<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Addenda On Occult And Modern Science on Superphysics</title>
    <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Addenda On Occult And Modern Science on Superphysics</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <atom:link href="https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Reasons for These Addenda</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-01/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-01/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Many of the doctrines contained in the 7 Stanzas and Commentaries having been studied by some Western Theosophists.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;They found some of the Occult Teachings lacking scientifically.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- They seemed to encounter insuperable difficulties in the way of their acceptance, and to require reconsideration in view of scientific criticism. Some friends have already been tempted to regret the necessity of so often calling in question the assertions of Modern Science. It appeared to them—and I here repeat only their arguments—that “to run counter to the teachings of its most eminent exponents, was to court a premature discomfiture in the eyes of the Western World.” --&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- It is, therefore, desirable to define, once and for all, the position which the writer, who does not in this agree with her friends, intends to maintain.  --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Prof. Huxley describes Science as “organized common sense”.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Modern Physicists are Playing at Blind Man&#39;s Buff</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-02/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-02/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Occultism puts to Science the question: Is light a body, or is it not?&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Occultism shows that the current, most eminent Physicists have no real knowledge on the subject.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;To know what light is, and whether it is an actual substance or a mere undulation of the “ethereal medium,”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Gravitation a Law?</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-03/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-03/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Gravitation is the principle that all bodies attract each other with a force proportional:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;directly to their masses&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;inversely to the squares of the distances between them&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;It reigns today, supreme as ever, in the alleged ethereal waves of Space.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Theories of Rotation in Science</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-04/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-04/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Considering that “final cause is pronounced a chimera, and the First Great Cause is remanded to the sphere of the Unknown,” as a reverend gentleman justly complains, the number of hypotheses put forward, a nebula of them, is most remarkable.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Masks of Science. Physics Or Metaphysics?</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-05/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-05/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If there is anything like progress on earth, Science will some day have to give up, nolens volens, such monstrous ideas as her physical, self-guiding laws, void of Soul and Spirit, and will then have to turn to the Occult Teachings.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Samuel Metcalfe and the Sun Force</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-06/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-06/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The wise words of several English men of Science have now to be quoted in our favour. Ostracized for “principle&amp;rsquo;s sake” by the few, they are tacitly approved of by the many.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Life, Force, or Gravity</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-07/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-07/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The imponderable fluids have had their day.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Mechanical Forces are less talked about.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- Science has put on a new face for this last quarter of a century; but  --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Gravitation has remained, owing its life to new combinations after the old ones had nearly killed it. It may answer scientific hypotheses very well.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Solar Theory</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-08/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-08/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A SHORT ANALYSIS OF THE COMPOUND AND SINGLE ELEMENTS OF SCIENCE AS AGAINST THE OCCULT TEACHINGS. HOW FAR THIS THEORY, AS GENERALLY ACCEPTED, IS SCIENTIFIC.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;In his reply to Dr. Gull&amp;rsquo;s attack on the theory of Vitality, which is inseparably connected with the Elements of the Ancients in the Occult Philosophy, Professor Beale, the great Physiologist, has a few words as suggestive as they are beautiful:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Coming Force. Its Possibilities And Impossibilities</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-09/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-09/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Is Force “moving Matter,” or “Matter in motion,” and a manifestation of Energy?&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Or is Matter and Force are the phenomenal differentiated aspects of the one primary, undifferentiated Cosmic Substance?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Elements and Atoms</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-10/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-10/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!--When the Occultist speaks of Elements, and of human Beings who lived during those geological ages, the duration of which it is found as impossible to determine—according to the opinion of one of the best English Geologists960—as the nature of Matter, it is because he knows what he is talking about. &#xA;&#xA;When he says Man and Elements, he means neither man in his present physiological and anthropological form, nor the elemental Atoms, those hypothetical conceptions, existing at present in scientific minds, the entitative abstractions of Matter in its highly attenuated state; nor, again, does he mean the compound Elements of Antiquity. --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;In Occultism, Element means Rudiment.