The 4 Laws of Creation

The Four Absolutes / The Four Laws of Creation

We would like to elaborate on the four absolutes, the four laws of creation.

Number one: you exist. Can’t do much about that.

Number two, the one is all. The all together are one.

Number three, what you put out is what you get back.

Number four, everything changes. It is constant. Change is constant.

Now, these ideas we have discussed at length from a variety of perspectives from time to time. And we would like to now add a different notation for each one, a kind of shorthand reminder of what each of the four laws, the four absolutes, represents.

• Number one, you exist. This can be summed up as the concept of self-awareness.
• Number two, the one is all, the all is one can be summed up as the concept of synchronicity.
• Number three, what you put out is what you get back can be summed up, if you wish, as the concept of karma, or consequence, or reflection. It doesn’t matter what term you use as long as you understand that when you use the term karma, it does not mean it in a judgmental way. It simply means it as consequences of action, as a reflection of the state of being you exist upon or in.
• Number four, everything changes. Change is the constant. The idea here is that this can be summed up as the concept of creation itself.

So you have self-awareness, synchronicity, karma, and creation. These ideas perpetuate creation. These ideas perpetuate themselves and act as the fundamental underpinnings of all that you experience in what you call reality. This shorthand notation can help you understand a different way of looking at each of these so-called absolute laws. Perhaps by examining in more depth all of the concepts associated with those four shorthand terms, allowing yourself to explore all the different ways that individuals in different cultures may view or express these four absolutes, and give you something to play with and think about.

Every experience in any reality, be it on your world or any other world, is based on these four absolutes, and there are no more. Everything else, as you say, as we have said, is your ball game beyond that. It is your combination of these four laws that create every experience that you have.

And now we would like to add another kind of spin to this concept. And we would like to play a little bit with your minds, if you don’t mind.

So let us talk about the three absolutes, as we have said. Number one, you exist, or self-awareness. Number two, one is all, all is one, or synchronicity. Number three, what you put out is what you get back, or karma. And then let us talk about the fourth absolute. And yet, a moment ago I said three absolutes. Now I say four absolutes. What’s going on here?

The idea to understand is this: The fourth absolute is in and of itself, by definition, a paradox. Change is the only constant. Everything changes except the first three laws. However, change in and of itself must contain the concept of change. So change even has to change to be true to the concept of change; even has to change what it means to change. And that means there are things that don’t change. And those are the first three.

So the fourth is an absolute and yet at the same time is a paradox and contradicts itself, because change itself, to be true to change, must change from being change, which means it must become fixed—and this is what creates the first three laws. So they are self-reinforcing. The fourth absolute reinforces the other three. You might say they are the exceptions to the rule of change. But yet at the same time, paradoxically, all things change.

The other reason why the fourth absolute can be looked at as an absolute and as a transitional idea is to ensure that there are in fact only four, or three, absolutes. If the fourth absolute—change is the only constant, and everything changes—were fixed in the same way that the first three were fixed, then you could say there are four absolutes, and that would be a statement that would actually be a fifth absolute. Then you could say there are five absolutes, and that would be a sixth absolute, and so on and so on.

So the fact that the fourth is transitional as an absolute is what reinforces, by always referring back to the first three and never going beyond that, that there remain four and only four absolutes—or three.

Think about it, play with it, and thank you for allowing us to play with your minds a little bit in this concept. If you will delve into this in fun, you will find that by examining and exploring this concept of paradox in the fourth absolute, it will open new doorways and allow you to see the unlimited complexity and richness of creation as expressed in the four laws we have just outlined, as they interact with each other to create every possible experience that can be imagined within the mind of the self-aware infinite one. All that is.

So we thank you for allowing us to reflect these ideas to you this day of your time, and in return for the gift you are giving to us, I ask now: in what way may I and my civilization be of service to you? You may proceed with sharing in any manner you so desire.

Questions

Life, Culture, and Experience

Asker: how do you spend your time? Like, do you work?

Bashar: We do not have a 9-to-5 regimen. But we do many different things as we are inspired to do them. And spontaneously and synchronistically, anything that anyone is inspired to do automatically meshes with the mass consensus reality of our world and enhances everything else everyone is also automatically and spontaneously and synchronistically inspired to do.

So we do not have delineated jobs. Each individual is allowed to follow their highest joy, because we know that to do so allows each individual to operate in the most natural way. And to allow each individual to operate in the most natural way automatically reinforces what any individual within such a reality would want to do.

