Atlantis and Lemuria

Atlantis and Lemuria

Asker: Was Atlantis in our density vibration?

Bashar: Yes, so that the ruins could be found on the ocean floor. Why are there little remains? The destruction was quite total. I see, and there has been much passage of time and much erosion. There are a few, and a few have already been found. Where? In what you call the Bahamas.

Asker: how about Lemuria?

Lemuria will be less likely, although what you call the manifestation of Hawaii and Easter Island are the manifestations of Lemuria still remaining, with those big heads at Easter Island. They were made to the scale of the Atlantean heads.

Asker: I notice I’ve seen several different people channel. When Darryl is… when you’re coming through Darryl, there are great physical movements, whereas with the other people I’ve seen channel, the passage, the arrival of the entity is occasioned by almost no physical motion. Correct. Why? Thank you. Do you have an idea why with you and Darryl there’s much more physical motion?

Bashar: Of course. it has to do with the definition of the relationship between us.

First of all, also recognize the idea that in your terms the channel is physiological, and in my terms I am also still physiological. Thus there is much to be identified with in terms of let us say feeling each other out in that sense, and there’s a great deal of physiological interaction in allowing the energy to be felt in that way and expressed in that way for the physical channel, because in a sense it is like well, trying on a new suit.

Asker: Do you intend that your communication with us be merely the words going back and forth, or are you also intending to affect us at a vibratory level?

Bashar: Oh, we are speaking to you on many levels at once, and part of the motions that you are perceiving within the physical channel’s body in this way are reflections of some of the energy that is not being vocalized.

Asker: You spoke about the idea that when we experience an obstacle in life, it only continues to be an obstacle if we don’t recognize that it’s a signpost simply to go right or left, or up or down. My question to you is: what if it has been our intention to create for ourselves the experience of beating our heads against a wall?

Bashar: Then obviously that is what you do until you get tired of doing it.

Asker: Just a few minutes ago you said life is easy if you let it be easy, but it is very easy to create the reality in which you beat yourself against the wall.

Bashar: I did not say it would necessarily be enjoyable. I said it was easy. Easy to create that.

Asker: I’m looking at it as if part of why we have created the physical universe is to have the opportunity to experience the kind of pressure that we create for ourselves. And so you can if you desire to… Simply, we are perceiving in your reality that you have experienced this so many times, you are about to change your mind.

Asker: I see. And do not forget, you do have the creation in your society of what you call masochists.

Asker: You, I’m having a ball.

Bashar: Yeah, creating a ball. I want to… a lot of wounds. You know, create a lot of wounds. I’m starting a magazine that I’m going to publish next month called Interplanetary News, and I would like to invite you and any other ETs or terrestrials to present articles or viewpoints, so you’ve got a local Earth publication to transfer some of your…

Asker: All right, you on one condition.

Bashar: Oh, okay. Well, if you want to make one, go ahead.

Asker: Thank you. I will. All that we in this way will co-create with you to be a sharing within your endeavor will be, in your terms, 100% verbatim.

Asker: About a week ago I woke up about 2 in the morning and realized that there were a lot of environments that were moving very fast. Beginning at that moment, I drifted off into a tunnel.

It was spinning. It was moving so fast that for a second I started to put the brakes on by saying “Don’t harm me,” thinking it was out of my control. Then I surrendered to the tumbling through. Then I went into a state of unconsciousness; I guess I call sleep.

Bashar: In a sense, what you are experiencing is what you may call the beginning of an out-of-body projection. It is also the beginning of what you call the death experience, leaving the body, perceiving the symbology of going down a tunnel. It is a symbol. It is simply a symbol for the idea that you are moving through a dimensional gate, a doorway, a shifting of vibration.

Asker: Yes, I felt there were tremendous shifts in the body, as if I’d almost come out from a surgery except that there was no pain.

Bashar: You make alterations in that state many times.

Dream

Asker: I had a dream a couple nights ago that I’d like to talk about. It had to do with a cabin, and all kinds of people were there. I walked in like I’d been there, and I hadn’t been there in a long time. And there were basins where there was soap, and you just went to the basin and started washing your face and waving at people across the room or sitting with coffee, and then I just kept on going through, and happy. And I ran into somebody who came and brought me my two children. I couldn’t remember giving birth to them, but I knew they were my two kids. They were hugging me and I was hugging them, and it was nice. And he was waiting for me. And I asked somebody, I said, “Could you show me the way? Is this the correct road?” And I just woke up. But it was so clear — the clearest strings I’ve had in a long time.

