Fate

Fate, Destiny, and Guides

Asker: What do you think of fate?

Bashar: You create your reality. But there are different levels to this concept. So while on the one hand we know that there is the free will and the ability to choose on the part of the physical consciousness, we also understand that what you may call euphemistically the soul or the higher self has chosen in this life to experience certain kinds of themes, certain kinds of agreements to fulfill, certain kinds of dates with destiny to keep because they are representative of the kind of themes and or lessons or experiences the soul deems necessary for its growth, both to the physical incarnated portion of the collective consciousness that you call yourself here on the physical reality as you say.

Some of these agreements may seem like fate or destiny so on and so forth. But you are always as a physical being allowed the free will to determine how you will experience, how you will move through, in what way specifically, in what modality you will create the idea of the experience of that theme. So in a sense fate and free will go hand in hand working together to allow you to experience a particular, shall we say, corridor, but how you walk down that corridor and how much time you spend in any given door is up to your physiological free will.

Asker: Is there some other way you wish to take this conversation?

Asker: I would just like to ask one other thing. Yes. We spoke once before of an entity or a being that you said is in my vicinity. I just for my own amusement I take him sometimes to referring to this being as Ernie ‘cause I don’t know its name. Right. Could you tell me its name or introduce us because I don’t know what it is.

Bashar: Well, not necessarily of a mind that it has what you would call a given name, being that it is in our sense at least from our point of view not corporeal. There are many different kinds of vibrations one could use to attach to it that might be representative of its signature frequency, but it would not exactly be the same as the kind of given name that your species has in what you call birth name and such.

Bashar: One moment. It is our perception that this idea that you call this entity functions in some senses like what you call a guide. You are familiar with this concept?

Yes. Touching lightly here and there now and then, whispering so to speak, suggesting so to speak, urging so to speak to allow you to perhaps gain a little bit more clarity and precision in recognizing those things, those opportunities, those circumstances, those interactions that are representative of your true natural self.

One moment. One moment. One moment. We are being given the suggestion that perhaps what would best serve you for now would be to simply refer to it as companion rather than giving it something more specific than that for now. Is this something that you believe can work for you or is it something that you believe you desire more specificity about?

Asker: I could use all the specificity I can get.

Bashar: Why do you think so? In what way do you believe that this kind of specificity would actually serve you?

Asker: I hadn’t thought beyond just desiring it. Well, think beyond it now. In what way do you believe that this kind of specificity that you are asking for would serve you?

Asker: It might give me more understanding of what my options are in life, what perhaps what efforts I can make all that would be productive.

Bashar: I will tell you it will not do that. Not one iota, not any more than you already have because all you have to do at any given moment is choose the thing out of all the options available to you that contains the highest degree of excitement. That’s all you have to do. What could be more specific than that? Does that make any sense to you? Or are you saying that you’re having difficulty believing that that’s all it takes?

Asker: A little bit of…

Bashar: Bullshit is all it takes. It’s that simple. What you call excitement is the vibration of your natural self. It’s the vibration that if you act on it at any given moment, no matter what the opportunity is that contains it, out of all the options available to you at any given moment, if you act on it to the best of your ability at every moment, whatever contains the highest excitement, that’s what will support you. That’s what will serve you. That’s what will allow you to fulfill the goal, which is the only goal that exists for any of you. And that is to be the best you you can be. That’s the only purpose and mission and goal any of you have in life is to be the best you you can be. That’s it.

Any other thing that you in a society such as yours call a goal is not a goal. It is an expression of the goal of being yourself. So all you have to do to fulfill the only goal you have is at every moment choose the thing that you believe is most representative of your highest most creative frequency of joy, excitement, imagination. That’s all you have to do. And if you just do that, you have fulfilled the goal of your life.

Now how you choose to express that goal is up to you and your free will. Whether it is this kind of project or that kind of career or this kind of sharing or this kind of creative artistic expression does not matter ultimately. It only matters that you decide that that is at that moment what best expresses the goal of being your highest most fully expressed self. And that’s it. It’s that simple. That’s the physics of it. That’s the philosophy of it. That’s the nature of it. That’s it. Big fat period. That’s it. It’s no more complicated than that. Unless, of course, you prefer it to be more complicated than that. But that’s your choice. Now, do you want it to be more complicated than that? It’s up to you. It is neither right or wrong if you want it to be, but that’s your creation.

But really honestly, I guarantee it 100%. Because the guarantee is not coming from me. It’s coming from the laws of the universe. What you put out is what you get back. If what you’re getting back feels somehow lacking, what you’re putting out must be lacking something, too. Therefore, you can only get back to the degree that you are expressing what is your natural self because you are always fundamentally supported by the universe, but only to the degree that you put out what you believe is who you are. You always get a 100% reflection, but that 100% only contains the percentage of your true self that you are willing to believe in.

Does that make some sense so far? So far. So the way to show the universe that you believe in your true self 100% is to at any given moment just take stock of all the opportunities that present themselves to you in your life, all the things that you could act on at any given moment, and choose only the one at any given moment that contains the highest degree of joy and excitement that you have the highest capability of taking action on. Do that first, and in the next moment when you’ve taken that to the limits you possibly can, choose the next most exciting thing that you are capable of taking action on. Even if it appears unconnected to the thing you were excited about a moment ago, it’s the excitement in it that lets you know it’s connected, that it’s your path, not how it looks on the surface.