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ancient Thought in Modern Dress</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-11/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-11/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Modern Science is Ancient Thought distorted, and no more.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;More than one F.R.S. is unconsciously approaching the derided Secret Sciences.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Modern speculations on Cosmogony and primeval matter are ancient thought, “improved” by contradictory recent theories.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Scientific and Esoteric Evidence for, and Objections to, the Modern Nebular Theory</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-12/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-12/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Of late, Esoteric Cosmogony has been frequently opposed by the phantom of this theory and its ensuing hypotheses. “Can this most scientific teaching be denied by your Adepts?” it is asked. “Not entirely,” is the reply, “but the admissions of the men of Science themselves kill it; and there remains nothing for the Adepts to deny.”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Forces—Modes of Motion or Intelligences?</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-13/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-13/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- This is, then, the last word of Physical Science up to the present year, 1888.  --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Mechanical laws will never be able to prove the homogeneity of Primeval Matter, except inferentially and as a desperate necessity, when there will remain no other issue—as in the case of Ether.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gods, Monads and Atoms</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-14/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-14/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Some years ago we remarked that:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The Esoteric Doctrine may well be called &amp;hellip; the “Thread Doctrine”. Like Sûtrâtmâ [in Vedânta]1050, it passes through and strings together all the ancient philosophical religious systems, and reconciles and explains them.1051&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Triangle became the Tetraktys</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-14b/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-14b/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;On the authority of this Archaic Symbol, a male, personal God, the Creator and Father of all, becomes a third-rate emanation, the Sephira standing fourth in descent, and on the left hand of Ain Suph, in the Kabalistic Tree of Life. Hence, the Monad is degraded into a Vehicle—a “Throne”!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gods, Monads and Atoms</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-14c/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-14c/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- Philosophers in the present as in the past—men who certainly have not worked in the laboratory—have reached the same view from another side.  --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Herbert Spencer believes that “the chemical atoms are produced from the true or physical atoms by processes of evolution under conditions which chemistry has not yet been able to produce.”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Leibnitz</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-14d/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-14d/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Occult Science teaches that the “Mother” lies stretched in Infinity, during Pralaya, as the great Deep, the “dry Waters of Space,” according to the quaint expression in the Catechism, and becomes wet only after the separation and the moving over its face of Nârâyana, the Spirit which is invisible Flame, which never burns, but sets on fire all that it touches, and gives it life and generation.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cyclic Evolution and Karma</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-15/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-15/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;It is the spiritual evolution of the inner, immortal Man that forms the fundamental tenet of the Occult Sciences.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;To realize such a process, the student has to believe in:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cyclic Evolution and Karma</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-15b/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-15b/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Those who believe in Karma have to believe in Destiny, which, from birth to death, every man weaves thread by thread round himself, as a spider his web; and this Destiny is guided either by the heavenly voice of the invisible Prototype outside of us, or by our more intimate astral, or inner man, who is but too often the evil genius of the embodied entity called man.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Zodiac and its Antiquity</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-16/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-16/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- “All men are apt to have a high conceit of their own understanding, and to be tenacious of the opinions they profess,” said Jordan, justly adding to this—“and yet almost all men are guided by the understandings of others, not by their own; and may be said more truly to adopt, than to beget, their opinions.” --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;This is doubly true in regard to scientific opinions upon hypotheses offered for consideration—the prejudice and preconceptions of “authorities,” so called, often deciding upon questions of the most vital importance for history.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Summary of the Position</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-17/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/blavatsky/doctrine/part-3/section-17/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;It is up to the reader to decide whether my summary is favourable or not.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;If there were such a thing as a void, a vacuum in Nature, one ought to find it produced, according to a physical law, in the minds of helpless admirers of the “lights” of Science, who pass their time in mutually destroying their teachings.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
