Those Who Believe in Martyrdom

Questioner: how would one begin a dialogue of peace with another who fervently believes that martyring themselves or killing is the way to God? What is the entry point where an alignment can begin?

Bashar: The entry point is in general is in the definition of God.

Discuss a definition of what they believe God to be.

You will find in many cases that those people are in such states of denial that you can’t have a logical or intelligent conversation with them.

Nevertheless, part of that is also allowing yourself to realize that may mean that you never will, and therefore it may not necessarily be something you will do.

That’s the first thing to recognize—is that you may never be able to open up a dialogue, or even if you do, to reach them in any way.

That’s the first step in any kind of dialogue: doing it without an agenda of needing to reach them or needing them to change.

Questioner: I understand that’s very difficult for many of you. Nevertheless, you actually give your point more power by not needing your point to have power. So you’re not trying to convince them of anything. You can’t convince anyone of anything anyway, can you? No. But we certainly do in this society have an urge to try. Yes, this is the idea of trying to control reality. You don’t need to do it.

Now we understand that it may be beneficial to make an attempt to open up a dialogue with certain people who may have a way of doing things that’s not necessarily very compatible to the preservation of life. Nevertheless, they may not be in their own reality capable of even understanding you. You follow me? Yeah.

And here—see, we’re talking about paradox a few moments ago, and this is an ultimate paradox in our society that we’re experiencing right now with the conflicts that are going on. Nevertheless, for those that might harbor a willingness to communicate with those that they hate, you can perhaps find some crack to open in a conversation, as we said, with the idea of the definition of God. However, you might also be under the mistaken assumption that they do what they do under the auspices of faith, when in fact they may be saying that exactly, and it may have nothing to do with that exactly.

So the approach we are suggesting really only has to do with those that are reachable on that level. And the idea being that if you can both agree to an idea or a definition of what God is and can come around to the common understanding that it is truly a vibration of unconditional love, and that acting in any other way is obviously antithetical to that and in opposition to that vibration, then you might form the foundation of the basis of a further dialogue—if you can even get that far.

However, this is why we say it isn’t really about changing anyone else’s mind. It’s really just about changing yourself and allowing yourself to put into place those ideas, those implementations, those institutions that represent the vibration of the world you prefer to live in. So that when you make a shift yourself, you yourself will wind up in a world where those individuals who are incompatible with it will simply no longer exist in that sense.

Questioner: I’ll put it in what you would call a space-time linear kind of pragmatic way. Let’s just talk about it from an incarnational point of view. Now again, as we say, everything exists simultaneously, so it is not really reincarnation—it is multiple simultaneous incarnations. However, from the linear experience, let’s say that one way you could experience the idea is that as you generate more and more energy and do more and more things that are compatible with the world that you prefer to live in—a world of peace, a world of creativity, and a world of joy—the people that do not resonate to that frequency will no longer be born into your world, and bit by bit they will die out. You follow me? And they will not come back to your Earth. They will go to another Earth, another parallel reality Earth. If they reincarnate, they will not come to yours. And so bit by bit, you will think your world is changing—you will think they are changing—but in a sense they are not, unless they actually choose to. But if they don’t change, it doesn’t mean you will continue to experience them beyond a certain point, as long as you continue to add your vibration to a world that is representative of what you prefer.

Now it doesn’t mean that you can’t make an attempt to open a bridge and a link and a dialogue, because that in and of itself is an action that represents the kind of vibration of the kind of world that you prefer to be in. All we are saying is it is the action that you take in that direction that will make a difference in the world you ultimately experience—whether they respond or not. That’s not the point. That’s why you don’t need to go in with an agenda. You know that your actions alone in that direction are sufficient to make a difference, no matter what they choose to do. And that’s the power of having no point to make.

Questioner: Make sense? You do it because that’s who you are. Because that is who you are. Because that’s the behavior that represents the world you would like to live in. And it isn’t about what they choose to do—it’s only about the actions that you take. That’s very powerful. Thank you.