Does this make some sense to you? Yes. It’s the feeling. It’s the energy that says this is you, not the trapping it comes in, not the wrapping, not the cover. Sometimes the cover will be one to one, a reflection of your joy, but not always because that isn’t always the path of least resistance.

Sometimes you may be very excited about doing this particular kind of business endeavor. And you have taken it as far as you possibly can, acted on everything you possibly can act on to the best of your joy, to the best of your ability, and in the next second there is nothing else you can do. You look at your options and all of a sudden, literally the most exciting thing that pops up out of all the options available to you is to take a walk on the beach.

Now, the way you’re taught is to scratch your head and say, “What’s that got to do with this? That can’t possibly get me anything to do with this. It can’t possibly be an extension of this. So, I will not do that. I must be fooling myself.” However, it might actually be the path of least resistance. For if you do follow your excitement and take that walk on the beach, you might run into exactly the person you needed to run into that you may have been looking for over here that you would not have found over here any more quickly than taking the walk on the beach.

You have to trust that the excitement is telling you, even though it seems that you’re weaving around, the excitement is telling you that if you follow it, that’s the shortest path, the path of least resistance to your natural self. Because your natural self, pay attention, your natural self by definition contains everything it needs already to allow you to work flawlessly and allow your life to unfold flawlessly.

So if you follow the path of your natural self, you will automatically run into all the things you already contain. If that’s the you you’re willing to be, resist it and all those opportunities will be invisible to you until you become aligned with who you are because you cannot experience a reality you are not the vibration of. That’s simple physics.

Bashar: I am not actually speaking your language. I am simply sending thoughts and it is being translated through the channel’s understanding of your language. However, in the process of doing this for 13 of your years, we have picked up on a few concepts and do understand now some of your English language. It was very confusing to us for a long time. Because in many cases, we at one point assumed that the word “yabut” was one word because most of you said it so often. “Yah. Yah. Yah. Yes, but, yes, but, yes, but” because it seems so naturally attached and we finally figured out, wait a minute, it’s not one word. They are saying yes, but then contradicting themselves. They’re saying, I believe, but I don’t. I believe, but I don’t. And this is very confusing to us because in our reality, there’s no such thing as I believe, but I don’t. So now we understand that “yabut” is not really a word but it is a fascinating reflection of the idea that you don’t really yet give yourself permission to see the obvious and that’s all right. So what is the “but” that goes with your “yah”?

Asker: Well, I’ll just try to make this very brief. I don’t want to take unfair amount of time. In the abstract as ideas as words what you’re saying to me makes a lot of sense. I understand it. As my life goes, it seems to me that the opportunities and so forth that come along are either very trivial or they may be exciting in the moment, but they lead nowhere.

Bashar: That is only because of how you define those things. The effect you are getting is only because of the automatic and most likely unconscious meaning you have been taught to put into what it is you’re seeing on the surface. You have been taught to react, to respond, to give a certain meaning to a certain thing based on the way it looks. Thus, your ability to call something trivial or to say it doesn’t go anywhere. Those are only definitions that create the perception that it is impossible for those things to go anywhere.

If you would give yourself, if you would train yourself, if you would take the time and the opportunity to retrain and give yourself a moment of pause before you simply automatically assume you think you know what something represents, you will then have a space of time in which to take the time to decide what meaning you would prefer to give to a circumstance. Because I tell you this, no situation has built-in meaning. All situations are fundamentally neutral, empty, devoid of any meaning whatsoever.

The meaning you supply, and again many times because you have been taught these things from childhood, you supply these meanings so automatically, you don’t even know you’re doing it, but you have to catch yourself doing it because you are doing it. The meaning you supply is what automatically determines the effect you are capable of getting out of it and to what degree you’re capable of seeing how that experience could actually be or not be representative of the reality you prefer.

You are automatic creators. You are made in the image of the infinite. You create so rapidly, so automatically that you can do it instantaneously. And it can seem as if the meaning comes built into the circumstance but it doesn’t. Catch yourself giving it the meaning because you are giving it the meaning.

So when you say first and foremost to use your own words “this is all very well and good in the abstract.” That right there is a definition. You are saying this has no pragmatic and practical definition. It is only an abstract concept. That right there says you have been taught to believe it cannot really fundamentally be incorporated into your actual day-to-day practical physical structure. That’s true. So catch yourself. Catch those definitions. Listen to how you talk. Listen to how you define things. That will tell you volumes about yourself. Watch. Listen, look, learn everything that comes along. Don’t automatically assume it must mean this just because it looks that way.

The true measure and here’s the secret which is no secret. The true measure of knowing that you have changed so that your reality can reflect that change to you. The true measure of knowing you have changed and experiencing the change is to respond differently than you did before. Even if the outer reality looks the same as it used to. When you respond differently to what looks the same as it did to the idea that your outer reality must reflect the change first, you are making the change conditional and that means it can never change.

