Technology, Location Spheres, and Plasma
Asker: We, as a group, have been working on several of the things that you have proposed. For example, your um, description of how magnets attract and repel from the little vortices of each of the crystal molecules. It’s very similar to what has been proposed by our leader Nassim Haramein. Yes. And you’ve experienced one of his crystals because we gave one to you um, at Conscious Life Expo. You mean to the channel?
Bashar: Yes. To the channel. All right. Perhaps you have some experience with that.
Asker: Well, yes. So we’ve seen photons being emitted from certain vortices from that tetrahedral crystal.
Bashar: Yes. Does that make sense?
Asker: Yes. What do you want me to say about it? Just… what do you think about those photons and where did they come from in a quartz crystal that’s been energized by our resonator technology?
Bashar: Well, they’re stepped down from higher frequency dimensions and translated into observable photonic energy in your dimension. Okay. Because the vortices in the crystals have that effect. They act as step-down transformers for a number of different frequencies of energies. But you won’t know that unless they present you in your reality with some interpretation of those energies in a form that you can perceive and understand. Right.
Asker: Well, we don’t completely understand it, but we see them.
Bashar: You have the potential to understand. Thank you. So, in terms of the one… one of the questions I have is the consciousness that I want to have when I’m working with technology. Of course, staying with the highest excitement, yes. And not being downturned by anything that I don’t expect. Yes. And all that. But are there special tools that you can suggest when working in a technology environment that might enhance a literal tool?
Bashar: Well, you’ve suggested several tools that enhance the three rules that you put forth. And I just wondered, in this specific area of technology, if there’s anything that you can suggest.
Bashar: Yes. I can suggest a tuning fork tuned to the vibration that feels best to you when you strike it. Working in that environment can enhance and focus your consciousness in profound ways. Will that do?
Asker: I’m… do you understand what we’re saying? Perhaps I’m not sure whether I do.
Bashar: All right. In other words, there are tuning forks that vibrate at certain resonances, certain frequencies. Yes. All right. Well, find one that vibrates at a frequency that you feel puts you in the proper focal state to do the work you’re talking about doing. And then let yourself have that vibration. It can be low in the background in the environment in which you’re working. It can help focus you. Or you can do it at 15-minute intervals. Hit it. Strike it. Let it resonate. Let yourself identify with that state, that vibration, that frequency. Let yourself relax into it, absorb it, feel it, contain it. Let it put you in that semi-hypnotic focal state. And then go back to doing the work. And if you need to do it at different intervals for you, then let your imagination be your guide. But that is actually a tool that can help focus you on certain frequencies that are germane for the work that you’re doing.
Asker: Okay. I think that gives me something to try.
Bashar: Oh, all right.
Asker: I wanted to ask also about the… we are considering… we well, we already starting to make the location sphere that you described for that experiment. Yes. Right. And it… we have a material that we think will allow us to make an extremely thin but very perfect sphere, to within say, a 10th mm.
Bashar: Okay. That’s wonderful. And congratulations. Close enough. Yes.
Asker: And so, nickel-copper is fine?
Bashar: Is fine. That’ll work. Yes. Especially as thin as you’re making it. Yes. It’ll be like a quarter millimeter thick. Yes. Very, very thin. Just make sure that your surface is also very, very flat on the table that you rested it on.
Asker: Okay. And so when we ping it with some either RF or AC… yes. What kind of frequency should we be listening for?
Bashar: Well, you will find out when you take the reading of what the frequency is at the initial location. Then when you move it to the new location and take another reading, you’ll find out what that frequency is. If your equipment is sensitive enough to tell the difference in the frequencies between the two different locations, that’s the whole point of the experiment.
Asker: Well, I get that. But will it be say, within 9 kHz?
Bashar: And I can’t tell you that. It has too many variables in terms of what it is you’re constructing. It will be determined by everything in the room, the table that it’s on, the equipment you’re using to ping it with, all sorts of things. So I can’t tell you that. You’ll find out when you take the recording, when you take the reading.
Asker: Okay. Well, we have very sensitive equipment.
