Anger
You are releasing in various ways, giving yourself different symbols that will aid you, assist you in releasing when you find yourself in the particular situation of being in communication with those family members or other individuals.
When you come up to the point of making a choice between I’ll say having the conviction to simply I’ll say say who you are say what you are know what you are express yourself freely in this way you will find that you will then have given yourself a symbol on many levels one of simply striking out at yourself in this way and also one of the idea of diverting your course.
The idea of your physical vehicular interaction in this way will have been mostly an idea that you wish to divert your course. You will not in this way fall into what you believe to be the pitfalls of the interactions you are dreading.
In this way, you simply reflected to yourself that it is the I’ll say simply the belief that that course you are on that will lead to discomfort pitfall that has created the symbol for you of being on a course in your driving that led to that clash. You follow me? It is a reflection for you of how you believe the path you are on will lead to discourse with your individuals.
I feel there’s a part that feels really good about going.
When you say well maybe it is deep rooted to a degree, you can look at it that way.But also understand since you were willing to bring it to the surface in a physical interaction to act as a symbol to show you what you believed then it is no longer deep rooted and it is right there very easy for you to deal with now right on the surface right in your consciousness something you can now consciously choose.
Oh but again very good attracting the exact individual who would openly discuss what you have been rejecting within you. Now simply recognize in this way therefore that all of this is becoming surfacely conscious within you.
You are now examining and dealing with all these ideas right out in the open so that you can make a choice to change if you do not prefer it. And in this way, simply recognize that all the individuals that have made you quote unquote made you feel that way in the past, well, recognize simply that it was your way of in a sense giving yourself something to push against to get where you are now.
All those purposes have already been served. Now that you are bringing it to your conscious forefront, you can recognize you do not need that symbol anymore. And in this way, if you simply begin to act like you know you are taking care of yourself, you will allow them to change their perspective in such a way that they do not have to present to you the idea that you need taken care of.
Sirius
Asker: I have questions about your civilization and the triad. Could you tell us your area in the direction of Orion? You and us and the third party is Sirius. Who is on Sirius?
Bashar: There are 3rd 4th 5th and 6th density civilizations. The level of consciousness with whom the majority of you have been most familiar with the Sirius connection comes from 6th density.
They exist in a quasi energy, quasi material state. Through their 3rd 4th 5th and 6th density materializations, they are quite more blended than even our civilization across the entire spectrum of their dimensionality.
So even The physiological civilization of the 4th density is almost non-material although the 3rd dimensional one is material.
They do not live on the star of Sirius. The planet in every dimensionality will also like yours, like ours, as the 3rd planet from the star.
The one that we are most familiar with in terms of the communication is the one that is on a planet with no solid surface. It will be more like an energy sea where beings exist floating around.
The projection mentally they usually explore the universe mentally rather than within the idea of spacecraft. So the projection of their mentality to your civilization in the past was because of their quasi energy state because they exist in an energy sea.
Your civilization perceived them as amphibious which is not literally so.
Although many ideas of God and deityhood were granted to them in amphibious form in the level of understanding that your civilization could make of it.
They do have some some physiological form that is somewhat humanoid. Though it will be very plain, smooth, almost featureless.
They can change their shape. Their planet, the energy searified on the outer edges and will become somewhat energy dense toward the center.
At the very center, there will be a black hole through which they communicate and project their consciousness to all portions of All-That-Is. That is what they use as a mass consciousness and individually to explore the universe.
Asker: What names do they give themselves when they relate to us?
Bashar: They call themselves Sysine.
Asker: Oh, who are the uh Oathans?
Bashar: We do perceive that there is a consciousness that is referred to in that way which does have interaction with your planet. What is your experience? What is your definition?
Asker: Very little. I heard a program Saturday night in which a woman was interviewed, her name is Greta Woody and she has been channeling the Ogatans. The only thing that I got from it was that the channeling information was mostly about physical survival and I thought that’s rather strange if it comes from a highly developed civilization.