Questioner: There’s one more aspect to that question though. What’s going on in our world conflict-wise and our transformation from dark to light—if there is a segment of our world who is reflecting to us this darkness and these primal urges that we’re transcending, then it’s reflecting also to us those two parts that are within us that are in conflict as well.

Bashar: They are reflecting to you things that you definitely contain. They don’t have to be in conflict within you just because you contain them. You could have made peace with them within yourself a long time ago.

Questioner: With them within myself? But what about the part of me that is in my dark side that’s in conflict?

Bashar: That’s what I’m saying. You can either have the peace within you that is still in conflict, or you can have that peace within you that is no longer in conflict. It can be either way.

Questioner: You’re saying that when it’s within us, just like what this whole workshop is about—discovering beliefs and issues that are no longer preferred—basically that we have tools that as the person who is preferring to change, can utilize to transform that energy. Whereas if it’s that conflict in the Middle East where someone may not necessarily be willing to communicate or change where they’re coming from because they may be covering it up with another revenge item or whatever it is—that’s a little different because we’re not in charge of changing that preference with them.

Bashar: No, we’re in charge of changing it within ourselves, of course. And they’re reflecting some of these things to ourselves to make it more possible for us to make choices. And you can make those choices and still allow them to make their choices, even if their choices are different than yours.

Questioner: We don’t have to, in order to transcend our personal issues, change them?

Bashar: No. And you can’t. You can’t. It’s impossible. This is why it is so perfect that everyone is autonomous, because it isn’t reliant on anyone else that you change and grow. It’s only reliant on you—which is important because if there are people that feel that in order to bring peace we’ve got to change the terrorists or those who do not agree—this is big, this is really important—and again, you can always make the attempt to open up a dialogue, but the point is it is the attempt that makes the difference and will lead us to peace because we will gather together those people who really want peace—they’ll so way outnumber the ones that are not willing to go.

Bashar: Let me give you also an example of something we have talked about before, and perhaps this will shed a different kind of light on another way in which something like this can occur. We have in the recent past said—and at this point, as we sense the energy that exists at present, find that nothing has really changed yet—we have said that there is a 98% probability that there will be some sort of terrorist nuclear strike in the Middle East.

Questioner: I’m afraid I do, but I don’t remember hearing this.

Bashar: Well, I’m telling it to you now. Here’s the point of this—I’m not saying it has to happen, it can still change. The point is, if it does, it is going to cause such a backlash around the world that I guarantee you the response to it will be that it will never happen again. So even out of something that you would call horrific can come accelerated peace, by throwing in everyone’s face something unavoidable that they must look at and come to a decision about and make changes about immediately, so that they will then realize they must take action in some way, shape, or form that is positively constructed to prevent that from ever happening again. So even if it happens, it can still actually allow peace to accelerate.

Questioner: Is there anything we can do to more turn the tide on that, to make sure that doesn’t happen?

Bashar: The attempt to express love for your enemy, the attempt to express understanding is what counts. You know what—the attempt to express that you understand they are a part of God, even though they may not understand you are a part of God. The attempt to express the idea that if God is as vast and incomprehensible as they protest it is, the idea is that God also created you, and if God created you as different from them, God must have had a reason in its wisdom for doing so. These are all, shall we say, the foundations of the beginnings of dialogues. But again, it is simply the putting out of the information and the behavior, the action that you take that makes the difference—whether they respond positively to it or not is really up to them. But if you are clever, you may find a way to strike a chord within them if you study and understand what they are all about and why they do what they do. That’s going to have to be left up to you.

But I shall read you something now. This is a passage from what you call a Bible, but it’s not the Bible that exists in your reality. It’s a Bible that exists in a parallel reality Earth where this prophecy is actually something in that Bible—it isn’t in yours, but it’s in this one.