You have to know you have changed. And if you know you have changed, you have to behave differently. No matter what might look the same as it used to around you. You have to respond differently to it. Then your reality will know you have changed. Otherwise, all you’re doing is something similar to the analogy of looking in a mirror, seeing a frown on the face in your reflection, and insisting that you will not smile until your reflection does first. But you’ll be staring at a frown forever. The mirror will only smile back when you smile first.

Physical reality truly literally is a mirror. That’s all it is. So you have to smile first. That is you have to give positive meaning. You have to know that whatever is happening even though you may not be able to immediately understand it intellectually, you have to know that it must be serving you somehow. And remove your expectation for how you think it’s supposed to go and let it show you how it is serving you by knowing that it must be doing so.

Then simply acting on the highest joy you can in that moment, giving it a positive meaning even if it’s not a specific positive meaning, it will still give you the positive effect if you’re willing to at least go that far.

The example that we have given which I will now give again briefly to illustrate this point is the idea of the runaway train. You are following your excitement to go on a train to get a job that excites you very much and you know that you have to make the train in order to make the appointment in order to get the job. You have done everything in the best of your ability to the best of your power to make the train on time. You get to the station. You walk out on the platform. You look at the track. The train is all the way down the track. It is already left. Bye-bye.

Two options. You can say this is horrible. I am now going to give this a negative meaning. I have missed the train. Something’s wrong. My life is ruined. I won’t get the job. Yada yada yada yada as you say in your language, which is another fascinating word. And you become angry or any other manner of conflictive emotional states and you go stomping off and ruin your day and ruin everyone else’s day as well because misery loves company.

Option two, you have done the best you can. You know, you have not been slacking. You get to the train platform. The train is halfway down the track. You’ve missed the train. But now, option two, I know that I did the best I could. Yet, I still missed the train. There must be a positive reason for this. I don’t know what it is, but there must be. There has to be. Why? Because I said so. Because there’s nothing in the universe that’s going to contradict me. So, I know even though I can’t fathom it right now, there’s a positive reason for this.

And now, because you’re no longer angry and you’re not stomping off the platform to go and complain to someone, you stay there. You ponder and tap tap tap on the shoulder. You turn around and there’s a friend you haven’t seen in 10 years who says, “You know, this is an amazing coincidence. I was looking for you. Couldn’t find you anywhere. I was about to leave town. Here I am. Here you are. I wanted to offer you this job.” And all of a sudden it goes click. The job he is offering is 10 times better than the one you thought you wanted. Now you know why you missed the train. But the only way you would have been there to meet your friend at the right place at the right time was to have been in the proper state so that your friend could meet you. Had you gone into the negative state and defying the situation in a negative way and gone stomping off that never would have happened.

So you get the reality that you are the state of putting it in practical terms. Does that help you?

Asker: I understand what you’re saying. Yeah. Yeah. But it helps. Thank you. Thank you. Remember this before you sit down.

Understanding is incorporation. Understanding is incorporation into behavior. What you believe you do. To say “I understand” is not to understand. It may be some kind of an intellectual comprehension of the concept, but it is not understanding unless you allow yourself to incorporate it into your behavior.

Do you understand how to walk over to the door or do you simply know that you can do it and do it? You’re asking. I am. I know to walk over to the door and do it. All right. If you took the time to say, “Oh, all right. Yes, walk over to the door.” All right. Well, I have an intellectual understanding of what that means. You would never make it over to the door. Right? The idea is that what you actually truly understand is incorporated and ingrained into your actions and your beliefs. They are one and the same. Belief and action are one. So that’s understanding.

Allow yourself to begin to behave as I have described. If you behave as I have described on all levels, thought, word and deed, you will start to get the reality reflection that goes along with that behavior and then you will understand.

Integration of Aspects of Self

Asker: I’ve been thinking about integration lately. Integration. And I realized that I don’t think I completely understand what that is.

Bashar: What a surprise. No offense. What do you understand integration to mean?

Asker: Well, I think of the idea of understanding an aspect of myself, another aspect of myself that may not be in alignment with my true self. Yes. And then I say, okay, so what’s the mechanism that happens once you identify that to integrate it?

Bashar: I have already told you that.

Asker: Well, I’m sure you have. I think that just that coming at it from this angle, I don’t see it clearly.

Bashar: There are very few tools. No matter what angle you come at it from, you don’t have to become confused because you can remember that there are only a few tools that create this mechanism no matter how it appears to you. And those are simply the ideas of definition and motivation. And that’s really it. So even though you may now discover what you consider to be a new aspect of yourself and are attempting to integrate, all you really have to do is go back to the idea of the definitions that go hand in hand with the new thing you have discovered and find out if there are definitions that you would rather have in their place. When you know what definitions you would rather have in their place, the knowledge and the creation of those new definitions will automatically replace the old ones and there will be integration.

Asker: Well, I guess I’m thinking more in terms of like beings within yourself. You know, in what way do you mean this?

Bashar: Well, aspects of yourself that seem to have autonomy. Yes. So, so what? So, that’s a definition, too. Remember that reality is definition. It doesn’t mean it’s any less real, but it’s only definition. So it doesn’t matter whether you have aspects of your consciousness that are in and of themselves autonomous, self-realized, self-perpetuating beings, because as far as you’re concerned, your experience of them is only from the definition of them that you have.