Bashar: The interpretation is coming from your dimensionality not from theirs. And in this way we perceive them to be or at least the portion of them communicating with your civilization to be of a higher density.
Many interpretations in your civilization are in this way filtering the information. They are also presenting the symbology in a way that certain individuals with with I’ll say the habit of looking at the idea of survival or not can understand the information first.
It will change all the information upon your planet that is coming through that deals with the terminology that you are used to hearing in terms of your symbology or particular idea of the separation of your powers from yourself will ultimately change when I’ll say you change into integration.
They will speak or you will understand them more from the idea that no one needs saving. Whereas now you are simply interpreting the idea of the shift you will be making as something that will be done for you from outside.
Sassani Factories
We have factories which construct spacecraft by forming an energy pattern then are assembled. But the energy pattern will then allow the material the crystallin metal material out of which they are constructed to grow on the pattern.
Once they have the shape of the pattern, they cannot be changed in shape. Thus, even the thinnest layer of this material will not be able to be dented, torn, bent because it will obey the original template of energy on which it was built, which had a certain shape which is not a material thing and cannot be shifted.
Sassani Jobs
We simply project our consciousness the overall concepts which we wish to communicate with you and in this way we rely on the ability of the physiological channel to act as a translation device and in this way allow the appropriate wordage to be drawn from your own vocabularies. We simply will sense it is in a way simply a direct sensing. Allow me to put it in terms of an analogy. You are in a room by yourself who know somewhere on the other side of the wall there is another individual. You know that the individual has a bottle.
You fill your room water. Their room is also full of water. The bottle floats. You wish to send them a message. You wish to give them the message by having the bottle float one way or another. Therefore, what you do since you cannot talk to them directly is you will attempt to set up currents in the water that will influence the movement of the bottle in a particular direction.
This is a analogy of the methodology involved. We sense the currents of electromagnetic gravitic energy between our mentality and your mentality and we simply play them in much the same way that you may play an instrument and evoke the chords and vibrations that to us seem to be the closest representation that you have in your language for the concepts we are sending. We set up harmonious syncratic vibrations. Now we know from time to time there will be misunderstanding both in the terminology that you have upon your planet that may not exist to express concepts we have and also in I’ll say like manner you will have concepts we are not familiar with and in this way there may be some juggling of the energy from time to time until we focus in on something that will represent a common vibration.
Sometimes unconscious vocabulary. So, anything that he’s read or or see in the past, you have access to a sense.
rom time to time, depending upon the willingness and the openness of the channel, there may be an opportunity to pull through ideas which exist in the overall mass consciousness while not specifically existing in the memory of his individual consciousness.
Language and Terminology
Asker: One moment. Um you’re next. On this subject of words and stuff like this is quite interesting. I want to um say that you simply uh prefer not to butt. However, in our language there are there’s a negative connotation which I believe is the one you prefer not to use.
Bashar: We prefer not to have it used.
Asker: All right. Although we have said it many times. Yes. And there’s also a positive connotation which just means I’m now about to express a difference a different point of view.
Bashar: So it’s okay to say but oh we have never said it is not okay. Right. From time to time we point it out because in the specific I’ll say dialogue being undertaken it may illuminate perhaps because the exact words do not exist in your language for some of the concepts that we perceive. It may illuminate to help underline a certain word or concept that you have all of the subtle shadings of the meanings of the overall idea we are discussing.
But underlying this word seems to become individual ritual. All right. It’s not necessary to do it every single time. All right. But again, it will be different for every individual. And at times you will find as we have said we will use the word. At times we will say nothing when an individual says but and at times we will when we feel is appropriate to the conversation.
Asker: You have the idea of fighting fire with fire. Does it have a positive use?
Bashar: We use it to mean that fire only makes a bigger fire when the individual should be concerned with not having any fire at all.
Asker: But you use fighting fire as an analogy of a negative manifestation which is not exactly valid.
Why not? Everything is valid.
