Frequency Tuning (432Hz vs 440Hz)

Dimensions, Archetypes, and Ancient History

Asker: people say… in Ascension Today, Lisa Transcends Brown, for instance, she says she is a 12D gatekeeper/gridkeeper. What does it actually mean?

Because if I’m not mistaken, I often hear you say that 5D is the limit of our physicality—of us humans being physical—and that after that we become non-physical. So thank you for explaining this a bit more. Thank you. Bye-bye.

Bashar: 4D is the limit of physicality. 5D is totally non-physical. But the idea is that people can connect to those higher frequency dimensions. It doesn’t mean they live there as a physical being. But all of you exist on different dimensional levels. So someone saying, “Well, I am from this dimension or that level,” may simply be using an old-fashioned term to say that they feel connected to that non-physical dimension of reality or that frequency of existence. But clearly, as a physical being, they don’t reside there. But they may reside there as a non-physical being, as a higher-level spirit, which you all have on different levels of existence.

Now, some people may also simply be putting out information that is erroneous because they simply have a misunderstanding of how these things work and a misinterpretation of what terminology to use that would be more accurately representative of what they’re saying. But all of you exist on every level. So it depends on what you’re keying into that allows you to say, perhaps, “I’m tapping into eighth dimension or 12th dimension or this or that.” Also remembering that dimensional labels are relatively arbitrary because it’s just a matter of different frequencies.

Asker: I want to ask you about the experience I had while I was meditating about a place in South Korea, Jeju Island. I felt connected to it. I saw it on TV and I wanted to visit there in my meditation. And I saw someone, a being who accompanied me, that was a woman with an octopus head and a body of a woman. And she was bluish. She didn’t talk to me; she just went with me everywhere where I went. And there was a… when we went to the water, I felt she wanted to teach me how to breathe in the water. I don’t know what the meaning of it is. Can you give me more information?

Bashar: Well, you are experiencing a combination symbol of things that represent different vibrations that are connected to the ocean because of your connection to Sirius.

Bashar: But what you’re dealing with are elemental beings in nature that are connected to the idea of the sea, presenting you with a multiple-combination being in your meditation to represent the different relationships and aspects of the ocean and the beings within it that you are most strongly experiencing. So look at it symbolically. Look at it symbolically for what the different aspects of that being represent to you.

For example, the idea of the octopus not only represents an extraterrestrial connection—because octopods belong to a different reality even though they are also projecting themselves into yours—but also the idea of the eight-fold way, the eight branches, like a way stretching out so that you can experience more of your connections to different things on your planet and other planets as well. The woman, of course, [represents] the aspect of your femininity that allows you to dive deeply into your emotional being to understand how to hold on to or let go of belief systems that do and don’t work for you. And there are other symbols there for you as well. You have to ask yourself what these different aspects represent to you, and you will have a deeper understanding of why those aspects were reflected to you. Does that help?

Asker: Yes. But I don’t understand… so why… why she wanted to teach me about breathing in the water? What… what does it give me?

Bashar: It’s the idea, again, of the ocean standing for a deep dive into your consciousness, and how to allow yourself to be more naturally connected to your deeper self, your higher self. And how to “breathe in” a new reality. Also dealing with spirit. It’s like the idea that many times when people on your planet connect to spirits, the air around them may feel like they’re attempting to breathe water. So she’s, in a sense, helping you understand how to breathe in a new reality. Breathe at a new level of experience. Breathe in the new vibration and make it as real as the idea of the air you breathe. Make it as natural to dive into those other dimensions, other realms, other ideas of yourself, as natural as breathing the air in the reality that you’re familiar with. So teaching you how to breathe underwater doesn’t necessarily mean that literally. It means teaching you how to exist and thrive in a new reality, a new level, a reality that contains more information for you, more connections for you to breathe it all in.

Asker: Yes. I want to ask you about the soul. You said that when we die, then our focus becomes the soul of this lifetime, physical life that we had—the soul that connected to the life that we had. But now, if the soul wants to choose a new, so-called new life, then does she split herself? And no, the soul experiences a new soul?