Questioner: The prophecy you’re going to tell me about?

Bashar: The one we just discussed about the nuclear. I am just sharing with you on a variety of levels some of the differences between parallel realities to illuminate several points at once. And in one parallel Earth reality, their Bible actually has this prophecy whereas yours does not.

“And lo, those with hate in their hearts did call upon the god of fear and rained down fire and brimstone upon the holy city, and it was utterly consumed. And there arose thereafter such a hue and cry in the land that those were cleansed away who caused this to be done.”

Questioner: You’re going to have to say that slower. Can you read slower because I really want to get it down before I—three months passes.

Bashar: “And lo, those with hate in their hearts caused to be rained down fire and brimstone upon the holy city.” You understand? “And thereafter the people did rise with such a hue and cry that those that caused this to happen were cleansed away.”

Questioner: Okay.

Bashar: It does not mean what it means in your reality. In this context, “cleansed away” in that reality means all were gathered up and placed in isolation where they eventually eliminated themselves.

Questioner: Wow. Isolation.

Bashar: It is rare to find one whose excitement in life is stenographer.

Questioner: No, my excitement is not—well, it is—because I like to write down things that are important so I can access them later.

Bashar: Just one little piece of adding this into where you’re—same question. If you put—if you extend love to people, even the wildest creatures change. I think that somehow they change even if they don’t change the way you want them to.

Bashar: You don’t want to change anything in your world. Change yourself—you will take yourself to a reality in which you are then dealing with the versions of those things that already exist in that reality. They do not change.

Sungazing

Questioner: My question is about sungazing. It’s a new thing I’ve come across—an ancient practice. This gentleman’s going around talking about staring at the sun between the hours an hour before sunrise and an hour after sunrise, and somehow the sun rays open up the pituitary and hypothalamus gland and it activates like a solar charge in the brain, and that if you do this for nine months, your body can completely live without food.

Bashar: The different degrees of polarization of light as it comes through the atmosphere at different angles have different vibratory effects on the body in different ways.

This depends on the state of the person to begin with. It will not work for everyone.

Questioner: Collectively for all of us, this question is about getting where we want to get to—our dreams. If we have a place we’re trying to get to, and as you said to one lady, you can’t reach that because your belief system isn’t there. Are we supposed to just climb a stairway to that—just find something easy and then work towards that?

Bashar: It depends upon what belief systems you have. What we are simply saying is: honor the beliefs you have and don’t force yourself to step off what you believe to be a cliff unless you believe there will actually be a footing there. So the idea is to honor what belief systems you actually have. If you believe you can go faster, go faster. If you believe you need to take your time, take your time. If you believe you need assistance in a certain way, then allow yourself to have assistance. It’s up to you.

Questioner: What happens if you don’t really know what you want?

Bashar: The point that we talk about when we talk about following your excitement can simply be followed on the simplest level of all. And that simply is, as we say, at any given moment you have available to you a number of different options of things you could do. All we’re simply saying is that at that moment, make a decision: which one contains the highest degree of excitement that you have the greatest degree of capability of taking action on—and take action on it. And the next moment, do the same, and the next moment do the same. It is the thread of excitement that you need to follow. It doesn’t have to be represented by a big overarching life career or project. At every given moment, different degrees of excitement come with different options that are presented to you. Pick the one that has the highest excitement that you have the greatest degree of capability of actually acting on. That’s all you have to do.

The Judas Story and Past Lives

Questioner: I read an article about some ancient scriptures that had been recently discovered that spoke of Judas and suggested he did not betray Yeshua.

This was something that I had no background and understanding of, and in a sense it was a setup. So immediately after I read this brief article, for approximately ten minutes I would say I was immersed in a very strong flow of love, a sense of release, of joyful tears and love relief, and it was quite a joyful experience—even to the point I was jumping around the room joyfully and jubilant.