The idea of communicating with other civilizations in this fashion is one of the things that I and many others of my kind will do. We express ourselves through similar ideas of art and music and investigation and exploration of what you would call scientific thought.

But in our evolution, at this time, in that we are moving in our own transition from physicality to non-physicality. we no longer either eat or sleep in that sense as you understand it, though we used to.

Asker: And I uh came back from New York, and um the company that I was working for uh got taken over by the Internal Revenue Service. I lost my car.

Bashar: It doesn’t mean you had no transportation.

Saying you had no transportation is to blind yourself to the possible opportunities of all the different ways transportation might have been provided for you. I found an individual that had a uh an old car. I made a deal on the telephone that if I liked the car, I would buy it. But he used to be a used car salesman. So he was using manipulation and trickery.

Bashar: It is again a wonderful synchronicity in the names you give each other—that very often, of course not in all cases, individuals who have allowed themselves to become named “used people,” “used car salesmen,” used this, used that—perhaps in many ways, if they actually are using other people in a negative way—is because they have been used themselves.

Asker: Well, that certainly uh puts a little forgiveness light on the subject. That’s for sure. Yeah. And at the time, I did not know that he had been a… used person.

Bashar: All right. It doesn’t condone the action, but it does give you more insight into how to recognize vibrations that may not be aligned with your own, and to not necessarily allow them to impact you by buying into their reality.

Asker: Right. And I did not know how to react to him. Oh, all right. And but I did know that I wasn’t going to leave there till I had that car.

I got stuck. I kept uh trying to trying to make him honor the deal, and he kept sidestepping and being a comedian at my expense, though.

Bashar: Bring this into the present. In what way do you feel stuck now?

Asker: A man gave me a beer to drink. It was a hot day, and I sweated the beer out right on my right side of my neck, which I thought was extremely unusual. I’ve been stuck in that area of the right side of my neck ever since. The power isn’t flowing. I breathe in that area more than any other area of my body for all these years. And

Asker

Um, the feeling is I don’t know what to do with just the fascination that I don’t want to leave there without the car.

Bashar

And uh, so what you are saying is that you did not trust that your reality would provide you something if you simply made the decision to move in a direction that would be more in alignment with what you preferred.

Asker

Right. Yeah. I should have just left.

Bashar

Exactly. Should. But you could recognize that if you had, your reality could still have provided you in fact not only what you needed, perhaps even something better than you had imagined.

Asker

Possibly.

Bashar

Absolutely.

Asker

I didn’t see anything else at the hand, but ah—

Bashar

You see, but here in lies the key. Very often, and you have really hit it now right at the core, very often your people will not take an action because they do not see an indicator before they take an action. But that’s not the way reality works. You have to be the state first of the reality you want in order to even be capable of seeing an indicator that it’s possible to have such a reality. You can’t wait for the indicator. That, as we have said many times, is like waiting for your reflection to smile in the mirror before you do. You understand?

Asker

Right.

Bashar

So you cannot say, “Oh, all right, if I get an indicator first, if the reflection smiles first, then I’ll move in that direction, then I’ll smile too.” Doesn’t work that way. You have to already believe that your reality can provide you with something of that nature by moving in that direction in order for you to see how it can provide you with something by moving in that direction. Otherwise, if you’re not on that frequency, if you’re not on that channel, that program remains invisible to you. You have to make the switch first. Remember, your society, no offense, has it backwards. It’s not seeing is believing. It’s believing is seeing. You understand?

Asker

Yes, I do.

Bashar

So, is this helping you feel a little less stuck?

Asker

Yes, it is.

Bashar

Why?

Asker

Thank you. I’ve had a couple of coughing releases and in that area and uh—

Bashar

That’s what you need to work on is the idea of not waiting for indicators to indicate which way to go, but to be the state of the reality you prefer to be, knowing that there is no reason why that reality will not be just as real as any other reality you’ve had the experience of. Because there is no reality except your definition of it. There is no reality just as there is no reflection unless you are there to give the reflection off first. You understand?

Asker

Yes. And yes, what I felt like happened was I gave him a reflection of him to dominate me. Yes. And he has ever since.

Bashar

Well, you have allowed it.

Asker

Yes. And so have—

Bashar

But you’re not actually dominated. You are playing, as you said, the domination game. Being dominated. You’re playing the game, too.

Asker

So, how do I get off it?

Bashar

Do you understand that you’re playing the game? Do you understand that you are choosing to act like you’re being dominated?

Asker

Well, not consciously.