Bashar: No. A soul experiences a new life. There’s a new soul. You have to understand that you’re also experiencing this from a higher level. So think of it as an oversoul that has many different soul individual extensions. And each of those extensions can experience a different life. So you’re looking at something linearly that actually takes place on a nonlinear level. So you’re not splitting. It’s just that you’re coming from the higher level of the oversoul that already has many, many different individual soul extensions through which it can experience individual lives, all existing at the same time. Even though from your experience it seems as if they’re happening one after another, but that’s an illusion of physical reality.

Asker: So if I die, and then I… I feel that I am… is this soul for this life? So what does my focus change like? How do I know who am I? Like, maybe one day I’ll say, “Okay, I’m the oversoul,” and I feel like I’m the oversoul, and now I want to be this specific soul. Just my focus changed all the time?

Bashar: In a sense, yes. Let me give you an analogy with a human hand. The whole hand is the oversoul. Here’s a life, here’s a life, here’s a life, here’s a life, here’s a life. Individual soul, individual soul, individual soul, individual soul, individual soul. All the fingers exist at the same time for the hand. So this never becomes this. This finger never becomes this finger. This finger never becomes this finger. But if you look at it from a linear perspective, you can say, “Oh, I’m looking at this finger now. My focus is on this fingernail. My focus is here. My focus is here.” But they all exist and all extend from the hand. So it depends on whether you’re looking from the perspective of the oversoul or whether you’re looking from the perspective of an individual finger. But yes, it’s all about changing your focus constantly in order to have different kinds of experiences: linear ones from the finger point of view, or simultaneous ones from the hand’s point of view.

Bashar: Yes. That’s what “All-That-Is” is. “All that is” is all the things in existence. All of them. So that could be said from your point of view to be the ultimate level. But you can experience yourself in a way that is like you are not All-That-Is. You can experience different portions of “All-That-Is.” So you are always constantly, dynamically changing your focus. But your focus also exists in all of those places simultaneously. I understand that to a linear perspective that can seem somewhat confusing. But you’re constantly shifting your focus, and doing so more often than not as you expand your consciousness. So that when you say, “I’m experiencing this” or “I’m experiencing that,” the “I” that you are referring to can actually be different levels of yourself from time to time. So you have to know which “I” you’re talking about when you describe a particular experience.

Asker: So when people die, and they know… they know that now their energy… they’re not confused? They understand it all?

Bashar: Yes. The moment they die, they understand. They feel the connection. Well, it depends. It depends on what you feel you need to go through. The moment you die, you may experience different things that don’t necessarily allow you to experience all that knowledge. But eventually, you’ll get to the point, sooner or later, where you understand it.

Asker: Okay. And when you say that when we’re talking to you, we’re talking to our higher mind and using you as a permission slip, but you’re your own individual. So why would you speak as my higher mind? You can say whatever you want. You have your free will.

Bashar: Yes, I can. But remember, I’m also doing a job that I chose to do with my passion and my free will. And part of the job is helping to reflect to you what your higher mind is saying, so that you can get more used to communicating with your own higher mind, using us as an example. It’s simply part of my job description.

Asker: But everybody’s mind that listens to you thinks the same. Their higher minds are the same?

Bashar: On a basic level, the principles are all the same. But no, there are of course differences in the way that you express yourself as a higher mind, as a physical mind. But remember, you gravitated to us vibrationally. You’re asking us the questions, which means there is some similar vibration in your higher mind that can serve you by answering the questions you would ask of it. So it’s not exactly the words, you say, but the meaning, the energy of our higher mind. Not specifically the words. Sometimes specifically the words, but more often than not, the energy. Remember, higher mind communicates with an energy language that you translate in your physical reality as passion, excitement, creativity, love. That’s the language of the higher mind as you interpret it through your physical medium. But nevertheless, you have attracted yourself to us, which means there is a vibrational frequency within you that also is similar to the vibrational frequency within us and within your higher mind. So you have decided that, at least for right now, allowing us to represent the higher mind is the path of least resistance for you. Maybe you will change your mind. Maybe you will change your mind tomorrow.