In other words, what you’re saying is that you don’t really believe that reality is only definition.

Asker: No, it’s just that I’m not sure what the next step is.

Bashar: I just told you.

Asker: I know. And I guess it’s just not penetrating for me because…

Bashar: All right. Would you like me to push harder?

Asker: Well, it seems like if there’s an autonomous…

Bashar: Yeah. What’s your conflict? What’s your bottom line conflict as you say?

Asker: Oh, it would probably be like around fear. Like…

Bashar: But of what? Of what? What I am saying is, is your bottom line conflict something of the following idea that because you recognize that an aspect of yourself may actually have some kind of autonomy that to change the definition would be somehow to kill that being off. Is that your fear?

Asker: Maybe. Or I don’t even know if I have a fear about it. It’s just that I looked at it and went, well, if I change the definition of this being, is that what you’re saying?

Bashar: Change the definition of the being. So that it no longer… change the definition of your relationship to what you are calling this autonomous being. Obviously you have a definition of the relationship that you have to this autonomous concept of yourself or within yourself. There’s an acknowledgement. Well, but what’s the relationship? What does it represent to you? If it is autonomous in that sense, representative of what you would call an archetypal aspect or reflection of the total you, archetypal aspects are symbolic of something. What is this particular being, if there is one you have in mind specifically?

Asker: Well, actually very positive.

Bashar: Well, so then why would you want to change that?

Asker: Well, but I just the idea of integrating it is…

Bashar: Integrated. Ah, we see your misunderstanding. You are assuming that integration somehow is homogenization. No, integration is the strengthening of a good communicative relationship between what you are creating to appear as autonomous components. It doesn’t mean you absorb them and they disappear and they become homogeneous and they don’t exist anymore. Integration is a communicative relationship, a network. You understand?

As long as you express your consciousness as a physiological being, you are going to express yourself in what might seem to be some form of segregational manner. Not all segregation and separation and limitation is negative. You know, you cannot experience physical reality without some concept of compartmentalizing yourself. So the idea of integration is not always… sometimes yes, but not always representative of negating the compartment, but it might be representative of forming a positive relationship with that compartmentalized aspect of your total self.

Asker: Well that’s what I’ve been doing.

Bashar: So then that’s integration.

Asker: Oh well that’s…

Bashar: As long as you have clear line of communication and it serves you in a reflective positive way that you believe you are gaining benefit from, then your relationship with it is integrated. It doesn’t mean it will vanish or be absorbed within you in a way that will allow you to no longer experience it as an autonomous aspect. That’s not necessarily what integration means.

Asker: Okay. So then with the same thing with a negative aspect that may be experiencing fear of something. The idea is to explore whatever the fear and then to form a relationship with it that has a positive nature and then allow that relationship to transform the fear for the other aspects.

Bashar: Yes. And that’s integration.

Asker: Yes. Oh, that’s cool.

Bashar: It is whatever temperature you want it to be. Does that help you?

Asker: Yeah, that’s great. Thank you. Another question was regarding following your excitement. I was having a conversation with a colleague and she had to choose between two jobs, one in New York that it intensely excited her in the sense of escape or change or something new and exciting. But then she had relationships with the people that she’s working with and she had another job offer locally that will allow her to maintain those and continue working with her clients. All right. So she chose that one. She was talking to me about it and she was like, I don’t know if I did the right thing because…

Bashar: Of course she did. If she decided that what she chose was her highest excitement to the best that she could figure it out, then that for her is the right thing. If she changes her mind, then it will be the right thing for her to change her choice accordingly because she felt like she was grieving about not choosing the one that was like the explosively exciting one and instead picking the quiet excitement. It does not matter that excitement is quiet. It only matters that you deem it is truly most representative of your true natural self. Excitement doesn’t have to mean that you’re jumping up and down.

So by choosing a more grounded excitement, that can be representative of what might be the more aligning choice, but she will have to make those determinations based on the idea of what she truly within her own self-communicative honesty decides is reflective of her truth and is not a choice being made out of the idea of fear or fear of lack or feeling that she won’t get what she needs in something else that might truly be representative of her joy. Okay. You understand?

Asker: Yeah. It was amazing because I was like stumped. I was like, I don’t know.

Bashar: All it takes is a little assessment and discernment of understanding. All right. Here’s this thing that has all of this wonderful explosive excitement. Now, is it my fear that’s making me not choose that because I am afraid I can’t get other things that I also want in it? If that’s the case, then simply the person is forgetting that whatever is the highest excitement is the organizing principle and the driving engine that brings everything else you need into proximity.

So if she was worried that that wouldn’t give her something else that was representative of her joy, then she may have decided against her truth if it was made in fear and definitions of lack and lack of faith that her highest joy would bring her what she needs. So she has to determine what kind of a definition she gave to those circumstances. Because sometimes, yes, you can talk yourself out of your highest excitement and think that something else is, but that might simply be the idea of being afraid and allowing yourself to think that you’re being excited by the choice you make. You have to really be honest about why you’re choosing what you’re choosing and find out if you are the one that’s devaluing the excitement based on your definition of the circumstance. It’s like fine-tuning.

