excited by something—to manifest that reality, that becomes the new primary belief. And nothing that you observe can be evidence that it is not so—only that there are still, shall we say, issues to look at in order to truly allow the entire background to shift. For that’s all it is: a slight shift in a primary belief will give a grand sweeping difference in your reality. That’s all it takes.

Some of the primary beliefs in your society that as you say are ingrained within you from your idea of childhood are as follows: one, “I do not deserve all that I can desire. I must earn it. I am not inherently as I stand worthy of it. I must prove myself to the universe to deserve it.” That is a belief. You can now see when operating with that primary belief how the background sets itself up to give you evidence that this is so. We feel it is most obvious and mostly everybody present can understand that evidence. But you do not have to keep using that evidence to lock you into that viewpoint. Again, Infinite Creation has bequeathed to you existence, and that is all the prerequisite you need have to allow yourself to create a reality that you do prefer.

Another primary belief that is again ingrained upon you, mainly because of your perception of linear time—before, during, and after—is the idea that everything must occur in a process. For instance, “If I am to change the idea of my primary belief, I must engage in a lengthy process,” and that process does vary from individual to individual—the idea you label psychoanalysis. “I must first figure out everything that’s ever happened to me in order to reconcile it in my mind.” All right, it’s a valid path; many do use it, but it takes, as you say, many years. Some individuals never actually get to the cause of the problem, colloquially speaking. Understand that no less valid a belief system, no less valid a primary belief, is that it is that simple. Having the conception is the same as manifesting the reality. If you will simply change your belief to that which you do prefer and then act as though it is already so, it is that simple. And that in a sense is the adverse or opposite belief of “I must have a process to validate the change.” You can again do it that way and you have seen that it works, but “it is that simple” is also a primary belief. And again, you will allow yourself to affect immediate changes in your life by even beginning to examine this perspective.

Therefore again, recognize it is all within you. You do not have to validate with the echo; you can validate with the primary belief. “I now believe this, therefore anything I see that runs contrary to this idea is simply an opportunity to in a sense weed out the background.” And it is all quite automatic; you do not have to analyze. Each issue will come up in perfect timing, allowing you when it is most conducive for you to in a sense settle or reconcile these ideas. To look at it simply, you may now realize you can trust your timing. It is all coming up when it comes up for a reason, for again it is the most conducive time, place, and space in order to progress with these ideas.

Well, one other idea: what you label fear is a belief system—a belief system that is accompanied by physiological changes. The underlying principle being that you believe that something is most likely to occur which you do not prefer. Therefore you cannot get rid of anything. You are the entire universe; where are you going to get rid of it to? It is all you. When attempting to push away an idea, the strength and force and magnitude that you push away with is the strength that it will bounce back with when it reaches the parameters, colloquially speaking, of your being, of your universe. Therefore do not in a sense get rid of anything; simply allow it to transform, allow you yourself to integrate it. When fear does come along as you say, it is again an opportunity to view what you must still believe in order to be thinking that something you do not prefer is most likely. Therefore, an opportunity.

We have recently shared one other idea, a small perspective that will allow you in a sense to cut through much of this: that being when you do perceive that something is happening to you, when for a moment you quote let down your guard and choose to forget for whatever reason that it is happening from you, simply when you do feel “why is this happening to me”—born a little old me—simply change the phraseology. Simply in any given situation that this does occur with any emotion whether you choose to label it positive or negative, substitute the idea of “how does this serve me exactly as it is?” That is the slight change in perspective which will allow you to glean generally what is most obvious, but at least gears your belief system, gears your thinking toward taking it back within you, for you cannot change what you do not own. And therefore any perspective that will give you back your ownership of your reality as you have already created it will allow you by virtue of that same ownership to transform it into anything you wish—anything.

Therefore, although we have shared the idea with you that what you label karma is self-imposed, the methodology by which your society has up till now in a sense perceived of karma is not the only way that an individual may experience balance. When you do buy into the concept of retribution-style karma, you do create that effect. It is not unreal; it is a real reality. You believe it to be most likely; you will get that effect. In a sense that is what is now occurring on a mass scale upon your planet at this time—the idea of certain retribution-style karmas playing itself out, and the idea of balancing of energy in a way that will allow you all by perceiving it to glean many things that will aid and assist you toward creating a life that you do prefer. However, you do not have to do it that way. You do not have to have an eye-for-an-eye mentality. If you do something you feel is out of integrity, you can balance that, for balance will be restored, balance will be maintained. It is only a slight perversion on how the balance must maintain that has become your idea of karma: do something bad, something bad will happen to you; do something good, something good will happen to you. “Oh dear, I have done something bad in my last life, better watch out.” All right, that is one way to view it. However again, balance does not have to occur by experiencing a negative from having put one out.

Another pathway of balance in this regard can be as follows: you do something out of integrity—out again, for the purposes of this discussion, definition of integrity is the recognition of integration, realizing that you have as much power as you need to create the reality you prefer without having to impose yourself upon others, without having to hurt yourself or hurt others. In a sense, when you do recognize that you have in a sense functioned out of integrity, you are within integrity to be able to have that recognition. You cannot recognize that you are out of integrity when you are within the framework of being out of integrity. Therefore that recognition—the moment it occurs, may just be for that moment—but you are within integrity in order to view that you have been out of integrity. A way to balance this idea can simply be to have that recognition, decide you do not prefer it, function and operate with the belief system that you wish to have integrity, and then act that way. That also is balance. You may balance out in a sense, colloquially speaking, negative with positive.

If an individual murders another individual, one way to work out balance is to be murdered. All right. However, another way to work out balance would be for instance to prevent another individual from murdering another individual. There are many ways to look at it, and it does not have to be so directly—negative for negative.