Bashar: All right. Well, we’ll see over a very wide… how sensitive it is. Okay. And you’ll get your reading, and then you’ll know what the frequency is.
Asker: Well, we’re going to be trying it within the next few weeks.
Bashar: Congratulations. Also, the space-time coil.
Asker: Yes. So we’ve constructed one. 33 turns. 33 degrees. Yes. The cone, the top peak of the cone and the base of the other cone are connected at one end, but open on the other. So they’re two. And it’s made out of 1/8 inch copper tubing. All right.
Bashar: So you’re saying there are two interpenetrating coils, one up, one down, and they’re connected at each end?
Asker: They’re connected at one end.
Bashar: Why not the other?
Asker: I don’t know. That’s what I’m asking. Should they be connected at both ends?
Bashar: Yes. Okay. One coil is the other coil. So they must be connected at both ends. Yes. So you don’t have a complete circuit, do you?
Asker: No. Of course not. That’s why I’m asking.
Bashar: Yes. Because that was the original description. Our… my colleague who’s actually doing the construction… yes, has made it that way with only one end connected.
Asker: Well, that’s not the original description we gave.
Bashar: Okay. I… that’s what I thought. That’s why I’m asking the question.
Bashar: All right. Well, now I have answered it. Instruct him to do it a little bit differently.
Asker: How? Then how do we energize this coil?
Bashar: You can attach an electrical source to it and give it a kickstart.
Asker: Okay. Where would you attach it on the coil?
Bashar: Anywhere. Doesn’t matter. Just give it a kickstart.
Asker: Well, if current’s going to flow, it has to have two connections, right?
Bashar: What I’m saying is, you are creating an energy source. You’re bringing an energy source, a battery, what have you. Yes. Right. Okay. And you are connecting the two leads to the coil at different places. Okay. To the two coils that are essentially… you have a short one up and one down, right? The coils are insulated, are they not?
Asker: No.
Bashar: Well, we told you they had to be.
Asker: Oh. Okay.
Bashar: Therefore, if they’re insulated, connecting the lead to one and the other will give it the kickstart it needs. But you just said they were shorted to each other. The cone, the tip of the cone… I understand. But you’re dealing with something different here than your normal technology. The very shape of the thing itself will cause a different phenomenon to happen.
Asker: Well, we can induce a current with an inductive field. Then do it that way. Because a battery, if it’s insulated, wouldn’t be connected.
Bashar: Then do it that way. There are ways to do it with the battery, but if you have the ability to use an inductive field, then by all means do that. We definitely do.
Asker: Then that would be more efficient.
Bashar: Excellent. Until you tell us what level you’re at and what you’re capable of doing, we have to start you at the basic level.
Asker: We’re capable of a lot more than I have said.
Bashar: All right. Then use what you are most capable of, and that will take you farther.
Asker: We can do an inductive source. We could… I mean, if there’s a bare spot on the copper, we can connect a battery.
Bashar: All right. But again, you have already said that the inductive source is something you’re capable of doing. And therefore it would be more efficient and allow you to experience the effects in a more efficient and larger, more measurable way.
Asker: And then how would you extract energy from this?
Bashar: If it’s… we’ll talk about that later. When you first induce a current and see what effects you can measure from it.
Asker: Okay. So we should come back and report that to you?
Bashar: Thank you. Okay. We will do that. Step at a time. Okay. Very good. Thank you very much.
Bashar: You are welcome.
Asker: Um, okay. So can you tell me anything? Can you give me a hint about spinning noble gas plasma?
Bashar: I can talk about spinning noble gas plasma. I can talk about spinning noble gas plasma in a variety of ways. But a hint based on what and for what purpose? Because there are many purposes to spinning noble gas plasmas. For either A) extracting energy, B) inducing healing effects from, say, argon, helium, neon, krypton, or xenon.
Asker: I understand what you’re saying. But the technology that I’m familiar with would be beyond your technology.
Bashar: You actually don’t have the technology to do what I could describe to you.
Asker: Well, describe it anyway. Please.