I asked you about Judas and did he turn Yeshua in and in doing so betray him, and you told me no—Yeshua told Judas to turn him in.

And then the next day I began working with an exercise you had given us—the spiral with the four D’s—your expression, my desire, to define, my dedication, to detach.

And as I sat down to work with that exercise, just before I got involved with it, I made a connection to a conscious being and this being identified itself as a son of Judas, and asked me two questions. What were the questions? The first question was: Yeshua told Judas to turn him in—why did not Yeshua turn himself in? And the second question: What happened to Judas after that event took place?

Bashar: The reason for having the appearance of being turned in was more powerful as a statement in the eyes of those around him to carry out certain aspects of the play.

If you shall we say in modern terms write a movie and you have the hero simply turn himself over to the bad guys, is it not more dramatic to have someone betray him to the bad guys?

Does it not resonate more strongly in the mythology to do so? There seems to be on this planet a stronger resonance to that idea. So it was something that people could identify with in a way that would cause the appropriate reaction or vibration to occur, so the story could have the proper impact.

Now in that he was asked to do something that was to him in that sense loathsome and contradictory to the love he felt for Yeshua.

There was for Judas—even though he understood the part he was playing and understood the effect it would ultimately have and understood the benefit that could ultimately be derived from it—he had within himself the idea of self-loathing. And in that way you will find that the scenario of the hanging is accurate. He hung himself.

Questioner: Was this within a week after, a year or two years after?

Bashar: It is not that long after. Within a day or within the week.

Questioner: Because of self-loathing?

Bashar: he would understand the importance that out of love he did what Yeshua said, but in doing what Yeshua said in that sense would put him through that torture and simply couldn’t live with having done it—even though he understood the importance of it and wanted in that sense to join Yeshua on another plane.

So they both chose to move through in what we consider a tragic way to present their message in the way they felt, because they understand the cathartic transformation that occurs in your society when presented with a tragedy that then ends in a transformation—it has a much more powerful cathartic effect than the other way they could have done it.

Questioner: Did he make the decision that he would end his life that way before he actually did turn Yeshua in, or after?

Bashar: After.

Questioner: So the being that is communicating with me—the son—did not know that this occurred? I’m curious why he was asking me.

Bashar: To rekindle in you and extract from you an ability to get back in touch with that particular vibration and energy, since you have familiarity with it—with that type of circumstance or with that specific event—both. And you said earlier when I read the article it was a setup because—well, a setup in the sense that it was organized, it was orchestrated, a coincidental idea.

Questioner: Not meaning that? Meaning it was orchestrated in other words that he asked him to do it.

Bashar: I mean when I read the article and—okay, I understand what you’re saying.

Questioner: I’m not clear as to my connection to this event. Could you—

Bashar: You existed—or shall we say again, simultaneously coexisted—in that time frame. You are familiar with the proceedings going on, and it affected you. It impacted you in a very profound way to come into this life and find out that those that were blamed are not to be blamed—is a great release of understanding for you and a great joy for you to understand that everything that was done was actually done out of love.

Questioner: Can you give me an idea who I was in any—or is that for me to discover on my own?

Bashar: You can, but giving you a name really wouldn’t help. It is not someone in that sense you would be able to historically track down. Any connection as a family or friend to these two? Yes, in the sense of listening to the information, being a part of the organizations—shall we say the groups, the philosophical organizations that understood what Yeshua was saying.

Questioner: The Essenes—I was a part of the Essenes?

Bashar: Yes. And how small a group—what might have been the smaller size group? About 50. And you were in that sense crushed by what at that time you felt was a betrayal because you weren’t let in on it. Now you understand it wasn’t, and great joy and release is yours. And it is calling you back—those questions to get back in touch with that vibration so you can bring the joy of it into the present reality in whatever form works for you.

Questioner: So I wasn’t necessarily the son of Judas—it’s just the consciousness of the son of Judas that contacted me to bring this up.

