<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cartesian Linguistics on Superphysics</title>
    <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/chomsky/cartesian/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Cartesian Linguistics on Superphysics</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <atom:link href="https://www.superphysics.org/research/chomsky/cartesian/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/chomsky/cartesian/intro/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/chomsky/cartesian/intro/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;My primary aim is simply to bring to the attention of those involved in the study of generative grammar and its implications some of the little-known work which has bearing on their concerns and problems and which often anticipates some of their specific conclusions.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Creative aspect of language use</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/chomsky/cartesian/chapter-01/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/chomsky/cartesian/chapter-01/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Descartes makes only scant reference to language in his writings.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- Yet certain observations about the nature of language play a significant role in the formulation of his general point of view. --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;He did a careful and intensive study of the limits of mechanical explanation. This carried him beyond physics to physiology and psychology.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>La Mettrie and Bougeant</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/chomsky/cartesian/chapter-01b/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/chomsky/cartesian/chapter-01b/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The important things are:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;the emphasis on the creative aspect of language use&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;the fundamental distinction between human language and the purely functional and stimulus-bound animal communication&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- rather than the Cartesian attempts to account for human abilities.  --&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- Subsequent discussion rarely attempts to meet the Cartesian arguments regarding the limitations of mechanical explanation. --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Descartes argued that there must be a “thinking substance” to account for the facts that he cites.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Herder</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/chomsky/cartesian/chapter-01c/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/chomsky/cartesian/chapter-01c/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Descartes’s second test for determining whether automata are “real men” is also reinterpreted, within the context of the “great chain of being.”&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Descartes argues that animal behavior is a matter of instinct. The perfection and specificity of animal instinct make it subject to mechanical explanation.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Humboldt</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/chomsky/cartesian/chapter-01d/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/chomsky/cartesian/chapter-01d/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Humboldt’s tries to develop a comprehensive theory of general linguistics using the Cartesian emphasis on the creative aspect of language use.36&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Humboldt’s characterization of language:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;as energeia (“activity” [Thätigkeit]) rather than ergon (“product” [Werk])&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;as “a generative activity [eine Erzeugung]” rather than “a lifeless product”&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;He extends and elaborates the formulations typical of Cartesian linguistics and romantic philosophy of language and aesthetic theory.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The structuralist emphasis on language</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/chomsky/cartesian/chapter-01e/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/chomsky/cartesian/chapter-01e/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The structuralist emphasis on language as “a system where everything holds together” is conceptually, at least, a direct outgrowth of the concern for organic form in Humboldtian linguistics.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;For Humboldt, a language is not to be regarded as a mass of isolated phenomena – words, sounds, individual speech productions, etc. – but rather as an “organism” in which all parts are intercon- nected and the role of each element is determined by its relation to the gen- erative processes that constitute the underlying form.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Creative aspect of language use</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/chomsky/cartesian/chapter-02/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/chomsky/cartesian/chapter-02/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The study of the creative aspect of language-use develops from the assumption that linguistic and mental processes are virtually identical&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Language provides the primary means for:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;free expression of thought and feeling&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;the functioning of the creative imagination.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Similarly, much of the substantive discussion of grammar, throughout the development of what we have been calling “Cartesian linguistics,” derives from this assumption.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Port-Royal Grammar</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/chomsky/cartesian/chapter-02b/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/chomsky/cartesian/chapter-02b/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Turning from the general conception of grammatical structure to specific&#xA;cases of grammatical analysis, we find many other attempts in the&#xA;Port-Royal Grammar to develop the theory of deep and surface structure.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>General Grammar</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/chomsky/cartesian/chapter-03/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/chomsky/cartesian/chapter-03/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Within the framework of Cartesian linguistics, a descriptive grammar is concerned with both sound and meaning.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;In my terminology, it assigns to each sentence an abstract deep structure determining its semantic content and a surface structure determining its phonetic form.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Language is Acquired and Used</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/chomsky/cartesian/chapter-04/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/chomsky/cartesian/chapter-04/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- We have so far extracted from “Cartesian linguistics” certain characteristic and&#xA;quite important doctrines regarding the nature of language and have, quite&#xA;sketchily, traced their development during the period from Descartes to&#xA;Humboldt.  --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;As a by-product of this study of langue, and against the background of rationalist theory of mind, certain views emerged as to how language is acquired and used.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Summary</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/chomsky/cartesian/chapter-05/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/chomsky/cartesian/chapter-05/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Returning to the remark of Whitehead’s that initiated this discussion, it seems that after a long interruption, linguistics and cognitive psychology are now turning their attention to approaches to the study of language structure and&#xA;mental processes which in part originated and in part were revitalized in the&#xA;“century of genius” and which were fruitfully developed until well into the&#xA;nineteenth century.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