Bashar: All right. If you have a toroid container, a torus as it were, filled with noble gas plasma, and the container is an alloy of aluminum, boron, neodymium, nickel, copper in a nanoglass matrix suspended with double-layer graphene, and you introduce the same kind of induction current that you were talking about before, but on a much, much more powerful level, you will create a radiant field, an electromagnetic field around the torus that can have many different kinds of effects depending upon other things that you would contain that torus in, that would translate that energy for multiple purposes at multiple frequencies.
Asker: Can you build one of those?
Bashar: We can get pretty close to that. Let’s see. Well, we’re… I mean, it will take a while to do that. That’s what I was saying. But the thing that I showed um, the channel there, yes, earlier, yes, is something of sort in that direction. It’s a nanomaterial with layers of copper and nickel.
Bashar: Yes. We understand. But it’s nothing close to what we just described.
Asker: Can be infused with graphene. And we’re working with graphene, by the way.
Bashar: All right. All right. And glass. Tell me, when you get to the nanoglass… by nanoglass, what do you mean? Do you mean little beads of glass at the nano… like 20 nanometer?
Bashar: That it is nanotechnology that is made of a type of glass that can change form and can absorb energies of certain quantities and certain resonances for specific purposes, and shift as it needs to in real time to handle the fluctuations going on in the energy fields that you generate.
Asker: Fascinating. It’s a new form of containment.
Bashar: Thank you. A responsive, real-time containment.
Asker: Containment of what?
Bashar: Of the plasma.
Asker: Okay. I see. Thank you. Thank you very much.
Bashar: You’re welcome.
[Applause]
Q&A Session 9: Narcissism, Lady Gaga, and Anunnaki
Questioner 9: Hi Bashar. And you good day. Um, my first question is: can you expand on the mechanics behind narcissism?
Bashar: Well, that’s simple enough. You understand that certain negative beliefs that a person might hold about themselves will create a kind of feeling that you would call emptiness. And they will attempt to either fill the emptiness, but not necessarily with things that will actually allow them to feel fulfilled or connected to their self-empowerment. And therefore, at a certain point, they may go into denial that the emptiness is there. They may attempt to numb it out by overcompensating for their feelings of lack of self-worth with an exaggerated sense of their worth. Hence the narcissistic reflection. Does that make sense? Mhm. There you go. Thank you. You’re welcome.
Questioner 9: Anything else? Yes. My next question is kind of silly.
Bashar: Oh, all right. We love silly questions.
Questioner 9: Uh, is Lady Gaga connected to the hybridization agenda?
Bashar: She is.
Questioner 9: Can you elaborate on that?
Bashar: I cannot. Okay. Um, I would have to discuss that with the individual herself.
Questioner 9: Right. Uh, what’s an example of a permission slip you use on Essassani spaceships?
Bashar: We don’t absolutely need them to travel around anymore. But we use them as permission slips so that we may arrive on other planets and other civilizations for whom the arrival of a spaceship is a little bit more acceptable than having us simply pop into their bedroom. So we use those permission slips.
Questioner 9: Anything else? Yes. Um, are the Crystal Skull Masters connected to Draco?
Bashar: There is more Draco energy connected to them than many of you know. And some of that information will be coming out in the near future. Not now. Okay. Not right now. No.
Questioner 9: Um, okay. My next question is: what is the relationship between Ra and Thoth? Between Thoth and Ra? This is for a friend. Yeah.
Bashar: You are dealing, in both cases, with symbolic representations of ancient Anunnaki beings.
Questioner 9: Can you elaborate on the actual beings?
Bashar: Those beings responsible for the genetic hybridization that created Homo Sapien. And those responsible, in Thoth, for the education of same. Does that make sense to you? Ra overseeing the idea of one of the primary genetic programs that created Homo Sapien. Thoth overseeing the education of the created humans. Does that make sense?
Questioner 9: Yes. Does that answer your question?
Bashar: Yes. Why was that funny?
Questioner 9: Well, because I was looking at my friend to see if it registered for him. Yeah, ‘cause I was asking for him.