Bashar: You were in the astral state and creating a physiological representational reality in which to exemplify the visitations you were making. Yes, and that you are beginning to live in both worlds simultaneously.

Shifting back and forth, back and forth, back and forth, blending, blending, blending, and allowing your activities on that side to be equal to the idea of this side and vice versa. That you can accept the idea that you can and do quite often pay many visits on that side as you do on this one.

Asker: That’s beautiful, because for some months now, when I go to sleep, I know I’m going to… big smile, and don’t need to remember. And now not feeling I needed to remember, I’m seeing I’m remembering. Paradox. Interesting. Thank you very much.

Bashar: Thank you for allowing the formation of dream reality, of dream life, to be one thing.

Asker: But yes, I want to ask a question. When I was sitting there by my sister-in-law one night, I looked up and I saw this figure in a purple robe with what looked like white iridescence around, and a tremendous jeweled type of headdress. I presumed or I thought that it was probably a guide or something helping her through this, but the face looked so… didn’t seem to have compassion, just knowingness, just certainty. Oh, I see, that’s what it was. Could you tell me who this was?

Bashar: No. One moment. Two connections: the purple vibration and the nomenclature not literally of “dragon” will assist. They are very sketchy, I know, but that is what we are allowed at this time, and that is what will spark additional understandings within you about that idea. All right. Or perhaps the idea of “Emperor.”

Mhm, that was what I thought, like an emperor.

Asker: Your higher Consciousness? Where are they? Everywhere. They? Who? Forget.

I asked you: forget what? Uh-oh, uh-oh. You wish for sharing? Something? Yes, I do. Would it be possible for you and Darryl to meet face to face in a sense in time? Perhaps days?

There would be a difference in the meaning that at first would be as you would say like unto each of us seeing through not only our own but each other’s eyes as well simultaneously. What about the higher Consciousness? And in my viewpoint these days, if I’m staying as higher Consciousness and I have to pretend or be in a lower state than my higher Consciousness, when is that as one as I am in right now in the moment? But understand simply that even though you know you are creating some degree of separation, you can still function within synchronous harmony with the idea of your higher Consciousness, which creates reality with ease and effortlessness.

When many individuals on your planet relate to the idea of where they are relative to their higher self, they are creating a judgmental comparison as opposed to allowing there to simply be a synchronistic relationship that allows you to not feel the comparison in a negative way. Does that clarify the idea? It clarifies the idea, but it seems like at that point then there is a separation, whether without any comparison, even though it can be a synchronicity. Well, by definition, yes.

Otherwise you would simply disappear from this physical reality if you pulled yourself back together. I got you. And when the purpose of being separated has been served, that is what you will do. I got you.

Asker: I heard you say that on your planet there is marriage, but not as you understand it. First and foremost, every member of our society knows in a sense they are married to every other member.

There is no ceremony.

Is there a commitment?

There is a commitment to be what we are to each other. Any relationship that has co-created is enjoyed for the relationship it is, not what we expect it should be. Why do you think we’re so attached to the idea on this planet? Because in this way you feel it is the only way to guarantee the idea of support. But in this way, recognize that it is the creation of relationships that are only reflections of your own belief in your incompleteness that you attract in that way, and therefore need a guarantee.

If you know you are in this way attracting exactly what you need to attract, you will be exactly as you need to be for the time you need to be. Committed you will be to that relationship for what it is. You follow me? Yes, I do. If and when it should change in various ways, you will always change with it. The definition of the relationship may change physiologically in many different ways, but it is still a relationship. No matter what the new definition, you are in fact — whether you know it or not — always committed, though you can fool yourselves into thinking you are not. You follow me? No? Commitment to oneself, commitment to the idea you are co-creating.

If you choose to view the co-creation through judgment, you may not be aware of the fact that you are obviously committed by being in the relationship to begin with.

Even if you are in this way forming a relationship in which you are exploring the idea of commitment or lack of commitment, you are at that moment committed to exploring that idea within that relationship. You follow me? Yes, I do. Thank you. Then in this way, you will also simply know that for whatever you create the relationship, you will then enjoy it for that creation, not what you think it should be but what it is. That is how we relate to each other in our civilization. And that is why when a situation and a relationship changes, we are committed to the change as well, for we know that change is the only constant and all change serves us and allows us to serve.