Well, maybe it is not valid for you, but it perhaps was valid between the conversation of the individuals that were involved.
Well, just for applications, in fighting fire with fire, one creates a controlled fire um in a um either along a line or a perimeter around an uncontrolled fire, burns a controlled patch such that when the uncontrolled fire comes up to the controlled the area that has been burned in a controlled manner, there’s no more fuel for the control fire to uh burn. All right. Therefore, it’s not that it necessarily creates more fire, it’s that it puts out the fire.
Bashar: We understand that terminology also. However, we also understand that more land has been burnt.
Asker: That is true. But not more land that as would have been burnt had there been no controlled fire. That depends on whether or not you may choose another method for putting out the fire. Right. But sometimes in um in terms of efficiency that’s the most efficient manner perhaps as your civilization knows its technology now.
Bashar: Yes. Of course we have to be working within our technology. All right. But understand usually when we use that terminology we have never really been referring to the physiological act of putting out a physical fire. But the analogy seems pretty far off for you.
Well, I speak with anybody else who shares my view.
Scalar Waves
Asker: how would you define scalar waves? We’re using it on this planet apparently.
We perceive your concept as a type of measurement of overlapping patterns of wavefronts such that you recognize that within a combined measurement of many different wavefronts, you may have another type of wave implied over the normally recognizable system so that you recognize that within one system of measurement. By adding together all the different components in one system of measurement, you give yourself a progression that may lead you to realize there is another type of system over overlapped on top of that one. The measurement of the difference between the two systems will be what we perceive to be the basic foundation for scalar mathematics.
Asker: Okay, I understand scal mathematics. Uh this is something different I believe. Uh it may connect in some way. What I understand this to be is some kind of an energy beam I’ll say that uh is projected which when projected from a single source point doesn’t create much of an effect. However, when projected from two source points such that the two beams from the separate source points cross the area within which they cross creates um electromagnetic phenomena which are apparently affecting the weather on our planet creating um all right those things. Yeah. I’m wondering how is that how that’s generated? Are the Soviets in fact using those?
Bashar: Thank you. Both of your governments are experimenting with that idea. What is happening is this. When the wave fronts cross, they are forming a generation of electromagnetic energy 90° out of phase with your normal energy, electromagnetic pattern upon your planet. And in this way, in his how do you say causing a feedback loop in such a manner? No terminology. All right. If you have something that pushes 90° out of phase, it will in a sense go through all the different dimensionalities round in a loop. And when it comes back through, it will cause there to be a controllable polarity 180° opposite to the effect that you have in the area in which you initially crossed the beams. So you will be causing what you call highs and lows in the same area in the same proximity. you will be causing fronts which will then be unstable and fluctuate back and forth between the two polarities 180° out of phase. And in this way will cause much in the way of instability in the electromagnetic fluid which one of the effects of one only one there are several effects. One of the effects of control to a certain degree will cause there to be the electromagnetic attraction of the ionic structures in your atmosphere that will gather together. The ideas of ozone, electromagnetic force can cause what you call storm can cause what you call twisters.
Asker: Yes. How is each beam generated?
Bashar: It is a pulseed a magnetically pulsed ion discharge. Ion discharge. Ion discharge. Nice. The basic principles are between the 180° phase, the polarity of positive and negative ions.
Asker: Okay. So, it’s an alternating. Yes. Sounds like something that Tesla was um he touched upon some of those ideas. Yeah. Although use them in different ways. Okay. So, it’s not technically a radio wave per se, but not exactly. No. Okay. When you speak of an ion um thing is it then not it must be electromagnetic. Yes, electromagnetic pulsing. Okay. And the ions are generated as a result of the electromagnetic pulsing.
Bashar: The ions are contained in what you call magnetic bottle plasma form pulsed and in this way the energy the phasing between them causes the beam which creates the scalar waves.
Asker: Okay, is the beam itself a beam of ions?