Bashar: Oh, all right. And so… and that’s it. We thank you. Love you, Bashar. And you as well.
[Applause]
Q&A Session 10: Cause and Effect, Healing, and Ghosts
Asker0: Well, hello Bashar. Any you good day? So, question for you. Going back to the idea of frames. Frames. So if I understand it correctly, it’s our consciousness that moves between the realities?
Bashar: No. It’s the reality that moves through your consciousness. But you’re projecting it as if you are moving through the reality. Okay.
Asker0: So you’ve talked before about if you want to manifest something, you can switch from frame to frame.
Bashar: Yes. That’s how you manifest. That’s how you’re manifesting. Because you’re creating a manifestation in a framework of space and time.
Asker0: So I was listening to an exercise that you had talked about before on a tape called Shifting Through Infinity. Yes. And in the exercise, what you do is you imagine a scene, you freeze it, yes. And then you start to move through it, look at the frames, and then start to click them forward. Yes. And so I was doing this exercise, and after it was over, I noticed a couple of things. One of the things is I looked at my watch and I said to myself, “I could create a frame where I have a completely different watch on my hand.” Yes. But then I noticed that my beliefs kind of kicked in saying, “Uh, that’s not in the line of procession. There’s no progress in that. Having a completely different watch on your hand would break the cause and effect.” I realized now… one moment. One moment.
Bashar: Understand that there is potentially a difference between recognizing that as a belief, and also recognizing that as simply irrelevant for your life path. Okay. You need to determine which it actually is.
Asker0: It’s just not relevant.
Bashar: There you go. I don’t need another watch. But all right. What it kicked up was the whole idea of just having completely different frames. And the… if you like the frames and the… well, this is what I’m really getting at is: cause and effect. A belief?
Bashar: Cause and effect is a spacetime way of understanding that things are connected. Okay. But if you’re flicking through the frames, it is um, cause and effect is a spacetime illusion of separation to let you know that you’re just looking at one thing that simply exists in both states. Okay. Does that help?
Asker0: Yes. So with cause and effect, they’re just… they’re essentially two states that are just separate from each other that have been made to appear separate.
Bashar: Yes. And you can actually even use an effect to create a cause. This is what we’re talking about. Yes. When we say that you zero out every moment, you’re a new person. Mhm. And if you truly understand that you’re a new person, that has to mean you have a new history. Because from a space-time perspective, the logic of it, in a space-time framework, is: to be the person that you are now, you must have had a different history than was there before in order for that history to have made you who you are now. So you’re creating an effect and creating a cause to go with that effect. A matching cause. A matching cause. Okay. Okay. So that’s what you’re doing all the time. In the idea of zeroing out and redefining yourself is: you’re creating the effect, and then the cause comes with it. It has to.
Asker0: Okay. So in terms of say, a practical application of this… that wasn’t a practical one. Well, I… I really want to kind of get it into my system, so to speak. So say, for example, you had like a bodily injury. Like Daryl has a damaged finger. Say if you had a cut or something like that. Can you skip a lot of what we would call the healing frames if it is relevant for you to do so?
Bashar: Yes. But it may not always be relevant. You may desire, on some level, or at least believe on some level, that you require a certain process that uses time and change in order to develop a deeper appreciation of what the lesson is within that experience. Okay. So yes, it can be done. Will it be done? Depends on many different factors in different people for why they have created it to begin with.
Asker0: Okay. And similarly, could you apply this whole idea, this notion, to, for example, speeding up the period of time like it might take you to learn a language or to learn an instrument or something like that?
Bashar: Yes. Yes. Um, you can just know it. If it is relevant for you to do so. You can just know it because you have become the version of you that already knows it. This is what you see in the example that we have mentioned before, that many of you are already familiar with, of the idea of medical differences in multiple personalities within one body. Right. One personality might have a particular medical condition. The other personality doesn’t. There’s no time there. There’s no shifting of process there. There is simply: it is here, then it is not. Because these are two different people, literally. So yes, you can do that. But is it relevant? Is always the question. Not “is it possible?” Of course it’s possible. “Is it relevant? Is it probable for you?” That’s the question.