Bashar

Well, now you do, don’t you?

Asker

Sort of. Sort of.

Bashar

All right. What makes it seem that you’re only sort of aware that you’re playing at being dominated? Uh, instead of knowing that you’re playing at being dominated?

Asker

That I was scared when it happened.

Bashar

So what? What’s that got to do with anything? You’re saying that the emotional feeling of being scared somehow means to you that it’s not a choice.

Asker

Yeah, I felt like there was no choice.

Bashar

But you see, again, that goes hand in hand. Every belief system will bring with it as a complete kit the emotions and everything else that goes with it to reinforce that belief.

This illustrates what we were saying a moment ago: that you felt there was no other choice is simply not that there really is no other choice. It’s simply one of the side effects of believing that there is no other choice. Because you cannot have a feeling without having a belief first. So if you believe there’s no other choice, of course you’re going to feel there is no other choice. And that’s going to bring with it the idea of fear that there is no other choice to reinforce the belief that you have already decided to buy into: that there is no other choice. So every belief is a self-fulfilling prophecy, self-reinforcing, for the purpose of allowing you to experience that belief system only. But if you have a stronger, or shall we say broader, underlying foundational belief that every belief is only a self-perpetuating system unto itself, and that no matter what you experience in any one belief, you can still remember that it’s only a belief and can change your belief and so change your feeling—then you’ll be able to do that. And that’s what you need to remember. You have to have the underlying belief that supports the idea that no matter what you may be experiencing in any one belief system at any given moment, you can always change it because it is only a belief and not empirically true. Remember, we already said what the four laws were. Right? Being afraid and feeling that it cannot change was not mentioned as one of the laws. Okay? So believe me, those four laws are the only four laws. If you didn’t hear us say being afraid and that makes it so nothing can change, that’s a law too—if you didn’t hear us say that, it’s not a law. It’s just the definition. It’s just a composition and a combination of the way you’re using the four laws, right?

Asker

And I don’t see how I could have gotten so stuck even myself. Intellectually, I understand I can just choose not to be. And yet there you go again.

Bashar

When you say “intellectually I can understand,” you are exhibiting that what you have been taught in your society is that there is somehow a difference or an importance in making a separation between the concept of intellectual understanding and true behavioral understanding, which is actually the only kind of understanding there is. Intellectualizing it is only a concept. It’s not really understanding. Experience is understanding. Behavior, action is understanding. What you really believe, you simply do. You behave what you believe. You act out what you believe. When you say, “I understand it intellectually,” you actually don’t understand it. You just have a concept. Oh yes. You see the difference?

Asker

Yes, I understand.

Bashar

And the very act of saying that is an indicator that you have been taught to make those kinds of segregations in your thought process. And that’s what allows you to create definitions that bring about such experiences and make it seem as if there’s no way to change them, because you’re creating a segregation, a separation from yourself, and thus then making it appear as if the reality is happening to you instead of through you. Oh wow. You understand?

Asker

Yeah. Yes. I hear that. Oh, all right. Yeah. That’s a deep one.

Bashar

Well, all right. If you say so. Okay. Is this helping you?

Asker

Oh, yes it is. Yes, it is. I feel energy moving as well as uh intellectual grasp.

Bashar

Take a deep breath. Make it your own. Let the breath out and let yourself know that you are not the person that was here a moment ago. True. Because every change is a total change unless you choose to believe otherwise. Make sense? Okay. Does this help you?

Asker

Yes, it does. Thank you. Thank you very much.

Bashar

Sweet dream. Thank you. Good day.

Asker

Good day, Bashar. On a personal note, and then—in the past I’ve successfully created challenges in relationships, romantic relationships. Yes. And I’ve done that quite successfully. Thank you. However, that is not where I want to be now.

Bashar

Oh, all right. Where do you want to be now? Who do you want to be now?

Asker

Well, my question is not so much who I want to be. I am who I am. Thank you.

Bashar

Then who are you now?

Asker

I am me. And that means—

Bashar

And that means—

Asker

I am in relation to what you were talking about.

Bashar

What does that mean? Since you’re talking about relationship, in relation to what you were talking about, what does it mean to say “I am who I am”? I am. How does that express itself in the concept of relationship, since that’s what you brought up?

Asker

Well, I’m a loving, caring person. Yes.

Bashar

Is there a butt in there?

Asker

There’s no butt. No buts about it.

Bashar

No buts about it. All right. Then what challenges would such a loving, caring person have created? Are you creating them now?

