<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Introduction on Superphysics</title>
    <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/kant/critique/intro/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Introduction on Superphysics</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <atom:link href="https://www.superphysics.org/research/kant/critique/intro/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The difference between Pure and Empirical Knowledge</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/kant/critique/intro/chapter-01/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/kant/critique/intro/chapter-01/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;All our knowledge begins with experience.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The faculty of cognition can be used only through sensory objects.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;These produce representations that make our understanding work to:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;compare, connect, or separate these&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;convert the raw material of our sensuous impressions into a knowledge of objects called experience.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Therefore, in temporal terms, our knowledge begins with experience.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Human Intellect Has A Priori Cognitions</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/kant/critique/intro/chapter-02/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/kant/critique/intro/chapter-02/</guid>
      <description>&lt;details id=&#34;note&#34; class=&#34;pl-6 pr-4 pb-4 my-4 rounded-lg toc shadow border border-gray-300&#34; open&gt;&#xA;  &lt;summary class=&#34;flex items-center font-bold py-2 cursor-pointer justify-between select-none&#34;&gt;&#xA;      &lt;span class=&#34;tracking-wide&#34;&gt;Superphysics Note!&lt;/span&gt;&#xA;      &lt;svg xmlns=&#34;http://www.w3.org/2000/svg&#34; class=&#34;icon icon-tabler icon-tabler-chevron-down&#34; width=&#34;24&#34; height=&#34;24&#34; viewBox=&#34;0 0 24 24&#34; stroke-width=&#34;2&#34; stroke=&#34;currentColor&#34; fill=&#34;none&#34; stroke-linecap=&#34;round&#34; stroke-linejoin=&#34;round&#34;&gt;&#xA;        &lt;path stroke=&#34;none&#34; d=&#34;M0 0h24v24H0z&#34; fill=&#34;none&#34;&gt;&lt;/path&gt;&#xA;        &lt;polyline points=&#34;6 9 12 15 18 9&#34;&gt;&lt;/polyline&gt;&#xA;     &lt;/svg&gt;&#xA;  &lt;/summary&gt;&#xA;  &lt;div class=&#34;&#34;&gt;&#xA;    We replace a priori with within-the-mind&#xA;  &lt;/div&gt;&#xA;&lt;/details&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;2-the-human-intellect-has-cognitions-within-the-mind&#34;&gt;2. The Human Intellect Has Cognitions within-the-mind&lt;/h3&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- &#34;a priori&#34;. --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;How do we distinguish a pure from an empirical cognition?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Philosophy Needs a Science to Determine Principles of a priori Knowledge</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/kant/critique/intro/chapter-03/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/kant/critique/intro/chapter-03/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h3 id=&#34;3-philosophy-needs-a-science-to-determine-principles-of-within-the-mind-knowledge&#34;&gt;3. Philosophy Needs a Science to Determine Principles of Within-the-Mind Knowledge*&lt;/h3&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&lt;details id=&#34;note&#34; class=&#34;pl-6 pr-4 pb-4 my-4 rounded-lg toc shadow border border-gray-300&#34; open&gt;&#xA;  &lt;summary class=&#34;flex items-center font-bold py-2 cursor-pointer justify-between select-none&#34;&gt;&#xA;      &lt;span class=&#34;tracking-wide&#34;&gt;Superphysics Note!&lt;/span&gt;&#xA;      &lt;svg xmlns=&#34;http://www.w3.org/2000/svg&#34; class=&#34;icon icon-tabler icon-tabler-chevron-down&#34; width=&#34;24&#34; height=&#34;24&#34; viewBox=&#34;0 0 24 24&#34; stroke-width=&#34;2&#34; stroke=&#34;currentColor&#34; fill=&#34;none&#34; stroke-linecap=&#34;round&#34; stroke-linejoin=&#34;round&#34;&gt;&#xA;        &lt;path stroke=&#34;none&#34; d=&#34;M0 0h24v24H0z&#34; fill=&#34;none&#34;&gt;&lt;/path&gt;&#xA;        &lt;polyline points=&#34;6 9 12 15 18 9&#34;&gt;&lt;/polyline&gt;&#xA;     &lt;/svg&gt;&#xA;  &lt;/summary&gt;&#xA;  &lt;div class=&#34;&#34;&gt;&#xA;    This is already addressed by the Asian Sciences and by Superphysics&#xA;  &lt;/div&gt;&#xA;&lt;/details&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- ### III. Philosophy stands in need of a Science which shall Determine the Possibility, Principles, and Extent of Human Knowledge &#34;a priori&#34; --&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- Of far more importance than all that has been above said, is the consideration that certain of  --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Some of our cognitions rise completely above physicality.