Asker: And in telepathy, when two people think the same, who gives the first… the words? Where did they come from? If the two people are thinking the same…

Bashar: The words are everywhere. Remember, all knowledge is ensconced everywhere all the time, here and now. So when you’re on a certain wavelength, a certain frequency, that means only certain words will be relevant to that frequency. And so both of you, or all of you, will think of those words at the same time because those are the words that go with the frequency that you’re both on. Everything has a matching frequency. Yes, of course. They’re everywhere. Everything exists now, including words. Just because you don’t think of them yet doesn’t mean they don’t exist.

Dreams, Vibrations, and ET Encounters

Sandra (Miami, Florida): This is Sandra from Miami, Florida. I had a dream that I would like your insights on. On September 30th, in the middle of the night, I was awakened by a sensation of like being plugged into a current of electricity, so to speak. My whole body felt like it was vibrating, and I was perceiving a presence of an ET, a male. And I just remember being afraid to look up into his face because I was kind of afraid of being afraid, which I guess is another belief I can take a look at. And I just wanted to know what truly happened in that moment, and if that sensation of electricity or vibration was my own resistance. Any insights would be appreciated. Thank you and good day.

Bashar: Yes. Sometimes spirit beings or extraterrestrial beings will vibrate at a level that allows you the practice to match it. So yes, you’re always feeling only your own energy, even if someone is offering you a higher frequency to mirror or match. So they’re giving you the opportunity to practice moving to a higher level so you can have more conscious awareness of the encounters and interactions that you’re having with extradimensional extraterrestrials, spirit beings, and so on and so forth. So don’t be afraid of the energy. It’s your energy, but it gives you an opportunity to expand yourself. All right. Good day.

Asker: You told us about the antiquity of yoga. Yes. Um, was it discovered, developed, or was it given to us?

Bashar: It was intuited by those who were very, very close to the idea of nature and its forms and expressions of energy.

Asker: Okay. Um, what can you tell us about the archetype Shiva? And was there a physical incarnation of Shiva on this planet at some time?

Bashar: There have been physical projections that appeared to be physical incarnations but weren’t really incarnations in the classic sense. But archetypes can project physical representations that may seem very solid. So the archetype, again, is simply one of the ways that your collective consciousness has of looking at the concept of creation and destruction.

Asker: So Shiva is sometimes referred to as King of the Yogis. Yes. Uh, why is that?

Bashar: because of the nature of the ebb and flow of energies being represented by certain yogic positions. And therefore, at the very core or heart of the energy of the archetypal representation that you’re calling Shiva.

Because again, everything is about the ebb and the flow back and forth in different ways, in different forms, almost down to, or actually literally quite down to, the idea of atomic structures.

Because as you have relatively recently in your history, in your evolution, started representing the idea of how atoms are structured and electron clouds are structured, there are different forms that are representative of lobes, spheres, toruses, and things like that, that are more representative of the probabilities of the existence of the structure of atoms and subatomic particles. And these also are representative of the idea of Shiva energy and yogic flow.

Tapping into those electron structures can actually allow someone to intuit different positions in the body that allow for the most efficient superconductive flow of electron energy and electromagnetic energy through your body. So this connects directly to the idea of the core of the ebb and flow of the archetype of Shiva, because it is again the positive, the negative, all flowing into one another in a constant dance of creation and destruction.

Asker: What about Krishna? What about Krishna? So like, say, like Shiva and Krishna were both often depicted with blue skin. And so I know that there’s that thing with the Anunnaki. Yes. And that’s why that depiction exists?

Bashar: They are considered archetypal gods.

The Anunnaki, in their time, were considered gods as humanity, as Homo Sapiens, understood them at that time. And some of that recognition has been handed down through genetic memory that at one time your so-called gods actually did have blue-tinted skin. And therefore, in certain cultures, that genetic memory remained and was applied to the archetypal representations of gods.

Asker: So the Anunnaki came here, um, created Homo Sapien from the native Sasquatch?

Bashar: No. Not from Sasquatch.

Remember, they created Homo Sapiens from early hominids.

The hominids that were not genetically altered to become Homo Sapiens evolved into Sasquatch. Became a different branch of the hominid. So it’s not that they took Sasquatch and created Homo Sapiens.