Asker0: Okay. So like the watch issue, you realized that wasn’t necessarily a relevant experience for you. But at least it gave you an understanding to some degree that it might be something that could be in a different context or with a different thing. Mh. So it’s at least giving you an opportunity to explore that concept. Or it’s telling you: watch what you wish for. Very funny.
Bashar: Okay. Thank you very much. Appreciate it. You are very welcome.
[Applause]
Asker0: Hey Bashar. And are you good day? So I started to see more ET contact signs since last night. So thank you for that transmission.
Bashar: You’re welcome. It sparked a fire in me for sure.
Asker0: Thank you for sparking the fire. Or firing the spark. Yeah. Uh, who are the beings who are specifically responsible in changing others’ DNA for the purpose of evolution? Who are the beings?
Bashar: Well, partly the Grays, obviously. Since they’re creating a hybrid race that has to do with Earth becoming the sixth hybrid race, which is part of your evolution. Right. That’s one. That’s one group.
Asker0: How about another that I’m connecting to? Uh, connected to the higher-level Cobra energy? Besides the Anunnaki?
Bashar: Are you sure that your interpretation of the energy as Cobra is accurate? For we are tapping into another evolutionary trigger species that doesn’t seem to contain that particular reference in its energy. That is connected to you, but it doesn’t come across with that interpretation. So maybe I’m… what is it that the Cobra symbolizes to you? Maybe that’s your particular interpretation of the energy. By the law of similars. You understand the law of similars? Yeah. Um, sometimes I do this to come full circle.
Bashar: This… well, that’s not what we’re saying. The law of similars works like this: two different people may be vibrating with a certain idea in mind that represents something specific to them. But each of them will have a different representation of that thing that makes it seem as if they’re not on the same wavelength. But they may be, because each has their own way of symbolizing the same energy. So you may be symbolizing this energy as a cobra, but it may not necessarily translate or interpret in their reality in the same idea, in the same symbol. So what does the Cobra mean to you? So that if you understand the idea, then we can see if there’s a similar notion in the energy we’re perceiving in them.
Asker0: So you said it has to do with the idea of the cycle. Uh, well, I was bringing the two together, but the full circle. But um, the… you’re not thinking of a cobra. You’re thinking of an Ouroboros. Do you understand that term?
Bashar: Yeah. That came to me too. All right. The Ouroboros is a more accurate way to represent that idea. Okay. The Ouroboros is a symbol of a snake eating its own tail. The idea of the endless cycle. The endless circle. Can you tell me about the beings that I feel like I’m connecting to that I brought up before? That are not the Grays.
Bashar: We are talking about the Ouroboros beings. Oh. So okay. Interesting. It’s that group that is representing itself energetically to you in the symbol of the Ouroboros. So you might as well call them that. Okay. Because their translation, their name for themselves, their perception of themselves, wouldn’t really translate in your reality in any other way.
Asker0: How does the eating itself correlate to the expansion and the uh, awakening of DNA?
Bashar: It’s the idea of cycles expanding. Remember, not just a circle, but in another dimension, it actually is an expanding spiral. Right. Therefore, your DNA, being a spiral, is connected to that vibrationally. Connected to the expanding spiral of change in evolution and growth.
Asker0: And how is the Cobra connected with that as well? Because I know…
Bashar: No. I said it’s not a cobra. It’s an Ouroboros. But they’re similar, right? In as far as the DNA…
Bashar: No. No. No. No. No. No. You’re not getting this. The Ouroboros is a different dimensional being. It’s not a physical snake. It’s a representation in your reality of a different kind of dimensional being, symbolized by the idea of the snake. Because the snake represents the idea of ancient wisdom, like the dragon to some degree. And specifically, why the snakes appear on your caduceus, right? It’s DNA. So in this case, it represents the idea of the DNA spiral. It’s not a cobra. Okay. Does that make sense?
Asker0: Yes. Um, and that connects with one of my hybrid children. He calls himself Rowan Draco.