Bashar: Then it is more again a beam of phased electromagnetism. Okay. The ions themselves do not come out of the device, but they give off their electromagnetic charge in relation to each other that causes a 90° phase to project itself 90° from the interaction of the positive and negative ions in the magnetic bottle.
Clarity on Relationships
Asker: I want to know the nature of the relationship with 2 people in my life. The first one is Paul, very dear teacher and friend.
Bashar: You have already said he is a very dear friend. I will now assume therefore that what you are asking is something quite different for is that not a part of the nature of your relationship?
Asker: Yes. What is the nature of our relationship?
We have had some interreaction and then there’s been a space where we haven’t been. So I just want to know the direction where it’s going with that. It’s been kind of vague lately. I need some clarity on it.
Bashar: Do you feel that you yourself have been a little vague in your life?
Asker: Oh yes.
Bashar: Then is it any surprise that anything else would be vague in this way? Simply if you wish interaction why not get in touch?
Asker: I haven’t gotten any communication back.
What do you require from them? For what reasons do you feel you wish the communication? I get this if you are getting you feel you need the communication for clarity. Is this what you are saying?
inspiration that you should do this. Is there a difference?
Bashar: Perhaps not right now. Perhaps the silent times are an opportunity for you to be in communication with yourself and give yourself your own inspiration so that you can be equal to your teacher rather than always only being a student. You are a teacher too though. Everyone Everyone is now in your terminology. The best quote unquote teachers will recognize this and perhaps in this way will let go a little bit to give you some room to fly so that you can provide your own illumination so that you do not have to rely on them to run things for you to give you your clarity. When you allow yourself to simply stop being vague about yourself and act within the conviction that you are also your own teacher whether anyone else is around or not then perhaps you will create a type of equality that will then allow you to interact with him more often because then you will be on the same vibration.
Asker: The second person is a more romantic involvement. I need some understanding about good objective perspective.
Do you have an objective perspective about yourself in terms of your part in the relationship? why you are there, why you have cocreated it, why you have attracted him, why he has attracted you.
Asker: Yes, it becomes clear.
Bashar: Do you again in the same manner as the first question feel that you need the relationship in order to be complete or can you recognize yourself as complete before you attract a relationship?
Asker: I am working towards that very because I’ve recognized that I have strong relationships towards…
Bashar: Try working on with every then simply recognize you don’t have to then simply recognize you don’t have to work so hard because you are really already in an overall sense complete. Simply the idea of quote unquote working to become complete is not actually working to become complete but allowing yourself to become more aware of the completeness that already exists.
Allowing yourself to become more aware of the completeness that already exists is much less tiring than working towards completion.
Recognize all the things you are recognizing in terms of your cocreation in the relationship. If you always know where you stand, it will be easy for you to understand where everyone else stands. The vagueness in what everyone else is up to is from the vagueness in yourself.
Reincarnation and Karma
Speaker 6: Yes. Um in there’s the idea that in order to have an ascension or and I create more physical lives. Yeah. Uh you must work after karma and all all this. Um I was curious um uh is it really the person’s own belief system that determines uh their amount of lifetimes that they create or they come back to or it is not the belief system that determines that.
Bashar: It is the higher consciousness. It is the oversoul that determines that. Now your karma is completely self-constructed. It is what you want to explore about yourself. It is how you want to see yourself as balanced. You form a personality construct out of the three substances that you would call beliefs, emotions, and thoughts. Therefore, in this way, you can recognize that once you are once again in a linear sense non-physical, it is always up to you how to proceed with your idea of growth. Whether it be through a physical reincarnation again, whether it be through an incarnation in the same place again, whether it be no physical incarnation at all, it is up to you. So, it’s more or less Your love will grow up as you reach in order to proceed from there.
All of these things are also happening simultaneously and from the non-physical point of view this is more obvious. Therefore, in that state of being, not state of mind but state of being, it is not so much of a puzzle as to what to do. You simply shift your focus and become that another fragment of that which you already know yourself to be.
Black Holes and White Holes
Asker: Now. What is a black hole and are they created or and what are they used for?