Bashar: Understand, not literally genetically. Understand that different groups were called “son of this,” “son of that.” You were a son of Judas that way. And so you felt that whom you had named yourself after betrayed the entire order and couldn’t understand what happened. Now you do. So this is the person talking to me now is potentially myself in that timeline? Yes. Okay, understand. And you have completed a cycle. Got it. And hence the great release.

Questioner: Excellent. Thank you, Bashar. Much love to you and all who are with.

Bashar: And to you as well.

Bashar: By the way, just as an aside—think about the modern translation of Yeshua in this day and age of your timing. The full name back then was Yeshua Ben Yosef—what you would say is Jesus Son of Joseph. But Yeshua is actually more properly aligned with the name in your modern parlance of Joshua rather than Jesus. Jesus in a sense is a Greek alteration. So really a modern description of the name of Jesus from directly ancient times to modern times would be Joshua Josephson. This may seem like an aside, but there’s a reason for this we cannot go into at this time, but it will become apparent to some later on as to why we bring this up.

Visual Experiences of Parallel Realities

Questioner: I’ve been having these experiences of visual experiences, so I’m trying to understand them. It’s kind of like I can see a movie on a wall, and it’s like a film strip—it’s like a movie. It looks like other communities, different things going on, and in between it’s like space and galaxy and angels and flying through. It’s getting to the point where I can see what I’m seeing. I think I’m seeing parallel realities, or I’ve been told I’m processing information that I was not conscious of.

Bashar: Is it both? You are having experiences you may not be completely conscious of and recollecting it this way, and you may also be crossing over into parallel realities where you’re also having similar experiences. One may bleed into the other, so it’s a combination.

Questioner: When I see these communities, I’m wondering if they’re represented that way at all—can you be more specific in describing them?

Bashar: Like cartoons—a lot of it’s cartoons. Like cartoon communities where they look more animated and not like we are so much.

Bashar: I see that may be an interpretation, although we are aware of one species we have referred to in the past called the Dilla that you might look upon as animated cartoons. What do they look like? They are sort of plasticky—the idea is that they are thin, malleable, flexible beings that can stretch and change form in a variety of brilliant colors that might be in some sense a close approximation like an animation moving quickly.

Questioner: It’s always moving very quickly, but I’ve seen black and white and real stuff and babies and hybrids and all that.

Bashar: There are a lot of things lumped into those visions that you having that represent different kinds of experiences on different planes at different times, and they’re all being lumped into these photogenic films that you are perceiving. They change—there’s like space in between them, then you go into another one.

Questioner: What can you make of this in terms of how can you use this and apply this in your life?

Bashar: Energetically, just accepting it and being okay with it and not judging it good or bad. But I do see a lot of war and explosions—a lot of other realities as well as probable future ones. You are sifting through different probabilities, different experiences. You are in your own way helping to add energy to the ones that define the path of most preference out of all the probable ones that do happen, have happened, or could happen. It’s your way of doing it. You have an unusual connection in this way. There are a few individuals from time to time that incarnate on Earth that come from different places and different times than most of the population’s incarnation, and they have different ways of doing things. It is highly likely that one of the things you are seeing in those movies is actually a place you have a strong connection to and many different life experiences in.

Questioner: I interpret it as the destruction that’s going on here with the collective consciousness is going on in many other parallel realities, so we can connect through this way and see that they have wars and all these things as well.

Bashar: When we become aware of each other, many other parallel Earth realities have taken themselves places that you will not. Many parallel Earth realities have had things like nuclear war and so forth. So you are sifting through all of this to determine the vibrations that brought them to those choices, so that you can aid and assist this reality in making other choices.

Questioner: That answers—does that help you? Yes. Thank you. Thank you.