Bashar: Yes. So more of that idea of the Draco constellation, serpent, dragon energy coming in. Right. Also, um, I connected that energy with um, Morning Star. The Anu head. The Anu head. Yes. Because when I was connecting with that energy, Morning Star came in.
Bashar: Oh, all right. There are ways to tap into that vibration. It may not be the complete personality, but the vibrational energy and domain of the seventh hybrid race is vast, and there are many ways to plug into it for your own purposes.
Asker0: And how is that connected with the Ouroboros or the DNA connection?
Bashar: It’s connected only in the sense that the Annunaki represent, as the seventh hybrid race, the completion of a very large evolutionary cycle in your galaxy. And that’s the full circle.
Asker0: Yes. That is a deeper breath. Thank you.
Bashar: And that will do. Thank you. Thank you.
Q&A Session 11: Missing Cat, UFO Activity, and Power
Asker1: Hello Bashar. And are you a good day? Um, very appreciative of this communication. Um, about… as are we… about my indoor cat. Her name is Funk. Seven years old. She’s been missing from June 10th. I’ve been looking for her everywhere every night, at least 7 hours. Where can I… instead of going to look, stay in a place that gives you a sense of being centered, at peace, and allow you to recall the vibration of being with the cat. And from that place, send out energy to call to the cat like a beacon, so the cat can follow that energy beacon home. Don’t go out looking. Because that’s not home. Be at home and send out a beacon of home. Be at home and send out a beacon of being at home with the cat. Call the cat back to you.
Asker1: Actually, I just did that. After I was so exhausted, I stopped.
Bashar: The exhaustion was pushing you in the correct direction so that you would be able to send the message in the way that the cat has the best probability of receiving it. All right. Right. All right.
Asker1: So um, could you clarify the meaning of Funk leaving?
Bashar: Funk? No. Not at this time. Other than to say it’s something that allows you to experience being more centered, and then realizing that you can communicate with anything from your center, but not when you go scattered out looking for something.
Asker1: I tried about that one. Exactly that one. One or twice. Stop looking for her. Being the center of my energy. And probably she can follow me.
Bashar: Yes. That’s what I already did. But you have to be at home.
Asker1: Oh. Because that’s where you want the cat to go.
Bashar: Yes. Yes. So be at home in the energy of the cat being there with you. In other words, remember what it’s like, what it feels like to have the cat at home with you. That’s the energy you need to send out. That’s being centered. Because you’re centered in the relationship, the state of being that represents the feeling you have in the relationship of having the cat at the house, at the home. Not looking for it. Having it at home is the beacon the cat needs to receive.
Guadalupe Island UFO
Bashar: Can you share any info on the UFO/UFO activity off the coast of San Diego, specifically in Cerritos and Guadalupe Island?
Bashar: Guadalupe Island is an underwater/underground round base for UFOs.
They are doing maneuvers that are part of the idea of allowing disclosure to happen. So that they become obvious. And so obvious eventually that they must be reported and cannot be ignored.
So they’re part of an advanced wave that is helping the idea of more and more people being willing to say what they’ve seen. And it will continue, and it will increase.
But they set up a base of operations that no one can actually get to yet, because no one is actually really allowed to investigate that island.
Nevertheless, eventually it will be revealed. But for now, it’s a reconnaissance mission. To go out, show yourselves, zip around, make it apparent that you’re here.
In the special airspace and underwater craft that are sort of shaped like a capsule, a pill that you would recognize in that sense. So they’re having fun.
Sort of toying with you. “Chase me if you can, catch me if you can. But see us. Here we are. See what we can do.” And the more you report it, the more you acknowledge our presence, our existence, the more we will know you are ready for more.
I will give you now, because the question has been raised, one sentence that will be elaborated upon in another transmission. One sentence from the Speaker for the Interstellar Alliance that belongs in the upcoming message that will be delivered in another transmission. So in a sense, because you have raised this question, you are allowed a sneak peek. Here is the sentence. Are you ready? I think so. Are you ready for now? Make of it what you will. It will be more thoroughly explained in the upcoming transmission. So understand, right now, there may be many different interpretations to this. But just absorb it for what it is. The sentence is this: “We are coming.”