They took an early hominid that eventually became Sasquatch on its own without the genetic alterations. Very different.

Asker: So when they came here and created Homo Sapien… Homo Sapiens… and then they left. But did they then come back?

Bashar: Some of them came back. But the ones that came back were not the ones that were here initially, because the ones that created Homo Sapiens did so outside of their laws. So they were recalled. So the ones that came back, along with others, were ones who now knew they had some responsibility for the creation of Homo Sapiens because their brethren had created them outside the law. And therefore knew that they had to provide some guidance to set Homo Sapiens on a path that would allow them to evolve.

Asker: Did they come back like during Atlantean times?

Bashar: Yes. Sometimes. There were more species involved than just the Anu, who were evolving out of their present form and evolved into the beings that now occupy the Lyran systems and the Pleiadian systems.

Lao Tzu

Asker: About Lao Tzu, what was he connected to? And who was he?

Bashar: He is connected to the archetypal consciousness as the dragon energy.

This is a level of being that exists in another dimension that is often interpreted as the form of a dragon in your reality, even though that’s nothing like what they actually look like in their own reality.

But Laozi was connected very strongly—not the only connection, but connected very strongly—to the dragon dimension.

Asker: in the I Ching, he described the ancient Masters. And so I was just wondering to whom he’s referring.

Bashar: People that you don’t remember in your history that have existed throughout the ages.

They were some of the different spirit beings choosing incarnations to come to you and let you all know that you are equal to them.

Asker: So there was one point in the I Ching where Laozi says, uh, like referencing the Tao, he says: “I don’t know who gave birth to it. It is older than God.” The Tao is God?

Bashar: Nothing is older than God, because “older” is just a concept.

All things exist. There is no beginning and no ending to “All That Is.” It just is.

Tao is a part of it. The only way that it could be, in a sense, from a linear perspective, quote-unquote, “older than God,” is he was simply recognizing that it is part of “The One.”

But “The One” has absolutely no awareness and no experience.

“All That Is” is the portion of “The One” that does know itself as “All That Is.”

So if you want to euphemistically say, “Well, the idea of the Tao is older than the portion that knew itself as All That Is,” you can make a sort of linear extrapolation that that has some truth to it. In the sense that if you take it all the way back to “The One,” then yes, of course, everything in that sense is older than God, because God comes from “The One” too.

But that’s just more like word play than anything else.

Kabbalah

Asker: In the Kabbalah, they use the word God to refer to or to describe the masculine principle, and then the universe as the feminine principle, and then as one, uh, described as All That Is.

Bashar: Well, to us, there may be differences in terminology. “All That Is” is the portion of “The One” that knows itself as “All That Is.” “The One” has absolutely no knowledge of itself, no awareness of itself, no experience of itself, because it has nothing to compare itself to.

“All That Is” knows itself, has a self-awareness, because it is also aware that there are other aspects of itself that make it seem as if there is something other than itself. Which is the only way you can know yourself: is if there is seemingly something other than yourself to compare yourself to.

Asker: So I’ve heard you describe a particle in a vacuum with nothing to impose upon it moving at infinite speed, so it’s everywhere at once. Hence Prime Radiant. The Prime Radiant in our ancient language, but in your scientific, it’s called the Single Electron Theory. You can look it up. Okay. And so I was just wondering, like, could you consider the particle to be the masculine and the vacuum or the void to be the feminine?

Bashar: If you want to, these things are just labels. If it works for you to do that, go ahead. But that doesn’t mean it’s an accurate representation of what it actually is.

Asker: Yeah. Well, that’s definitely what I’m looking for is an accurate representation.

Bashar: Then it’s just “All That Is.” That’s all it is. Because “All That Is” is everything: masculine, feminine, neutral, whatever you want it to be. It is. It’s existence itself.

Asker: So when Laozi speaks about “wei wu wei”—doing not doing, where the poem writes itself when we give ourselves over to the moment—yes, this is essentially like what you’ve described as the channeling state?

Bashar: Yes. Because when you are following your passion, when you’re in that vibration, when you’re in the channeling state, whatever you wish to call it, you do a lot, but it seems like you’re not really doing very much because you’re in sync.