Bashar: Many things. in your technological vernacular, it is a stellar phenomena.
There are many types of black holes. The one you are now most familiar with is simply a star that has a certain amount of mass energy.
When it ceases to be an interactive, nuclearly interactive phenomenon, it will no longer support the phenomenon — it will no longer support the idea, in mass, of being able to contain or hold its shape and act as a burning star.
It will collapse through the gravitational fields of the mass energy. Depending on the amount of mass originally contained in the star, it will be determined as to exactly how far it will collapse into its center.
Those stars over a certain degree of mass will collapse so far that they will punch a hole from your dimension into another dimension.
And so they emit almost nothing. Some of them will emit nothing that you can perceive not even light. And so they are dark and become a black hole.
Depending on how you approach them, many things can happen. You:
- can be physiologically destroyed
- can be rendered into energy, converted
- can utilize them by the manipulation of fields as doorways from one dimension to another
Many times, many civilizations do so when they go from one dimension to another.
You have a black hole of a type in:
- the center of your brain
- the center of every cell in your body
It is through these doorways that you are constantly recreating your physical form from the non-physical template universe, by an outpouring and an influxing of energy, always creating the polarity of yourself in that way.
So you not only have a black hole but a white hole overlapping. All of your connections to all the multi-dimensional selves that you are go through this black/white hole.
Feeling Like “Scumbags of the Universe”
Speaker 8: Yes. Um last week you said that they’ll begin to realize that I don’t know what you said. I already realized I was going to tell you something about that. Oh, yeah. That we don’t really need you. Yes. Well, I realized that a while back.
Bashar: Well, very good. Yeah, but uh I didn’t want you to think we didn’t want you.
Speaker 8: That is not the same thing. I know. I know. I just wanted to point it out. But I did want to point out that I noticed um I think when we started the channels here like last sometime last year, maybe March or something like that. I remember when I came and I had the feeling some of the other people felt the same way I did. We kind of felt well I know at least one other person. They don’t have a list of but kind of like that our creation here maybe wasn’t as valid as yours. And I don’t know. I kind of felt like you were a scumbag of the universe or something. You know what I We understand many of you have that belief about yourselves.
Bashar: Yes.
Speaker 8: Well, not anymore.
Bashar: All right. Because well, some of you still do. Okay. But, you know, because sometimes we would look at it and say, “Well, gee, maybe, you know, because they communicate uh telepathically and or we use words or they have a kind of spaceship that we don’t or we have war and they don’t.” So, we kind of say, “Geez, we’re we’re really uh you know, not very on the ball and stuff like that.” And um then at some point after that, I realized that um you know, I did realize that what we’re doing is valid. And I don’t I don’t totally understand all of it. I mean, I know it’s it’s different. It’s not actually a better word, but I know it’s um it’s different and something something it served your purpose.
Bashar: Right. Right.
Speaker 8: I don’t know. It just I used to feel kind of, you know, like really worried about my future. I didn’t know what I was doing here. I felt kind of trapped or and and now and now I don’t feel that way. I feel more I feel like a more part of the team, you know? I feel like more um I don’t feel like I’m all alone out in the middle of nowhere and I I don’t worry like about my future. I one thing I discovered is now I have more trust in myself and I’m not really looking for somebody else to like before all my life I was always looking for someone to lay out a path and say here follow me or here’s the way to do it and someone lay it out for you and I found you know it never worked and then now I I feel good because I feel like um you know I feel like I’m on my own I can trust myself to do what I need and that I’m going to leave myself exactly where I need to Right. Oh, thank you.
Bashar: Well, the reason I wanted to say this, like I said, well, maybe I won’t say it because sometimes you say that you’re getting our communication anyway. And I thought perhaps perhaps you could tell that some of this is um changed our mind that we don’t, you know, we don’t really feel like uh led.
Bashar: We can sense the shift in a general sense. Sometimes we can sense it specifically for individuals. However, in this way, recognize also that since it is your methodology to physically communicate to express yourself, yeah, the communication will then have conviction of your belief.