[Applause]
And to address another question coming up, that’s why, despite everything that seems to be happening on your planet that seems, in some sense, to be potentially capable of preventing the ideas of disclosure and contact… it’s that sentence and the information behind it that we haven’t revealed yet, which the Speaker will reveal, that allows our ship to be as low as it is over Sedona. Because now it’s not just about what’s happening on your world. It’s also about what’s coming. And I am the balance point between the two. Catching the wave coming from Earth and the wave coming from the Stars. So now the barometer of the height of my ship is not just about one energy coming from your world. It’s showing you what’s happening as the two waves meet, and what will happen when it arrives. Any other questions?
Asker1: Oh, thank you for that. Um, when there are already multiple parallel Earths, why the split into two Earths at this time?
Bashar: I didn’t say it was two. The splitting prism is splitting into many variations. It’s just that because of the polarization happening on your planet right now, two of them seem to stand out. But I didn’t say there were only two. It’s splitting into a multitude of versions of Earth and parallel realities. You’re just only recognizing a couple because you’re so used to dealing with the idea of polarities.
Asker1: And how much longer of this overlap of opposites until each side is invisible to the other completely?
Bashar: Absolutely no less than 50 of your years. More like a 100. Okay. But on an individual level, it can happen tomorrow. Because if you shift enough, you may simply suddenly stop experiencing an interaction with people who are too vibrationally incompatible with you. And therefore, that’s kind of a micro version of the macro version.
Asker1: Yes. Yes. And so if things shift in the direction of not moving towards contact, people will still be able to experience things individually based on their personal…
Bashar: Remember, there will always be versions of Earth in which open contact happens. We’re not talking about the idea that there will be no such Earth, or that someone can’t shift themselves to it. We’re talking about collective averages of what many people on your planet may create for themselves to experience that might be different from that by flowing in the direction or matching negative frequencies of fear-based belief systems. So we’re just taking a barometer reading of the probability of how many people might shift themselves in certain ways at certain times because of what they’re choosing to buy into as fear-based beliefs. It doesn’t mean that people cannot shift to the realities where open contact exists. But it might be more on an individual level than a large-scale level, depending upon what choices are made in the collective.
Asker1: Okay. Got that. Um, and there’s some question about a definite shift of Two Earths in the year 2037. Is there something happening into 2037?
Bashar: That I cannot address this at this time. But again, the idea is that it’s more than two.
Asker1: Okay. Um, regarding the people in positions of power: if we, as a group, do not acknowledge their power, do they really have any power over us?
Bashar: They never have power over you. As we have said, their greatest power is to convince you that they have power over you. You are the ones that have put them in that position. So if you’re playing the game that they have power over you, then the effect will be that they seem to have power over you. And one of the things that certain people do when they are given that position is make sure you continue to believe that they actually have more power than they do.
Asker1: So as a collective, we are responsible for our government because our government represents us. So of course the idea isn’t that sort of built into the mix, that our government has some sort of power in relation to…
Bashar: They only have as much power as you have given them.
Where would that power come from other than from all of you, by agreeing to play a certain game in a certain format? And sometimes it can work to your advantage, and sometimes it can work to your disadvantage, depending upon the collection of belief systems being utilized in the sharing of that power, in the assignment of that power. So anytime you’re in a circumstance where it appears that someone else has power over you, and at the same time it’s perhaps an uncomfortable circumstance, yes, what are the kinds of psychological choices that a person needs to make in order to… I guess it’s very simple.
Form that it’s very simple. You ask yourself the question: “If I’m finding the reflection of having this agreement that they are in a position of authority, if I find this arrangement to be vibrationally incompatible with what I prefer, what belief systems are within me that continue to perpetuate that particular relationship when I don’t have to?” And simultaneously, as a collective, if we’ve agreed to have a certain experience together, how does that override your personal desire to have a different experience? Only if you believe that it does.
So really, as you advance in this process, you become more and more aware of what your fundamental beliefs are, where they may or may not be in harmony with the collective.