Asker: I’ve been seeing this chiropractor for about a month and he also practices something called NE. Nice. And today when I saw him, he said I mentioned where I was going tonight and he said, “Oh,” he suggested that I ask you how effective the treatments have been.

Bashar: There is a lot of relativity to that question for it takes into account many different kinds of things when you say “how effective is a treatment.” However, in terms of the, shall we say, general outlook that represents the combined outlook of that individual and you, I would say at this point somewhere between what you would call 75 and 87%.

But again, that can change in the next moment based on your own self-evaluation of whether or not something else would be more exciting or more aligning or whether you can allow yourself to adjust the technique or add something to it that would be more representative and put you in touch of whatever it is that you have attracted yourself to the technique to be put in touch with.

Previous Lives, Karma, and Responsibility

Asker: Is there a difference between emotional excitement and intellectual excitement.

Bashar: Some of these concepts do not always find their way into your language in the most holistic way possible. And so there can be some semantic confusion.

At any time that anyone feels any kind of clarity or precision is wanting, we will be happy to attempt to clarify the idea of what the actual principle is we are talking about.

Asker: The theme of duality seems to play a very large part in my life.

Bashar: Well, of course you are in physical reality which is by nature in a sense dual.

Asker: Are you familiar with the concept of previous existences and karma.

Bashar: Yes. However, we see that a little bit differently than the way some people on your planet define it. For example, if I may, the idea is that to us it’s not really previous existences. All lives are simultaneously coexistent because there is only now. They simply exist on different frequency levels that makes it appear from your perspective in third-dimensional reality to be a before and an after. And karma to us is simply completely self-imposed concepts of balance. Not anything that has to do with the idea of retribution or punishment as some people on your planet… not necessarily implying you see that term to mean.

Asker: I had a very non-metaphysical life until about 3 years ago.

Bashar: It’s simply a prelude.

I mean, an individual on your planet doesn’t necessarily have to live their life in what someone would call a metaphysical manner in order to simply be being true to themselves.

Asker: At that time 3 years ago, I find myself inadvertently without knowing a thing about subject channeling a tremendous amount of energy. And since that time, I’ve had a very what I consider a very fascinating life and I’ve had a crash course in metaphysics. I find amongst other things I find that I had apparently two previous or two other existences which both of which could be considered to be incomplete.

Neither of the people involved perceive their lives as being successful in those incarnations. And so the nature of these two people who seem to influence my life at this time, this karma concept, this relationship right, is that the perception of failure or incompletion. Secondly they were both opposite each other in terms in most ways in terms of interests and goals and so on.

So at this point I find myself with these people’s two previous frustrations at incompletion within me. One of these people was…

Bashar: Are you saying that these are individuals who are presently incarnate along with you on your planet?

Asker: No, they’re not presently existing as far as I know.

Bashar: These are individuals that you experienced in other lives that were your quote unquote self or individuals that you knew in those other lives.

Asker: These were people that were my previous selves apparently.

Bashar: I see. And you are referring to that as two other people.

Asker: Yes.

Bashar: Or else there are metaphor.

Asker: No, they are in that sense two other people and that is an accurate assessment.

Bashar: Now we understand and there is clarity. Do continue.

Asker: Okay. This sets up a conflict. One of them was an entertainer and the other one was what they call a black magician. All right. Okay.

Bashar: How is this a conflict?

Asker: Well, are there not entertaining black magicians? You understand that I am to some degree playing with you? Yes. Quite all right. Thank you. Do proceed.

Asker: So, it is right an attempt to lighten the energy up a little bit. I find myself with just in testing the water, so to speak, my abilities in each area. I see that I have a profound ability to complete either one of these person’s karma, so to speak.

Bashar: Why not both?

Asker: Well, I don’t know how to do that.

Bashar: Oh, all right. Well, let’s do that if you want, shall we? All right. Is that what you want?

Asker: Well, if this can be reconciled, sir.

Bashar: Well, yes, it can. So, knowing that it can, is that what you want?

Asker: Yes, if it can.

Bashar: This may seem absurdly simple. All you have to do is understand that the awareness that karma is self-imposed, that awareness erases all karma.

So karma is self-imposed completely, completely, completely.

You are now creating this life relative to these other two and bringing up the issue that something needs to be reconciled or resolved or balanced.

The recognition, your willingness to do so. Your recognition that this is possible in and of itself reconciles and resolves all the karma because that’s all karma is is the ability to recognize that it’s self-imposed and that you create your reality and that there is no karma outside of the one you impose on yourself.

So having arrived at this point where you now know at least I assume you now know you create your reality. Then you take whatever lessons you believe are important from those and any other lives you are also experiencing and you recognize that that is all coming together to allow you to have the realization right here and right now that you are free to define yourself any moment however you wish. And that’s it. And it is the recognition of that in and of itself that erases karma. And it’s all balanced.

Asker: The interests that both of these people, beings, whatever had… Yeah. I still possess.

Bashar: No, you don’t. If you don’t want to.

Asker: I don’t want to.