Question 10: Awareness and Neutrality

Questioner: I have a question on awareness and understanding of neutrality. I understand the concept of everything being neutral. I also understand the various vibrations that you can choose once in a neutral state. I had an experience where I changed a belief system of mine to experience a certain kind of music, understanding that it was neutral, where before I had a definition that it was negative. But in hand understanding this neutral, I still felt a very heavy feeling.

Bashar: That can simply be an observation of the mechanics of the vibration itself and a recognition that there may be incompatibility with your preferred vibration. But that can be recognized within a neutral state.

Questioner: Within the heavy feeling and the low vibration—how does that help within the acceleration of an individual?

Bashar: By simply accepting it for what it is and recognizing that it is not your preference, and thus in that sense not incorporating that vibration into your overall preferential vibration. It’s simply an assessment process—this works for you, this doesn’t—and you’re observing that from a neutral state to choose what works for you. It doesn’t mean you’re invalidating or judging what doesn’t—it’s simply an observation and an experience that you can use to incorporate into yourself whatever vibration is more compatible with the being you prefer to be.

Questioner: It’s just very powerful because within seeing the neutral, you experience one to be very high and one to be very low, but then you see the variations—one feeling of a flow of acceleration upward and then one very grounding.

Bashar: That’s okay, of course. As we said, the process of expansion is the process of inclusion, and that requires that you do some observation and acknowledgement of what’s there so that you can pick and choose the ultimate effect you wish to create in your life.

Questioner: So is the whole point of this experience—like you said yesterday or today—that you come here to choose? Physical reality is a choice, and then by seeing choices, you look at everything—like for example for me was the definition of God. When most of us feel that when you come into this world you have a definition of God saying that it’s more like an entity or individual and not really the new idea of all that is in creation—so the whole choice of coming into this reality is to come in here, see that, and then choose to have a new way and a new vision of it.

Bashar: That can be a choice. Many people may choose many different kinds of things, but in your general transformational age, many people are choosing that particular perspective of transforming from the limited view to a more expanded view. Is that what physical or third density is—to expanding it more to look at going from third to fourth density? Yes, that’s what that is—the process of going from the limited view to the more expanded view.

Questioner: Okay. Thank you. Thank you.

Question 11: The Physics of Consciousness and Manifestation

Questioner: I wanted to try to get a handle on—and I know this is a big thing to tackle at the end of the session here—the physics of consciousness and manifestation. I really get excited about trying to understand this. I’ve sort of made this division in my mind, and I know they don’t really exist, into the metaphysics of it—which to my sense means intentionality, coherence, belief systems—and then the physics of it which involves zero point field and Bose-Einstein condensates.

Bashar: These are simply different labels for things that are somewhat similar from time to time—different ways of people interpreting similar ideas.

Questioner: How then does that work if you were to explain it in a physics sense in terms of reality actually coalescing and manifesting out of a shift in consciousness?

Bashar: Do not your quantum physicists already understand that there is no reality apart from the observation of it? Well there you go. Quantum physics has already defined this idea: there is no reality apart from your observation of it, and that’s what reality is.

Questioner: Is it in a sense kind of this holographic projection?

Bashar: Yes, and that’s another way that some scientists have of defining it. It’s still in a sense a convenient euphemism, but it will work as a template to define something that allows everyone to at least be on common ground with their terminology.

Questioner: And how do we move from third to fourth density?

Bashar: Well, there are many ways to look at it. One way we have defined the recognition of it and the moving through it is to recognize that you actually are the reality that you previously thought you existed in. And another way of saying that again is as your quantum physicists say it—the idea that there is no reality until you decide to observe something, and it is the choice you make of what to observe that determines the reality you experience. So it’s just a matter of making a certain choice to observe a certain thing, and whatever the definition of that thing is then becomes the reality you experience based on how you set up the observation. So if you start defining the idea of fourth density as something different from third and imbue qualities to fourth density in your definition, then you set yourself up to be capable of perceiving and experiencing fourth density reality based on the definition you have given it. Does that make sense?