Asker

No. The challenges still exist. No, that’s where my question is leading. Yeah. All right. The question is leading—is in reading your book and reading that some of us have come from, we’ll say, other areas of the cosmos.

Bashar

Well, sort of. You come from here and now. Okay. But I understand what you mean in terms of making a connection to another dimensional realm for certain purposes. Yes.

Asker

Okay. Is there a way I will know in future relationships or have a sense of knowing whether it’s the proper correction? And what I’m saying is, can there be deception blinding me about—or is it about what they’re putting out—because I can’t, okay, in a sense, buying into belief systems correct that are not necessarily aligned with your own truth. Yes. Correct. And so is there a way I can know if that is just what’s being put out—it’s more—is it mirroring me more because they’re just mirroring what I put out?

Bashar

It is not necessarily always a one-to-one reflection in the same degree. But the idea is that you can always use what you are offered and decide how it sits with you relative to what is really important for you to be you. Some of these things are not really that critical for you to understand in order for you to simply be who you are where you are right now. So the idea really, in a sense—and we trust you will understand perhaps how this is meant—is to not really care so much about those kinds of things. Because if you really can’t immediately discern the so-called truth of such esoteric statements, then it really doesn’t matter that you do. All you have to do is come back to the fundamental: What do I need to know to be me right here, right now? And how does this relate? Does it relate? If I can’t find a way to allow it to relate, if there is confusion in discovering how I could relate to this, then let it go for the moment. If it needs to be understood more clearly by you, your reality will bring it back to you in a way that will make it apparent that it needs to be more clearly understood, and may even bring it back to you in a way that allows you to clearly understand it. But what you don’t immediately find use for, find relevance for in your reality, let it go. Be the transparent window that it passes through like sunlight, and know that what needs to remain will remain. Very good. Make sense?

Asker

Makes sense.

Bashar

Because that’s what’s allowing you then to be here now, regardless of any where or when else the total aspect of you might also be. And that’s really what’s important: is simply being where you’re at. Correct. Does that help you?

Asker

That helps me. One other thing. Yes. This is more of a concern um in the community that I associate with, and that’s what’s going on in the Middle East. Yes. And the turmoil there. Yes. And not just so much in Israel, but also what happened in the pilgrimage in Mecca. Yes.

Bashar

And what about it?

Asker

Well, as the people perished in a tent fire and yet all the turmoil is continuing there. Yes. Can you shed some light on that for us?

Bashar

In what way? In what direction? In what manner?

Asker

In the future.

Bashar

Well, again, we have said already that as we read the energy now—since there really is no such thing as a prediction of the future, but only a sensing of the energy at present, that if it doesn’t change, may culminate in a manifestation—as we sense the energy now, there is still a great deal of momentum for the probability, not absolute, but a high probability of what you would call a nuclear terrorist action in the Middle East within the next few years of your time. If this even then does come to pass, it can still act in a positive way to shock that portion of your world and the collective reality into making necessary changes instead of waiting until such a thing happens again. You understand?

Asker

I understand.

Bashar

Thus, the idea is that every different culture on your planet is playing out its own cycle. And more and more and more, the things that have not been dealt with and not been integrated and not been unconditionally loved will rear their heads more strongly than ever. For it is important for you all to see what it is you have created to appear to be negative about yourselves so that you can really finally decide what you really want yourselves and your world to be. So it has to all come out of your system some way or another. It’s not going to come out positively. It will come out negatively because it’s going to come out. Understand?

Asker

Understand. Thank you.

Bashar

Thank you. Good day.

Asker

And to you. Good day. I want to ask you why lately I seem to be going through this sort of up and down cycle very, very fast. Up and down.

Bashar

Can you be more specific about what you are calling an up and down cycle?

Asker

I would say um I feel energetic at one moment and then like I get very depressed or very non-energized within my cycle—maybe of repeating maybe once every two days, sometimes even once every one day.

Bashar

Do you believe that you are defining what would be called a manic depressive state?

Asker

I don’t know.

Bashar

Have you conferred with anyone about this?

Asker

No.

Bashar

Why not? How long has this been occurring for you?

Asker

Like this? Only maybe three weeks. Yes, like this.

Bashar

All right. Are you in any way, shape, or form planning to confer with anyone about this?

Asker

Didn’t really think about it.

Bashar

Why not?

Asker

I don’t know.

Bashar

Think about it now. Okay. Do you believe it might be of advantage to you to confer with someone about this? A healer of some sort? For balancing techniques of some sort?