Asker: He said supposedly in around seven years you’ll be able to contact us physically. Maybe. If that occurs, would it be physically possible for us to visit your planet?

Bashar: Maybe. No promises.

Asker: Can I go now? Don’t hold your breath. You can always go now in your energy state. And understand, as we have described, the majority of our population is actually composed of beings who do so — like out-of-body projections of mentality — and the creation instantaneously of a representational body upon our planet in which they can experience existence upon our planet for any length of time, and then when they are through with it, poof.

Asker: Are we doing that now?

Bashar: Yes.

Asker: Is the physiological makeup the same as we are now on your planet?

Bashar: No, it is our physiological makeup. You are in our type of body, there. By definition, is that the conscious eye of myself here? Are you imagining in this way that you exist in our civilization right now? Sort of. Sort of? Then you are sort of there. Understand, our civilizational energy is offered to everyone and is malleable. The second you form the identification, you have a representational form on our planet, in our dimension, and it can interact and does interact with all the other members. But I want to know that here. That is why we have told you many times that does not serve your purpose. Obviously, by definition you can allow it to, but right now obviously if you do not have the awareness, you are not allowing it to. In this way, recognize also that this is one of the reasons why we say that when we talk to you, we talk to all different kinds of portions of you. We are many times while we are talking to the “you here” talking to the “you there,” and you as the “you there” are talking to the “you here.” You have only but to allow yourself to realize it to begin to experience it consciously. You follow me? Yes. So we’re all… if you wish. Do you have any idea where specifically you’re going to land? Just an area? No, and again, again, again, do not expect us to.

Asker: Why not?

Bashar: Because then we can’t. Because the expectation is something that says “We need you to” — we place you above us, and immediately you put us out of reach.

Asker: No, I just think it’d be exciting. It’s like when you have something that’s going to happen on the weekend, it’s exciting. You look forward to it.

Bashar: “Look forward” — as we know, time does not exist. But in this way, simply recognize that the idea is when the excitement is in the present, that is when we can meet you. It’s very exciting right now. I see. Very exciting. Very exciting. Very exciting right now. How exciting? Very exciting. Is it so exciting that you are willing to completely be the beings you know you are?

Asker: Yes.

Bashar: Yeah. All right, then the sooner you begin to act like it, the sooner we will be here.

Asker: Thank you. You are also applauding on our world, and you are applauding yourselves, of course. Hooray for us.

Bashar: Yes, very much so. Hooray for you all, for you are all wonderful creations.

Asker: Oh, we love you too.

Bashar: Oh, thank you.

Asker: As regards applause, does your society use applause as we do, in acknowledgement of performance?

Bashar: No.

Asker: I have another question about your society. Do your people clown around? Do you ever stop clowning around?

Bashar: Let me… never. Well, maybe sometimes, but not really unless we want to, which is always. But no more than that.

Asker: Okay. Do you have physical things that you clown around with, such as eyeglasses with a big nose and a mustache attached?

Bashar: Not in that sense as you mean that definition, no.

Asker: Do you use physical things to clown around with?

Bashar: There may be a physical object at hand that can provide a demonstration of some idea in that way, but not specifically manufactured in that sense for that idea. And there is the opportunity to also understand that when we utilize an object in that manner, there is very much, let us say, truly more of a transformation that takes place than simply what appears to be on the surface a symbolic representation. Now, not that this has happened in this way, for we do not have lamps and lampshades, but allow me to exemplify the act that if we were, let us say, to avail ourselves of one of your lampshades and were to put it upon our head, we could, to all perceptions, become a lamp literally.

Asker: Right. You follow me? Yes, I guess. As you were speaking, I got the idea you could literally light it.

Bashar: Yes, yes.

Asker: Do you have Halloween on your planet?

Bashar: No. You will when we get there. You are already there. Sure. Happy Halloween. Individuals are… Now, one moment: Halloween, All Hallows’ Eve. Your mythical representation based upon the three nights — what you call your October 31st, your November 1st, your November 2nd. Our perception on this is a little bit clouded if you will provide the accurate data. We perceive that it is All Hallows’ Eve, All Souls’ Day, and All Saints’ Day. Recognize: All Hallows’ Eve — the eve before the destruction of Atlantis. All Souls’ Day — the destruction. All Saints’ Day — the day after. That is where that comes from. It has been in this way simply interpreted in your mythology as those three memory dates.