Reincarnation Fragments
Asker: I’m not done. When she’s done, I got something else. Okay. The other question I had was like it was on the idea of reincarnation, right? Now, I’m kind of in a way looking at this from a fragment type viewpoint, right? All right. What I’m thinking is like let’s say you know this Mary Edler number four type whatever, right? Let’s say I was to die tomorrow, right whole life. Well, it’s like would the same the same fragment of same essence just that part of it like create a new life or you know what I’m saying? Is it like that or is it just that the oversoul has different bodies and lives and things going on all at once. You know what I mean? Over soul has different lives and bodies going on all at once.
Bashar: Okay. But still would it also be like let’s say you as a fragment are contained within the whole and contain the whole and this is why each and every light can understand the portions the other portions it has been or will be. It is not so much that it is exactly the same personality because personality is a physical thing. Okay. But let’s say like a person remembered another lifetime. It’s not necessar not necessarily in the line like oh I last li last time I died in 1959 and then I was born again in 1960. It doesn’t necessarily it can be but it does not have to be. It doesn’t have to be, but but it okay when I’m trying to get across.
Judgment and Relaxation
Asker: I wanted to see if I could get a suggestion on, you know, from a different viewpoint. Like, I find that I’m much happier than I don’t judge things as much as like being bad or good or you know somebody does something and I don’t say oh what a terrible person for doing that. You know what I mean? Like when I just let things be how they are and see what they are and then when I did that I became more aware of like the purposes for some of the things I did that I maybe felt like like I was saying shame shame on you to myself for. Right. Yes. So, a lot of that, you know, I found ways to get over that judgment. And I was wondering, you know, there’s still things that I judge it and it doesn’t really make me feel good, you know, to do it.
Bashar: All right. I know you do. That doesn’t work. All right. Then what does work for you?
Asker: I don’t know. How have you created all the other ways in which you chose not to judge?
Bashar: Well, just um it would just happen at the right time and something.
Asker: All right, then. That is one way that works for you. Yeah, that might work.
Bashar: All right, then. I guess I was just trying to uh push it, you know. Trying.
Asker: All right. Yeah.
Bashar: Pushing. All right. Yeah. Okay. Um but in that way. Yeah. Trying and pushing are forms of judgment and will only create more judgment.
Asker: Yeah.
Bashar: If you say so. Yeah. Well, our suggestion is simply this. Yeah. Three words. Relax and enjoy.
Asker: Thank you.
Bashar: Now, paradoxically, recognize that many individuals you recognize to be quote unquote all here are actually almost not here at all. And that is why they seem to be all here. You follow me? People who can manipulate will you know yes are functioning through their higher non-physical self. They are allowing whatever minimal degree of physical reality they require to allow the manipulation of the physical universe to take place but they are functioning from the will say about you. You think they will think you will be dingy?
Asker: I’m ready to get told that. All right, that doesn’t sit very well with me. Why not? What do you care?
Bashar: You know you’re not dingy. So what do you care what they say? They are giving you a gift, an opportunity to realize that you can look at that concept of being dingy and know that is not you. You can say interesting concept. No thank you. I am not dingy.
Asker: It’s funny. The same people have said that to me have said it to me in the past and said that to me are people to be most attracted to you.
Bashar: Yes. Because they are but in this way they are fascinated with your ability to live in a dingy way. Understand also that because of your polarity, many times the ideas you fear, you are attracted to because you know it is something that you can also do and you are fascinated how someone else could possibly have done it. But you attack them and try to invalidate them because you fear or they fear that to really live that way will not be valid. So it is a dichotomy. It is a polarity. But all they are offering you is always both sides. Choose which one you prefer. You can simply say, well, I prefer. You can simply say, well, I recognize that because you are attracting yourself to me, you are also exploring the possibility of living in this way of believing these ideas. I know I am not dingy. Therefore, if you are willing, I will share with you my ideas. You don’t have to like them. But in this way, recognize that I am not calling you dingy for living the way you are living. Why call me dingy for living the way I know I wish to live? Therefore, what you really wish to experience in terms of your non-physicality can be emotionally achieved in your life. You can feel that way if you begin to allow yourself to be valid as you are and allow that to be a valid way to live without taking to heart the judgments of others that you attract to yourself only to show you that you do not have to accept the judgments. The idea that other individuals judge you is that you are judging yourself and if you do not like it, you don’t have to accept that. So they are providing you with an opportunity to see that you are simply judging yourself and that is why you do not feel like you want to feel because you are not simply allowing yourself to know that you can exist in that way without being considered thingy.