Bashar: I’m going to ask you a question then and here it is. Why do you have a need to take responsibility for them? Why not allow them to be autonomous and simply be responsible to them instead of for them by being who you prefer to be? So that by being who you prefer to be, you function as a reflective example to them for the kinds of choices they can also choose to make. But for which you are not responsible, being a different person.

Asker: Are you claiming that by that I can influence what they did?

Bashar: Not directly influence but you can allow them a broader opportunity in their reality streams to make choices that are more in alignment with the choices you are making here and now by not being responsible for the choices that they make. Paradoxical as that sounds, it is similar to the concept of choice. I understand. You don’t want to be responsible for living their lives and making their choices. You do want to guide. You do want to show them what kind of choices are available to make. So you have to be an example yourself. So that by being an example, you give them the best opportunity to make choices in their own lives that would benefit them as well. But you cannot take responsibility for the choices that they have made. Otherwise, you’re only reinforcing the idea of the limitations that they have already chosen and then not giving them an opportunity to decide otherwise.

Asker: Yet to this point, responsibility has been one of my main perceived. All right.

Bashar: However, easily also is that transformed by a simple magical twist of definition. Yes. Response ability. The ability to respond. That’s it. You have the ability in any situation to respond as you see fit. That’s responsibility. So if you redefine the idea, perhaps it will not carry such a heavy burden with it because the only burden that responsibility would have in terms of burden and blame and all these ideas only comes with the definition you have been taught to give it.

What you’re doing in connecting to those lives is you are reinforcing and in a sense allowing them to help you reinforce a definition of responsibility that doesn’t work for who you are now.

You decide what responsibility means to you. For example, as we just said, it can simply be the ability to respond, which is a very freeing concept.

And if that’s the definition of responsibility that you prefer to have right here and now, then that is your right and your free will to say so. And you then break any chains or ties you yourself from here are creating to those lives that reinforce a definition of responsibility that doesn’t serve you.

In other words, do not try to fix what they did. No, because they are who they are.

But again, the paradox and the power in the paradox is that if they’re going to have any opportunity to make different choices at all, it’s only going to come from you actually not trying to fix what you think needs fixing, but simply acting as a shining example and radiating that energy through the time stream to them to let them know there are other choices that could be made, but you can’t insist that they make them.

Otherwise, your love is conditional and that limits your ability to be who you need to be and that limits your ability to actually help them because you’re not being yourself.

Asker: That makes sense. One point… I myself am in the position of changing my life of course always going into a new create a new profession. Oh, all right. Living in a new place and so on. It happened that these memories surfaced at the same time that everything else in my life happened to break down all the other structures.

Bashar: Yes, that is natural. Yes.

Asker: So, are you saying that I should… that I not should… can dispense with these other two personalities altogether.

Bashar: Yes. Doesn’t mean you have to lose touch but you can dispense with the kind of connection you have made and allow a new relationship to exist. Yes. And in a certain sense could this not be seen like a genetic inheritance on an energetic level whereby I have these person’s talents for a better term that I could now use to my advantage in some senses.

Bashar: Yes. But on that level, they are only template ideas. And you have the free will to express that so-called etheric genetic lineage in any way, shape, or form you want. You are not in any shape or form limited to expressing it in the way that they in their own time streams are expressing them.

Gray Experiences and Hybrid Children

Asker: 2 years ago, I changed my relationships with the Grays. I had had a lot of abduction experience. Nice. And I decided once I let go of the fear that I had of them and recreated my relationship, my co-agreement with them. The relationship changed. Of course, that’s what we said quite a bit. Nice. And I still had visitations with children and that kind of thing. Nice.

A few weeks ago I had… I was surprised when I woke up. Well, I didn’t wake up. I started to have an abduction experience and I panicked at first. All right. And then I realized through the panic that I was in control and that I could… that I had ended that type of relationship. And so, when I woke up, I was trying to figure out what brought this on. After like 2 years of not having any abduction experiences and having a very good peaceful relationship with them, all of a sudden having this…

Bashar: You always arrive at new levels of understanding. With the fact that that particular frequency can also allow you to go to a higher level and you can use it that way still. You will always come to new understandings and discover new things within yourself that require integration. So it simply may be a technique that worked for you. Also at the same time of course that doesn’t necessarily mean that new individuals will not come in and make an attempt to do something that they don’t necessarily know they can or cannot achieve.

Asker: Okay. Was this… do you sense this was a new in some senses?

Bashar: It was a new offshoot.

Asker: And could it have been because of the challenges that and changes I’ve been making in my life?

Bashar: In some senses, yes. You may be wavering and fluctuating a bit in your frequencies and may have gone through the bandwidth that have made you, shall we say, visible to them and made them think that they were someone in that sense or that you were someone that they could interact with in that way temporarily. You understand? Yes. You may have wavered in your frequency enough to signal them. But then if you change your frequency, you moved out of the bandwidth and then it was obviously no longer possible for that particular kind of interaction to take place. Okay.

Asker: I’ve noticed over the last month that it seems to be a lot of energy at night when I go to sleep. Can you give me some idea of why this is happening all of a sudden?