Bashar: We can also describe an actual scientific experiment that could be done to actually prove that point. You understand the process that exists on your planet called hypnosis? Yes. This is actually a very strong technique to unlock you from one reality assumption and allow you to focus on others.

One actual experiment that could be done to literally prove this would be to have a series of chambers, one inside the other, each big enough to contain people. And what you can do is you can hypnotize people to tell other people in the inside chamber that one particular kind of thing will happen in the next chamber, and then hypnotize that person to tell another person that thing will happen in that chamber, and hypnotize that person to tell another person that a particular kind of thing will happen in that chamber. And in each of those chambers you can have cameras. In the outer reality chambers, the cameras will record one thing. In the inner reality chambers, the cameras will record whatever those people absolutely believe they would see in that chamber. You will have two different realities on tape. Do you understand this? Because if you get everyone in one reality to believe a certain thing, it completely affects everything about that reality. And if the person doesn’t know that there’s another reality to believe in, then that is the overriding vibration in that chamber and becomes what gets recorded by everything that does record in that chamber. And you can actually see on two side-by-side monitors two completely different realities happening. And these similar realities are viewable within this reality because you are creating bubble realities through the hypnotic technique of convincing some that there is only one kind of reality on that side and another kind on this side.

Questioner: So in terms of surpassing and dealing with the limitations that we put on ourselves, can we then self-hypnotize to the point where we’re able to?

Bashar: That’s what you do all the time—but we just don’t do it consciously. What belief systems are you hypnotizing yourself with? And we’re entirely capable of putting a different program in there. You are with an overriding understanding that you can hypnotize yourself to something else. Does that help?

Questioner: Yes.

Bashar: As always.

Questioner: I’m not quite finished—I don’t know where else to go with this. So much of it depends on choice. If you have let’s say the physics experiment where they have Schrodinger’s cat and the cat is either alive or dead—and of course you know the answer is the cat is alive and dead because that represents two different parallel realities. If you did it in the way we just described this experiment, you could actually record the cat both alive and dead. You will see both simultaneously co-occurring parallel realities, and they are both equally—there’s an opportunity for either to exist equally. They exist equally until the observer comes along, and then it’s their belief system that then creates it, sort of collapses that wave function into dead or alive. You bring your own belief system into it and you decide at that point which be the effect in your reality—unless, as I said, you bring a belief system in that you are capable of perceiving both realities simultaneously.

I am simply suggesting a technological way to assist you to do that, because some of you will believe in the power of the technology a little bit more easily than the power of your own belief system. So you can set yourself up through hypnotic suggestion to actually experience that through literal physical recordings. Because you see, if you bring someone in as an observer that has absolutely no idea what the experiment was, then there will be no bias at all and they will actually be capable of telling you that they see one recording on one monitor and a completely different result on the other monitor, because they have no idea what you did to get those two recordings. So there will be no contradiction in their mind that both recordings can exist side by side.

Questioner: You need to constantly remove someone from the belief system level though that would in a sense allow them to collapse it one way or the other.

Bashar: That’s what the hypnosis is for, and that’s what the idea is for of a blind observer who has no idea what the experiment is, so they can actually tell you that they can see both results side by side without bias.

Questioner: And how do we break our circuit sufficiently to be able to exist in that state?

Bashar: You can start by understanding it is possible and believing that it is possible and conducting the experiment.

Questioner: Cool. There’s that temperature again. I love you so much.

Bashar: Our unconditional love to you, and remember that your own imagination will also supply you with many other techniques other than what we have suggested here in this communication.

Final Question: Relationship and Discernment

Questioner: I had an experience with somebody at work which was like more of personal like love kind of experience, and it wasn’t good at all at the end. I’ve been always denying the red flags and denying everything everybody was saying me—“She’s not good, blah blah blah”—but then finally I realized two days ago after suffering and suffering that she doesn’t deserve me basically, and I’ve been always saying I don’t deserve her.