Asker: How many years ago, approximately?

Bashar: In your terms, approximately between 12 and 11,000 years.

Asker: Would shivers have come over my body because of that memory? Yes. Now how does the symbology of that connect with the symbology of dressing up in costumes and giving candy to kids? The idea simply has been interpreted throughout the idea of foreboding, of warning, what you have exemplified to be the unleashing of the negative forces upon your world. You follow me? And the idea that if you do not allow yourselves to go along with the alignment, then you will play a very nasty trick on yourselves. Trick or treat? Trick or treat. Yeah, amazing. So we can all choose treats, yes, instead of tricks. Thank you. So therefore, recognize in fourth density it may simply be “treat or treat.” Right. Yes. Continuing.

Asker: I know that various individuals are given to various intensities of things. Do you personally clown around?

Bashar: Yes.

Asker: Okay, good. I knew that. I knew that you very much like — at least when you’re translating to our society — the word humor. You probably feel in concept humor, but I didn’t know whether it was of a physical nature. But now that I do. On another subject, we’ve been dealing with a lot of tampering in our society: tampering, yes, glass in baby food, glass in ice cream, in drugs and stuff like that. And I’m wondering… it is connected to that whole idea we discussed relative to what you call that shuttle so-called disaster, of the idea of hidden things being able to hurt you.

Asker: Okay, all right, good. Another question: things hidden within yourself in this way that you fear if they come to the surface will cause harm. As the fact in itself that the idea that you can hide things from yourself means that they must be harmful. That idea continues.

Asker: As a youth, I was particularly attracted to the sound of the name Shadrach, and you’ve mentioned this before, right? Yes. And those other… Meshach and Abednego also? Similar thing. You may talk to Steve.

Bashar: Will Steve know it relative to me? He will know it relative enough for now. Enough, okay.

Asker: Steve, thank you.

Asker: A while ago I asked you a question. I said, “To what degree am I talking to myself when I talk to you?” You said 100%. Do you have any judgment? No. Couldn’t have any judgment? I could if I wanted. You consider that the accuracy of the statements that you are making… we do not deal in accuracy, we deal in validity. Validity, not the same thing. All right, understood. You feel that the validity of your statements are more valid than mine? For me or for you? As example, if you know I were to make a statement regarding Atlantis and you make a statement regarding Atlantis, is there a consideration that yours is more valid or has more validity than mine? No. Okay. My truth is your truth, and your reality… get the difference between accuracy and validity? In this sense, accuracy is a judgment that there must be one truth and measure everything against it. And there is no one truth. There’s a mass of experience, yes, and there are many truths within it. The truth is composed of all truths. Does that clarify the idea to some degree? It goes along with the understanding that when we say you are your completely total, whole universe unto yourself, we mean it literally. You can have experienced what you deem to have experienced within your own experience of the idea of Atlantis, and for you in your reality that was your experience, until you decide to change it. Understand, again, you are creating your past and your future from your present. And when you change the idea of yourself in the moment, everything changes — your entire universe, all of its past, all of its future, you follow me? Instantaneously. In other words, recognize there are parallel realities in which the idea of Atlantis did not destroy itself. So you could just as likely say, “Well, my perception is that Atlantis didn’t destroy itself,” and I would just as easily say you are right. In my perception, in your reality, in your reality it did destroy itself. In the reality that we share with the idea of co-creating the reality you have decided to share with us, it did. I understand. However, in this way, recognize that both are real. There is an Atlantis that did not destroy itself, and there is an Atlantis that did. And both are real. It is not “this or that,” it is “this and that.” The truth is composed of all truths. This and that. And the one that is yours is the one you experience, plain and simple.

Bashar: In truth, we’re not going to be traveling to your planet; we’re going to evolve to the ability to create and experience it, aren’t we?