Asker

Yeah, maybe.

Bashar

Your energy may need some smoothing. It may be that as individuals now go through acceleration, there may be things that they have hidden within the aspects of their consciousness that they have not revealed to themselves completely nor integrated completely yet. And as this energy floods through you, it may cause you to go in very rapid cycles. The idea, however, is not to really understand it as depression but compression. The idea being that you go into the center of yourself to find out what you need to know and then come out to express what you have found, and then go into the center to find out what you need to know and come out to express what you have found. And this cycle can speed up. But the idea is that this to some degree can be aided and assisted through breathing exercises and through aid and assistance of energy balancing and/or body work or a variety of things that you can simply attract into your reality and allow your reality to synchronistically show you what would work best for you in helping you smooth and balance this out. You follow?

Asker

Yes.

Bashar

Do you have any suggestions? Are you drinking enough water?

Asker

I try to.

Bashar

What does that mean? You pick the glass up but somehow just can’t get it to your mouth? No. What does “I try to” mean?

Asker

Okay. I believe I do.

Bashar

Meaning about how much per day? Is it between one and two quarts?

Asker

I think more.

Bashar

More. All right. Well, don’t overdo it. Yeah. You don’t want to flood yourself. So, yeah. Allow yourself to let your reality synchronistically show you who you can attract that excites you the most that you feel comfortable with, who can help you with the idea of some energy balancing and/or body work, and see if that has an effect from there. If there is in that sense then a change, we can perhaps have a conversation from that point forward. But do that first and see what happens.

Asker

Okay. Thank you very much.

Bashar

Thank you. Good day.

Asker

And to you. Hello, Bashar.

Bashar

And to you. Good day.

Asker

Um, first off, I’d like to talk about uh black dogs.

Bashar

You go right ahead.

Asker

Well, actually, I was going to ask you to talk about it.

Bashar

Well, too late. You said you were going to talk first.

Asker

Okay, I’ll do that. Uh, a few years ago, as I was evidently pursuing my joy, I ran over a dog on the freeway, which wasn’t black. It was a tan dog. All right. But for about a year or so after that, it seemed like every time I turned around, I saw a black dog. Yes. Uh, and I’m not even talking about dogs that were with people. I mean dogs that were by themselves, dogs that would be looking at me from across the street. All right.

Bashar

So, in a sense, the shade of the dog that you feel you killed—the shadow side of that experience.

Asker

No, that’s not what I’m saying. I don’t actually feel that I killed it. It was a total accident. If it happened under the same circumstances—

Bashar

I didn’t say you killed it in the sense of blame. But all things are co-created, and obviously you played your part in being at that particular moment and that place and that time for that experience to happen. This is not a blaming or judgment thing. We are simply talking about the idea of the shade of the dog, the echo, the memory, the shade in that sense that is bringing you into contemplation about this and keeping it on your mind, focusing you in this way. Okay. So, what did you feel about the experience at the time when it happened? What were you doing? Where were you going? Uh, and why did you say “when I was evidently following my joy”? What did you mean by that?

Asker

I was being sarcastic.

Bashar

I see.

Asker

So, uh, I felt very terrible over the next several days. I don’t—I like dogs. I like animals. And it was a shock. All right. And uh and I never would have wanted it to happen.

Bashar

Understood. Yet it has. So let’s deal with that. So the idea again is, where were you going? What state were you in when this occurred?

Asker

As a matter of fact, I had left um a reading of a psychic that I got. Yes. That was not especially satisfying to me. And I was going home.

Bashar

I see. And so why did you go? And what were you looking for in that reading that you feel you didn’t get?

Asker

Um, probably not too much different than what I’m looking for when I come to meetings like this. What I didn’t get was—which is—oh, some focus, some information that I can use, things to think about that will benefit me, that I can learn from, to understand things, to be yourself among other things, I suppose.

Bashar

There is nothing else?

Asker

Well, there are things that I want to know about that don’t directly relate to understanding myself.