You’re in harmony. You’re in resonance with your true self. And actions are effortless. Actions are joyful. And it doesn’t seem like you’re expending any effort, so it doesn’t really seem like you’re doing anything because there’s no resistance.

Astrology

Teresa (Long Beach, California): Please discuss the 12th house sun in astrology, where a person may have their ego in a blind spot, they may have self-awareness issues.

I was hoping that you could delve into that theme a little bit. Also, can you tell us how modern astrologers may work with some of the bodies we’re not as familiar with, such as Quaoar, Veruna, and Sedna? Thank you.

Bashar: Astrology is a reflection, a permission slip.

Astrological positions don’t cause things to happen; they reflect things that are happening in the overall consciousness.

Whatever energies you may assign to the smaller bodies in your solar system, like Sedna, you will determine among yourselves for whatever you think it represents first, before we are able to comment on it.

The idea of going into astrological houses and so on and so forth, again, is just another way of presenting archetypal energy in a manner that works for different belief systems and different cultures on your planet. We cannot necessarily at this point go more deeply than that into this particular concept.

Solitude, ADHD, Beliefs, and Forgiveness

Nania: How important is solitude for going through the eye of the needle? I feel more joy, alignment, and aliveness during solitude.

Bashar: The very idea of solitude is what has, to some degree, been happening because of your pandemic, allowing each of you to go within, be with yourself.

It can be very important. It doesn’t necessarily have to exist for everyone, but the idea of solitude allows you, shall we say, to really focus on yourself, allow your entire environment to nurture you, to cushion you, to allow you to be aware of the things in the quiet, in the silence, that are important for you to pay attention to without the idea of outside distraction. As you say, now, again, not everyone is distracted by outside sounds, but for most people on your planet, solitude will be very important for you to take stock of who you are, to be quiet within yourself, and to really hear the thoughts clearly that come through your mind, to be able to discern the difference between those that work for you and those that do not.

So solitude, for most of you, can be very important toward learning who you are.

Nania: people with ADHD do not maintain focus on a single thing for a long period of time. They switch their focus rapidly from one thought to another, all based on what’s most exciting to them. Does this mean that people with ADHD are better equipped to perceive the shifting of parallel realities, follow their excitement, and choose their preferred reality?

Bashar: Not necessarily.

Again, you have to take this on a case-by-case basis. Because some of what you are referring to as ADHD can also be happening for negative reasons. It can be an avoidance issue. Switching from one thing to another rapidly doesn’t necessarily represent the idea of following the waxing and waning of your excitement in a natural way. So the idea is: you will have to look at the reasons why someone might switch, even with the experience you call ADHD, and avoid the idea of doing so because you’re not willing to look at something that might be important to look at, to stay with something that might be important to stay with.

So again, on a case-by-case basis, you will have to determine what is actually happening and whether for some people it is positive, or for others it is negative. It can, in a positive way, represent the ability to go with the flow of your excitement, of your passion. It can, based on a positive utilization of the idea of switching around very rapidly, connect you to different parallel reality probabilities and options. But again, one must always be honest within themselves as to whether this is a flowing experience following your passion path, or whether it is an avoidance experience, not wishing to look at things that you believe you might find painful.

Nania: Can different personality aspects within an individual’s mind hold concurrent beliefs that disagree with each other?

Bashar: Essentially, yes. Of course. You find this most often in what you typically have referred to as Dissociative Identity Disorder, or what you used to call Multiple Personality Disorder. Because you know from the research that’s been done there, that one personality can switch to something completely different as a personality and have a completely different experience, completely different perspective, completely different opinions from the other personalities that may have been present a moment ago. So yes, it is absolutely possible.

Nania: Um, how can I burn the fear-based beliefs that I’m not aware of? Are there ways to burn through them without having to become aware of each deep-seated issue?

Bashar: The use of the term “burn through them” is interesting.