Asker: It is not impossible to travel to our planet. That is also a truth. But aren’t you presenting — or are we presenting to ourselves — create the reality of which you speak, yes, to shift yourself to the reality that contains that if that is what you need. And the physical… we’re not going to meet physically? Or this concept that we will not meet physically? When you say “we,” recognize that the “you” that is saying that is not the “you” that might meet us. I understand, therefore you cannot really make that statement. Well, I could make a statement. I made it, but I mean… we mean in the sense that it is true for you right now that the you you are now is not meeting us. But if in that sense, so to speak, you meet us, it is not the same you. Of course. Therefore it is not the you you are now that will meet us, even if you do meet us; it’ll be another you. Right. I understand. Thank you. Well, what is the… I don’t like to use the word judgment, but you’re saying when we consider ourselves equal to you, then we will meet physically.

Asker: Nice. Simply consciously, when you become equal to the vibration of the reality that is defined by us meeting physically, that is the reality you will experience. We are projecting our reality to be that reality, that vibration. In a sense, we are already meeting the “you” that you will be when we meet you. That chosen path is to develop more of a spiritual awareness of ourselves and choose what reality you wish to experience to fulfill the idea of what you are outside of validating the physical. And senior to our own subjective viewpoint? Everything is your subjective viewpoint. Yeah, okay. That’s what we’re coming to. Understood. Okay. Thank you. For where is the Atlantis that did not destroy itself? In parallel realities. You understand the concept? I understand the concept, but I can’t do anything with it. All right, then that is doing something with it that you need to do.

Bashar: One moment. Yes. What are you doing with your hands when you’re listening and talking?

Asker: Nothing. In my physical form, I am perfectly still.

Bashar: What are you doing with Darryl’s hands? I am not doing anything with them. The reaction that you may see as you exemplify the idea is simply, let us say, an increase in the pulsation of my mentality, so that the physiological body by definition must translate the extra energy in some way, shape, or form. If it cannot be translated vocally… it’s beautiful. Does that answer your question?

Asker: Yes, it does. Thank you. It’s the language.

Bashar: You sure?

Asker: You had mentioned this was activity month. Yes. I brought my blocks and all.

Bashar: Very good. Did you bring your pen and paper?

Asker: I’ve got them.

Bashar: What would you like me to do? I would suggest you do not have to do anything. Okay. I would suggest that each and every one of you now begin the idea of knowing that you are your government, your political institutions, your social institutions, your religious institutions, your economic institutions. You are these ideas. And that without admonition, without accusation, without demands, but from complete and total unconditional love, you communicate with them every single day. And you let them know that you prefer peace. Talk to them. Send them a letter every single day. For are you not alive every single day? Then communicate every single day. They will get the message. If all of you do that every single day, they will begin to think that that is truly what you want, and they may allow themselves to go along and co-create the idea that they too can let it be all right for them to also prefer peace. Share with whatever your imagination allows you to share. Allow it to come from you, not from us. From you. No accusations. But if you are willing in this way to understand that you know that they know that there are interactions with other civilizations, simply let them know that you know, and that it is all right for them to let you know so that you can share the experience together. They do not have to take responsibility for your fear anymore. You are now beyond panic. You are big children. You can do this as well. But we are speaking of action on every level. And since you obviously have chosen to be physical, the physiological action is where — once you allow yourself to master physiological action — the rest of it will take care of itself. The willingness to do is now what you are going to be willing to exemplify or not. It is up to you. But our suggestion is to begin. We will have many more suggestions, but our suggestion is to begin and continue, if you wish, what you call nothing more than a postcard or a letter every single day. Now if you truly believe in peace, is it not worth the small amount of time it takes to sit down and express in a very brief and loving statement, “I prefer peace. Thank you very much. You’re loving equal”?

Asker: You have suggestion as to which level of government?

Bashar: Every level. You are your own governments. I mean in physical terms, since we are communicating in physical, all of them. Then if you are choosing to see more than one level, write to all of them. Cover them all. Why leave any of them out? A lot. A lot. Do you not understand in this way that individuals who are willing to be peace would not care if they had to write to every single individual on the planet? For them it would be an act of joy and love to share the peace that they have within them with everyone. Why not allow everyone to get a letter? Do they not deserve it? Send them where you will, whatever feels right for you, knowing that however you do it is perfect.

Asker: Thank you. Yes. There are those in this world that… let’s say…

Bashar: I am hearing a belief system coming up. I am hearing an excuse.