Bashar

Well, that’s what I say. In other words, things external to me, events—yes, I understand what you’re saying, but there is nothing that you could possibly express an interest in that doesn’t have to do in some way, shape or form with you learning to be who you are. It’s not possible. Therefore, all events, any experience you have, is related to the idea of learning more of who you are, including the death of the dog. If you will look at it that way, the black dog is a reminder, the shade, a reminder that you need to look at it that way, that you need to accept it as a part of your own co-creation with the dog as having to do with an opportunity to learn more about who you are. You have to be able to use it in a positive frame of reference. That is the great gift of the dog. For the dog in general in your society symbolizes service, and thus it has given you a great service of its life to allow you to examine all the things that have happened since then, to give you more insight into who you are and how to use what you’re discovering about yourself. That’s why you are being dogged all the time by them. Accept it in unconditional love as something very profound—very profound. The gift of this animal consciousness to you in a toemic sense, very profound and loving gift to aid and assist you in knowing more about yourself and the issues perhaps relative to service and who it is you are and following your joy. So, can you use it that way? Perhaps can you allow your imagination to begin to wrap itself around the idea that this is part of who you are and not an interruption in it?

Asker

Well, I had come to a beginning or a glimmering of what you’re talking about. Yeah, I felt that in the sense because it’s a very, very vivid image in my mind because the animal walked into my car. There wasn’t any mistake about it. It wasn’t an accident in that sense. He walked directly into my wheels. Yes.

Bashar

Very bold and brave thing to do.

Asker

Certainly was.

Bashar

And very loving, you see. And so use the gift wisely. Don’t dismiss it. Don’t put it out. Don’t think, “Oh, no. This shouldn’t have happened. It happened.” Use it. Use your imagination. Use it. See what it puts you in touch with. Feel it. Find out what you can discover about who you are by using this, and then you will not need to be reminded by the black dogs to use it.

Asker

That hasn’t happened in quite some time, but it was very intense for about a year after that. All right. Um, but I never got it out of my mind.

Bashar

All right. Absolutely. It’s still there. They’re still in there. So, they are helping you in that sense.

Asker

Well, you’ve given me a lot to think about, and thank you.

Bashar

We thank you.

Asker

May I ask you about one or two other things? Yes. Hopefully very quickly. Uh, street lights going out. Yes. Is that anything, or is it just a coincidence or meaningless?

Bashar

Again, nothing is meaningless in that sense. There are no accidents. However, causations physiologically can be simply the idea of electrical surges on their own. But it is the timing that is significant in anything, no matter what the cause. The timing is really indicative that all things are one and that there is a relationship. Whether there is an actual direct physical one or not is not the point. Sometimes yes, individuals will have an amplification of their electromagnetic field that may in fact, as you would say, directly physically impact or magnetically impact the light and have it go out or flicker or surge or what have you. But more often than not, it is simply the idea of the timing. And it involves the idea again, depending upon the specific circumstance, but in general symbolically of looking into the dark, looking into the light, using lights in different ways within you, opening up aspects of yourself that have been hidden in darkness, switching ideas on, switching ideas off. It can mean many different things, but by all means do not ignore the fact that the timing is significant if you happen to notice it.

Asker

They follow. Yes. Um, well, I have noticed that most of the time that this seems to happen is when I’m in some state of irritation. Well then—well, that I noticed that, but after that I don’t really know what to do with it.

Bashar

Think about it for a moment. You are saying that when you are generally in a state of irritation, you notice that as you pass one of these lights, it does what? Goes out. Which means that the state of irritation is indicative and symbolic of you turning your own light out, and that that’s not the state you want to be in if you want your light to shine and shed more light on the circumstances of your life and what they can mean for you. So you are being given and giving yourself a symbolic reflection that that state is counterproductive to illumination. Make sense?

Asker

Yes, it does.

Bashar

Okay, that’s good. All right, you see how simple this can be. Let it be obvious, because sometimes it really is, and it doesn’t need to be made into a great mystery.

Asker

Well, I’m trying to keep it simple, too. All right. Well, um, ask one other thing. Yes. Um, we’ve spoken several times about this what you refer to as companion, or this entity that is or from time to time is around me. And I realized a couple of weeks ago that I kind of made an error. I made an error because when I first mentioned it to you, I described what somebody else said it was. And you didn’t say yay or nay. You just started talking about it. So I want to go back a couple of steps. What exactly is this thing, or who is it?

Bashar

In a sense, it is like a guide. It is assisting you in reflecting things to you from time to time. It is not really that important to pin down this idea, so to speak, as if it were somebody you used to know in a past life or somebody you’re connected to from another civilization. Suffice to say right now that this idea would serve you best to simply understand it is someone who from time to time is there for you to whisper this, to suggest that. Whether you take it or not is not the point, but they’re there to help guide things going on in your life. Make sense?

Asker

Yes. And that’s what you said before. I understand that.

Bashar

Well, what’s missing from this explanation?

Asker

Uh, my interest in—like I said, what it is.