You don’t really have to burn through them to ashes.

it’s the idea of being honest within the self as to what does and doesn’t work, but not invalidating what doesn’t work for you. But the idea of belief systems that are in the unconscious or subconscious mind in that way can again always be brought into conscious recognition by allowing yourself to ask: “What’s going on in your physical reality?” Because the emotions, the thought patterns, the behaviors, and the experiences that are reflected to you are guiding mechanisms to help you determine whether you are holding on to negative, fear-based beliefs or whether you are moving forward in a positive way. All you have to really do is be observant as to what’s happening in the emotions, the thoughts, the behaviors, and the reflections of physical reality, to let you know that these are reflective of beliefs you may be unaware of within yourself. And again, always being able to ask the question: “What would I have to believe in order to feel, think, behave the way I do?” will always help you get in touch with them.

Do you always have to be aware of what the belief is?

No. There may be some exceptions. There may be techniques, tools, and certain kinds of permission slips. If you are really willing to know that you are powerful enough to switch to become a truly different person in the moment, to know that your past is different, to let go of those things automatically and quickly that don’t serve you—if you have that ability, then fine. You may not need to know exactly or precisely what the belief system is.

But how many of you can actually say that you can do that without having some idea of what kind of belief you’re holding on to? So again, it takes a great deal of clarity, transparency, and honesty to know whether you can truly just let go of all the negative and fear-based beliefs whether you know precisely what they are or not, or whether you actually do need to go through a process of understanding what it is so that your physical mind can also have the same kind of clarity as your higher mind. So you have to each determine for yourselves how honest you are about whether you believe, truly know for a fact, that you can do that without knowing what the belief actually is.

Nania: Could you define gratitude and humility?

Bashar: Gratitude is the total acceptance of what is, and the allowance, total allowance, of it being exactly what it needs to be to teach you what you need to know, to grow, to learn, to expand your consciousness. Humility is knowing that, again, the ego is only for the purpose of allowing you to focus in your process and experience of physical reality. And that there is not necessarily information that is accessible to you in what the ego thinks it should be. But to know and to trust and to allow your life to unfold in the way that it unfolds through synchronicity, knowing that everything is working perfectly. And if you are willing to remain in the positive state, then you can express the humility of knowing that everything you need is presented to you, nothing is left out. But that you also don’t know everything as to exactly when or how things should come to you. That you’re willing to accept what is going on and make the determinations as to what works for you, to allow creation to unfold in the way that it automatically can, and to accept the totality of yourself and be appreciative of yourself and the way things unfold in every given moment.

Nania: And what is the difference between discernment and judgment?

Bashar: Honesty can allow you to know the difference between excitement and anxiety.

Therefore, with anxiety can come judgment. Discernment is simply the neutral observation of what is and isn’t vibrationally compatible with your core vibration, your core frequency. There is no, shall we say, evaluation of it in the sense of “this is better, this is worse, this is good, this is bad.”

It is the willingness to simply discern what isn’t you, vibrationally. But also the willingness to use whatever comes up in the most positive way for you, knowing that everything is happening for a reason if you’re willing to stay in that positive state. To determine what that is, it will reveal itself to you.

So again, honesty: knowing the difference between excitement and anxiety within yourself, and being in that neutral space that allows you to simply observe what is and isn’t you, as opposed to making an emotional reaction or response to it that brings with it some kind of value judgment.

Nania: is there such a thing as positive ego or negative ego energy or manifestation?

Bashar: Yes, of course.

The negative ego is the result of putting too much on the shoulders of the idea of the physical mind when it’s not designed to actually control anything.

But only designed, in the positive ego sense, the neutral ego sense, of allowing you the opportunity to have a physical experience. As we have often said, it’s sort of like a diving mask when you go under the water. The ego is simply structured to allow you to have clarity in the physical reality experience. The negative ego thinks it needs to control everything because it’s been given that task, because people may not understand that everything is automatically working in exactly the way it needs to, even if things crop up that you don’t prefer. It’s there for a reason. So the positive or neutral ego will accept that it’s there for a reason and stay in a positive state, just doing the job it was designed to do of allowing clarity of what’s happening. Whereas the negative ego thinks it needs to know what will happen, what is going to happen, so it can control everything and manipulate details into place to make sure everything works, instead of simply surrendering to the fact that everything does work when you let go of the need to try and control everything.