Bashar: Well, again, this is natural. The idea is that what you call your typical sleep time is actually when many of you are opening your psychic doorways to other dimensions of reality. Now, sometimes you allow this to be experienced as what you call dream reality. But quite readily in many cases your natural biological rhythm would actually be best served by actually being awake in the wee hours of the morning because that’s a time you are highly energetic and highly psychically active and can do many, many, many wonderful things and allow yourself thus then to sleep during the daytime. Of course we understand you have created a societal structure which sometimes frowns upon this. Nevertheless, it might actually be more representative of your natural bio-rhythmic cycle to open those gates of creativity and extradimensional contact in what you call the late hours of the night.

So, however it is you wish to take advantage of this natural phenomenology and bio-rhythmic technology, so to speak, is up to you in your creative imagination and whatever schedule you wish to keep. Okay.

Asker: Is there an entity or maybe a guide that just recently has been having a lot of influence? I’ve been told I have… other people tell me that they sense something around me and sometimes I feel like I’m being watched and it’s just seems to be one particular…

Bashar: It would seem at least as we can scan if we are picking up on the idea you are talking about to be something that could be equivalent to a child.

One moment, one moment, one moment, one moment. There might be several things happening. One of which might be that a stronger connection or a stronger relationship might be being built between you and one of the hybrid children that you have. Okay, you may be feeling this very concretely as for the individuals that do have hybrid children, the time is coming closer when the hybrid children will actually be coexisting with you on the earth. You understand? Yes. So many of you will begin to strengthen and formalize the relationships that you have with those hybrid children. That may be some of what you’re feeling, but at the same time, there may also be new guides coming into play to assist you within this formalization and gain some familiarity for you within this and help you in that idea. Okay. Of forming a new understanding of family.

The Grays, Rogue Factions, and Blood Types

Asker: Last time we talked here in Vegas, I asked you about the grays that were cut off from their society, guys. And you said that one of their situations that they run into is that they as punishment, so to speak, they get cut off telepathically from the rest of the group.

Bashar: In some senses, this has occurred from time to time where rogue individuality has appeared. Yes.

Asker: What type of actions would determine that action to be taken by the collective?

Bashar: That which at any given moment may appear contradictory to the collective agenda.

Asker: And what determines when they’re allowed back in?

Bashar: It will depend upon the individual circumstance mostly obviously as to whether or not they come back in line with the collective agenda and if not perhaps then in a sense not allowed back in. But each individual case may have some specific attributes that will determine whether or not this is advantageous. For in some senses sometimes the collective may feel that the individual or what might be called the rogue consciousness has to some degree been contaminated with vibrations that do not serve the collective agenda. And in that level, it may never be allowed back in.

Asker: So they could just scan the individual’s vibration and when they see that frequency not there anymore that they’ll allow them back in.

Bashar: Remember, it is not even a matter of scanning. It is a collective consciousness. They simply know in the same way that you automatically know when your little finger is hurting. They simply know when some part of their collective hive mentality is not functioning in alignment with the whole.

Asker: And is there a faction of the grays similar to let us say us here who are not following the collective momentum?

Bashar: Yes, those are the rogue individuals but in a in a positive sense sometimes, mostly in a confused sense since many of them do not bring with them the wherewithal to evolve completely into a completely balanced individualized consciousness state. Some of them simply die out. Some of them in one sense of the word go mad. Some of them will attain the idea of the balance but may be very very still alien to anything that you would recognize as an individual who is unto itself emotionally balanced.

Asker: Okay. And I had a couple questions on the three absolutes and the four… the four. Yes. Because the fourth one change is the only constant in a sense is an absolute but I understand what you mean in that the first three don’t change. Right. And the area that I wanted to focus on was the transition from the first to the second guys which seems to be an extrapolative jump where you see that you are the one guys, the self guys separate from everyone else and you can be sure of that idea guys, but yet you can’t be sure of the external things to you and how do we make that jump that all those things are us? Can you explain that a little clearer?

Bashar: There are many ways to express this concept. However, first of all, there is the first absolute which is simply that you exist. That existence is an undifferentiated idea unaware of itself. No self-reflectivity exists within that first concept. However, in the second absolute, the one is all and the all is one, that is the result of the isness becoming self-aware in a sense reflecting itself to itself.

The jump occurs because isness in and of itself being a complete state still is not, shall we say in our language, completely complete because it does not contain the concept within the totality of the separation.

Right? So the separation must occur, must also exist in order for existence to be a total existence.

But when the separation occurs, that automatically creates the split off of reflectivity so that the isness can see itself as isness. And as soon as it sees itself as isness, it understands that separation can occur.

And thus when it understands, because to isness, to the infinite, there’s no difference between understanding and creating. The second it understands that isness can occur and see itself, it then becomes all that it can be, all of what you call the individualized aspects of the one reflecting itself back to itself in all the ways it possibly can.

Is this translating into your language in any way that makes sense to you?

Asker: I understand what you’re saying. Oh, that again.

Bashar: But yeah, in this fractionated world, it just seems difficult sometimes to see how we are everything, especially those things we don’t prefer.