Asker: No, there are those who… okay. Who are you speaking for? Who can you speak for? For well, in reality, I like myself. Thank you. End of conversation. Your reality is your reality. If you insist on believing that there are those who… then you are saying that is the reality you experience and will continue to experience, because that is the reality you believe in. Sure. Again, if you are willing to know you are the reality of peace, define that reality for yourself. If in your reality of peace there are no longer “those who,” then don’t continue to act as if there are “those who” anymore. Treat them as if they are those who do not. And then you will be acting as if you are the one who does.

Asker: How many members are in the association?

Several billion, I think. How many in… you mean your world, our world, and Sirius?

Obviously several billion, since you have several billion of your own. There is no accurate count that we can give you, for it is constantly fluctuating.

Galaxy is a collection of many solar systems. Is that what you mean? Yes. I didn’t know your civilization, our civilization, and the civilization of Sirius exist within one galaxy, which is a collection in that way as you count them of what you call over 100 billion stars. And that is one galaxy.

In this way, you will find that there are other galaxies as well. Now we have explored minutely into five including our own galaxies at this time, and in this way there are some representations from each of those ones that we know of in overall association. The majority of the ones that our civilization is familiar with, however, stem mostly from our own galaxy, from several different star systems within this galaxy, what you call the Milky Way.

Asker: How many galaxies are there?

Bashar: Infinite. How many what you would perceive in your density? Approximately, or close to it, between 60 and 70 million. It fluctuates as well, but somewhere within that.

Asker: And how many stars? Over 100 billion. You said once that you had… not myself personally, but the people of the association, so that’s…

Bashar: All of the idea of what you call the 60 to 70 million habitations in a sense do not belong to the association. We are simply listing what we call the inhabited planets that we are aware of, many of which you have not interacted with.

Asker: Correct. Yes. Would you please define the extent of the Akashic record?

Bashar: Extent? All that it would include. Everything. Not just third density? No, no, no, not just physicality. No, all experience.

Asker: Thank you. On your planet, in the physical structure form, do you have running water?

Bashar: You would recognize it’s similar to your own planet.

Asker: Is it similar?

Bashar: Yes, it is similar. The forms would be somewhat different.

Asker: Colors similar?

Bashar: Yes. Although you will find there will be a prevalence of what you call green, and also a greenish cast light, for our star is green.

Asker: Have relationship with animals like we do with pets and that kind of?

Bashar: Not “pets” as you understand. We are free to interact with animals; they are free to interact with us. But you will find in that sense that there are many comings and goings. No one owns a pet. We interact with what animals we come across.

Asker: What would be a handy solution to… well, let’s see. How do I… There is one idea we find we cannot focus on completely, therefore some of this involves your own research. But in this way, we do perceive that there does exist a powdered form of an earth herb that you can rub into the cat’s fur that will allow the fleas to simply go their way without being harmed.

Asker: And would there be… are you saying you want to rub the powder on yourself? I don’t want them in my house at all. Why not? Because they’re ugly. I see. I wonder what they think of you, since we are going to be judgmental? Per… no. Why not strike up a conversation with them equally? Find out what they represent to you in that way. And perhaps if they have served you in that way, your cat will no longer need to carry them to reflect to you certain ideas that you may not have come to terms with yet.

Asker: All right, okay. The part that I have… think in terms of symbiosis rather than parasite.

Bashar: Well, if you wish you can do it that way, but simply the idea that instead of something living at the expense of something, living together, supporting each other, becoming symbiotic.

Asker: Okay, all right. Then perhaps you will have fulfilled the reason for why they are reflecting the idea to you in that way, and perhaps they can simply go on their way.

Bashar: You mean the idea that I can live with them peacefully?

Asker: Yes, with everything. Are you telling me that if you wish peace upon your planet, you are going to find something to exclude from that peace? Is it not unconditional love out of which you are going to create peace, or is it conditional love?

Asker: I had a dream that somebody said “This is South Carolina,” and I’ve never been there this life. One idea that it means is that there are individuals in that area who can assist within the idea of the learning — the more conscious learning — of what you call the out-of-body projections.

If there were to be an earthquake in the next 24 hours, where do you think it would be likely to be?

Bashar: Could be area you call Mammoth. About 5.2. Maybe. Maybe there is a probability. One moment. Between the 4th and the 11th. Act, act, act, act, act, act. Changes, changes, rapid changes, rapid changes. Observe. Act, act. Between the 4th and the 11th, act. Live, live, do not fear. Rapid changes. Act.