Bashar

Well, as we have also said, remember when you allow your imagination to be your best guide, your guides can speak more easily to you through your imagination. But you are your own best guide. And that’s the first thing any good guide would tell you if they’re doing their job. So, open up the imagination a little bit more. Let your imagination guide you by accepting these things as part of your reality, and let your curiosity and imagination light itself on fire so that you can be your own conduit to higher information and allow these things to be obvious and simple.

Asker

All right. Okay. Thank you.

Bashar

Pleasant dreams to you as well.

Asker

Okay, Bashar. Good day. I’ve got a few questions for personal question. Good day. Okay. Good day. Good day. Thank you. Yes. Good day. Excuse me. That was very rude.

Bashar

Oh, all right. I don’t care.

Asker

But um no, neither do I. Um, anyways, I’ve never heard of you until probably about maybe 45 minutes ago.

Bashar

Oh, all right.

Asker

Um, the four manifestations that you speak of that work in a cycle. Yes. As people live together and are close, such as in a family, say maybe a spouse. Yes. Um, friends, can karmas become intertwined?

Bashar

Well, in a sense, yes. In a sense, can they become as one karma, so to speak? Although there will always be individualization if you’re talking about different individuals.

Asker

Okay. Now, if yes, if the karma becomes combined, can it turn the synchronicity into chaos?

Bashar

Synchronicity is simply a statement that you see a connection between things. Synchronicity can be positive or negative.

Asker

Okay, that’s very understandable. All right. Now I’m feeding off of energy. Now feeding off of others’ energy. Um, it cannot really be done, but I know what you mean. Yes.

Bashar

What’s actually happening is you may simply be taking a cue from someone else’s vibration and allowing your energy frequency to match it. Okay? And thus experiencing what is conducive to that energy state. That is what is meant by feeding off of someone else’s energy.

Asker

And it’s okay for that to be strictly entertainment even, right?

Bashar

Depends on the integrity. Okay. Great. The integrity.

Asker

Okay. All right. That’s pretty much all I had to ask. Thank you. Great. Good day, Michelle.

Bashar

And to you, good day.

Asker

Uh, my name is Stephen.

Bashar

Oh, all right. If you insist.

Asker

All right. I uh I have a couple questions for you. Yes. I was relaxed about a year and a half ago in a meditation. Yes. And someone spoke to me very clearly and said one one. Yes. Can you tell me what that means?

Bashar

What it means? What do you believe it means?

Asker

It has something to do with equilibrium and everything imbalance. But I just—

Bashar

What else do you believe it means?

Asker

I don’t know what else I believe it means. That’s why I’m asking you.

Bashar

Of course you know what else you believe it means.

Asker

Well, it has all to do with uh it has to do with all is one. All right.

Bashar

You see? Mhm. Anything else?

Asker

Yeah. I’m still not satisfied with the answers I have.

Bashar

Not satisfied? I see. Now, may I ask you a question?

Asker

I guess.

Bashar

You guess?

Asker

Yeah. Go ahead. I’m kidding.

Bashar

Oh, all right. Thank you. What else would you like it to mean in the sense of what kind of information do you think would satisfy you?

Asker

Well, at the time I do uh healing for a living. Healing for a living. I balance energy and uh I was studying uh alchemy. Alchemy. Yes. Transmutation, transformation. Sure. Right. Uh, and the—it would seem that the 111 had pertained to um a higher degree of being able to balance energy.

Bashar

I see. And can you be more specific about what you mean by that?

Asker

Well, how does the 111 in your imagination apply to the concept of balancing energy?

Bashar

Possibly this: that there is one source but there are two aspects to that source. There’s a positive negative flow. It almost seems as if the energy—don’t forget the third aspect, which is the neutrality in between. Exactly.

Asker

That’s what I’m speaking of. Yeah. It’s all right. So yes, um my understanding up to this point is that we have the two aspects as the energy moves from the source and then returns to the source, and then there’s neutrality in between, so to speak. Yes. Okay. Um, and that would make sense for the 111. But however, it still instinctively does not satisfy me with the understanding I came to.

Bashar

I see. So you have nothing in your imagination that in any way, shape or form would represent what you believe would be a satisfying concept.

Asker

That’s correct.

Bashar

I see. What do you understand the concept of healing to be? Can you explain it in your terms mechanically as to what you think is happening when healing takes place in someone that you are assisting?

Asker

Uh, basically there is an equilibrium in the energy fields that allows people to access the potential of what they are into who they are.