Bashar: Oh, well, do you remember the idea that we gave you called the prime radiant? Yes. How even physiologically everything is actually constructed out of one thing. Just euphemistically to use this term, one single subatomic particle is zipping around at infinite speed so quickly that it’s creating the apparency of multitudes of atoms making up multitudes of things, but in fact it’s all the same one particle standing next to itself because it can move at infinite speed. I remember that. Well, that is a physical interpretation of everything being one thing. So even the things you don’t prefer in a sense are simply, shall we say, perspectives of yourself that from this particular point of view do not align with what you’re defining yourself to be here and now. However, from another point of view of yourself, what you don’t prefer here may be exactly what you prefer there. So it’s just a matter of geometry. It’s an angle of angles coming in and around and through you from all sorts of different points and perspectives looking at yourself here, there, everywhere simultaneously, and each point in that geometry deciding what perspective aligns and reinforces its existence and its autonomy. Does that make some sense?

Asker: Yes. Does that help clarify the idea to any degree?

Asker: Yes, it does. Does that help you then?

Asker: And the other situation I want to talk to you about was with the third absolute. Yes. What you put out is what you get back. And in the sense that when you often say how everything is simple physics, guys, and that it’s all mechanical.

Bashar: Well, in some senses of course we are usually referring to physiological space-time reality when we are talking about that level of it.

Asker: Right. And when we align our definitions and beliefs, we get the results that follow. Yes. But simultaneously with that, yes, you often say to expect the unexpected. Yes. And to make a friend of the unknown. Yes. Now, how does one get motivation to act when one aligns and clarifies their beliefs and they see all the situations occurring according to the definitions and beliefs and you’re without any kind of expectation because you understand that what it is that does occur is the best possible reflection at that moment to illuminate more and more and more of the self that up to that moment you were unaware of.

Bashar: And that’s what you become excited about is knowing that what’s going on, being that it wasn’t necessarily a direct reflection of what you expected must occur, but is a reflection of the combination of all your definitions, is the reflection that will lead you if you use it this way to understanding more of yourself. And that is an exciting prospect. So there’s the ultimate trust in a sense. Oh, absolutely. Okay. Does that make sense?

Asker: Right. And another area that I wanted to talk to you about was approximately 50,000 years ago, they trace back the old type blood. Nice. And it’s mostly in our indigenous tribes and people, they all carry the old O type blood. And then approximately 10,000 years ago, the A type blood came along. Nice. And 3,500 years ago the B type blood and a thousand years ago the AB type. This is what’s been given to us. Nice. And will there be a C type for the new children that are coming forth in some senses?

Bashar: Yes. Though you may not exactly call it that. But yes, since many of the ideas of the hybridization going on is not only going on in them but also going on in adjustments within your own physiological energy. And because many of the children being born on your planet today are actually in a sense a new species, not just a new generation, there will eventually also be a new type of blood that will be of a vibratory level and a different composition to handle the different vibrational change of your shift evolutionarily into fourth density reality.

Asker: Yes. And are the hybrids now exhibiting that type of blood or do they have a…

Bashar: Do you mean the pure hybrids on the spacecraft? Yes. Many of them. Yes. Not all of them, but many of them. Yes.

Asker: And how about in your realm as an Essassani? How does blood translate in the etheric dimension?

Bashar: Well, again, remember that we do have a physiological history and that we are simply now only evolving into a more non-physical etheric race. In that sense, of course, there is less physicality to us and of course that means less blood in the sense that we need to rely on that. However, in our level, in our domain, it will translate more purely as pure unadulterated electromagnetic fluid, the underlying template for all concepts that you might physically perceive as cellular in nature. So, more like an effluvium.

Asker: In some sense, it might be similar to one in your past language you called ectoplasmic form. Okay. And corn, which was according to some of the information that you’ve given was helped hybridized by EPS some time ago. Yes. And it’s been shown that O type blood which is the indigenous people are most are more than likely allergic to corn. Yes. What’s the reason behind that?

Bashar: Well, it is a number of different reasons that have a lot to do not only with the idea of genetic transformation, but also energy and vibrational transformation that have taken place on your planet over time with regard to the different kinds of environmental changes that have occurred based on your own growth and your own technology and a number of different factors both energetically, both emotionally and mentally. And certain kinds of allergic reactions and misalignments have come about simply because of certain limitations that have, shall we say, no pun intended, cropped up within your species.

But originally, it was almost all that was necessary to sustain your life form was those simple original forms that were hybridized and engineered. In some ways, some of you are going back to that. And eventually, as our species did, you will eventually go back to almost exclusively that kind of a thing, as we did in our society when we brought about through our collective mass consciousness the ingestion of only one type of what you would recognize as a kind of being, and beyond that then of course we needed no sustenance at all physiologically except direct energy. Your civilization will in time also go back to the idea that originated where you can be sustained on one very simple form of physical food and eventually also sustain yourself on etheric energy almost exclusively.

Asker: And in the Gulf of Mexico, there’s been reported some aberrant dolphins who have attacked and killed humans. Is this a result of… they’re just fed up with…

Bashar: No, it is the result in many cases of the idea of heavy metal toxic poisoning in their systems and the idea therefore of uncontrolled neurological reactions and imbalances within their brain chemistry.