Asker: I thought if I exist in that way that would be even me getting further away from accepting being your energy.
Bashar: Not necessarily.
Fear of Blindness and Out of Body Experiences
Insurance Claim and Legal System
Right. All of these things are up there in your consciousness that you are exploring.
I’m tying myself up for 6 months. Should I go to the doctor? On the other hand, maybe I’m going to meet someone while I’m doing this.
This is true too and you can always change your mind and once again simply You not have to think that changing your mind is cause for anyone to think you are dingy. So what?
Shifts in Consciousness and Language
Asker: I have almost completely ceased to judge right, wrong, good or bad. Once in a while I catch myself looking at something right, wrong, good or bad, but I’m able to view it in such a way that I can catch myself and go, “Oh, it’s not not that way. It’s it’s different.”
I have almost completely ceased to expect uh you know, ceased expectation in my life. I’m allowing things to flow as they will and acting basic basically on my excitement.
This comes to the next thing. Last week you mentioned that I asked my questions from the viewpoint of separation. And I had felt like I had been to a great degree not viewing myself as separate. I mean certainly physically my body is physically separate but I do have the viewpoint that I am not separate from All-That-Is not different not separate from any other individuals. And it surprised me that you said that I was asking from the viewpoint of separation. I don’t feel that I am.
Bashar: All right. Now, this was for two reasons. One is that in our perception there was still a little bit of separation. And I’ll say as a reference for that I will point out now again we understand you use terminology from time to time. We may have a different interpretation but allow us to say I perceive that the interpretation of this particular word will be much the same for you and I and it will be as you just said only moments ago. You did not believe that something that was said was valid in an overall sense. Everything is valid from whatever point of view it is valid too.
Asker: Okay. And I was aware that when I used the word valid that it could be viewed as a statement that something was invalid in in the sense of All-That-Is. And I was aware that there is nothing that is invalid.
Bashar: All right. Okay. Thank you. But sometimes when we’re in this plane, it’s it’s convenient to use terms which apply to the plane, but which from a cosmic sense really aren’t applicable. I probably could have used the word applicable and and made the point in a way that didn’t bring up the idea of right now.
Asker: Therefore, since you do have a physical language and since the words do have certain meanings in this way, one of the other reasons is that we simply sense that if you do in your terms take care in the selection of your words, your communication about what you really intend to say will be clearer. Thus to our perception we will find that the term in your language invalidation will have a negative connotation.
Bashar: Therefore simply preference will be something without a judgment.
Asker: Yes, I understand that. All right. Well, your point is well taken about the choice of words. I I’m interested in not taking a lot of time. I I have a lot of words at my disposal and when I come up with an idea I don’t necessarily immediately grasp the word that states it in the positive sense of the concept that I’m trying to right then our conversations act as practice for you to do so practicing for a long time right and I I felt that I was able to relax in certain respects and and use the term invalid without communicating the negative sense of the term
Bashar: No. All right. Because we will be utilizing again your terminology and in this the vibrations will be succinct.
Asker: Yeah. Well, you know, we have so many definitions for a given word. Some words have it single, some words have many definitions. Um, I’m wondering if that’s part of the reason that this occurs.
Bashar: Yes, it is a consolidation. And in this way you will recognize that as you reform your languages as you may even prefer to move out of vocal language at all. You will become more familiar with the expression of the concept in terms of matching the vibration of the concept to the word that may still exist within your language that would best suit it.