Bashar

All right. So you are giving off a frequency, and if they choose to match that frequency, then they will be in a frequency representative of their natural balanced state and simply allow themselves to be healthy, since that’s the definition of that state. Is that what you are saying?

Asker

That’s well put. Yes. All right. Thank you.

Bashar

Does this satisfy you when you do this?

Asker

Oh yes.

Bashar

This is representative of your joy that you do this.

Asker

Um, I’m not quite sure of that because I believe it could always be better.

Bashar

Well, does that mean that it cannot be representative of your greatest joy at whatever state it’s at at the moment? Does knowing that it will always expand take away from the joy of the moment?

Asker

Oh, no, not at all.

Bashar

Well, then why did you hesitate to say yes when I asked if this was representative of your joy?

Asker

Well, I just never thought about it as joy.

Bashar

You didn’t?

Asker

No, not really.

Bashar

So, you’re saying that when you do this, you don’t feel happy?

Asker

Yeah, I feel happy. I just never thought about feeling happy. I just did it because I could do it.

Bashar

I didn’t ask you to think about it. I’m just asking you, were you happy or are you happy when you do it?

Asker

Uh, most times—not always.

Bashar

Not always. All right. When are you not? And why are you not?

Asker

Maybe if I’m not in tune myself, I’m really having to struggle to balance other people.

Bashar

Or why do you have to struggle to balance other people since they are supposed to be balancing themselves?

Asker

Yeah, that’s true.

Bashar

So why is there a struggle to balance them?

Asker

It’s basically what um it seems to be basically how sensitive um and what my capabilities are of sending them certain frequencies at the time that gives them availability to balance themselves.

Bashar

How important is it to you that everyone who comes to you is healed?

Asker

I uh that would be my hope for everyone.

Bashar

Your hope. Mhm.

Asker

That would be my hope. My desire for everyone.

Bashar

Your desire. Mhm. Is it not more accurately and unconditionally your desire that everyone who comes to you simply gets what they believe they want?

Asker

Mhm. That’s a good way of putting it. Yes.

Bashar

All right. That doesn’t necessarily mean that they have to express it as healing, does it?

Asker

No.

Bashar

Then the idea of the 111 in a sense is the idea of the polarity of you, the person that comes to you, and the reality that is created as a combination of both—because that is a distinctly different reality than either you or them individually. Understanding the one in the center as a totally new reality full of unlimited potential and possibilities will expand your understanding of your healing arts many, many, many, many, many times. And if you can allow yourself to live in the center one—in a sense know that that center one is the event itself. Pay attention. The event itself that creates the apparency of the you and the them, of the other two ones that bracket it. You will understand that that’s how the one expresses itself in a trinary fashion: is that the center one is the event, and the event is actually what you are. The event that you are creates the apparency of the personality structures taking place in the event or participating in the event. But in fact, the event itself is what you are. Does that make sense?

Asker

Mostly, you’re saying basically as the two come together, there’s this creation and that event is really what you are.

Bashar

Well, in a sense, but I actually said it backwards. What I said was the event is what generates the apparency of two coming together. And when you start to understand that it is already one thing and see the two as the illusion or the side effect of the one event itself, then you’ll be working the energy from the correct direction.

Asker

When I was a small boy, I was walking down the street and as I was walking uh towards this yard, there was someone standing in the yard. Nice. And as I walked up to this person, I realized that I knew them. Nice. Uh, it was a very good feeling. It was almost as an adult feeling as I remember it now as a child. Nice. And um the person talked to me and I have no memory at all of what the person said to me. But the only way I knew how to describe it was that uh as time went by, but no time went by. Um, and the event stayed with me as one that’s very important, but I actually have no conscious memory—conscious memory—of what was said. All right.

Bashar

There will be conscious memory in time, but most of what was said was for the purpose of allowing the information to play itself out in actions rather than be recalled in words in your head. And the idea to some degree is that you were communicating with a being not from your time. And in some senses—and I will not go into this in great detail now, and please do not necessarily attach a fixed meaning to this because it is multi-dimensional—in some senses you were talking to your own future self, and your future self was guiding you to become who you are becoming. You are pulling yourself up by your own bootstraps, as you say.

it can be connected to what we’ve already talked about in terms of understanding that meeting between apparently two people as a single event that gave rise to the creation of what appeared to be two people having a conversation. Mhm. Think of it that way and you will have a little bit more of an innate understanding of the fact that in some senses you were talking with yourself from two different directions simultaneously.