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Difference Between Analytical and Synthetical Judgements</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/kant/critique/intro/chapter-04/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/kant/critique/intro/chapter-04/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- IV. Of The Difference Between Analytical and Synthetical Judgements. --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The judgements of subject to predicate is from a relation created in 2 ways:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA; &lt;!-- is cogitated (I mention affirmative judgements only here; the application to negative will be very easy), this relation is possible in two different ways. --&gt;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;The predicate &lt;code&gt;B&lt;/code&gt; belongs to the subject &lt;code&gt;A&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;This is passive-thinking [analytical judgement] and is explicative.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In all Theoretical Sciences of Reason, Synthetical Judgements &#39;a priori&#39; are contained as Principles</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/kant/critique/intro/chapter-05/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/kant/critique/intro/chapter-05/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h3 id=&#34;5-all-theoretical-sciences-of-the-abstract-mind-have-principles-based-on-active-thinking-within-the-mind&#34;&gt;5. All Theoretical Sciences of the Abstract Mind Have Principles Based on Active-thinking Within-the-mind&lt;/h3&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- Synthetical Judgements &#34;a priori&#34; are contained as Principles. --&gt;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Mathematical judgements are always active-connective-thinking.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xA; &lt;!-- synthetical. --&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- Hitherto this fact, though incontestably true and very important in its consequences, seems to have escaped the analysts of the human mind, nay, to be in complete opposition to all their conjectures.&#xA;&#xA;For as it was found that a synthetical --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Mathematical conclusions all proceed according to the principle of contradiction.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Universal Problem of Pure Reason</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/kant/critique/intro/chapter-06/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/kant/critique/intro/chapter-06/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h3 id=&#34;6-the-universal-problem-of-pure-reason&#34;&gt;6. The Universal Problem of Pure Reason&lt;/h3&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- It is extremely advantageous to be able to bring a number of investigations under the formula of a single problem. &#xA;&#xA;For in this manner, we not only facilitate our own labour, inasmuch as we define it clearly to ourselves, but also render it more easy for others to decide whether we have done justice to our undertaking.  --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The proper problem of pure reason is: &amp;ldquo;How are active-connective-thinking judgements within-the-mind possible?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Critique of Pure Reason as a Science</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/kant/critique/intro/chapter-07/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/kant/critique/intro/chapter-07/</guid>
      <description>&lt;details id=&#34;note&#34; class=&#34;pl-6 pr-4 pb-4 my-4 rounded-lg toc shadow border border-gray-300&#34; open&gt;&#xA;  &lt;summary class=&#34;flex items-center font-bold py-2 cursor-pointer justify-between select-none&#34;&gt;&#xA;      &lt;span class=&#34;tracking-wide&#34;&gt;Superphysics Note!&lt;/span&gt;&#xA;      &lt;svg xmlns=&#34;http://www.w3.org/2000/svg&#34; class=&#34;icon icon-tabler icon-tabler-chevron-down&#34; width=&#34;24&#34; height=&#34;24&#34; viewBox=&#34;0 0 24 24&#34; stroke-width=&#34;2&#34; stroke=&#34;currentColor&#34; fill=&#34;none&#34; stroke-linecap=&#34;round&#34; stroke-linejoin=&#34;round&#34;&gt;&#xA;        &lt;path stroke=&#34;none&#34; d=&#34;M0 0h24v24H0z&#34; fill=&#34;none&#34;&gt;&lt;/path&gt;&#xA;        &lt;polyline points=&#34;6 9 12 15 18 9&#34;&gt;&lt;/polyline&gt;&#xA;     &lt;/svg&gt;&#xA;  &lt;/summary&gt;&#xA;  &lt;div class=&#34;&#34;&gt;&#xA;    We replace pure reason with abstract wisdom&#xA;  &lt;/div&gt;&#xA;&lt;/details&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- 7. Idea and Division of a Particular Science, under the Name of a Critique of Pure Reason. --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Reason [wisdom] is the faculty which furnishes us with the principles of knowledge within-the-mind.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