Bashar: First of all, if you didn’t deserve each other, you wouldn’t have attracted yourself to each other in the beginning. It’s not about judgment—I mean it on every level. You only interact with those that are in some way shape or form on a wavelength that you need to interact with to get out of it what you need to learn. So in that sense, you always deserve each other, no matter on what level each of you is personally. There are no accidents.

And the point again, as you have brought up for you, is to learn more discernment in recognizing the signs of a situation ahead of time that are incompatible with your preferred vibration. You don’t have to bring it down to a deservability issue. That’s all it really is for—is learning discernment through practice of what it is sooner and sooner each time that represents vibrations that are not compatible with your preferred one. It’s just an issue in that sense of experience and practice.

Questioner: I understand everything happens for a reason, and I know this was a good experience for me to learn stuff about myself. And I did learn.

Bashar: Then you can also understand that it happened out of love, no matter what the result was. You attract yourselves to each other out of love. In fact, every single thing that’s done on your planet is done out of love. There are those that don’t understand how to match their actions in harmony with the idea of doing what they do out of love, but the reason and the fundamental underlying reason for what anyone does to anyone, for anyone, with anyone, by anyone, is done out of love. They simply may not have been brought up to understand how to express it in a positive way. But every single thing everyone does—even killing—the initial reason for that is because they want to be loved and feel like they’re not getting it, and so they lash out because they don’t know any other way to express the idea of getting what they want—of feeling loved. It’s all done out of love.

And if you understand that fundamentally, then you can go into any situation and recognize why it’s happening. You can see into the soul of the person and can also have discernment about what is going on in that particular interaction and relationship much more quickly, and can really learn what each of you are getting out of it much more quickly.

Questioner: Other branch is—I love my work. Is there a butt in there? There might be. All right. We can almost always sense that. Definitely. But the thing is, I don’t like the war politics. I don’t like—I consider myself to be straightforward, like if I feel like something, I cannot hide and put a mask. I cannot smile and laugh when I don’t feel it. Meanwhile I see people around me.

Bashar: Do you think you can find a creative way to express that without necessarily doing it out of judgment? Can you find a way to communicate to others that the politics are not your preference, but do it in a way that doesn’t judge others for doing it? Can you express who you are and how you prefer to communicate and how you prefer to behave and how you prefer to act without necessarily judging others for the way they have been acting? If not, and if you find you are completely incompatible, then the idea is to understand that when we talk about doing what excites you, we also talk about doing it where it excites you, how it excites you, with whom it excites you—and not doing it otherwise. If any of those components are not reflective of the vibration of what you are truly compatible with, then it is not really doing what excites you in a holistic way—you’re only doing pieces of it. So if you find that that particular situation and environment doesn’t fit the idea of your preferred vibration, we would suggest you look for something that is more compatible with it.

Otherwise, allow yourself to examine whether or not there is a way to communicate who you are clearly with your co-workers, so that they understand what it is that they can do to respect your way of doing things without necessarily compromising what they do or being judged for it.

Questioner: That’s what I explain to them—how I am—or just a different way?

Bashar: You can keep it very simple. You can say, “You saying this to me or you doing this in this way made me feel this or made me think this or made me feel disrespected. This is how I would prefer to communicate or have you communicate with me or deal with me or interact with me. If that’s not something you believe you would prefer to do, I can respect that. All I’m asking is for you to also see if there’s a way that we can find a common ground in which to work together, because the ultimate idea here is the doing of the work that excites us. And if you can come together in common ground to find ways to communicate to do something that excites you both, then use the thing that excites you both—if it does in fact excite you both—to find common ground on which you can communicate, because that’s the actual focus that needs to be there. So you can be inspirational in that way. And if they’re willing to rise to that level, they will. If they’re not, well then you still have to make a decision as to whether or not you want to stay there or find someplace that’s willing to act with more motivation for the big picture.