Sometimes you can make the decision not to experience what the collective is experiencing. And sometimes it’s another level of agreement that you will.
But that doesn’t mean you can’t experience it in a positive way for yourself anyway. Even if you’re sharing a general experience, you can still label it as you wish and get the benefit from it.
Because you’ve talked about things like levitating yourself. Let’s say, if it’s not really relevant to the theme that you’re exploring this lifetime, you can focus your energy on levitating till the cows come home, and you’re not gonna levitate. Yes. Right. I mean, in general. Except, of course, at that point your house will be full of cows.
Bashar: And I believe that that is cause for, at the very least, levity. Oh, maybe we should move on. Don’t milk this. Okay. I surrender. I will never try to out-pun you, Bashar. Oh my gosh. Um, that would be utter foolishness. Okay. And yes. Um, sometimes at night… this is not me, by the way. Um, sometimes at night I wake up half-asleep doing stuff in my bed.
Bashar: Let’s skip that question.
Asker1: Okay. Oh my goodness. Oh, by the way, how far up is your ship above Black Rock at the moment?
Bashar: It is about 5,000 miles.
Asker1: Isn’t that farther? Is that… never mind. How can we know the difference between not having experienced something at all, i.e., an ET encounter, versus having experienced something and not being able to remember it? So how do you distinguish between something that’s never really happened to you or something that you just don’t remember?
Bashar: What would attract you to actually even ask the question? A Ustream listener. Thank you. That’s the answer for the listener. What is it that would even attract you to ask that question? Okay. That might be an indication that if it hadn’t happened at all, you probably never even conceived of asking the question.
Asker1: Yeah. Because it would be totally irrelevant for you.
Bashar: That sounds right. Yeah. Because it would be totally…
Asker1: Thank you. [Laughter]
Asker1: Um, when will we see ghosts of deceased people?
Bashar: Did you see it? Did you catch it? Did it move too fast? I’ve never seen one.
Asker1: Are you sure? You know, sometimes they can appear very solid. Many of you may actually have seen the spirits of the dead and not known that they were actually spirits. “I don’t see dead people.”
Bashar: Oh, yes, you do. [Laughter] Yeah.
Asker1: How can I distinguish between whether that’s something I’ve never experienced or something I just forgot?
Bashar: If you want to see dead people, look in the mirror. Because all of us here on Earth are in a kind of zombie state. That’s one way to interpret it. But understand, as we have said many times, you’re actually still in spirit. You’re just dreaming that you’re not. Right. Right. Right. So when you see your reflection in the mirror, you’re looking at someone who actually is dead. God. So you see ghosts all the time. [Laughter] Um, yes. I have to find something else. Nevertheless, in the classical answer, it would be what we’ve said before: for you, allow yourself to follow your passion. You raise your frequency. And raising your frequency makes you a better receiver of other frequencies that are here, formerly invisible to you. And you can start seeing them. There are many techniques, many ideas. But first and foremost, it’s about raising your frequency to the level in which you naturally would be capable of perceiving things that are here, formerly invisible. Bottom line: follow the formula. And if it’s relevant for you to see a ghost, you will. Exactly. So by all means, follow your bottom line. [Laughter] Okay.
Asker1: And is… if the world is a reflection of me, and I can rewrite my history, present, future, how can I feel that there is any validity to the existence of others? Or how can I accept this without feeling entirely alone in my own existence?
Bashar: The idea that you create your versions of everyone should speak for itself. Because if there was no one there, there would be no one to create versions of. Do you understand? You wouldn’t be creating versions of others if there were no others. You can’t create something out of nothing. Correct. You cannot imagine non-existence. So if you are creating your versions of everyone, that means there is an “everyone” to create versions of. Therefore, you’re not alone. At the same time, you are your own universe. Remember, it’s “this and that,” not “this or that.” And just knowing how big the universe is… I guess we’re pretty big. You are. You’re All-That-Is, experiencing itself as if it’s not.
Leave a Comment
Thank you for your comment!
It will appear after review.