Asker: Yeah. those the connection of the word that’s most of separationist um is a rare usage that we almost have to work on figuring out what word to use here you know basically developing the terminology of uh and then realizing once we’ve got it oh we can use this word all these cases yes and this is why many times you will understand that when we activate the vocal mechanisms of the physical channel many times it is not so much that we will choose a specific word, but we will choose words that may not intrinsically have the meaning, but we will use them in such a way that will in your ears perhaps not sound like normal conversation, but will get the point across.
Asker: Well, along this line then since you are perceiving that I have this sense of separation because of the words that I use. If you were to take the viewpoint that when I use a word that implies a separationist viewpoint, it is not that I am in fact separated. It’s just that I have not found the word to express the non-separationist viewpoint.
Bashar: All right. And this is why simply we offer you a suggestion.
Asker: Mhm. Well, see, you have the choice of going, “Oh, well, this guy is still separated.” Or else, and the alternate choice is going, “Oh, well, he used a separationist word, but he’s not really separated. Let’s work on on a terminology, right?
Bashar: But you are also not here alone.”
Asker: True, but this applies to everybody. I mean, this would be, you know, all right, but this idea is that it applies to everybody. And in this way, we are forming a consistency that will allow there to be less confusion in other individuals. If another individual says, “Well, now I understand the difference between invalidation and preference. Why is Bashar not saying anything when he says invalidation?”
Asker: Oh, I uh I understand that and I think it is valid to uh suggest a different term only for the purpose of consistency. Yes, I agree. Not so much that the way you choose your words is right or wrong or that we do not perceive what you are meaning but in the terms of the consistency of the agreement of the mass consciousness. We are simply fulfilling the agreement in the broadest possible spectrum. Of course in using the word that has a positive connotation gets us thinking along the positive. Yes, I totally agree with that. I’m not um I’m not suggesting that if I were to use a negative connotation word that she would just bypass it. I I’m interested in developing the terminology for the for the most integrated uh viewpoint.
Bashar: All right. However, rather than hearing a word out of me that may see seem separationist and concluding that it’s because I’m separated, you can conclude that I just hadn’t developed the terminology to express in an integrated fashion suggest a word for me to use and allow me to use that. All right. Instead of determining that is separated.
Asker: All right. Okay. This will be swell for you.
Bashar: Now, one moment. One moment. One moment. One of the other reasons for the methodology of the conversation between you and I was exactly for this as well. The idea of the conviction of the statement of your own clarification which we now completely and in this way in your terminology totally accept from you.
Asker: Uh no I missed something there.
Bashar: All right. In other words, the opportunity to allow you to say what you have just said, to speak up for yourself if you felt you were getting a raw deal.
Asker: Yeah. And that is what makes the most difference. Your willingness to stop sitting there and fuming and say, “Bashar, that’s not who I am.” And then I can say, “Thank you. Now I recognize you.
Bashar: So thank you. Now I recognize you. Well, thank you. It’s interesting that I have recognized this myself for quite some time. I guess I presume that you would sense it.
Bashar: Thank you. But again, as we have said in your physical world, the statement of conviction is when you speak it because we will assume as you have created in your world that your thoughts are private and do not reflect what you necessarily want to really let anyone know until you say, “This is who I am.” Then I can say thank you. Now I will talk to you as if that is who you are because you have had the conviction to say so.
Asker: That’s very interesting because in in conversations with some people it’s been apparent that you do sense what’s going on with them because they have already made those statements in other ways. Perhaps many of you do not pick up on it but we do.
Asker: Oh, so u what that really does getting back to what her was saying really validates our creativity in using language on this planet society. Yes. It’s not something we should be able to shame.
Bashar: Oh no. I mean I never did. I love language either.
Asker: Oh we understand. My stock can trade. Thank you. Thank you.
Leave a Comment
Thank you for your comment!
It will appear after review.